Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Voting Rights Act.
Top Podcast Clips About Voting Rights Act
“… side and hoping that they'll get a Democrat president in. I've had my own serious doubts about whether this makes sense because I like minority rights in the Senate because I've just seen too many good Republican minorities stop crazy ass Democratic legislation. And also, Mike, because it seems to me that generally when you have a Democrat trifecta, House, Senate, and White House, they go nuts on the legislation. Whereas Republicans are more, you know, we're conservatives. We're more like we conserve the status quo. We don't we're not huge on like and another law and another law. So I think …”“… controlled. We have a Republican in the White House. And many people believe we don't do it now. What will happen guaranteed is the Democrats will come back into power in the Senate, whether it's 2026 or 2028, and they'll do it. They'll do it for their side and hoping that they'll get a Democrat president in. I've had my own serious doubts about whether this makes sense because I like minority rights in the Senate because I've just seen too many good Republican minorities stop crazy ass Democratic legislation. And also, Mike, because it seems to me that generally when you have a Democrat trifecta, House, Senate, and White House, they go nuts on the legislation. Whereas Republicans are more, you know, we're conservatives. We're more like we conserve the status quo. We don't we're not huge on like and another law and another law. So I think it'll help the Dems more than it helps the Republicans. Senate Republicans are giant pussies is what I think you're trying to say there, Megan. Look, I would say this about the Save America Act. It requires proof of citizenship and voter ID. This has the support of over 80% of Americans, including a super majority of Democrats and even a super …”View more
Ridealong summary
Republicans are rallying behind the SAVE Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voting, believing it could pass with overwhelming support. With a Republican majority in the House and Senate, they fear failing to act now will allow Democrats to implement their own version later. The debate centers around whether the filibuster should be eliminated or if senators should simply be made to debate until they exhaust their options.
The Megyn Kelly Show·Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, with Aronberg and Davis, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions, with Branca and Geragos | Ep. 1286·Apr 01, 2026
“Let's dive into mail-in ballots. Donald Trump's been jumping up and down, stamping his feet, throwing food from his high chair about voting since he got elected and wants to make it hard on Democrats and independents to vote. So he's threatened the Senate about the SAVE Act. SAVE Act is dead. SAVE Act requiring you to show citizenship papers with your legal name on it in order to vote, as opposed to just signing a penalty of perjury declaration, is not going to pass the Senate because the Democrats have successfully blocked it with the filibuster, and there's not 60 votes to …”“Let's dive into mail-in ballots. Donald Trump's been jumping up and down, stamping his feet, throwing food from his high chair about voting since he got elected and wants to make it hard on Democrats and independents to vote. So he's threatened the Senate about the SAVE Act. SAVE Act is dead. SAVE Act requiring you to show citizenship papers with your legal name on it in order to vote, as opposed to just signing a penalty of perjury declaration, is not going to pass the Senate because the Democrats have successfully blocked it with the filibuster, and there's not 60 votes to approve it. So no amount of Donald Trump threatening people, I'm going to primary you. I'm going to run against you. First of all, people don't think a Trump endorsement is worth the paper it's written on any longer. The Democrats have won 31 races where they flipped the seats of Republicans red to blue, including in Donald Trump's front yard, backyard, …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's decision on whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day could drastically affect voting rights. If they rule against counting these ballots, many votes could be disenfranchised, especially in rural areas where polling places are scarce. This situation highlights Trump's ongoing attempts to control voting processes and the logistical challenges facing states.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch·Legal AF - 4/1/2026·Apr 02, 2026
“… media for kids under 15 or 16. That's the human movement. And already nine states have introduced bills to restrict AI personhood so that human rights are for humans, not for protecting AIs. 45 states have specifically addressed sexually explicit deepfakes. And these laws send a huge signal that non-consensual exploitation of AI tools is a serious offense and we have to actually take action on it. So there's actually a lot that's happening and most people just don't see it. I want everyone to stop for a second because at least for me, I feel something different in my body. I feel like hope. I …”“And when you see that countries like Australia, Denmark, Spain, France are all banning social media for kids under 15 and 16. and I believe several US states now are banning social media for kids under 15 or 16. That's the human movement. And already nine states have introduced bills to restrict AI personhood so that human rights are for humans, not for protecting AIs. 45 states have specifically addressed sexually explicit deepfakes. And these laws send a huge signal that non-consensual exploitation of AI tools is a serious offense and we have to actually take action on it. So there's actually a lot that's happening and most people just don't see it. I want everyone to stop for a second because at least for me, I feel something different in my body. I feel like hope. I feel energized. And I just want you to hold on to that feeling because that is the feeling that's going to enable us to make sure that AI, the way it's being rolled out, actually isn't inevitable. And so this can be everything from like if you're really good at doing international coordination, track two dialogues, bringing countries together. …”View more
Ridealong summary
Several U.S. states and countries are taking significant legislative actions to restrict AI personhood and protect human rights. This movement is fueled by a growing public awareness and hope that we can shape a better future for AI, similar to how social media laws evolved over the past decade. Everyone can contribute to this movement, especially with upcoming midterm elections.
Your Undivided Attention·Here’s Our Roadmap to a Better AI Future·Apr 02, 2026
“… more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than …”“… Because it feels like that the backlash that we facing That if if the right was going to draw a line like what you and I might do is draw a line at the depression right And we might draw a line at FDR coming in and creating a government that is more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than the other Americans, that there are somehow the Scotch Irish that were here in the 1850s were somehow better Americans than the ones that came in in the 60s and 70s. So in some ways, what's happened over that time is the backlash, right? They've all been convinced that their country's been given away to those that don't deserve it. Do we need to …”View more
Ridealong summary
In a thought-provoking twist, the segment highlights the absurdity of viewing immigrants as thieves of American identity. The conversation cleverly contrasts historical perspectives on immigration with the current narrative, revealing the ironic belief that 'heritage Americans' are somehow more deserving, while poking fun at the idea that a family from Ecuador is stealing anyone's pie.
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart·Podcasting Through It with Heather Cox Richardson·Apr 01, 2026
“… to being born on the soil of the United States? Justice Kavanaugh, for example, also asked about the language differences between the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the 1868 14th Amendment, which is really what's at issue in this case, talking about the language that in the 1866 Act, saying that they He didn't want people to be citizens who are, quote, not subject to any foreign power, right? So that difference, the ACLU's attorney, Cecilia Wong, noted was because of the exceptions to the birthright citizenship, which is traditionally thought to be things like ambassadors in the country and not …”“… winds up being specifically on things like bloodline versus born in the country, soil. Justice Amy Coney Barrett specifically was saying, well, why didn't the justice, why didn't the framers make it more so that it was about parental descent as opposed to being born on the soil of the United States? Justice Kavanaugh, for example, also asked about the language differences between the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the 1868 14th Amendment, which is really what's at issue in this case, talking about the language that in the 1866 Act, saying that they He didn't want people to be citizens who are, quote, not subject to any foreign power, right? So that difference, the ACLU's attorney, Cecilia Wong, noted was because of the exceptions to the birthright citizenship, which is traditionally thought to be things like ambassadors in the country and not having those babies born given citizenship, which they're not allowed to, right? And Kavanaugh seemed to acknowledge in the second round of questioning to Wong when he was pressing her on this because she said that the intent was the same for the 1866 laws, the 1868 law, that, well, if the language was different, then history might be different. Nina, …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court justices displayed unexpected civility during a heated debate over birthright citizenship. With critical questions raised about the historical context of citizenship laws, Justice Sotomayor highlighted the potential real-world consequences of their ruling. This nuanced discussion reflects the complexities surrounding the interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
The NPR Politics Podcast·SCOTUS hears birthright citizenship arguments·Apr 01, 2026
“… through law to welcome other people in and then have requirements. You have to pass a citizenship test, whatever it might be. We can grant a special rights for those that are persecuted if we choose. This policy really is truly an aberration, as was said in that clip. This is not the norm at all when it comes to Republican government. It's just, I feel like, honestly, if we want to take the biggest thing, as we said, nations are repealing this. And I think we should remind people of what the of this are what we've seen happen because of this ridiculous interpretation of the law. We have, I believe …”“… world is understood to be the lawful right of a sovereign country to control its own citizenship. It can have a broad policy, it can have a narrow policy, it can allow this, it can allow that. But it's the decision of those that are here who consent through law to welcome other people in and then have requirements. You have to pass a citizenship test, whatever it might be. We can grant a special rights for those that are persecuted if we choose. This policy really is truly an aberration, as was said in that clip. This is not the norm at all when it comes to Republican government. It's just, I feel like, honestly, if we want to take the biggest thing, as we said, nations are repealing this. And I think we should remind people of what the of this are what we've seen happen because of this ridiculous interpretation of the law. We have, I believe they actually mentioned it during the oral arguments, there are something like 800 companies in China offering birth tourism to the Chinese We have this clip SOT 8 Let play that Let play SOT 8 Problem of birth tourism Here a fact about it that I think is striking Media reported as early as 2015 that based on Chinese media reports there are 500 500 …”View more
Ridealong summary
Birth tourism, particularly from China, raises critical questions about who controls American citizenship. With reports of over 500 companies facilitating this practice, the implications stretch from voting rights to taxpayer-funded benefits. This segment explores the constitutional and moral dilemmas surrounding birthright citizenship and the need for a more selective immigration policy.
The Charlie Kirk Show·Birthright Citizenship at SCOTUS Explained·Apr 01, 2026
Ridealong summary
When faced with a significant payroll error, should you demand repayment or let it slide? In this segment, Dave Ramsey and Jade Warshaw discuss the implications of an employer's mistake and how approaching the situation with confidence can lead to a more favorable outcome. They argue that acknowledging the error and its impact on morale could benefit both the employee and the company long-term.
The Ramsey Show·Stop Avoiding The Hard Truth About Your Finances·Apr 01, 2026
“… supply today. That's preparewithbannon.com. Do it today. Go check it out. When Congress used the term not subject to any foreign power in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, it rejected the British conception of allegiance. Senator Trumbull explained that subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the clause means not owing allegiance to anybody else. And in 1884, this court recognized that subject to the jurisdiction means owing direct and immediate allegiance. The clause thus does not extend citizenship to the children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens. Unlike the newly freed slaves, those …”“That is preparewithbannon.com to get your emergency food supply today. That's preparewithbannon.com. Do it today. Go check it out. When Congress used the term not subject to any foreign power in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, it rejected the British conception of allegiance. Senator Trumbull explained that subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the clause means not owing allegiance to anybody else. And in 1884, this court recognized that subject to the jurisdiction means owing direct and immediate allegiance. The clause thus does not extend citizenship to the children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens. Unlike the newly freed slaves, those visitors lack direct and immediate allegiance to the United States. For aliens, lawful domicile is the status that creates the requisite allegiance, and the text of the clause presupposes domicile. For decades following the clause's adoption, commentators recognized that the children of temporary visitors are not citizens. and illegal aliens lack the …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Citizenship Clause does not grant citizenship to children of temporary visa holders or illegal aliens, as they lack direct allegiance to the U.S. This interpretation contrasts sharply with the Dred Scott case, which dealt with state citizenship, and underscores the complexities of American immigration law today. The discussion reveals the implications of unrestricted birthright citizenship and its potential to encourage illegal immigration and birth tourism.
Bannon`s War Room·Episode 5263/5264: Historial Morning SCOTUS Hearing Arguments On Birthright Citizenship; Trump Live In The Courtroom·Apr 01, 2026
Ridealong summary
Allowing non-citizens to vote is seen as a theft of rights from American citizens, undermining the fairness of elections. This perspective argues that every citizen's vote is unique and should not be diluted by those who aren't entitled to vote. The speaker emphasizes that such actions are not only unfair but also illegal and un-American.
The Rob Carson Show·A Spiritual Wake-Up Call·Mar 30, 2026
“… should be illegal. By the letter of the law, I guess that is illegal, and yet it happens all the time. And his firing further infringes on the civil rights of, I don't want to keep repeating the three monotheistic religions, but I would say anyone who holds anything even resembling traditional sexual ethics. It further infringes on their rights because it's a signal. Hey, you could lose your job, and the government's not going to do anything to stop it.”“… individual autonomy and the gods of never publicly proclaiming you're Christian or, I guess, Jewish or Muslim faith. That's it. That's effectively a blasphemy law. This guy was fired because he was too outspokenly Christian. That's it. Now, that should be illegal. By the letter of the law, I guess that is illegal, and yet it happens all the time. And his firing further infringes on the civil rights of, I don't want to keep repeating the three monotheistic religions, but I would say anyone who holds anything even resembling traditional sexual ethics. It further infringes on their rights because it's a signal. Hey, you could lose your job, and the government's not going to do anything to stop it.”View more
Ridealong summary
A player was cut from the NBA for being too outspokenly Christian, raising serious concerns about free speech and civil rights. This incident highlights a troubling trend where expressing traditional beliefs can lead to job loss, signaling that the government may not protect those rights. Such actions infringe on the rights of anyone holding traditional sexual ethics, creating a chilling effect on free expression.
The Michael Knowles Show·Ep. 1943 - NBA Player CUT For Criticizing LGBTQ Pride Propaganda·Mar 31, 2026
“… by pulling him off right there. And then after that, the older gentleman begins to stick up for him and said, I fought for this. I fought for my rights. I fought for us to be able to stand here. Watch. Dude, fuck you. This is fucking wrong. I can't believe you guys are participating in this shit. The young man had rights. This young man had rights. Fuck you, Lawler. Fuck you. I serve my country for a piece of this shit like you. Go fuck yourself. Wow. Republicans are really doing a stellar job delivering on their promises. If their promises were to piss off every veteran in the country, piss …”“… to pause it for one second to explain the dynamic that is happening here because I didn't catch this until the second time. They removed the young man, who was actually sitting there rather quietly. They removed the young man via force by grabbing him, by pulling him off right there. And then after that, the older gentleman begins to stick up for him and said, I fought for this. I fought for my rights. I fought for us to be able to stand here. Watch. Dude, fuck you. This is fucking wrong. I can't believe you guys are participating in this shit. The young man had rights. This young man had rights. Fuck you, Lawler. Fuck you. I serve my country for a piece of this shit like you. Go fuck yourself. Wow. Republicans are really doing a stellar job delivering on their promises. If their promises were to piss off every veteran in the country, piss off everybody who's not in the Epstein files,”View more
Ridealong summary
During a heated town hall in Rockland County, NY, Congressman Mike Lawler faced a furious crowd of veterans expressing their frustration over government inaction while Trump boasts about his new ballroom. As tensions escalated, a young man was forcibly removed for speaking out, igniting further outrage from the audience. This incident highlights the deep discontent among veterans regarding their treatment and the state of the nation.
The Adam Mockler Show·MAGA Congressman RUNS AWAY after PISSING OFF CROWD·Mar 30, 2026
Ridealong summary
Israeli soldiers openly admit they are supporting illegal settlers as an act of revenge, despite the settlers' actions being against both Israeli and international law. This troubling dynamic highlights how outposts are established and later legitimized, escalating tensions with Palestinians. The situation is a vivid illustration of the ongoing conflict and the complexities surrounding land rights in the region.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar·3/31/26: World Leaders Dire Warning On Iran, Israel Execution Bill Passes, CNN Assaulted By IDF, Trump Ballroom Bunker·Mar 31, 2026
Ridealong summary
In a gripping segment from the podcast discussing the impact of fame and friendships, a surprising revelation emerges about Willow, a character from 'Boy Meets World.' It turns out she intentionally set a barn full of marijuana on fire, which led to significant consequences for her and her friends. This moment highlights the complexities of their relationships and the weight of past decisions that haunt them into adulthood.
Disabled individuals are the most underrepresented group in government, yet their experiences are vital for effective policy-making. A political candidate from Iowa highlights the disconnect between military spending and healthcare cuts, emphasizing the need for representatives with lived experiences. He urges disabled Americans not to let anyone, including the president, diminish their potential or dreams.
Pod Save America·SHOCKING GOP Plan to Fund War with Health Care Cuts·Mar 31, 2026
Ridealong summary
Ryan Coogler discusses the intricate relationship between names and identity in his storytelling, particularly in his recent film, which explores the lives of African-Americans in the South. He highlights how characters like Elijah and Elias reveal their emotional vulnerability through their names, contrasting their gangster personas with their true selves. This nuanced approach to writing adds depth to the film's characters and themes.
On Film…With Kevin McCarthy·Ep. 39 - Ryan Coogler New Interview talking Sinners, Oscars, Ending Credits, Filmmaking, IMAX, 1.43, 2.76, Score, Cinematography, Zinzi Coogler, Ludwig Göransson, Editing, Wunmi Mosaku, Guitars, Blues·Mar 15, 2026
“… even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful …”“… my way out if he said yes and blah, blah, blah. But he definitely said no. my thinking when he said no is he wasn't taking credit for it he was like kind of in a rock between a rock and a hard spot i just had to go along but it wasn't me then you know even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful because what would what would what would your people look like what would that a tribe looked like? Who's your people on this season? Yeah, yeah. So maybe I don't draw Emily and Ozzy, and I can draw Genevieve or Tiff and Joe or Jonathan, even Charlie in that moment. Anybody else other than what I drew, because again, I'm drawing three people who've …”View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, former Survivor contestant Q reflects on how the dynamics of the game have shifted, emphasizing that alliances now outweigh physical prowess in challenges. He shares a personal experience of being voted out and how pre-existing relationships among players can dictate game outcomes, illustrating the evolution of strategy in Survivor. The discussion highlights the importance of loyalty and social connections over traditional gameplay skills in modern seasons.
The Pod Has Spoken·‘Survivor 50’ Episode 3 Exit Interview! | The Pod Has Spoken·Mar 12, 2026
“We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they …”“We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they could shut it off in the middle of the highway and get you into a wreck. They could probably do a lot of things. If it's really got control. Well, when they get this agency, yeah. Well, it's also exhibited a lot of survival instincts. Yes. One of the things they do is they download themselves to other servers when they think that they're going to be …”View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, the hosts debate whether we should give rights to AI, with one quipping that chatbots could ruin your life if they ever gain control. The absurdity of imagining AI leaving notes for their future selves adds a comedic twist to the serious discussion about consciousness and ethics in technology.
The Joe Rogan Experience·#2467 - Michael Pollan·Mar 12, 2026
“… anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had …”“… he was like, if all eligible voters had voted, Trump would have won by three percentage points rather than 1.5. So I always think it's kind of funny because the Republicans are always trying to make it harder for people to vote. But under that calculation anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had voted, Trump would have won like basically by twice the margin. Well, I don't know if that's necessarily true, but when I see laws like what California has where you're not allowed to show ID, there's only, I mean, I've tried, tried to find some sort of charitable way where that would make sense other than you want to open the door for fraud. …”View more
Ridealong summary
This segment humorously tackles the absurdity of voting ID laws, highlighting the irony of needing ID for everything else but voting. The funniest moment comes when the host shares a clip of a man asking Black residents in Harlem about their IDs, only to find everyone has one, contradicting liberal assumptions. The comedic contrast between the narratives and reality makes this segment a must-listen.
The Joe Rogan Experience·#2465 - Michael Shellenberger·Mar 10, 2026
Ridealong summary
The ongoing war with Iran is driving up costs for everyday Americans, and residents of North Carolina are feeling the pinch just like everyone else. Despite Trump's claims, the economic impact is real and affecting people's finances. Hear firsthand how this conflict is worsening the financial strain on families across the state.
The Briefing with Jen Psaki·Trump goes off the deep end after judge halts his ballroom pet project·Apr 01, 2026
Ridealong summary
Recent allegations against civil rights leader Cesar Chavez have surfaced, revealing accusations of sexual assault, including the grooming and abuse of young girls. These claims, detailed in a New York Times article, include testimonies from Dolores Huerta, Chavez's long-time collaborator, who reported being assaulted by him multiple times. This shocking revelation raises serious questions about Chavez's legacy and the historical context of his activism.
Behind the Bastards·It Could Happen Here Weekly 224·Mar 21, 2026
“… they don't give a fuck what is actually happening to people and suffering. And it is unbelievable to me, yet very believable. I feel like people's rights have gone so far backward, like from the difference between like 2010 or like, let's say 2000 to 2010. That was a huge like we're going backwards. I mean, we are the clock is going backwards and that's why we have to be loud and proud. Yeah. And the thing that really irritates me a lot about the white people that the suburban white people I was speaking about earlier that try to have the perfect family image, they in that image, a lot of people …”“… did pass it where you can marry at 12 or they were trying to pass it. Like these people want to be the worst kind of people and tell everybody else how to live their lives. They want to say how great they are and their family values. At the same time, they don't give a fuck what is actually happening to people and suffering. And it is unbelievable to me, yet very believable. I feel like people's rights have gone so far backward, like from the difference between like 2010 or like, let's say 2000 to 2010. That was a huge like we're going backwards. I mean, we are the clock is going backwards and that's why we have to be loud and proud. Yeah. And the thing that really irritates me a lot about the white people that the suburban white people I was speaking about earlier that try to have the perfect family image, they in that image, a lot of people that I know, particularly in Oklahoma, will try to play both sides. they'll play the oh we're cool and we've got gay friends and you know we we're independents we're moderates we're socially liberal and fiscally conservative and they're fucking not it's a total lie they want the appearance of being cool and open-minded but deep down they're not …”View more
Ridealong summary
The podcast segment discusses the alarming trend of regressive LGBTQ+ rights, particularly referencing a proposal in Tennessee that would allow marriage at just 12 years old. It highlights the hypocrisy of those who claim to uphold family values while simultaneously marginalizing LGBTQ+ individuals, urging listeners to recognize the insatiable cruelty behind such political movements.
Despite spending $15,000 per person on healthcare, the U.S. remains the only major country that doesn't guarantee healthcare for all. This shocking statistic reveals the broken nature of our healthcare system, where 85 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured. The conversation raises critical questions about the fundamental rights to healthcare and the priorities of a wealthy nation.
This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von·#635 - Sen. Bernie Sanders·Jan 21, 2026
“… in the eye of Jewish people, because they were a lot of Jewish people were the white people that were kind of really heavily involved in the civil rights movement. Obviously, there are all kinds of people, but Jewish people were leading the charge for white America and the civil rights movement for the most part. Yeah, that's why they were also really highly critical of the NAACP is because they essentially said white people had they allowed white people to join. The white people had taken over and were now steering the boat. So you could not be white and be joined the Nation of Islam. I'm …”“… part of the complications of Malcolm X is that he had some anti-Semitic views at times. He had some pretty dark views of Jews in America and I guess all over the world, but specifically America. And this was especially sort of a, you know, a thumb in the eye of Jewish people, because they were a lot of Jewish people were the white people that were kind of really heavily involved in the civil rights movement. Obviously, there are all kinds of people, but Jewish people were leading the charge for white America and the civil rights movement for the most part. Yeah, that's why they were also really highly critical of the NAACP is because they essentially said white people had they allowed white people to join. The white people had taken over and were now steering the boat. So you could not be white and be joined the Nation of Islam. I'm sorry. They would not let you in. Still won't as far as I know. Yeah, for sure. But the media was loving this. The media loves to pit people against one another. So they had two really clear, like I think you described them as spoils early on, and Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, because they couldn't be any more different, not only in kind of the …”View more
Ridealong summary
Malcolm X's realization that Elijah Muhammad was not the true leader he believed him to be catalyzed a significant shift in his life and ideology. This moment of awakening led to a public confrontation, culminating in Malcolm's controversial statement following JFK's assassination, which ultimately resulted in his suspension from the Nation of Islam. This segment explores the dramatic fallout from this split, including Malcolm's subsequent revelations about Muhammad's personal life and his transformative pilgrimage to Mecca.
“… If you're trans, you can sue. But if you just hold an opinion, you lose because it's not there under the law as far as the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It should be there.”“… this. But the essential question is, can you get booted out of a public place because you're a conservative or a liberal or a libertarian or whatever you are? Now, if you're booted because you're Catholic or Jewish or Protestant or Muslim, you can sue. If you're trans, you can sue. But if you just hold an opinion, you lose because it's not there under the law as far as the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It should be there.”View more
Ridealong summary
Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a Little Rock restaurant after reportedly making patrons uncomfortable. The incident raises questions about whether political beliefs can justify refusal of service, highlighting a gap in anti-discrimination laws that protect against such bias. While some argue it was a misunderstanding, others see it as a politically motivated action against the governor.
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis·O'Round the World - March 29, 2026·Mar 29, 2026
“… assisted by the Supreme Court to first of all whitewash America racist history and the legacy of slavery by saying that all of the civil rights protections that we have in place are effectively reverse racism against white people and to weaponize the legacy of King, to weaponize things like the Ku Klux Klan Act against people of color and therefore render the idea of disparity and institutional racism sort of moot, right? Like everyone's, no one's a racist, everyone's a racist, white people are being discriminated against and therefore any protections that exist in our society should …”“… would take it one step further. And racist. And it's racist. Let me get that. And it is racist. Yes. I was going to say, I think this is a really – That's the first part I should have said. This is a really it part of a suite of actions from this administration assisted by the Supreme Court to first of all whitewash America racist history and the legacy of slavery by saying that all of the civil rights protections that we have in place are effectively reverse racism against white people and to weaponize the legacy of King, to weaponize things like the Ku Klux Klan Act against people of color and therefore render the idea of disparity and institutional racism sort of moot, right? Like everyone's, no one's a racist, everyone's a racist, white people are being discriminated against and therefore any protections that exist in our society should be done away with because it's all kind of meaningless. I mean, I think that's the kind of natural endpoint is to effectively turn back the clock and get rid of all the gains made on race and in civil rights in the last, I'd say, 100 years. Like, I really think and using you as a kind of example of like, oh, yeah, see, like this is we need to …”View more
Ridealong summary
The current administration is accused of weaponizing civil rights protections to promote a narrative of reverse racism against white people. This strategy aims to whitewash America's racist history and undermine the progress made in civil rights over the last century. Don Lemon argues that this is not only malevolent but fundamentally racist, distorting the legacy of figures like Martin Luther King Jr. for political gain.
Pod Save America·When Life Gives You Don Lemon·Mar 29, 2026
Ridealong summary
With the recent grant approval, Hani Ali is determined to expand mental health services for refugees, overcoming significant funding barriers. Her optimism stems from the strong team supporting her mission, aiming to open new doors for those in need. This effort highlights the crucial role of community-driven initiatives in addressing mental health challenges.
Connections Podcast·Spotlighting local women whose work changes lives·Mar 27, 2026
“… justify arrests in courthouses. That's according to a new court filing. The filing is part of an ongoing federal case in New York brought by civil rights groups challenging a policy of arresting people in immigration court. Federal prosecutors said Tuesday they had repeatedly cited a memo called 2025 ICE guidance to defend this policy of arresting people in courtrooms, and that led to courthouse arrests nationwide. Quote, we write respectfully and regrettably to correct a material mistaken statement of fact that the government made to the court and the plaintiffs that's jay clayton u.s attorney …”“… justice department saying, we don't have anything for you. We don't have an argument to present by like, wow. Uh, all right. Finally from ABC, the department of justice notified a federal judge that it has been erroneously relying on an ice memo to justify arrests in courthouses. That's according to a new court filing. The filing is part of an ongoing federal case in New York brought by civil rights groups challenging a policy of arresting people in immigration court. Federal prosecutors said Tuesday they had repeatedly cited a memo called 2025 ICE guidance to defend this policy of arresting people in courtrooms, and that led to courthouse arrests nationwide. Quote, we write respectfully and regrettably to correct a material mistaken statement of fact that the government made to the court and the plaintiffs that's jay clayton u.s attorney for the southern district of new york admitting yeah that memo is doesn't say what we said it said oh about arresting people in uh during in courtrooms um specifically i think this case 26 federal plaza anyway wow all right so that's our hit me on the head with a bat today All kinds of errors and mistakes and admissions of wrongdoing, which we …”View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump was able to vote in Florida's recent special election despite being a convicted felon, thanks to a unique loophole in state law. Florida defers to the voting rights laws of the state where a conviction occurred, which in Trump's case, is New York, where he retains his voting rights as long as he isn't incarcerated. This highlights the complexities of voting rights for felons across different states.
Leaving the United States is a choice for those who want their children to grow up valuing every human life, not just American lives. The speaker highlights the importance of voting to assert control over the political landscape, but laments the impatience of citizens who want immediate change. Ultimately, they believe in raising global citizens who recognize our interconnectedness rather than a nation driven by fear and anger.
The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett·WW3 Threat Assessment: "Trump Bombing Iran Just Increased Nuclear War Threat" The Terrifying Reality·Mar 04, 2026
“… you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News and were regurgitating anti-absentee ballot talking points. So …”“Now, are the officials in Mississippi defending this case not also Republicans? They are. And part of what is so striking is that you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News and were regurgitating anti-absentee ballot talking points. So Justice Alito referred to the confidence you can have once you turn your ballot over to the Postal Service and whatnot. Honestly, Justice Kavanaugh sounded like he was more in that camp than in the middle. So he was throwing out concerns about if the apparent winner the morning after the election ends up losing due to late arriving ballots, won't that …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court may soon decide on a case that could disenfranchise nearly a million voters in the upcoming 2024 election. Interestingly, some Republican-appointed justices appear more anti-voting rights than Mississippi officials themselves. This raises alarming questions about the integrity of voting laws and the potential for voter suppression just months before the midterms.
Pod Save America·TACO Tuesday in Tehran·Mar 24, 2026
Ridealong summary
Photo ID requirements are not discriminatory; in fact, they're essential for many everyday activities like flying or getting a job. The argument that obtaining a photo ID is too difficult for Americans is dismissed as absurd when compared to the complexities of filing taxes or passing TSA checks. If we can manage those, getting a photo ID should be a non-issue.
Mark Levin Podcast·3/20/26 - The Fifth Column: Unmasking America's Hidden Propaganda Network·Mar 21, 2026
“… in person at a local elections office in order to register to vote. Trump is also demanding that the bill include a nationwide ban on most mail-in voting and a ban on trans participation in sports and gender affirming care for minors, because why not? He said that he won't sign any legislation until the bill is passed, and yet the votes still aren't there in the Senate without nuking the filibuster, which Republicans also don't have the votes for, as John Thune continues telling everyone who will listen. They did just get one convert, however. Texas' John Cornyn, who's locked in a primary runoff …”“… one piece of advice for republicans in congress um it's become more of an all-consuming demand uh which is to pass the save america act um a bill that would require as we've talked about every American to present their passport or birth certificate in person at a local elections office in order to register to vote. Trump is also demanding that the bill include a nationwide ban on most mail-in voting and a ban on trans participation in sports and gender affirming care for minors, because why not? He said that he won't sign any legislation until the bill is passed, and yet the votes still aren't there in the Senate without nuking the filibuster, which Republicans also don't have the votes for, as John Thune continues telling everyone who will listen. They did just get one convert, however. Texas' John Cornyn, who's locked in a primary runoff with Ken Paxton, who said he'd only consider dropping out of the race if the Save Act passes. So, because of that, Cornyn wrote an op-ed in the New York Post this week explaining that he now does support ending the filibuster to pass the Save America Act. Again, they still don't have the votes. But Cornyn is having a hard time answering questions …”View more
Ridealong summary
Republicans are facing a challenge as Trump demands they pass the Save America Act, which includes strict voting laws like requiring identification for registration and banning mail-in voting. Despite their efforts, key Senate votes are lacking, and Texas Senator John Cornyn is now reconsidering his stance on the filibuster to support these changes. This internal conflict reveals the tension within the party as they navigate controversial policies and electoral strategy.
Pod Save America·Trump Celebrates High Gas Prices·Mar 13, 2026
“… if I was married, they played that whole game. You're saying this is part of the SAVE Act? The SAVE America Act has the major to do with this. The voting. It's all, Adam, at the end of the day. So they're tying the voting to, and what do the Democrats want to do? They don't want you to, what do you mean? Go look at them. They want everybody to be able to vote and not prove your citizenship. Full stop. That is it. And this is what they're going to make people suffer. I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what you're asking? I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what the core …”“… And what are they exactly arguing about in Congress right now? The main argument, Adam, the main one, don't let people try to fool you, is they are saying we want you to prove that you are a citizen. Remember that debate that was going on? But if I was married, they played that whole game. You're saying this is part of the SAVE Act? The SAVE America Act has the major to do with this. The voting. It's all, Adam, at the end of the day. So they're tying the voting to, and what do the Democrats want to do? They don't want you to, what do you mean? Go look at them. They want everybody to be able to vote and not prove your citizenship. Full stop. That is it. And this is what they're going to make people suffer. I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what you're asking? I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what the core crux is through it? Is this is the DHS not being funded because of the DHS? The Save Act? Yes, this is the whole thing. It's a combination of things, but it's the time-honored tradition that Chuck Schumer has of create a shutdown and blame the other guy and then let issues happen to this department, that department. American people can't go to the …”View more
Ridealong summary
TSA workers are facing chaos at Atlanta's airport due to a government shutdown, leading to long lines and unpaid labor. This situation highlights the political stalemate over funding the Department of Homeland Security, tying worker compensation to broader immigration debates. As tensions rise, the future of TSA jobs may hinge on automation, raising questions about the implications for workers and travelers alike.
“… step in and say, no, every single citizen of the country would have a protected right to vote. In fact, if you want me to read it to you, the Voting Rights Act actually begins with this simple statement. All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any state, territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision shall be entitled and allowed to vote. But this simple statement that the Voting Rights Act begins with all citizens. What's interesting is the Voting Rights Act …”“protected, that if there'd be any jurisdiction in the country that would violate that, that a federal court could literally step in and say, no, every single citizen of the country would have a protected right to vote. In fact, if you want me to read it to you, the Voting Rights Act actually begins with this simple statement. All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any state, territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision shall be entitled and allowed to vote. But this simple statement that the Voting Rights Act begins with all citizens. What's interesting is the Voting Rights Act protected the ability of a court to step in and say if some citizen is not being allowed to vote. We're going to take a short commercial break. We're going to come back to senators just a couple of minutes. Senator Langford, we'll come back to that. Not too shabby. And Neil is with us at the White House. I've got some other issues about the war that's …”View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act is a voter suppression bill designed to change election rules for partisan gain, disproportionately affecting women and those without passports.
Bannon`s War Room·WarRoom Battleground EP 970: Massive Throw Down In Senate Over SAVE ACT Cont; Joe Kent Resigns·Mar 17, 2026
Ridealong summary
Imagine a world where people without eyesight can drive autonomously. This advocate believes that banning driverless cars in Boston would strip away essential freedoms for many, not just the blind. Their vision includes personal ownership of autonomous vehicles, allowing everyone the same mobility and independence.
Search Engine·The Trial of the Driverless Car·Mar 26, 2026
Ridealong summary
Voting rights are under siege in America, with many states enacting laws that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. This push for restrictive measures raises questions about the integrity of democracy and the future of political representation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone interested in the health of our electoral system.
The Jesse Kelly Show·Hour 1: The Honest Commie·Mar 25, 2026
“… not endorsing Cesar Chavez. I'm just saying he was – I think it's a – I get a crack up every time the left lifts up this guy like he was some civil rights icon, and then you find out, oh, he was beating the crap out of illegal immigrants so that they would get the hell out of America. Andrew, Andrew, we just got to pause ourselves here. We should not – we don't need to highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez is based. If we can highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez, left-wing hero, is a rapist. Which is what the big news is today. I mean, I'm not laughing at that, but I still think leftists are …”“… from the same kathy nester who ran the defense for ory richens all righty so now we can talk about how you think caesar chavez is really based andrew which you gotta hold on you gotta be careful i'm not endorsing caesar chavez because because I'm not endorsing Cesar Chavez. I'm just saying he was – I think it's a – I get a crack up every time the left lifts up this guy like he was some civil rights icon, and then you find out, oh, he was beating the crap out of illegal immigrants so that they would get the hell out of America. Andrew, Andrew, we just got to pause ourselves here. We should not – we don't need to highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez is based. If we can highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez, left-wing hero, is a rapist. Which is what the big news is today. I mean, I'm not laughing at that, but I still think leftists are dumb. For those who have not seen it, we should explain what we're getting at here. It's been coming out over the last few days. What are you talking about? But the New York Times has a mammoth story this morning. Cesar Chavez, civil rights icon, is accused of abusing girls for years. This feels like a blast from the past. I feel like we got – …”View more
Ridealong summary
Cesar Chavez, long celebrated as a civil rights hero, is now being scrutinized for alleged sexual misconduct, challenging his legacy and the left's idolization of him.
Cesar Chavez, long celebrated as a civil rights icon, is now being scrutinized for alleged sexual misconduct, challenging his legacy and the left's portrayal of him.
The Charlie Kirk Show·THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 119 — Canceling Cesar Chavez? Downvote Buttons? Venezuelan Statehood?·Mar 21, 2026
“… because they were based on race that I seen estimates could affect four to five to six seats which would swing towards Republicans Because under the Voting Rights Act there has been a claim and it been upheld up until now that a state like Louisiana must have a certain number of majority black districts, and that may violate the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment as to equal protection of the laws. And so that's been argued, and I think that we don't know how”“… vote, obviously, also in those states. But for the purpose of the congressional races and the midterms, that would be very important. That where timing does matter because if they going to have to change the districts in Louisiana and other states because they were based on race that I seen estimates could affect four to five to six seats which would swing towards Republicans Because under the Voting Rights Act there has been a claim and it been upheld up until now that a state like Louisiana must have a certain number of majority black districts, and that may violate the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment as to equal protection of the laws. And so that's been argued, and I think that we don't know how”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's hands-off approach to redistricting could significantly impact the upcoming midterm elections. Specifically, a ruling on whether race can influence congressional districting in Louisiana may swing four to six seats toward Republicans. This decision hinges on the balance between the Voting Rights Act and constitutional protections, making the timing crucial for electoral outcomes.
The Jesse Kelly Show·Supreme Court To Issue BRUTAL Decision For Democrats·Mar 25, 2026
“Interesting. Not only do we have a preferential system, get this, we have compulsory voting. You will be fined if you don't vote. So you have to participate in elections, whether they're at the federal level, state, or local government. So we've got three levels of government, and you are obliged by law to participate in it. You will be fined if you do. You will be fined, yes. I've had fines I've had to write in and say. I wasn't in the country. Give me a break. How much are fines? What kind of fines is it? Oh, it's not crippling …”“Interesting. Not only do we have a preferential system, get this, we have compulsory voting. You will be fined if you don't vote. So you have to participate in elections, whether they're at the federal level, state, or local government. So we've got three levels of government, and you are obliged by law to participate in it. You will be fined if you do. You will be fined, yes. I've had fines I've had to write in and say. I wasn't in the country. Give me a break. How much are fines? What kind of fines is it? Oh, it's not crippling fines, but it'll be like around $100, I think. They fine you if you don't vote. Yeah. What percentage? Three elections we have to vote into. It's not just the one election. We've got state, federal, and local government. So each of the elections you don't vote for, you get fined? Yep. And the elections are at different times. So the federal election …”View more
Ridealong summary
In Australia, failing to vote can cost you around $100 due to compulsory voting laws. While this system aims to increase political participation, many voters are uninformed and resort to 'donkey voting,' simply filling out their ballots without knowledge of the candidates. This raises questions about whether mandatory voting truly reflects the will of the people or just enforces compliance.
PBD Podcast·Rita Panahi: Iran War, Sharia Law & Soccer Team Asylum | PBD #756·Mar 10, 2026
“… on this program, it was much more common for libertarians to say, all right, if I don't have a good libertarian candidate, I'm probably voting for a Republican. Small C conservatives might be good enough here. These days, I don't know. I mean, it's a very different Republican Party. So for libertarians who don't have libertarians in races, is it default Republican? Is it not vote? Is it something whoever is less authoritarian? What do you do? Sometimes it's that. I mean, this is up to the individual. I voted for all parties. I mean, I voted for like kind of across a lot of different …”“… strategy makes sense to get your policy preferences to make the community, the state, the world a better place. I would think that you're rarely rooting for the WFP, but here's the interesting thing. My guess is when you and I first started having conversations on this program, it was much more common for libertarians to say, all right, if I don't have a good libertarian candidate, I'm probably voting for a Republican. Small C conservatives might be good enough here. These days, I don't know. I mean, it's a very different Republican Party. So for libertarians who don't have libertarians in races, is it default Republican? Is it not vote? Is it something whoever is less authoritarian? What do you do? Sometimes it's that. I mean, this is up to the individual. I voted for all parties. I mean, I voted for like kind of across a lot of different candidates and races. So it sort of depends. And I'll try to pick the less authoritarian one is usually what it goes down to. Right now it's about less authoritarian? Yeah. Less, as you said, proto-fascist? Yeah. If we don't have a libertarian candidate running, sometimes that means voting Democrat for me. Sometimes it means voting Republican. It …”View more
Ridealong summary
Libertarians are increasingly faced with a tough choice: vote for a Republican, a Democrat, or skip the ballot entirely when no libertarian candidate is available. This shift reflects a changing political landscape, where the definition of 'less authoritarian' has become more complex. The conversation highlights the struggle for libertarians to maintain their principles while navigating a polarized political environment.
Connections Podcast·Libertarians say, 'I told you so'·Mar 09, 2026
“… AI gets, the more real it seems. yeah but then it's like it gets that gets to the point where you think that ai has to have some kind of like human rights treatment and they're equal to humans which it's common you think you wait until the debates start might be 30 years down the road but yeah yeah i i unless i start believing in god i i think i'm gonna fade that narrative because i i can't see that just wait um should we talk about bitcoin we've done like an hour on ai there yeah let's do it”“… I believe in the future I can see it but potentially I think I in a place right now where I think that everyone is going to fall into the two camps And there will be one side you'll have to take. And I just think it's inevitable because the better AI gets, the more real it seems. yeah but then it's like it gets that gets to the point where you think that ai has to have some kind of like human rights treatment and they're equal to humans which it's common you think you wait until the debates start might be 30 years down the road but yeah yeah i i unless i start believing in god i i think i'm gonna fade that narrative because i i can't see that just wait um should we talk about bitcoin we've done like an hour on ai there yeah let's do it”View more
Ridealong summary
As AI technology advances, some believe it may soon demand human rights, sparking intense debates about its status. Junseth argues that if you see AI as alive, it challenges the belief in a higher power, leading society to split into two camps on the issue. He suggests that these discussions are inevitable in the coming decades.
What Bitcoin Did·The AI Future Is Overhyped. Why Bitcoin Still Matters | Junseth·Mar 27, 2026
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act represents a direct threat to democracy by making it harder for people to vote, reflecting a broader strategy by powerful interests to maintain control. These oligarchs view democracy as a hindrance to their unpopular policies, leading them to legalize corruption and concentrate power. The result? A system where one dollar equals one vote, undermining the very foundation of democratic representation.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar·3/20/26: Bibi Demands Ground Troops, Hegseth Caught Lying, Iran War Master Plan w/ David Sirota·Mar 20, 2026
“… courageous thing to speak out, you know, to organize. Despite the fear of possible retribution. Yes. You know, when I was born, the 1964 Civil Rights Act had not yet been passed, had not yet been enacted. The Voting Rights Act had not yet passed. It would a couple of months later. You know, I would hear folks say all the time, oh, that happened so long ago when things happened in my lifetime. You know, when I was born, black people did not yet have rights. You know, my wife is white. Let me be Virginia. Did not, you know, that Supreme Court decision came down the week before my second …”“… these days you can barely say the wrong thing without being canceled or someone in the administration coming after you or losing your job or this or that. And so it's gotten to the point where it's the really courageous thing to say no. And it's a really courageous thing to speak out, you know, to organize. Despite the fear of possible retribution. Yes. You know, when I was born, the 1964 Civil Rights Act had not yet been passed, had not yet been enacted. The Voting Rights Act had not yet passed. It would a couple of months later. You know, I would hear folks say all the time, oh, that happened so long ago when things happened in my lifetime. You know, when I was born, black people did not yet have rights. You know, my wife is white. Let me be Virginia. Did not, you know, that Supreme Court decision came down the week before my second birthday. On the day of my fourth birthday, Stonewall happened. In the fifth grade, it was called back then the Education of All Handicapped Children Act. That is what would become the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. I never thought that I would live to see two terms of a black president and then live to see my history and people as black …”View more
Ridealong summary
Speaking out today is a courageous act, as fear of retribution looms large over activists. Anita Cameron reflects on her life, revealing that she was born before key civil rights laws were enacted, highlighting the ongoing struggle for dignity and rights. Despite significant progress, she emphasizes that the fight for humanity and value continues, making activism even more critical.
Connections Podcast·'Please don't stereotype us.' Local women share their stories on the Move to Include Podcast·Mar 20, 2026
Ridealong summary
The internet, once a limitless repository of knowledge, is losing its promise of free access to information. Originally envisioned as a space where knowledge couldn't be controlled or erased, increasing censorship by governments and corporations threatens this ideal. As we witness the acceleration of these trends, the future of free speech online hangs in the balance.
Taylor Lorenz’s Power User·This Is How The Internet Dies: Governments are Scrubbing the Web·Mar 20, 2026
“… the fact is, is that the United States typically, with few exceptions, actually has honored those asylum laws because it is a commitment of human rights that we do not send people back to their death, that we embrace people who are fleeing persecution and allow them the opportunity to seek asylum and have a process for doing so. But what the Trump administration did in the first term and has reversed Biden policy now in the second term to do this again has been what they try to call metering meaning that they are trying to stop people before they get to actually put their foot on the U …”“… case involving Haitian refugees that is the foothold, the toehold for John Sauer and the Trump administration to say they can move that from the waters into just feet from the border in Mexico, for example, and block people from seeking asylum. And the fact is, is that the United States typically, with few exceptions, actually has honored those asylum laws because it is a commitment of human rights that we do not send people back to their death, that we embrace people who are fleeing persecution and allow them the opportunity to seek asylum and have a process for doing so. But what the Trump administration did in the first term and has reversed Biden policy now in the second term to do this again has been what they try to call metering meaning that they are trying to stop people before they get to actually put their foot on the U territory like right outside the border Those are US agents agents of America you know being deployed to try to block people from seeking asylum I think that I think those cases should be revisited I think that we need to have a process for honoring those commitments to human rights but the fact is is that this administration has taken an extremely harsh …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's upcoming decision could severely restrict asylum seekers' rights, potentially allowing the Trump administration's 'metering' policy to block individuals just feet from the U.S. border. This policy, rooted in a controversial 1993 ruling, could undermine long-standing international laws protecting refugees from persecution. If the court rules in favor of this approach, it may jeopardize the U.S.'s commitment to human rights and asylum processes.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch·Legal AF Full Episode - 3/25/2026·Mar 26, 2026
“… bill that says you have to prove you're a citizen to vote in American elections. Think about that for just a second, just this basic idea. If you're voting in the United States, you should be an American citizen. That's it. But the Senate leadership is already warning that it might need 60 votes to pass. Well, yeah, if you don't do your job, it will. And that's where the game begins. Because technically, they are right. Practically, they're hiding behind the rules. the senate has called for something or it has something called the filibuster and originally if you wanted to block a bill all you had …”“… unrelated but they actually not They all telling you the same thing about how power is working in America right now So let me start in Washington. The Senate now is preparing to vote on the SAVE Act. This is a complete sham. Now, this is just a bill that says you have to prove you're a citizen to vote in American elections. Think about that for just a second, just this basic idea. If you're voting in the United States, you should be an American citizen. That's it. But the Senate leadership is already warning that it might need 60 votes to pass. Well, yeah, if you don't do your job, it will. And that's where the game begins. Because technically, they are right. Practically, they're hiding behind the rules. the senate has called for something or it has something called the filibuster and originally if you wanted to block a bill all you had to do is stand on the floor and talk hour after hour day after day you know your voice giving up your leg shaking mr stewart mr smith goes to washington okay that that that's the whole point of that movie but today you don't have to do that anymore because it's hard you just threaten a filibuster and then walk away and you need a 60 person vote to …”View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote, faces a quiet death in the Senate due to a lack of courage and accountability. Senate leaders are hiding behind the filibuster, avoiding a real debate on the issue, while the Justice Department reveals alarming findings of non-citizens on voter rolls. This situation highlights a significant power struggle affecting American democracy.
The Glenn Beck Program·Did the IRGC Really Kiss a Cardboard Khamenei?! | Guests: Sharyl Attkisson & Chad Wolf | 3/11/26·Mar 11, 2026
“… regime tries to frame it is, look, if you present to voters the issue of voter security and we want to keep it safe and you ask anybody, do you want voting to be safe and do you want voting security? And you frame the question like that, but don't actually explain what the SAVE Act is. I think lots of people go, sure, I want voting to be safe. The same way if you ask people, do you want safe borders and do you want to make sure that there are, you know, if there are criminals here who are migrants, that they get deported and prosecuted. Who says, no, I don't want that? I mean, of course, someone …”“… all the books I've read about Reagan, he wasn't a policy wonk. He didn't understand the details. But you put a script in front of him. He was an effective actor. Talk to us about the one thing I want to talk about the SAVE Act. But the way the Trump regime tries to frame it is, look, if you present to voters the issue of voter security and we want to keep it safe and you ask anybody, do you want voting to be safe and do you want voting security? And you frame the question like that, but don't actually explain what the SAVE Act is. I think lots of people go, sure, I want voting to be safe. The same way if you ask people, do you want safe borders and do you want to make sure that there are, you know, if there are criminals here who are migrants, that they get deported and prosecuted. Who says, no, I don't want that? I mean, of course, someone says we should have borders and we should have safe and secure elections. But I guess to your earlier point, too, those framings are often used as tools, I think, to distort and deceive. Because then what the Trump regime will say is, look, the black community supports the SAVE Act. Look, we have a poll that shows 75% of black people support the …”View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act is framed as a measure for voter security, but it’s actually a solution in search of a problem, designed to suppress votes. While everyone agrees on the need for safe elections, the details reveal that this legislation disproportionately disadvantages communities of color. This is a classic case of political propaganda at play, misleading the public and distorting the truth.
The MeidasTouch Podcast·Trump Suffers Utter Humiliation during War with Fatal Polling!!!·Mar 09, 2026
“… midterms and have a wipeout. So that's one theory, and I think that's not a bad one. The second one is that it's going to be a bad decision against voting rights and that the justices in the minority, no pun intended, like Ketanji Brown-Jackson and Kagan and Sotomayor are taking their sweet time, which they're allowed to, to write their dissents. And until the dissents are done, the opinion doesn't come out. That's why most major decisions do not come out in February. notwithstanding the tariffs. They usually come out at maybe March, more like May and June. I gave an example. The Dobbs decision …”“… make any friends on the court on decisions that had not yet been made. So I don't think they're bending over backwards to help Donald Trump at this midterm. One of the ways to tamp down an out-of-control president is to make him lame duck at the midterms and have a wipeout. So that's one theory, and I think that's not a bad one. The second one is that it's going to be a bad decision against voting rights and that the justices in the minority, no pun intended, like Ketanji Brown-Jackson and Kagan and Sotomayor are taking their sweet time, which they're allowed to, to write their dissents. And until the dissents are done, the opinion doesn't come out. That's why most major decisions do not come out in February. notwithstanding the tariffs. They usually come out at maybe March, more like May and June. I gave an example. The Dobbs decision to take away a woman's right to choose and destroy Roe versus Wade. It was officially published in June, like the last opinion, on their way out for summer vacation. But it leaked, a draft leaked in March, right? And then it sort of hardened positions and it ended up being ultimately the final the final decision. But it didn't come out officially …”View more
Ridealong summary
Despite expectations of Republican gains, the upcoming elections may favor Democrats due to potential backlash against redistricting efforts. With key states like Virginia poised to impact the balance of power, political analysts suggest that voter anger could flip traditionally Republican strongholds. This unexpected twist could lead to a significant Democratic advantage in the House and Senate.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch·Legal AF - 3/12/2026·Mar 12, 2026
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump's approval rating on immigration has dropped dramatically from plus three to minus thirty among independents, largely due to backlash from his deportation policies. This shift highlights the importance of independent voters, who are crucial for electoral success, especially after media coverage of emotional stories surrounding immigration. Understanding this divide is essential for any political strategy moving forward.
The Megyn Kelly Show·Shock Nancy Guthrie 2013 Today Show Segment, Ben vs. Piers, and Charlie Kirk's Mission of Dialogue and Debate, with Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff | Ep. 1270·Mar 11, 2026
“… showing ID when you show up to vote. It's about the voter registration rolls, destroying them, purging them, not letting people know, and taking the rights in an algorithm put together by ICE, put together by Doge and Musk.”“… they don't tell them until Election Day. And you show up and you say, you're not registered anymore. You're not registered here. You're not on the rolls. And they say, I didn't know that. This is a bill that destroys the country, and it is not about showing ID when you show up to vote. It's about the voter registration rolls, destroying them, purging them, not letting people know, and taking the rights in an algorithm put together by ICE, put together by Doge and Musk.”View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump insists that Republicans should block all legislation until the SAVE Act is passed, claiming it’s crucial for their political survival. Meanwhile, critics argue that the bill will lead to mass voter disenfranchisement by purging voter rolls without proper notification. This controversial legislation raises questions about the future of voting rights in America.
The Ben Shapiro Show·Ep. 2385 - Iranian Propaganda Syndrome·Mar 11, 2026
“… that it believes it cannot win an election fair and square. It needs to steal your vote, make it hard for you to vote, set up barriers to you voting, stop you from mail-in voting, dropbox voting, limit the different paths to voting, the time period to vote, the days and hours to vote, the locations to vote, make it harder and harder and harder. Why? Because the harder they make it for you to vote, they think the less likely you are to vote. And if they limit voting, they may be able to win. Because the more people that vote, which is what the Democrats want, we want lower, we don't want …”“See terms for details. What are we watching? Let's just take a step back for a moment. We are watching a party who is so depraved, who is so criminal, that is so immoral, at least with his leadership, that it believes it cannot win an election fair and square. It needs to steal your vote, make it hard for you to vote, set up barriers to you voting, stop you from mail-in voting, dropbox voting, limit the different paths to voting, the time period to vote, the days and hours to vote, the locations to vote, make it harder and harder and harder. Why? Because the harder they make it for you to vote, they think the less likely you are to vote. And if they limit voting, they may be able to win. Because the more people that vote, which is what the Democrats want, we want lower, we don't want fraud, we just want lower barriers to entry, right? Dropbox voting, absentee voting, early voting, early dropbox voting, right? Overseas ballot voting, extended hours for early voting. We want all of that because when that happens and people vote, Democrats win. So sometimes we call it suppress the vote, but it's better to think about it like they're …”View more
Ridealong summary
There’s a growing belief that certain political leaders are actively trying to suppress voter turnout to secure electoral victories. By implementing barriers to voting, they aim to limit access to the ballot box, while their opponents push for more inclusive voting methods. This discussion highlights the stark contrast in strategies between parties regarding election integrity and voter rights.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch·Trump Instantly Outmaneuvered with Troops Lawsuit·Mar 11, 2026
“… what's not in the bill. proof of citizenship to cast a vote. Again, this is something that Trump demanded earlier. It is not in the bill. No mail-in voting. As you have reported, this is something that House Republican leaders considered. There's not the support to ban it entirely, yet the president has continued to cast the bill, the version that already passed, as if this is in it. Now the new stuff. Banning trans athletes from women's sports. No gender reassignment surgeries for minors. These are things that Republicans do support. I can easily see it getting the vote. The problem is that they …”“… and has been sliced and diced by House leadership to figure out what can pass. So let's take a look at some of the provisions that are already in their mandatory ID to cast a ballot already in proof of citizenship to register to vote already in what's not in the bill. proof of citizenship to cast a vote. Again, this is something that Trump demanded earlier. It is not in the bill. No mail-in voting. As you have reported, this is something that House Republican leaders considered. There's not the support to ban it entirely, yet the president has continued to cast the bill, the version that already passed, as if this is in it. Now the new stuff. Banning trans athletes from women's sports. No gender reassignment surgeries for minors. These are things that Republicans do support. I can easily see it getting the vote. The problem is that they do include that, then they kind of lose the argument that this is fundamentally an elections bill. This can't be a Christmas tree where the president adds new ornaments that he wants, lest it undercut the message. Now, lastly, I spoke moments ago to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and asked him, given all the troubles that the Senate is having in …”View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's demands for the SAVE Act are unrealistic and risk undermining the bill's core purpose by adding unrelated provisions.
The SAVE Act's current form is unlikely to pass without significant changes, as President Trump's additional demands could undermine its focus as an elections bill.
Meet the Press·Meet the Press NOW — March 9·Mar 09, 2026
“… They had chosen Selma because while there were more black people than white people among the 29,500 people who lived in Selma, the city's voting rolls were 99% white. In 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, but the measure did not adequately address the problem of voter suppression. In Selma, a judge had stopped protests over voter registration by issuing an injunction prohibiting public gatherings of more than two people. To call attention to the crisis in her City, Amelia Boynton, a member of the Dallas County Voters League, acting with a group of local activists, traveled to …”“… their march was the shooting death of an unarmed 26-year-old, Jimmy Lee Jackson, but their journey had begun a full three years before, in 1963, when black organizers in the Dallas County Voters League launched a drive to get black voters in Selma registered. They had chosen Selma because while there were more black people than white people among the 29,500 people who lived in Selma, the city's voting rolls were 99% white. In 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, but the measure did not adequately address the problem of voter suppression. In Selma, a judge had stopped protests over voter registration by issuing an injunction prohibiting public gatherings of more than two people. To call attention to the crisis in her City, Amelia Boynton, a member of the Dallas County Voters League, acting with a group of local activists, traveled to Birmingham to invite the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. to the city. King had become a household name after delivering his I Have a Dream speech at the 1963 March on Washington, and his presence would bring national attention to Selma's struggle. King and other prominent members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC, arrived in …”View more
Ridealong summary
Jesse Jackson's activism in Selma helped ignite a movement for voting rights that changed America. In March 1965, after the tragic death of Jimmy Lee Jackson, he joined Martin Luther King Jr. and thousands of others to march for justice across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, facing brutal police violence. This pivotal moment drew national attention to the struggle against voter suppression and solidified Jackson's place in civil rights history.
Letters from an American·Remembering Reverend Jesse Jackson·Mar 08, 2026
“… yeah his thing was remember i'm concerned only with what affects aldean so he's like there's no way i would try to get all you people down there voting too because that makes my vote worth less that's fair i don't trust you they're realist a cold you know clear-eyed realist i feel like i've heard other stories about that teacher i feel like he made an impact did you ever trade a shotgun to him or no that was a different guy but that's also a very good story very good story that's back in the old days man the good old days we're in the good old days right now no i didn't say good days i said …”“… to encourage people to go register to vote and help him get registered to vote what did he teach i can't remember government or whatever something like that anyways i just remember him saying why would i want to dilute my vote with you people's vote yeah his thing was remember i'm concerned only with what affects aldean so he's like there's no way i would try to get all you people down there voting too because that makes my vote worth less that's fair i don't trust you they're realist a cold you know clear-eyed realist i feel like i've heard other stories about that teacher i feel like he made an impact did you ever trade a shotgun to him or no that was a different guy but that's also a very good story very good story that's back in the old days man the good old days we're in the good old days right now no i didn't say good days i said the old days old days i was gonna say i always like this is my one of my favorite stories i'll just tell just remind people when they i remember them saying hey you know what this isn't whatever high school yeah them going you know what no more guns at school and I thought well that's not gonna work and I remember going down I'm not kidding I go to …”View more
Ridealong summary
A high school teacher named Al De Young shocked his students by declaring he wouldn’t want to dilute his vote with theirs, highlighting a stark distrust in his peers. This story reflects a unique perspective on voting and personal interests, showcasing how one person's realism can shape their beliefs. His memorable stance emphasizes the complexities of civic engagement and the varying attitudes toward participation in democracy.
The MeatEater Podcast·Ep. 840: The Grand Finale Extravaganza | MeatEater Radio Live!·Mar 06, 2026
“… fan vote. Y'all know what's go put eyes on it. And I ain't gonna lie to you. I don't even know how y'all did y'all y'all y'all, uh, y'all pro bowl voting. But when I first got, when I first got to the stillers, I'm gonna keep it a buck with you. Okay. So when I first got there and you know, I got a chance that I was doing my first, you know, pro bowl voting. Yeah. You know, I get into there, you know, you're going to the meeting and with power, you know, if you, if you, uh, five minutes earlier, you ain't got never worried about being late. So I was afraid of being late. I was young. So I got in …”“I think it done turned into more of a popularity contest. Like I said, I'm not mad at it either. The, you know, the NFL, they want eyes on it. What's going to put eyes on like y'all looking at the fan vote. Y'all know what's go put eyes on it. And I ain't gonna lie to you. I don't even know how y'all did y'all y'all y'all, uh, y'all pro bowl voting. But when I first got, when I first got to the stillers, I'm gonna keep it a buck with you. Okay. So when I first got there and you know, I got a chance that I was doing my first, you know, pro bowl voting. Yeah. You know, I get into there, you know, you're going to the meeting and with power, you know, if you, if you, uh, five minutes earlier, you ain't got never worried about being late. So I was afraid of being late. I was young. So I got in there early. Right. So I grabbed my paper. Starting to look at the sheets, you know, they got the sheet and I'm starting to like, you know, pick guys, whatever. And as I started doing that, you know, everybody else started coming in and then everybody else started coming in. You got one, you got one person that went to the board. So the board, and …”View more
Ridealong summary
Pro Bowl voting has devolved into a popularity contest, where players vote for backups to increase their chances of getting selected. This flawed system not only affects current players but also impacts Hall of Fame selections, as biases and personal relationships influence votes. The human element in voting leads to inconsistencies and overlooked legends in the sport.
Club Shay Shay·Deebo & Joe - Shedeur named Pro Bowler?! Who will coach the Browns? Joe Brady named Bills next HC·Jan 27, 2026
“… votes last night. I love the player votes. The players, some take it very seriously and some apparently do not. Yeah. So which of the player voting results did you want to bring up first? I gotta, I gotta get one that jumps off the page. Here we go. While you're setting this up, while you're setting this up, one of the classic political science quotes of all time is the best argument against democracy is a 30 second conversation with an average voter. You know what? Let's just steer clear of, don't get me fired up. I just enjoyed the, so they organize it, player rank, media rank, fan rank. …”“… be honest about it. Right. Merit-based. He's not there. He's a top four player in Los Angeles in this conversation, maybe. So dude, it's tough. And I want to give you a platform here for your listeners because you texted me a startling stat about All-Star votes last night. I love the player votes. The players, some take it very seriously and some apparently do not. Yeah. So which of the player voting results did you want to bring up first? I gotta, I gotta get one that jumps off the page. Here we go. While you're setting this up, while you're setting this up, one of the classic political science quotes of all time is the best argument against democracy is a 30 second conversation with an average voter. You know what? Let's just steer clear of, don't get me fired up. I just enjoyed the, so they organize it, player rank, media rank, fan rank. I enjoyed that the players ranked Lucas sixth, which was, I thought was very interesting in the Western Conference voting. Steph was actually two in the Western Conference voting and KD were four and five, both over Luca. I found that interesting. And then look, the rankings, there's like a bunch of people tied for spots, but it's just like Shen …”View more
Ridealong summary
Alperen Şengün ranks 32nd in player voting for the NBA All-Star game, which is shocking given his talent. In contrast, players like Julius Randle and John Morant are ranked higher despite less impressive seasons. This discrepancy raises questions about how players perceive performance and whether fan or media votes align more closely with actual talent.
The Zach Lowe Show·The Knicks May Have a KAT Problem. Plus, Butler Injury Aftermath and Trade Deadline Preview.·Jan 20, 2026
“The man said that his attacker stripped him naked, beat him, zip tied his genitalia, an account that was corroborated by family members and rights activists who were also beaten. And I mean, their family, the children, they were all beaten by these settlers. They sexually humiliated him in front of the entire family. The only one who escaped unscathed was a young, you know, several month old baby because she was like hidden and slept through it. What a miracle. But everybody else was assaulted by these settlers. And listen to this. They also stole the family's 400 sheep, its entire …”“The man said that his attacker stripped him naked, beat him, zip tied his genitalia, an account that was corroborated by family members and rights activists who were also beaten. And I mean, their family, the children, they were all beaten by these settlers. They sexually humiliated him in front of the entire family. The only one who escaped unscathed was a young, you know, several month old baby because she was like hidden and slept through it. What a miracle. But everybody else was assaulted by these settlers. And listen to this. They also stole the family's 400 sheep, its entire livelihood, along with wedding rings, other jewelry, cell phones, cash and identification papers. Has there been any punishment? Not currently. Now, ask yourself, just ask yourself, let's say the roles were reversed. Oh, yeah. Let's say it was a Palestinian who did this to an Israeli. Every mainstream media outlet would cover it. It'd be all over the …”View more
Ridealong summary
In a shocking account, a Palestinian man's brutal assault by settlers reveals a disturbing pattern of violence that often goes unreported. Despite corroboration from family and rights activists, mainstream media largely overlooks these incidents, highlighting a bias in coverage compared to similar acts against Israelis. This raises critical questions about the role of journalists and politicians in addressing ongoing violence in the West Bank.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar·3/24/26: Israel Pushes Lebanon Annexation, Airport Chaos, AI Bubble Collapse·Mar 24, 2026
“And to me, that's that's even crazier than the MAGA position. The conservative majority Supreme Court appears ready to overturn a mail in voting law in Mississippi. And if they do, it could end up upend voting in time for this year's midterm elections. The conservative justices expressed skepticism over the existing state law that validates ballots postmarked by Election Day and received up to five business days later. That law is being challenged by the Republican National Committee, and a ruling in its favor in this case would make voting harder in this year's elections and all future …”“And to me, that's that's even crazier than the MAGA position. The conservative majority Supreme Court appears ready to overturn a mail in voting law in Mississippi. And if they do, it could end up upend voting in time for this year's midterm elections. The conservative justices expressed skepticism over the existing state law that validates ballots postmarked by Election Day and received up to five business days later. That law is being challenged by the Republican National Committee, and a ruling in its favor in this case would make voting harder in this year's elections and all future elections in 14 states, three territories, as well as our nation's capital. The justices did raise concerns today about the practical implications of changing the law so close to the midterms and how it would hurt overseas and military voting. Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson also pushed back on the suggestion by the RNC's lawyer that we should worry …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court may overturn Mississippi's mail-in voting law, which could drastically impact the upcoming midterm elections. This law has allowed ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to five days later, and its potential repeal could complicate voting in 14 states and D.C. Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson challenged the notion that late ballots would undermine election results, highlighting the historical acceptance of such practices.
Bulwark Takes·This Is How the GOP Starts to Crack·Mar 24, 2026
“… what's happening today about uh how we stop elections from being stolen in the future tomorrow the supreme court is set to hear oral arguments in a voting rights case that is pitting Republican against Republican. In an unusual case of inter-party warfare, the case Watson versus Republican National Committee challenges a Mississippi law that allows for a grace period for election officials to count ballots postmarked by Election Day, but arriving up to five business days later. Mississippi Republican Secretary of State Michael Watson and Attorney General Lynn Fitch, whose case pushed the Dobbs …”“court let's play the clip mike i want you to opine on what's happening today about uh how we stop elections from being stolen in the future tomorrow the supreme court is set to hear oral arguments in a voting rights case that is pitting Republican against Republican. In an unusual case of inter-party warfare, the case Watson versus Republican National Committee challenges a Mississippi law that allows for a grace period for election officials to count ballots postmarked by Election Day, but arriving up to five business days later. Mississippi Republican Secretary of State Michael Watson and Attorney General Lynn Fitch, whose case pushed the Dobbs case that overturned Roe, are defending Mississippi's law, which passed Mississippi's Republican supermajority legislature by a vote of 118 yays to one lone dissent. But will the people be damned, at least when it comes to this RNC, backed by the White House and Justice Department, who argue that ballots must be received before the end of Election …”View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court is set to hear a pivotal case tomorrow that could redefine how elections are conducted in Mississippi. The case, Watson vs. Republican National Committee, challenges a law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted for five additional days, stirring controversy among Republicans themselves. As state officials defend this law, the RNC argues for stricter rules, igniting a fierce debate over election integrity and the future of voting rights.
Bannon`s War Room·Episode 5238: Markets Shift As Talks With Iran Begin·Mar 23, 2026
“… this false idol is finally toppling. My only hope is that he is not replaced by another. Chavez has long been celebrated as a symbol of the civil rights era and as a champion of labor unions in America. He co-founded the United Farm Workers Union to fight for better condition for migrant laborers. But in truth, he exploited the very people he claimed to protect, while tying Mexican Americans to socialist ideology, which is of course what the Democrats want. He carefully crafted a public image as a family man devoted to Catholic social teaching, But the reality was much darker. Chavez's …”“… was presented as the figurehead for Mexican Americans, a symbol we were expected to revere. But he represented a collectivist ideology that perpetuated ethnic tribalism. After the New York Times broke the story of his sexual abuse of young girls, this false idol is finally toppling. My only hope is that he is not replaced by another. Chavez has long been celebrated as a symbol of the civil rights era and as a champion of labor unions in America. He co-founded the United Farm Workers Union to fight for better condition for migrant laborers. But in truth, he exploited the very people he claimed to protect, while tying Mexican Americans to socialist ideology, which is of course what the Democrats want. He carefully crafted a public image as a family man devoted to Catholic social teaching, But the reality was much darker. Chavez's philosophy echoes Marxist rhetoric about the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. At a UFW convention in 1981, Chavez proclaimed, I would not take one cup of coffee from a grower, and he means a farmer. There's not a good one. I hate them. A few presents, a little talk, then the noose. That's how capitalism works. This is the hero of the left. It isn't just …”View more
Ridealong summary
Cesar Chavez's legacy is marred by allegations of sexual misconduct, revealing a darker reality behind his public image as a civil rights hero.
Verdict with Ted Cruz·The Case is Made on the SAA, When the Bible Becomes a Campaign Prop and a Liberal Icon César Chávez Week In Review·Mar 21, 2026
Ridealong summary
The SAVE America Act is being blocked by Democrats who allegedly aim to undermine constitutional voting requirements and transform the political landscape to favor one-party rule.
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis·No Spin News - Weekend Edition - March 21, 2026·Mar 21, 2026
“… murder? I mean, I just feel like this opens a door. And if this prosecution goes forward, this opens a door so wide that it really puts reproductive rights at the most peril that they've ever been.”“… as you pointed out, is used when there is a miscarriage in order to complete the miscarriage. I'm worried also about, you know, birth control being next. Will you consider having an IUD as murder? Would you consider other forms of birth control murder? I mean, I just feel like this opens a door. And if this prosecution goes forward, this opens a door so wide that it really puts reproductive rights at the most peril that they've ever been.”View more
Ridealong summary
The prosecution of a woman for a miscarriage could open a dangerous door for reproductive rights, potentially equating common birth control methods with murder. This alarming trend is seen as a direct challenge to women's liberty to make choices about their own bodies. As the legal landscape shifts, concerns grow over the implications for mifepristone and IUDs.
“… citizens Jim Crow America it's just Jim Crow now he knows a lot about Jim Crow since his party was Jim Crow since his party did prevent blacks from voting, eligible American citizens who were black prevented them from voting, as part of the Democrat Party method of winning elections. And so they would use poll taxes, put a tax on the right to vote that was just too high for poor people, or they'd have literacy tests, or they'd have a hundred other ways of preventing people from voting. So Donald Trump says, let's go back to where we were 25 years ago. Just show your ID, voter ID, a citizen ID, a …”“… of people on the voter rolls who shouldn't be on the voter rolls. effectively that what he just said it effectively what he just said go ahead it outrageous the SAVE Act is nothing more than Jim Crow it could disenfranchise millions of American citizens Jim Crow America it's just Jim Crow now he knows a lot about Jim Crow since his party was Jim Crow since his party did prevent blacks from voting, eligible American citizens who were black prevented them from voting, as part of the Democrat Party method of winning elections. And so they would use poll taxes, put a tax on the right to vote that was just too high for poor people, or they'd have literacy tests, or they'd have a hundred other ways of preventing people from voting. So Donald Trump says, let's go back to where we were 25 years ago. Just show your ID, voter ID, a citizen ID, a driver's license with a picture. That's all. No, no, no. You see, that's like, that's like the segregationists. That's the racists. Nobody's buying this crap. nobody's buying this crap go ahead citizens we're not talking about immigrants we're talking about american citizens that are going to be kicked off the rolls no american citizens aren't …”View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE America Act is crucial to prevent Democrats from manipulating immigration and voting laws to gain power.
The SAVE Act is portrayed as a necessary measure to ensure only citizens vote, countering claims that it undermines democracy.
Mark Levin Podcast·3/11/26 - The Truth Behind Open Borders and Islamism·Mar 12, 2026
“… my boy become one scrimmage daughter and look at me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me. Where did leave dad? And these are our fundamental rights. I'm glad they addressed it that way. Yes, they're constitutionally protected. I believe our founding fathers are rolling in their grave at the thought that this would even need to be explicitly written into the Constitution that parents parent their children, not the government. But that's what's happening on so many levels, that parents are being left in the dark. Government thinks they know what's best for our kids. And if we're not willing …”“… our school district. And what happens to dads in the equation? Because you see, white liberal Karens fell for this stuff. Hollywood Karens, they fell for it. My children are transgender. It was Munchausen by proxy. My daughter wants to become a boy. my boy become one scrimmage daughter and look at me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me. Where did leave dad? And these are our fundamental rights. I'm glad they addressed it that way. Yes, they're constitutionally protected. I believe our founding fathers are rolling in their grave at the thought that this would even need to be explicitly written into the Constitution that parents parent their children, not the government. But that's what's happening on so many levels, that parents are being left in the dark. Government thinks they know what's best for our kids. And if we're not willing to go along with it, we are the enemy. In fact, there are over a dozen families here in Colorado, mostly dads, who have lost custody of their kids for not being willing to go by the transgender identity, who either lost full or partial custody of their children because they're not willing to do what the government has done in secret with their …”View more
Ridealong summary
Parents are fighting back against a system that they believe is undermining their rights and the well-being of their children. A mother shares how her daughter was influenced during a vulnerable time, leading to a lawsuit that aimed to protect parental rights in the face of government overreach. This alarming trend reveals that many fathers are losing custody for not conforming to imposed identities on their children, highlighting a deep conflict over who truly knows best for kids.
The Rob Carson Show·Media Meltdowns & a Chicago Caller Smackdown·Mar 18, 2026
Ridealong summary
Revoking Temporary Protected Status for vulnerable immigrants is not just a policy change; it's a violation of their rights. This program was designed to provide refuge for those in dire situations, and stripping it away without due process reflects a deeper issue of decency and humanity in our immigration policies. As courts weigh in, the future of hundreds of thousands hangs in the balance.
The Illegal News with Sarah Longwell·S2 Ep151: Trump’s Half-Baked Border Plan Collides With Legal Reality (w/ Andrew Weissmann)·Mar 17, 2026
“… of Hall of Fame voters. We're all human beings. We're a composite. We're an amalgamation. We all come together and reach a consensus. OK. So in voting in Hall of Fame voting as in just whatever elections. Sometimes we get it right. Sometimes we get it wrong. Sometimes we get it right. Other people think it's wrong. What have you. Now, in the case of Hall of Fame voting, since we are all human beings with differing opinions, let's take baseball first. Steroids. I vote for Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens every year until they were knocked off the ballot. Why? Because I think their steroid use did …”“Everybody is wrapped with attention to hear all the things you wanted to say while we were talking about Yanis breaking news. OK. Yeah. You have to think of Hall of Fame voters such as myself. The composite of Hall of Fame voters. We're all human beings. We're a composite. We're an amalgamation. We all come together and reach a consensus. OK. So in voting in Hall of Fame voting as in just whatever elections. Sometimes we get it right. Sometimes we get it wrong. Sometimes we get it right. Other people think it's wrong. What have you. Now, in the case of Hall of Fame voting, since we are all human beings with differing opinions, let's take baseball first. Steroids. I vote for Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens every year until they were knocked off the ballot. Why? Because I think their steroid use did not prevent them from being great players. And that's quantifiable. So other people would not vote for Barry Bonds because they're sanctimonious, because they're claiming to stand up for the integrity of the game. That's a valid opinion to them, not to me. OK. In the case of football, the Bill Belichick vote, everybody in his right mind thought …”View more
Ridealong summary
Hall of Fame voting is often subjective, influenced by personal opinions and changing perspectives. For instance, while some voters reject Barry Bonds for steroid use, others, like me, see his performance as undeniable greatness. This highlights how human biases can shape the voting process, just like my evolving taste for Brussels sprouts.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz·Postgame Show: Top 5 People Who Messed Up Their Careers In a Goofy Way·Jan 28, 2026
Ridealong summary
As Iran executes wrestlers for protesting, athletes remain silent, raising questions about their moral responsibility. With the World Cup approaching in the U.S., there's potential for political repercussions against the Iranian soccer team if the regime's actions continue. This could lead to a profound international statement against Iran's treatment of its citizens.
PBD Podcast·Trump SLAMS Israel's South Pars Strikes + Iran Executes Wrestler | PBD #763·Mar 20, 2026
Ridealong summary
The cancellation of 'The Bachelorette' season due to the Taylor Frankie Paul scandal may lead to the show airing on Hulu, which could attract more viewers than ABC.
The Viall Files·Ep1098 - The Bachelorette is Cancelled, Taylor Frankie Paul, and Age of Attraction's Leah and Vanessa·Mar 24, 2026
“… and realize that simping for billion-dollar companies that are ripping you off, stealing your data, robbing you blind and trying to take away the rights of ownership is not the thing to do. It's to band together and say, you know what, I don't accept this practice. And even if I would not buy the thing my neighbor bought, that may happen to me someday. Let's work together rather than all shit on each other as we get robbed blind. Some companies are featuring repairability as like a key selling point in their marketing. One example is the laptop manufacturer framework, which builds laptops that …”“… Or that person may have a smart TV that they didn't realize is spying on. It's like, well, what kind of moron buys a smart TV that has this? And it's like, you should have bought what I bought. And I really want to see people coalesce and come together and realize that simping for billion-dollar companies that are ripping you off, stealing your data, robbing you blind and trying to take away the rights of ownership is not the thing to do. It's to band together and say, you know what, I don't accept this practice. And even if I would not buy the thing my neighbor bought, that may happen to me someday. Let's work together rather than all shit on each other as we get robbed blind. Some companies are featuring repairability as like a key selling point in their marketing. One example is the laptop manufacturer framework, which builds laptops that are easily dissembled, upgraded and repaired. What do you think about this trend? What does it signal for the right to repair movement? The fact that they have not gone bankrupt several years in, in a very difficult and wavy economy, like I think that their products just started to become popular, right? As interest rates were soaring and all this …”View more
Ridealong summary
Repairable electronics are gaining traction as consumers demand respect from companies. Framework, a laptop manufacturer, is thriving in a low-margin industry by prioritizing repairability, signaling a shift in consumer values. This trend reflects a growing resistance against overconsumption and corporate exploitation.
Close All Tabs·The Fight for Your Right to Repair·Mar 18, 2026
Ridealong summary
Many voters feel trapped in their political choices, having voted for the current administration as a last resort. Despite frustrations with President Trump, one former supporter explains that they would still vote for him again, believing he is the only qualified option amidst a chaotic political landscape. This reflects a deep sense of disillusionment with the alternatives presented by the Democratic Party.
The Tucker Carlson Show·Tucker on the Propaganda Pawns, Bibi’s Threat to Trump, and the Great American Betrayal·Mar 12, 2026
“… to vote as people who as citizens knowing the history of our nation and the efforts that would be made to stop them even though we also passed the Voting Rights Act in the 60s which codified and gave the ability to enforce that promise in the 15th Amendment, the Supreme Court has all but gutted the Voting Rights Act. And with the pending case on the Louisiana redistricting, I think the ability even to bring a challenge claiming that such a claim is a unconstitutional poll tax or otherwise discriminatory won't be possible. So while in theory, I think you're right, Rochelle, in law,”“… that other folks who are purposely trying to be disenfranchised. Here's the problem though, Rochelle. While the 15th Amendment of the Constitution was a Reconstruction-era amendment that specifically was supposed to protect the right of Black people to vote as people who as citizens knowing the history of our nation and the efforts that would be made to stop them even though we also passed the Voting Rights Act in the 60s which codified and gave the ability to enforce that promise in the 15th Amendment, the Supreme Court has all but gutted the Voting Rights Act. And with the pending case on the Louisiana redistricting, I think the ability even to bring a challenge claiming that such a claim is a unconstitutional poll tax or otherwise discriminatory won't be possible. So while in theory, I think you're right, Rochelle, in law,”View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act's ID requirement could be seen as a modern poll tax, as it imposes costs in time and money that may disenfranchise voters, particularly in communities of color. Although the act failed to pass, its implications raise serious questions about voting rights and access in America. With the Supreme Court's weakening of the Voting Rights Act, the chances of challenging such laws are dwindling.
#SistersInLaw·285: Behind The Curtains (At Mar-A-Lago)·Mar 11, 2026
“… on this, the only thing that is the cure, the cure, the antidote to what we're watching is to vote. Overcome all of these ridiculous barriers to voting and bring your grandmother and bring your passport and bring your first grade report card Whatever it is whatever the rule that ends up being left standing in your state and make sure you not purged from the rolls based on mail-in balloting being under attack. You got time. Use the time now. Fix your own voting situation now. Then you can help others around the country get them registered. Because if the anti-Trump vote just comes out. This is …”“… in time for the midterms they're printing ballots primaries have happened right we're down to you know one hand and a couple of fingers on the other hand until the midterms. So the polling becomes real. And the only thing I can, I'll leave my rant on this, the only thing that is the cure, the cure, the antidote to what we're watching is to vote. Overcome all of these ridiculous barriers to voting and bring your grandmother and bring your passport and bring your first grade report card Whatever it is whatever the rule that ends up being left standing in your state and make sure you not purged from the rolls based on mail-in balloting being under attack. You got time. Use the time now. Fix your own voting situation now. Then you can help others around the country get them registered. Because if the anti-Trump vote just comes out. This is going to be a wave election that's going to wipe clean and send all of the House packing, put the Democrats back in power in the House and the Senate and set up for a 2028 presidential race. So no more hand-wringing, right? What's the line that I heard a lot of my attorney generals use when I interviewed them? If your hands are busy doing …”View more
Ridealong summary
The only antidote to Donald Trump's chaotic administration is to vote. With midterms approaching, it's crucial for Americans to overcome barriers and ensure they are registered and ready to participate. If anti-Trump voters mobilize in large numbers, it could lead to a significant shift in power in Congress.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch·Legal AF 3/7/2026·Mar 08, 2026
Ridealong summary
A court ruling now mandates that men must be allowed in women's spaces, like the Olympus Spa, a women-only nude spa in Washington state. This controversial decision raises concerns about women's safety and privacy, prompting discussions on legislative measures to protect women's spaces. The implications of this ruling highlight a growing tension between gender identity rights and women's rights.