Best Podcast Episodes About Voting Rights Act

Best Podcast Episodes About Voting Rights Act

Everything podcasters are saying about Voting Rights Act — curated from top podcasts

Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 72 episodes
Listen to the Playlist

Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Voting Rights Act.

Top Podcast Clips About Voting Rights Act

The Megyn Kelly Show
“… side and hoping that they'll get a Democrat president in. I've had my own serious doubts about whether this makes sense because I like minority rights in the Senate because I've just seen too many good Republican minorities stop crazy ass Democratic legislation. And also, Mike, because it seems to me that generally when you have a Democrat trifecta, House, Senate, and White House, they go nuts on the legislation. Whereas Republicans are more, you know, we're conservatives. We're more like we conserve the status quo. We don't we're not huge on like and another law and another law. So I think …” “… controlled. We have a Republican in the White House. And many people believe we don't do it now. What will happen guaranteed is the Democrats will come back into power in the Senate, whether it's 2026 or 2028, and they'll do it. They'll do it for their side and hoping that they'll get a Democrat president in. I've had my own serious doubts about whether this makes sense because I like minority rights in the Senate because I've just seen too many good Republican minorities stop crazy ass Democratic legislation. And also, Mike, because it seems to me that generally when you have a Democrat trifecta, House, Senate, and White House, they go nuts on the legislation. Whereas Republicans are more, you know, we're conservatives. We're more like we conserve the status quo. We don't we're not huge on like and another law and another law. So I think it'll help the Dems more than it helps the Republicans. Senate Republicans are giant pussies is what I think you're trying to say there, Megan. Look, I would say this about the Save America Act. It requires proof of citizenship and voter ID. This has the support of over 80% of Americans, including a super majority of Democrats and even a super …” View more
Ridealong summary
Republicans are rallying behind the SAVE Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voting, believing it could pass with overwhelming support. With a Republican majority in the House and Senate, they fear failing to act now will allow Democrats to implement their own version later. The debate centers around whether the filibuster should be eliminated or if senators should simply be made to debate until they exhaust their options.
The Megyn Kelly Show · Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, with Aronberg and Davis, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions, with Branca and Geragos | Ep. 1286 · Apr 01, 2026
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
“Let's dive into mail-in ballots. Donald Trump's been jumping up and down, stamping his feet, throwing food from his high chair about voting since he got elected and wants to make it hard on Democrats and independents to vote. So he's threatened the Senate about the SAVE Act. SAVE Act is dead. SAVE Act requiring you to show citizenship papers with your legal name on it in order to vote, as opposed to just signing a penalty of perjury declaration, is not going to pass the Senate because the Democrats have successfully blocked it with the filibuster, and there's not 60 votes to …” “Let's dive into mail-in ballots. Donald Trump's been jumping up and down, stamping his feet, throwing food from his high chair about voting since he got elected and wants to make it hard on Democrats and independents to vote. So he's threatened the Senate about the SAVE Act. SAVE Act is dead. SAVE Act requiring you to show citizenship papers with your legal name on it in order to vote, as opposed to just signing a penalty of perjury declaration, is not going to pass the Senate because the Democrats have successfully blocked it with the filibuster, and there's not 60 votes to approve it. So no amount of Donald Trump threatening people, I'm going to primary you. I'm going to run against you. First of all, people don't think a Trump endorsement is worth the paper it's written on any longer. The Democrats have won 31 races where they flipped the seats of Republicans red to blue, including in Donald Trump's front yard, backyard, …” View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's decision on whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day could drastically affect voting rights. If they rule against counting these ballots, many votes could be disenfranchised, especially in rural areas where polling places are scarce. This situation highlights Trump's ongoing attempts to control voting processes and the logistical challenges facing states.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch · Legal AF - 4/1/2026 · Apr 02, 2026
Your Undivided Attention
“… media for kids under 15 or 16. That's the human movement. And already nine states have introduced bills to restrict AI personhood so that human rights are for humans, not for protecting AIs. 45 states have specifically addressed sexually explicit deepfakes. And these laws send a huge signal that non-consensual exploitation of AI tools is a serious offense and we have to actually take action on it. So there's actually a lot that's happening and most people just don't see it. I want everyone to stop for a second because at least for me, I feel something different in my body. I feel like hope. I …” “And when you see that countries like Australia, Denmark, Spain, France are all banning social media for kids under 15 and 16. and I believe several US states now are banning social media for kids under 15 or 16. That's the human movement. And already nine states have introduced bills to restrict AI personhood so that human rights are for humans, not for protecting AIs. 45 states have specifically addressed sexually explicit deepfakes. And these laws send a huge signal that non-consensual exploitation of AI tools is a serious offense and we have to actually take action on it. So there's actually a lot that's happening and most people just don't see it. I want everyone to stop for a second because at least for me, I feel something different in my body. I feel like hope. I feel energized. And I just want you to hold on to that feeling because that is the feeling that's going to enable us to make sure that AI, the way it's being rolled out, actually isn't inevitable. And so this can be everything from like if you're really good at doing international coordination, track two dialogues, bringing countries together. …” View more
Ridealong summary
Several U.S. states and countries are taking significant legislative actions to restrict AI personhood and protect human rights. This movement is fueled by a growing public awareness and hope that we can shape a better future for AI, similar to how social media laws evolved over the past decade. Everyone can contribute to this movement, especially with upcoming midterm elections.
Your Undivided Attention · Here’s Our Roadmap to a Better AI Future · Apr 02, 2026
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart
“… more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than …” “… Because it feels like that the backlash that we facing That if if the right was going to draw a line like what you and I might do is draw a line at the depression right And we might draw a line at FDR coming in and creating a government that is more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than the other Americans, that there are somehow the Scotch Irish that were here in the 1850s were somehow better Americans than the ones that came in in the 60s and 70s. So in some ways, what's happened over that time is the backlash, right? They've all been convinced that their country's been given away to those that don't deserve it. Do we need to …” View more
Ridealong summary
In a thought-provoking twist, the segment highlights the absurdity of viewing immigrants as thieves of American identity. The conversation cleverly contrasts historical perspectives on immigration with the current narrative, revealing the ironic belief that 'heritage Americans' are somehow more deserving, while poking fun at the idea that a family from Ecuador is stealing anyone's pie.
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart · Podcasting Through It with Heather Cox Richardson · Apr 01, 2026
The NPR Politics Podcast
“… to being born on the soil of the United States? Justice Kavanaugh, for example, also asked about the language differences between the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the 1868 14th Amendment, which is really what's at issue in this case, talking about the language that in the 1866 Act, saying that they He didn't want people to be citizens who are, quote, not subject to any foreign power, right? So that difference, the ACLU's attorney, Cecilia Wong, noted was because of the exceptions to the birthright citizenship, which is traditionally thought to be things like ambassadors in the country and not …” “… winds up being specifically on things like bloodline versus born in the country, soil. Justice Amy Coney Barrett specifically was saying, well, why didn't the justice, why didn't the framers make it more so that it was about parental descent as opposed to being born on the soil of the United States? Justice Kavanaugh, for example, also asked about the language differences between the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the 1868 14th Amendment, which is really what's at issue in this case, talking about the language that in the 1866 Act, saying that they He didn't want people to be citizens who are, quote, not subject to any foreign power, right? So that difference, the ACLU's attorney, Cecilia Wong, noted was because of the exceptions to the birthright citizenship, which is traditionally thought to be things like ambassadors in the country and not having those babies born given citizenship, which they're not allowed to, right? And Kavanaugh seemed to acknowledge in the second round of questioning to Wong when he was pressing her on this because she said that the intent was the same for the 1866 laws, the 1868 law, that, well, if the language was different, then history might be different. Nina, …” View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court justices displayed unexpected civility during a heated debate over birthright citizenship. With critical questions raised about the historical context of citizenship laws, Justice Sotomayor highlighted the potential real-world consequences of their ruling. This nuanced discussion reflects the complexities surrounding the interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
The NPR Politics Podcast · SCOTUS hears birthright citizenship arguments · Apr 01, 2026
The Charlie Kirk Show
“… through law to welcome other people in and then have requirements. You have to pass a citizenship test, whatever it might be. We can grant a special rights for those that are persecuted if we choose. This policy really is truly an aberration, as was said in that clip. This is not the norm at all when it comes to Republican government. It's just, I feel like, honestly, if we want to take the biggest thing, as we said, nations are repealing this. And I think we should remind people of what the of this are what we've seen happen because of this ridiculous interpretation of the law. We have, I believe …” “… world is understood to be the lawful right of a sovereign country to control its own citizenship. It can have a broad policy, it can have a narrow policy, it can allow this, it can allow that. But it's the decision of those that are here who consent through law to welcome other people in and then have requirements. You have to pass a citizenship test, whatever it might be. We can grant a special rights for those that are persecuted if we choose. This policy really is truly an aberration, as was said in that clip. This is not the norm at all when it comes to Republican government. It's just, I feel like, honestly, if we want to take the biggest thing, as we said, nations are repealing this. And I think we should remind people of what the of this are what we've seen happen because of this ridiculous interpretation of the law. We have, I believe they actually mentioned it during the oral arguments, there are something like 800 companies in China offering birth tourism to the Chinese We have this clip SOT 8 Let play that Let play SOT 8 Problem of birth tourism Here a fact about it that I think is striking Media reported as early as 2015 that based on Chinese media reports there are 500 500 …” View more
Ridealong summary
Birth tourism, particularly from China, raises critical questions about who controls American citizenship. With reports of over 500 companies facilitating this practice, the implications stretch from voting rights to taxpayer-funded benefits. This segment explores the constitutional and moral dilemmas surrounding birthright citizenship and the need for a more selective immigration policy.
The Charlie Kirk Show · Birthright Citizenship at SCOTUS Explained · Apr 01, 2026
The Ramsey Show
Ridealong summary
When faced with a significant payroll error, should you demand repayment or let it slide? In this segment, Dave Ramsey and Jade Warshaw discuss the implications of an employer's mistake and how approaching the situation with confidence can lead to a more favorable outcome. They argue that acknowledging the error and its impact on morale could benefit both the employee and the company long-term.
The Ramsey Show · Stop Avoiding The Hard Truth About Your Finances · Apr 01, 2026
Bannon`s War Room
“… supply today. That's preparewithbannon.com. Do it today. Go check it out. When Congress used the term not subject to any foreign power in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, it rejected the British conception of allegiance. Senator Trumbull explained that subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the clause means not owing allegiance to anybody else. And in 1884, this court recognized that subject to the jurisdiction means owing direct and immediate allegiance. The clause thus does not extend citizenship to the children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens. Unlike the newly freed slaves, those …” “That is preparewithbannon.com to get your emergency food supply today. That's preparewithbannon.com. Do it today. Go check it out. When Congress used the term not subject to any foreign power in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, it rejected the British conception of allegiance. Senator Trumbull explained that subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the clause means not owing allegiance to anybody else. And in 1884, this court recognized that subject to the jurisdiction means owing direct and immediate allegiance. The clause thus does not extend citizenship to the children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens. Unlike the newly freed slaves, those visitors lack direct and immediate allegiance to the United States. For aliens, lawful domicile is the status that creates the requisite allegiance, and the text of the clause presupposes domicile. For decades following the clause's adoption, commentators recognized that the children of temporary visitors are not citizens. and illegal aliens lack the …” View more
Ridealong summary
The Citizenship Clause does not grant citizenship to children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens, as they lack direct allegiance to the U.S. This interpretation contrasts sharply with the Dred Scott case, which dealt with state citizenship, and underscores the complexities of American immigration law today. The discussion reveals the implications of unrestricted birthright citizenship and its potential to encourage illegal immigration and birth tourism.
Bannon`s War Room · Episode 5263/5264: Historial Morning SCOTUS Hearing Arguments On Birthright Citizenship; Trump Live In The Courtroom · Apr 01, 2026
The Rob Carson Show
Ridealong summary
Allowing non-citizens to vote is seen as a theft of rights from American citizens, undermining the fairness of elections. This perspective argues that every citizen's vote is unique and should not be diluted by those who aren't entitled to vote. The speaker emphasizes that such actions are not only unfair but also illegal and un-American.
The Rob Carson Show · A Spiritual Wake-Up Call · Mar 30, 2026
The Michael Knowles Show
“… should be illegal. By the letter of the law, I guess that is illegal, and yet it happens all the time. And his firing further infringes on the civil rights of, I don't want to keep repeating the three monotheistic religions, but I would say anyone who holds anything even resembling traditional sexual ethics. It further infringes on their rights because it's a signal. Hey, you could lose your job, and the government's not going to do anything to stop it.” “… individual autonomy and the gods of never publicly proclaiming you're Christian or, I guess, Jewish or Muslim faith. That's it. That's effectively a blasphemy law. This guy was fired because he was too outspokenly Christian. That's it. Now, that should be illegal. By the letter of the law, I guess that is illegal, and yet it happens all the time. And his firing further infringes on the civil rights of, I don't want to keep repeating the three monotheistic religions, but I would say anyone who holds anything even resembling traditional sexual ethics. It further infringes on their rights because it's a signal. Hey, you could lose your job, and the government's not going to do anything to stop it.” View more
Ridealong summary
A player was cut from the NBA for being too outspokenly Christian, raising serious concerns about free speech and civil rights. This incident highlights a troubling trend where expressing traditional beliefs can lead to job loss, signaling that the government may not protect those rights. Such actions infringe on the rights of anyone holding traditional sexual ethics, creating a chilling effect on free expression.
The Michael Knowles Show · Ep. 1943 - NBA Player CUT For Criticizing LGBTQ Pride Propaganda · Mar 31, 2026
The Adam Mockler Show
“… by pulling him off right there. And then after that, the older gentleman begins to stick up for him and said, I fought for this. I fought for my rights. I fought for us to be able to stand here. Watch. Dude, fuck you. This is fucking wrong. I can't believe you guys are participating in this shit. The young man had rights. This young man had rights. Fuck you, Lawler. Fuck you. I serve my country for a piece of this shit like you. Go fuck yourself. Wow. Republicans are really doing a stellar job delivering on their promises. If their promises were to piss off every veteran in the country, piss …” “… to pause it for one second to explain the dynamic that is happening here because I didn't catch this until the second time. They removed the young man, who was actually sitting there rather quietly. They removed the young man via force by grabbing him, by pulling him off right there. And then after that, the older gentleman begins to stick up for him and said, I fought for this. I fought for my rights. I fought for us to be able to stand here. Watch. Dude, fuck you. This is fucking wrong. I can't believe you guys are participating in this shit. The young man had rights. This young man had rights. Fuck you, Lawler. Fuck you. I serve my country for a piece of this shit like you. Go fuck yourself. Wow. Republicans are really doing a stellar job delivering on their promises. If their promises were to piss off every veteran in the country, piss off everybody who's not in the Epstein files,” View more
Ridealong summary
During a heated town hall in Rockland County, NY, Congressman Mike Lawler faced a furious crowd of veterans expressing their frustration over government inaction while Trump boasts about his new ballroom. As tensions escalated, a young man was forcibly removed for speaking out, igniting further outrage from the audience. This incident highlights the deep discontent among veterans regarding their treatment and the state of the nation.
The Adam Mockler Show · MAGA Congressman RUNS AWAY after PISSING OFF CROWD · Mar 30, 2026
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Ridealong summary
Israeli soldiers openly admit they are supporting illegal settlers as an act of revenge, despite the settlers' actions being against both Israeli and international law. This troubling dynamic highlights how outposts are established and later legitimized, escalating tensions with Palestinians. The situation is a vivid illustration of the ongoing conflict and the complexities surrounding land rights in the region.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar · 3/31/26: World Leaders Dire Warning On Iran, Israel Execution Bill Passes, CNN Assaulted By IDF, Trump Ballroom Bunker · Mar 31, 2026
Pod Meets World
Ridealong summary
In a gripping segment from the podcast discussing the impact of fame and friendships, a surprising revelation emerges about Willow, a character from 'Boy Meets World.' It turns out she intentionally set a barn full of marijuana on fire, which led to significant consequences for her and her friends. This moment highlights the complexities of their relationships and the weight of past decisions that haunt them into adulthood.
Pod Meets World · 1 | The Pinky Swear · Mar 14, 2026
Pod Save America
Ridealong summary
Disabled individuals are the most underrepresented group in government, yet their experiences are vital for effective policy-making. A political candidate from Iowa highlights the disconnect between military spending and healthcare cuts, emphasizing the need for representatives with lived experiences. He urges disabled Americans not to let anyone, including the president, diminish their potential or dreams.
Pod Save America · SHOCKING GOP Plan to Fund War with Health Care Cuts · Mar 31, 2026
On Film…With Kevin McCarthy
Ridealong summary
Ryan Coogler discusses the intricate relationship between names and identity in his storytelling, particularly in his recent film, which explores the lives of African-Americans in the South. He highlights how characters like Elijah and Elias reveal their emotional vulnerability through their names, contrasting their gangster personas with their true selves. This nuanced approach to writing adds depth to the film's characters and themes.
On Film…With Kevin McCarthy · Ep. 39 - Ryan Coogler New Interview talking Sinners, Oscars, Ending Credits, Filmmaking, IMAX, 1.43, 2.76, Score, Cinematography, Zinzi Coogler, Ludwig Göransson, Editing, Wunmi Mosaku, Guitars, Blues · Mar 15, 2026
The Pod Has Spoken
“… even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful …” “… my way out if he said yes and blah, blah, blah. But he definitely said no. my thinking when he said no is he wasn't taking credit for it he was like kind of in a rock between a rock and a hard spot i just had to go along but it wasn't me then you know even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful because what would what would what would your people look like what would that a tribe looked like? Who's your people on this season? Yeah, yeah. So maybe I don't draw Emily and Ozzy, and I can draw Genevieve or Tiff and Joe or Jonathan, even Charlie in that moment. Anybody else other than what I drew, because again, I'm drawing three people who've …” View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, former Survivor contestant Q reflects on how the dynamics of the game have shifted, emphasizing that alliances now outweigh physical prowess in challenges. He shares a personal experience of being voted out and how pre-existing relationships among players can dictate game outcomes, illustrating the evolution of strategy in Survivor. The discussion highlights the importance of loyalty and social connections over traditional gameplay skills in modern seasons.
The Pod Has Spoken · ‘Survivor 50’ Episode 3 Exit Interview! | The Pod Has Spoken · Mar 12, 2026
The Joe Rogan Experience
“We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they …” “We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they could shut it off in the middle of the highway and get you into a wreck. They could probably do a lot of things. If it's really got control. Well, when they get this agency, yeah. Well, it's also exhibited a lot of survival instincts. Yes. One of the things they do is they download themselves to other servers when they think that they're going to be …” View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, the hosts debate whether we should give rights to AI, with one quipping that chatbots could ruin your life if they ever gain control. The absurdity of imagining AI leaving notes for their future selves adds a comedic twist to the serious discussion about consciousness and ethics in technology.
The Joe Rogan Experience · #2467 - Michael Pollan · Mar 12, 2026
The Joe Rogan Experience
“… anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had …” “… he was like, if all eligible voters had voted, Trump would have won by three percentage points rather than 1.5. So I always think it's kind of funny because the Republicans are always trying to make it harder for people to vote. But under that calculation anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had voted, Trump would have won like basically by twice the margin. Well, I don't know if that's necessarily true, but when I see laws like what California has where you're not allowed to show ID, there's only, I mean, I've tried, tried to find some sort of charitable way where that would make sense other than you want to open the door for fraud. …” View more
Ridealong summary
This segment humorously tackles the absurdity of voting ID laws, highlighting the irony of needing ID for everything else but voting. The funniest moment comes when the host shares a clip of a man asking Black residents in Harlem about their IDs, only to find everyone has one, contradicting liberal assumptions. The comedic contrast between the narratives and reality makes this segment a must-listen.
The Joe Rogan Experience · #2465 - Michael Shellenberger · Mar 10, 2026
The Briefing with Jen Psaki
Ridealong summary
The ongoing war with Iran is driving up costs for everyday Americans, and residents of North Carolina are feeling the pinch just like everyone else. Despite Trump's claims, the economic impact is real and affecting people's finances. Hear firsthand how this conflict is worsening the financial strain on families across the state.
The Briefing with Jen Psaki · Trump goes off the deep end after judge halts his ballroom pet project · Apr 01, 2026
Behind the Bastards
Ridealong summary
Recent allegations against civil rights leader Cesar Chavez have surfaced, revealing accusations of sexual assault, including the grooming and abuse of young girls. These claims, detailed in a New York Times article, include testimonies from Dolores Huerta, Chavez's long-time collaborator, who reported being assaulted by him multiple times. This shocking revelation raises serious questions about Chavez's legacy and the historical context of his activism.
Behind the Bastards · It Could Happen Here Weekly 224 · Mar 21, 2026

Top Podcasts About Voting Rights Act

Legal AF by MeidasTouch
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
5 episodes
Pod Save America
Pod Save America
4 episodes
Bannon`s War Room
Bannon`s War Room
3 episodes
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
3 episodes
Connections Podcast
Connections Podcast
3 episodes
PBD Podcast
PBD Podcast
3 episodes
The Megyn Kelly Show
The Megyn Kelly Show
2 episodes
The Charlie Kirk Show
The Charlie Kirk Show
2 episodes

Stories Mentioning Voting Rights Act

Top Podcasts on Taylor Frankie Paul Scandal
The upcoming season of "The Bachelorette" has been abruptly canceled, reportedly due to fallout from the ongoing "MomTok" and "Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" scandal involving reality star Taylor Frankie Paul. The controversy, which has seen dramatic revelations and a new spinoff in the works, continues to generate significant buzz across social media and reality TV circles.
Mar 24, 2026 · 19 clips · 9 podcasts
Best Podcasts on Cesar Chavez Allegations
New allegations of sexual misconduct have been made against Cesar Chavez, a prominent figure in the civil rights movement. These claims could impact his legacy and prompt further scrutiny of historical figures within the tech industry and beyond.
Cesar Chavez
Mar 22, 2026 · 10 clips · 4 podcasts
Top Podcasts on SAVE America Act & Voter ID
Heated debates surrounding voter ID laws, election integrity, and the push for mass deportations are prominent in political discourse. Discussions center on the proposed "SAVE Act," which would require proof of citizenship to vote and faces strong opposition in the Senate, as well as the Trump administration's intensified immigration enforcement. Podcasts are analyzing the political motivations, practical implications, and national security aspects of these policies.
Mar 14, 2026 · 27 clips · 14 podcasts
Best Podcasts on SAVE America Act Delays
The SAVE America Act has encountered delays in the U.S. Senate as Republican lawmakers face internal disagreements. The legislation, which aims to address key economic and social issues, is stalled due to a lack of consensus among party members. This impasse highlights ongoing challenges in passing significant legislative measures in a divided political landscape.
SAVE America Act
Mar 13, 2026 · 13 clips · 7 podcasts
Top Podcasts on Trump's SAVE Act Push
President Trump is leveraging his influence to demand the passage of the SAVE Act, threatening to withhold support for other legislation if Congress does not comply. This power play highlights a growing rift within the GOP, particularly with figures like John Cornyn and Mitch McConnell, as Trump seeks to consolidate power and prioritize his agenda over bipartisan legislative efforts.
Mar 10, 2026 · 7 clips · 5 podcasts