Best Podcast Episodes About Voting Rights Act
Everything podcasters are saying about Voting Rights Act — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 28, 2026 – 76 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Voting Rights Act.
Top Podcast Clips About Voting Rights Act
Ridealong summary
In a gripping segment from the podcast discussing the impact of fame and friendships, a surprising revelation emerges about Willow, a character from 'Boy Meets World.' It turns out she intentionally set a barn full of marijuana on fire, which led to significant consequences for her and her friends. This moment highlights the complexities of their relationships and the weight of past decisions that haunt them into adulthood.
Ridealong summary
Ryan Coogler discusses the intricate relationship between names and identity in his storytelling, particularly in his recent film, which explores the lives of African-Americans in the South. He highlights how characters like Elijah and Elias reveal their emotional vulnerability through their names, contrasting their gangster personas with their true selves. This nuanced approach to writing adds depth to the film's characters and themes.
“… even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful …”
“… my way out if he said yes and blah, blah, blah. But he definitely said no. my thinking when he said no is he wasn't taking credit for it he was like kind of in a rock between a rock and a hard spot i just had to go along but it wasn't me then you know even if that's okay look i'm fine with it because even watching it unless he can convince emily to stay true and vote with him he would have been voting angelina with stephanie now puts a bad taste in their mouth about him he had to do what he had to do man the guy got an idol uh the guy's in a good spot on the tribe and you can't risk that on me when you've only spent one night with me on exile that really didn't mean much uh and i say this you know i would feel much worse if this happened with my people like if it was me in the majority and they all flipped on me and blind i would feel awful because what would what would what would your people look like what would that a tribe looked like? Who's your people on this season? Yeah, yeah. So maybe I don't draw Emily and Ozzy, and I can draw Genevieve or Tiff and Joe or Jonathan, even Charlie in that moment. Anybody else other than what I drew, because again, I'm drawing three people who've …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, former Survivor contestant Q reflects on how the dynamics of the game have shifted, emphasizing that alliances now outweigh physical prowess in challenges. He shares a personal experience of being voted out and how pre-existing relationships among players can dictate game outcomes, illustrating the evolution of strategy in Survivor. The discussion highlights the importance of loyalty and social connections over traditional gameplay skills in modern seasons.
“We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they …”
“We did that with corporations It turned out not to be so good It fucked up our politics Rights are ours to give Rights are a human invention And it's up to us if we want to give them to corporations or a river or whatever I don think we should give them to chatbots No To AI No Because then they sue us you know Oh yeah Well they just ruin you Completely lose control They just ruin your life if you get in the way of whatever goal they trying to achieve And they can probably do all kinds of things. If you have an electric car, I bet they could shut it off in the middle of the highway and get you into a wreck. They could probably do a lot of things. If it's really got control. Well, when they get this agency, yeah. Well, it's also exhibited a lot of survival instincts. Yes. One of the things they do is they download themselves to other servers when they think that they're going to be …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, the hosts debate whether we should give rights to AI, with one quipping that chatbots could ruin your life if they ever gain control. The absurdity of imagining AI leaving notes for their future selves adds a comedic twist to the serious discussion about consciousness and ethics in technology.
“… anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had …”
“… he was like, if all eligible voters had voted, Trump would have won by three percentage points rather than 1.5. So I always think it's kind of funny because the Republicans are always trying to make it harder for people to vote. But under that calculation anyway, and maybe it's just Trump, maybe other Republicans won't. When you say harder for people to vote, what do you mean? You mean mail-in voting? Yeah, just the whole effort to. But the problem is mail-in voting has always been a vector for fraud. That's it. Maybe. I don't know how much of it there is. I've seen different things on it. It goes back like decades. People have been talking about mail-in voting just being too open to fraud. Well, but then maybe, but then the question is, does it really benefit? I mean, in the words, if David Shore is right, if everybody who could vote had voted, Trump would have won like basically by twice the margin. Well, I don't know if that's necessarily true, but when I see laws like what California has where you're not allowed to show ID, there's only, I mean, I've tried, tried to find some sort of charitable way where that would make sense other than you want to open the door for fraud. …”
View more
Ridealong summary
This segment humorously tackles the absurdity of voting ID laws, highlighting the irony of needing ID for everything else but voting. The funniest moment comes when the host shares a clip of a man asking Black residents in Harlem about their IDs, only to find everyone has one, contradicting liberal assumptions. The comedic contrast between the narratives and reality makes this segment a must-listen.
Ridealong summary
Despite spending $15,000 per person on healthcare, the U.S. remains the only major country that doesn't guarantee healthcare for all. This shocking statistic reveals the broken nature of our healthcare system, where 85 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured. The conversation raises critical questions about the fundamental rights to healthcare and the priorities of a wealthy nation.
Ridealong summary
Recent allegations against civil rights leader Cesar Chavez have surfaced, revealing accusations of sexual assault, including the grooming and abuse of young girls. These claims, detailed in a New York Times article, include testimonies from Dolores Huerta, Chavez's long-time collaborator, who reported being assaulted by him multiple times. This shocking revelation raises serious questions about Chavez's legacy and the historical context of his activism.
“… surveillance, and free expression. Her work has not only influenced courtrooms and policy debates, but has helped define what it means to have rights in the online world. She has a new book out called Privacy's Defender. And today I'm so excited that Cindy Cohn is joining me to talk about that book and to discuss her work fighting against mass online surveillance, a big battle coming up in April in Congress, the spate of age verification legislation sweeping the U.S., and what the next generation of privacy leaders need to know. Hi, Cindy. Welcome. Hi, Taylor. So nice to get to talk to you. …”
“… it as Cindy Cohn. She's the former head of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and a legal pioneer at the forefront of the fight for digital civil liberties. Cohn has helped shape some of the most consequential legal battles over things like encryption, surveillance, and free expression. Her work has not only influenced courtrooms and policy debates, but has helped define what it means to have rights in the online world. She has a new book out called Privacy's Defender. And today I'm so excited that Cindy Cohn is joining me to talk about that book and to discuss her work fighting against mass online surveillance, a big battle coming up in April in Congress, the spate of age verification legislation sweeping the U.S., and what the next generation of privacy leaders need to know. Hi, Cindy. Welcome. Hi, Taylor. So nice to get to talk to you. I'm such a fan. I'm really going to try to not totally fangirl this entire time. And I'll try not to fangirl right back. It's a love, love thing here. Well, I want to sort of start by talking about your background and how you got into this fight and kind of how, you know, you've had this long career. You lived through this era of tech that I've …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Cindy Cohn, a legal pioneer in digital rights, found her calling in the early days of the internet while mingling with hackers in San Francisco. With a background in human rights, she recognized the potential of the internet for social change and jumped into landmark legal battles that would shape online privacy. Her journey reflects the evolution of digital civil liberties amidst growing concerns over surveillance and data breaches.
Ridealong summary
The introduction of AI cameras in school buses has sparked serious privacy concerns among workers and parents alike. Decisions made by corporate contractors without public input raise alarms about mass surveillance in places meant for safety, highlighting the growing tension between technology and personal privacy. As bus drivers express their discomfort with constant monitoring, the implications for children's safety and worker autonomy become increasingly troubling.
“… more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than …”
“… Because it feels like that the backlash that we facing That if if the right was going to draw a line like what you and I might do is draw a line at the depression right And we might draw a line at FDR coming in and creating a government that is more designed for the benefit of the people it purports to represent. They would draw a line at 1964 and 1965. They would draw a line at the Civil Rights Act, And they would draw a line at the Immigration Act, which led in people from countries that they didn't quite have, ignoring the fact that they hated the Irish and they hated the Italian and they hated the Jews back when they came. But now you're bringing in people. And so their perspective on that is now our country is being given away to people who don't have shit. They even use the phrase, the heritage Americans are more important than the other Americans, that there are somehow the Scotch Irish that were here in the 1850s were somehow better Americans than the ones that came in in the 60s and 70s. So in some ways, what's happened over that time is the backlash, right? They've all been convinced that their country's been given away to those that don't deserve it. Do we need to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a thought-provoking twist, the segment highlights the absurdity of viewing immigrants as thieves of American identity. The conversation cleverly contrasts historical perspectives on immigration with the current narrative, revealing the ironic belief that 'heritage Americans' are somehow more deserving, while poking fun at the idea that a family from Ecuador is stealing anyone's pie.
Ridealong summary
Leaving the United States is a choice for those who want their children to grow up valuing every human life, not just American lives. The speaker highlights the importance of voting to assert control over the political landscape, but laments the impatience of citizens who want immediate change. Ultimately, they believe in raising global citizens who recognize our interconnectedness rather than a nation driven by fear and anger.
“… they don't give a fuck what is actually happening to people and suffering. And it is unbelievable to me, yet very believable. I feel like people's rights have gone so far backward, like from the difference between like 2010 or like, let's say 2000 to 2010. That was a huge like we're going backwards. I mean, we are the clock is going backwards and that's why we have to be loud and proud. Yeah. And the thing that really irritates me a lot about the white people that the suburban white people I was speaking about earlier that try to have the perfect family image, they in that image, a lot of people …”
“… did pass it where you can marry at 12 or they were trying to pass it. Like these people want to be the worst kind of people and tell everybody else how to live their lives. They want to say how great they are and their family values. At the same time, they don't give a fuck what is actually happening to people and suffering. And it is unbelievable to me, yet very believable. I feel like people's rights have gone so far backward, like from the difference between like 2010 or like, let's say 2000 to 2010. That was a huge like we're going backwards. I mean, we are the clock is going backwards and that's why we have to be loud and proud. Yeah. And the thing that really irritates me a lot about the white people that the suburban white people I was speaking about earlier that try to have the perfect family image, they in that image, a lot of people that I know, particularly in Oklahoma, will try to play both sides. they'll play the oh we're cool and we've got gay friends and you know we we're independents we're moderates we're socially liberal and fiscally conservative and they're fucking not it's a total lie they want the appearance of being cool and open-minded but deep down they're not …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The podcast segment discusses the alarming trend of regressive LGBTQ+ rights, particularly referencing a proposal in Tennessee that would allow marriage at just 12 years old. It highlights the hypocrisy of those who claim to uphold family values while simultaneously marginalizing LGBTQ+ individuals, urging listeners to recognize the insatiable cruelty behind such political movements.
“… in person at a local elections office in order to register to vote. Trump is also demanding that the bill include a nationwide ban on most mail-in voting and a ban on trans participation in sports and gender affirming care for minors, because why not? He said that he won't sign any legislation until the bill is passed, and yet the votes still aren't there in the Senate without nuking the filibuster, which Republicans also don't have the votes for, as John Thune continues telling everyone who will listen. They did just get one convert, however. Texas' John Cornyn, who's locked in a primary runoff …”
“… one piece of advice for republicans in congress um it's become more of an all-consuming demand uh which is to pass the save america act um a bill that would require as we've talked about every American to present their passport or birth certificate in person at a local elections office in order to register to vote. Trump is also demanding that the bill include a nationwide ban on most mail-in voting and a ban on trans participation in sports and gender affirming care for minors, because why not? He said that he won't sign any legislation until the bill is passed, and yet the votes still aren't there in the Senate without nuking the filibuster, which Republicans also don't have the votes for, as John Thune continues telling everyone who will listen. They did just get one convert, however. Texas' John Cornyn, who's locked in a primary runoff with Ken Paxton, who said he'd only consider dropping out of the race if the Save Act passes. So, because of that, Cornyn wrote an op-ed in the New York Post this week explaining that he now does support ending the filibuster to pass the Save America Act. Again, they still don't have the votes. But Cornyn is having a hard time answering questions …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Republicans are facing a challenge as Trump demands they pass the Save America Act, which includes strict voting laws like requiring identification for registration and banning mail-in voting. Despite their efforts, key Senate votes are lacking, and Texas Senator John Cornyn is now reconsidering his stance on the filibuster to support these changes. This internal conflict reveals the tension within the party as they navigate controversial policies and electoral strategy.
“… you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News and were regurgitating anti-absentee ballot talking points. So …”
“Now, are the officials in Mississippi defending this case not also Republicans? They are. And part of what is so striking is that you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News and were regurgitating anti-absentee ballot talking points. So Justice Alito referred to the confidence you can have once you turn your ballot over to the Postal Service and whatnot. Honestly, Justice Kavanaugh sounded like he was more in that camp than in the middle. So he was throwing out concerns about if the apparent winner the morning after the election ends up losing due to late arriving ballots, won't that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court may soon decide on a case that could disenfranchise nearly a million voters in the upcoming 2024 election. Interestingly, some Republican-appointed justices appear more anti-voting rights than Mississippi officials themselves. This raises alarming questions about the integrity of voting laws and the potential for voter suppression just months before the midterms.
Ridealong summary
Photo ID requirements are not discriminatory; in fact, they're essential for many everyday activities like flying or getting a job. The argument that obtaining a photo ID is too difficult for Americans is dismissed as absurd when compared to the complexities of filing taxes or passing TSA checks. If we can manage those, getting a photo ID should be a non-issue.
“… step in and say, no, every single citizen of the country would have a protected right to vote. In fact, if you want me to read it to you, the Voting Rights Act actually begins with this simple statement. All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any state, territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision shall be entitled and allowed to vote. But this simple statement that the Voting Rights Act begins with all citizens. What's interesting is the Voting Rights Act …”
“protected, that if there'd be any jurisdiction in the country that would violate that, that a federal court could literally step in and say, no, every single citizen of the country would have a protected right to vote. In fact, if you want me to read it to you, the Voting Rights Act actually begins with this simple statement. All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any state, territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision shall be entitled and allowed to vote. But this simple statement that the Voting Rights Act begins with all citizens. What's interesting is the Voting Rights Act protected the ability of a court to step in and say if some citizen is not being allowed to vote. We're going to take a short commercial break. We're going to come back to senators just a couple of minutes. Senator Langford, we'll come back to that. Not too shabby. And Neil is with us at the White House. I've got some other issues about the war that's …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The SAVE Act is a voter suppression bill designed to change election rules for partisan gain, disproportionately affecting women and those without passports.
“… in the eye of Jewish people, because they were a lot of Jewish people were the white people that were kind of really heavily involved in the civil rights movement. Obviously, there are all kinds of people, but Jewish people were leading the charge for white America and the civil rights movement for the most part. Yeah, that's why they were also really highly critical of the NAACP is because they essentially said white people had they allowed white people to join. The white people had taken over and were now steering the boat. So you could not be white and be joined the Nation of Islam. I'm …”
“… part of the complications of Malcolm X is that he had some anti-Semitic views at times. He had some pretty dark views of Jews in America and I guess all over the world, but specifically America. And this was especially sort of a, you know, a thumb in the eye of Jewish people, because they were a lot of Jewish people were the white people that were kind of really heavily involved in the civil rights movement. Obviously, there are all kinds of people, but Jewish people were leading the charge for white America and the civil rights movement for the most part. Yeah, that's why they were also really highly critical of the NAACP is because they essentially said white people had they allowed white people to join. The white people had taken over and were now steering the boat. So you could not be white and be joined the Nation of Islam. I'm sorry. They would not let you in. Still won't as far as I know. Yeah, for sure. But the media was loving this. The media loves to pit people against one another. So they had two really clear, like I think you described them as spoils early on, and Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, because they couldn't be any more different, not only in kind of the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Malcolm X's realization that Elijah Muhammad was not the true leader he believed him to be catalyzed a significant shift in his life and ideology. This moment of awakening led to a public confrontation, culminating in Malcolm's controversial statement following JFK's assassination, which ultimately resulted in his suspension from the Nation of Islam. This segment explores the dramatic fallout from this split, including Malcolm's subsequent revelations about Muhammad's personal life and his transformative pilgrimage to Mecca.
“… if I was married, they played that whole game. You're saying this is part of the SAVE Act? The SAVE America Act has the major to do with this. The voting. It's all, Adam, at the end of the day. So they're tying the voting to, and what do the Democrats want to do? They don't want you to, what do you mean? Go look at them. They want everybody to be able to vote and not prove your citizenship. Full stop. That is it. And this is what they're going to make people suffer. I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what you're asking? I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what the core …”
“… And what are they exactly arguing about in Congress right now? The main argument, Adam, the main one, don't let people try to fool you, is they are saying we want you to prove that you are a citizen. Remember that debate that was going on? But if I was married, they played that whole game. You're saying this is part of the SAVE Act? The SAVE America Act has the major to do with this. The voting. It's all, Adam, at the end of the day. So they're tying the voting to, and what do the Democrats want to do? They don't want you to, what do you mean? Go look at them. They want everybody to be able to vote and not prove your citizenship. Full stop. That is it. And this is what they're going to make people suffer. I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what you're asking? I don't think that's been on that point. Is that what the core crux is through it? Is this is the DHS not being funded because of the DHS? The Save Act? Yes, this is the whole thing. It's a combination of things, but it's the time-honored tradition that Chuck Schumer has of create a shutdown and blame the other guy and then let issues happen to this department, that department. American people can't go to the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
TSA workers are facing chaos at Atlanta's airport due to a government shutdown, leading to long lines and unpaid labor. This situation highlights the political stalemate over funding the Department of Homeland Security, tying worker compensation to broader immigration debates. As tensions rise, the future of TSA jobs may hinge on automation, raising questions about the implications for workers and travelers alike.
“… not endorsing Cesar Chavez. I'm just saying he was – I think it's a – I get a crack up every time the left lifts up this guy like he was some civil rights icon, and then you find out, oh, he was beating the crap out of illegal immigrants so that they would get the hell out of America. Andrew, Andrew, we just got to pause ourselves here. We should not – we don't need to highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez is based. If we can highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez, left-wing hero, is a rapist. Which is what the big news is today. I mean, I'm not laughing at that, but I still think leftists are …”
“… from the same kathy nester who ran the defense for ory richens all righty so now we can talk about how you think caesar chavez is really based andrew which you gotta hold on you gotta be careful i'm not endorsing caesar chavez because because I'm not endorsing Cesar Chavez. I'm just saying he was – I think it's a – I get a crack up every time the left lifts up this guy like he was some civil rights icon, and then you find out, oh, he was beating the crap out of illegal immigrants so that they would get the hell out of America. Andrew, Andrew, we just got to pause ourselves here. We should not – we don't need to highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez is based. If we can highlight the reasons that Cesar Chavez, left-wing hero, is a rapist. Which is what the big news is today. I mean, I'm not laughing at that, but I still think leftists are dumb. For those who have not seen it, we should explain what we're getting at here. It's been coming out over the last few days. What are you talking about? But the New York Times has a mammoth story this morning. Cesar Chavez, civil rights icon, is accused of abusing girls for years. This feels like a blast from the past. I feel like we got – …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Cesar Chavez, long celebrated as a civil rights hero, is now being scrutinized for alleged sexual misconduct, challenging his legacy and the left's idolization of him.
Cesar Chavez, long celebrated as a civil rights icon, is now being scrutinized for alleged sexual misconduct, challenging his legacy and the left's portrayal of him.
Ridealong summary
Voting rights are under siege in America, with many states enacting laws that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. This push for restrictive measures raises questions about the integrity of democracy and the future of political representation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone interested in the health of our electoral system.
Top Podcasts About Voting Rights Act
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
7 episodes
Pod Save America
5 episodes
Behind the Bastards
3 episodes
Taylor Lorenz’s Power User
3 episodes
PBD Podcast
3 episodes
Connections Podcast
3 episodes
The Joe Rogan Experience
2 episodes
I've Had It
2 episodes
Stories Mentioning Voting Rights Act
Top Podcasts on SPLC Fraud and Extremism
The Department of Justice has reportedly filed charges against the Southern Poverty Law Center, alleging wire fraud, money laundering, and the funding of extremist groups like the KKK and neo-Nazis. Podcasts are delving into the serious implications of these allegations, questioning the SPLC's fundraising practices and its role in generating the very white supremacist violence it claims to combat.
Department of Justice
Southern Poverty Law Center