Best Podcast Episodes About Midterm Elections
Everything podcasters are saying about Midterm Elections — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 80 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Midterm Elections.
Top Podcast Clips About Midterm Elections
“… Service would effectively grow under this. This order would create a big role for that agency in basically administering a big part of national elections. I wonder what you made of this, though. And do you have a sense of how this would actually work? Well, I think to start off with, to be very clear, Commerce Secretary Harald Lutnick, he has no role at the U.S. Postal Service. The U.S. Postal Service is an independent federal agency that's not part of the Commerce Department. But Secretary Lutnick has talked a lot about the Postal Service, especially during the first year of the second Trump …”
“… at first to see Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick there. And I was like, why? Why is Lutnick there? And then it was very, like, quickly, very clear what was going on. One of the big parts of this order that stood out to me was that the role of the Postal Service would effectively grow under this. This order would create a big role for that agency in basically administering a big part of national elections. I wonder what you made of this, though. And do you have a sense of how this would actually work? Well, I think to start off with, to be very clear, Commerce Secretary Harald Lutnick, he has no role at the U.S. Postal Service. The U.S. Postal Service is an independent federal agency that's not part of the Commerce Department. But Secretary Lutnick has talked a lot about the Postal Service, especially during the first year of the second Trump administration and bringing up talk of potentially taking over the Postal Service and having it under the Commerce Department. You know, the thing about this order is it's basically saying the Postal Service would have to come up with lists of eligible voters, get input from states on those lists and make sure that mail ballots are only delivered to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's executive order could transform the USPS into a tool for voter eligibility control, raising alarms among postal workers. Experts argue this move undermines the Postal Service's core mission to facilitate mail delivery, particularly for ballots. With concerns about its feasibility, the order may weaponize USPS against mail-in voting.
Ridealong summary
What if RFK Jr. had survived? The political landscape could have been drastically different, with him potentially being a presidential nominee. This speculation raises questions about current candidates and the dynamics within the Republican Party, especially with figures like Ted Cruz and Lee Zeldin in the mix.
“… a sweeping executive order aimed at cracking down on mail-in voting, escalating his long-running effort to restrict voting access ahead of the 2026 midterms. Elias then states, if Trump signs an unconstitutional executive order to take over voting, we will sue. I don't bluff, and I usually win. This is going to be hotly contested. I'm sure they're going to be in court tomorrow morning. Tell me your thoughts about this executive order. President Trump had really thought this through. Number one, it was about cleaning up the voter rolls, and it was also about mail-in ballots. Your thoughts, sir? …”
“This comes from Mark Elias, a fan favorite here at the War Room. He tweets out with President Trump talking about breaking. He's expected to sign a sweeping executive order aimed at cracking down on mail-in voting, escalating his long-running effort to restrict voting access ahead of the 2026 midterms. Elias then states, if Trump signs an unconstitutional executive order to take over voting, we will sue. I don't bluff, and I usually win. This is going to be hotly contested. I'm sure they're going to be in court tomorrow morning. Tell me your thoughts about this executive order. President Trump had really thought this through. Number one, it was about cleaning up the voter rolls, and it was also about mail-in ballots. Your thoughts, sir? Yeah, immediately my thoughts turned to those judges. You know, everyone was celebrating that Trump put 232 federal district judges and appellate judges on the bench. but at least 85 of them were in blue states so that they were in some way shape or form approved by democratic senators and so the federal bench is full of so-called republican judges …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump is set to sign an executive order that aims to overhaul mail-in voting, a move that could reshape the electoral landscape ahead of the 2026 midterms. This order mandates the creation of verified voter lists and threatens states with funding cuts if they fail to comply, igniting potential legal battles with opponents like Mark Elias. The stakes are high as the nation heads into a crucial election cycle, and the implications of this order could be profound.
“… of campaigning as the role model of campaigning so the campaign was not hot at all you know and it was very hard to make people excited for the elections why i think that revealing this story was so important was because it was a reminder what Jansha is. And it was also showing like what kind of Sikh methods he's using to go to the victory. What will happen and what happened on the elections is that Gulob won for like 7000 votes. It was very intense. I should say Gulob is the incumbent, the progressive incumbent. Yes. And also, like right now, we don't know who will be the next prime minister of …”
“… like the first thing was that like people were disappointed by the government um they were disappointed by the cost of living by the housing situation by health care and also like what current government did wrongly is that they had like biden's model of campaigning as the role model of campaigning so the campaign was not hot at all you know and it was very hard to make people excited for the elections why i think that revealing this story was so important was because it was a reminder what Jansha is. And it was also showing like what kind of Sikh methods he's using to go to the victory. What will happen and what happened on the elections is that Gulob won for like 7000 votes. It was very intense. I should say Gulob is the incumbent, the progressive incumbent. Yes. And also, like right now, we don't know who will be the next prime minister of Slovenia. We know that Jansha lost in his big mission. His big mission was to get a constitutional majority. And I think this could happen without all the stuff that happened in the last week. But I think that in Slovenia right now, what would need to happen is that all the parties would need to say we are not going with Jansha. He betrayed the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a surprising turn, Slovenia's progressive incumbent, Gulob, narrowly defeated Janša, who was expected to win. With coalition talks underway and uncertainty looming, the political landscape may shift dramatically as parties grapple with the implications of Janša's controversial methods and governance. The future of Slovenia's leadership hangs in the balance as the nation awaits the next prime minister.
“… the files would violate federal privacy law, raise First Amendment concerns, and run counter to Justice Department rules meant to avoid influencing elections. From the letter, quote, the congressman has never been accused of wrongdoing in that matter, and your attempt to release the file is a transparent attempt to smear him and undermine his campaign for governor of California. Your actions threaten to expose you, others at the FBI, and the FBI itself to significant legal liability. Congressman Swalwell at a Monday press conference addressing the matter. The brave investigative revelations this …”
“… over the weekend that Director Patel quote dispatched agents to review and redact the files in a potential move to ready them for public release In a copy of the letter reviewed by the Post attorneys Sean Hecker and Norman Eisen argue releasing the files would violate federal privacy law, raise First Amendment concerns, and run counter to Justice Department rules meant to avoid influencing elections. From the letter, quote, the congressman has never been accused of wrongdoing in that matter, and your attempt to release the file is a transparent attempt to smear him and undermine his campaign for governor of California. Your actions threaten to expose you, others at the FBI, and the FBI itself to significant legal liability. Congressman Swalwell at a Monday press conference addressing the matter. The brave investigative revelations this weekend in the Washington Post and New York Times aren't just news stories. They're a diagnosis of a sickness, of a great Washington rot. They detail an effort by the federal government to manufacture deceit, to crush a campaign not with arguments, but with bruised purple fists of power. The president dreams of a servant in Sacramento, a western White …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Congressman Eric Swalwell is battling the FBI to prevent the release of files related to his past contact with a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. He claims this move is a political smear tactic aimed at undermining his campaign for California Governor, despite no accusations of wrongdoing against him. The situation raises significant concerns about federal influence in elections and the integrity of political campaigns.
“… assets, and much more. Okay, final news item, Chainlink and Anchorage Digital back the launch of crypto-aligned PAC. So ahead of the November midterm elections, backers are lining up behind a new hybrid political action committee that allows contributions directly to candidates. So guys, midterms are coming up. Anybody who's anti-crypto is going get their butt kicked again if they didn't learn their lesson in 2024. So seven months ahead of the November midterm elections, Chainlink Labs and Anchorage Digital announced that they were the founding contributors to a political action committee to support …”
“launchers, stablecoin, tokenized assets, and much more. Okay, final news item, Chainlink and Anchorage Digital back the launch of crypto-aligned PAC. So ahead of the November midterm elections, backers are lining up behind a new hybrid political action committee that allows contributions directly to candidates. So guys, midterms are coming up. Anybody who's anti-crypto is going get their butt kicked again if they didn't learn their lesson in 2024. So seven months ahead of the November midterm elections, Chainlink Labs and Anchorage Digital announced that they were the founding contributors to a political action committee to support candidates working to advance digital asset and blockchain policy in the United States. In a Monday announcement, the two crypto companies said they were supporting the Blockchain Leadership Fund, A hybrid pact that allows contributions directly to candidates as well as independent expenditures such as media buys. So it's going to be a very …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Ahead of the November midterm elections, Chainlink Labs and Anchorage Digital are launching a political action committee to support pro-crypto candidates. This new initiative aims to counteract anti-crypto sentiments and influence blockchain policy in the U.S. The Blockchain Leadership Fund will allow direct contributions to candidates and independent media expenditures, setting the stage for an impactful election season.
“… realignment. So things like winning in Arkansas and South Dakota were more possible. But yeah, I mean, in the 2008, there were people who won elections that no one thought was going to be on the table. And the other thing Nate Silver points out, because this question of can he go even lower than the 30s because his base famously very strong, very cult-like, etc. That is definitely the case. But he does point out that the level of strong approval for Trump has really fallen off. So if you ask people, you know, you can give people these options, not just approve, disapprove, but strong, …”
“… a Democratic senator? I don't think Obama won North Dakota, but he won Indiana. North Carolina. North Carolina. North Carolina. He won North Carolina. Didn't Arkansas have a Democratic senator? Yeah, I mean, part of that is because it was pre-full partisan realignment. So things like winning in Arkansas and South Dakota were more possible. But yeah, I mean, in the 2008, there were people who won elections that no one thought was going to be on the table. And the other thing Nate Silver points out, because this question of can he go even lower than the 30s because his base famously very strong, very cult-like, etc. That is definitely the case. But he does point out that the level of strong approval for Trump has really fallen off. So if you ask people, you know, you can give people these options, not just approve, disapprove, but strong, disapprove or strong, approve, weak, approve, weak, disapprove. And the strong approve has fallen from, you know, at the beginning of the term, it was at 36 percent. Now it's only 22 percent. And that's all his base going from like, yes, make America great again to being like, I think he's better than Kamala. You know, I mean, that's and that's …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's approval ratings have dropped from 36% to just 22%, signaling a potential crisis for his base as midterm elections approach. With Democrats flipping 31 seats since his election, the political landscape is shifting dramatically, reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis. This could lead to significant changes within the GOP, leaving them vulnerable and possibly in the political wilderness for years.
Ridealong summary
Abdul El-Sayed, a candidate in Michigan's tight Democratic Senate primary, is avoiding a stance on the Ayatollah's death, citing concerns for the Dearborn community. Instead, he plans to deflect questions by bringing up Donald Trump's ties to Jeffrey Epstein. This strategy reflects the radicalism within the Democratic base and could significantly impact the election's outcome.
Ridealong summary
Political action committees (PACs) are secretly funding campaigns, and it's about to get messy. In California, fraudulent hospice money is linked to campaign contributions, mirroring past corruption with Ukraine funds. As Gavin Newsom prepares for a national election, the question remains: who will back him financially amidst this chaos?
“… before the end of this term, what could it look like? Well, they must retain control of the House and the Senate, at least one of them. So these midterms really matter. These midterms really matter. if Trump is able to retain control by intimidating voters, having ballots seized by this new policy of the post office that, well, we're not going to guarantee your postage cancellation stamp will appear promptly. Yesterday he called, he said it's not mail-in voting, it's mail-in cheating. And he claimed that the United States is the only country in the world that does it, which is baloney. Absolute …”
“So what does the final consolidation of power in this particular government look like? In the next one to two, I mean, before the end of this term, what could it look like? Well, they must retain control of the House and the Senate, at least one of them. So these midterms really matter. These midterms really matter. if Trump is able to retain control by intimidating voters, having ballots seized by this new policy of the post office that, well, we're not going to guarantee your postage cancellation stamp will appear promptly. Yesterday he called, he said it's not mail-in voting, it's mail-in cheating. And he claimed that the United States is the only country in the world that does it, which is baloney. Absolute nonsense, yes. And then the post office just got a Supreme Court ruling that even if two postal workers refuse to deliver your mail to you because they're racist and they don't like your race, which is the actual case in front of them, you don't have a case. There is no requirement that the Postal Service actually deliver your mail to you. That is …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The upcoming midterm elections are crucial for Donald Trump's consolidation of power, as he seeks to intimidate voters and control Congress. With alarming policies like potential mail-in voting restrictions and threats of state violence, the stakes have never been higher. If voters don't act, they may find themselves under the risk of oppression from a Trump-led government.
“… to have we going to have to get the cyber ninjas in there to figure out exactly what went wrong And it routed through Venezuela and China sent in elections And then suddenly in 2024 no that one actually was pretty good That one Everybody forgot to do that. That one worked pretty well. And so it really does seem to be an argument of convenience. Yes, absolutely. It's an argument of convenience. I also think that another thing that's important to highlight here is just the demand for these narratives, right? In a moment in 2020, when Donald Trump had clearly lost, there was a huge demand on the …”
“And there was all this fraud. And the Democrats had rigged the election. And we going to have we going to have to get the cyber ninjas in there to figure out exactly what went wrong And it routed through Venezuela and China sent in elections And then suddenly in 2024 no that one actually was pretty good That one Everybody forgot to do that. That one worked pretty well. And so it really does seem to be an argument of convenience. Yes, absolutely. It's an argument of convenience. I also think that another thing that's important to highlight here is just the demand for these narratives, right? In a moment in 2020, when Donald Trump had clearly lost, there was a huge demand on the right for that not to be true. Once he won in 2024, that demand sort of went away, right? And so that energy was able to go elsewhere. But I think it's really important to talk about the demand side, because the algorithms, they're super important. But as Renee said, the people are what's gluing that together. And they just sort of want certain things …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, the hosts hilariously dissect the absurdity of election fraud claims, likening the quest for truth to a wild scavenger hunt involving cyber ninjas and foreign bots. The comedic twist comes when they point out how the narrative shifts depending on who’s winning, making it clear that people's desire for certain 'realities' is more powerful than the facts themselves.
“… rise over the next three years someone someone else would have to Being an Obama thing it would be like someone who would be rising in this upcoming midterm. So if there's someone like that maybe But all it takes is someone who's a compelling speaker who's not demonstrably full of shit because the thing about him is he's so vulnerable to any kind of a debate when someone starts talking about the Fraud and waste in California. How about the high-speed rail? They spent billions of dollars as well. Nothing We're gonna get it done soon, right? There's so much fraud so much waste Yeah, but I don't think …”
“… did he can he can just be like I did fine or whatever the fuck Do you think so? I think so. I've done enough to enough to run enough to probably get the nomination Do you think he's gonna get the nomination who else? Who else like someone else can rise over the next three years someone someone else would have to Being an Obama thing it would be like someone who would be rising in this upcoming midterm. So if there's someone like that maybe But all it takes is someone who's a compelling speaker who's not demonstrably full of shit because the thing about him is he's so vulnerable to any kind of a debate when someone starts talking about the Fraud and waste in California. How about the high-speed rail? They spent billions of dollars as well. Nothing We're gonna get it done soon, right? There's so much fraud so much waste Yeah, but I don't think they have anything cuz you can right now all you can run you can just run on like I'm not”
View more
Ridealong summary
Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro's tactics for rigging elections are being compared to potential manipulation in the upcoming U.S. elections. A recent analysis reveals how Maduro's regime declared victory despite evidence of a historic loss, showcasing a dangerous precedent for election integrity. This discussion highlights the implications for American democracy and the alarming parallels in political manipulation.
“… and we are already seeing record turnout. After day one, the Secretary of State's office says there was an 85% increase in voters from the last midterm election in 2018 to today. Hat tip, Christian Collins. Collins for Texas TX on X for showing us that one. That's a great catch. But I thought Chuck Schumer, who's chronically full of shit, guys should be wearing diapers all the time. You never know when all that stuff's going to come out, right? Chuck Schumer told you voter participation goes down with voter integrity measures. That's weird. That's weird. That was a newscast from Georgia where …”
“Republicans want to pass through the eye of the needle, eye of a needle. Sorry. Republicans want to make Americans pass through the eye of a needle. just to exercise your fundamental right to vote. Right now, early voting is happening across Georgia, and we are already seeing record turnout. After day one, the Secretary of State's office says there was an 85% increase in voters from the last midterm election in 2018 to today. Hat tip, Christian Collins. Collins for Texas TX on X for showing us that one. That's a great catch. But I thought Chuck Schumer, who's chronically full of shit, guys should be wearing diapers all the time. You never know when all that stuff's going to come out, right? Chuck Schumer told you voter participation goes down with voter integrity measures. That's weird. That's weird. That was a newscast from Georgia where it went up. So it's almost like they're lying. It's almost like they live in a world of ideas. Ideas. You're all racist. Black people don't know how to get a license. And then you move into reality. Hey, everybody's going to need to show a license. And then what happens? A result happens. Voter participation goes up. And it turns out the idea looks …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Despite claims that voter integrity measures suppress participation, Georgia is experiencing a record 85% increase in early voting compared to the last midterm election. This rise challenges the narrative pushed by Democrats, showcasing that when people are required to show identification, they actually turn out to vote in higher numbers. The discussion highlights the disconnect between political rhetoric and real-world voting behavior.
Ridealong summary
With Congress approval ratings plummeting to just 15%, Andrew Yang highlights a staggering disconnect between public sentiment and political action. Despite this discontent, incumbent members enjoy a 94% re-election rate, leaving many Americans feeling frustrated and disengaged from politics. Yang's insights reveal the urgent need for change in the political landscape.
“… can use what's happening with these ICE helping out at the airports. We can use this as a test case to really perfect ICE's involvement in the 2026 midterm election, sir. Yeah, I think we should have ICE agents at the polling places. If you're an American citizen, you should be happy that ICE is there because you're not going to have illegal aliens canceling out your phone. They say no ICE agents can be at a polling station. What's the trouble with that, Jessica? What's the problem if illegals aren't voting? Why can't ICE agents be at a polling station? I mean, again, you start to hear them …”
“… that Steve Bannon said about this, because sometimes they say the quiet part out loud about what is all behind this. So let's play that. We'll talk about it on the other side. One question. I want the mainstream media's head to blow up today. We can use what's happening with these ICE helping out at the airports. We can use this as a test case to really perfect ICE's involvement in the 2026 midterm election, sir. Yeah, I think we should have ICE agents at the polling places. If you're an American citizen, you should be happy that ICE is there because you're not going to have illegal aliens canceling out your phone. They say no ICE agents can be at a polling station. What's the trouble with that, Jessica? What's the problem if illegals aren't voting? Why can't ICE agents be at a polling station? I mean, again, you start to hear them circulate the same talking points over and over again. Do you think that's what this is about? I actually don't think they know what this is about. Yeah, they're literally just like the president sent ICE agents because he to to our airport, but also to other airports, because he saw somebody on Twitter that got picked up by Fox News. This guy is doing …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Steve Bannon suggests using ICE agents at polling places to prevent illegal voting, claiming it would reassure American citizens. However, the implications of this idea raise concerns about racial profiling and voter intimidation, especially given recent incidents involving ICE. The discussion highlights a broader trend of political shifts as Democrats gain ground in traditionally Republican areas, signaling a significant change in voter sentiment.
“… some big complicated tactical plan to changing government and keeping those changes, letting the concrete dry. But we have to continue to win elections or you're going to see more of this. This is Ted Cruz at the hearing the other day, the same hearing, laying out some of the stuff we had to let people go for. And there are investigations on right now that are public. It's not like nothing is happening. You can look it up yourself. It's open source. Here's Ted Cruz laying out what happened that Chris O'Leary, who I've never met before and don't care to, seems to have completely forgotten …”
“… what side they were on. This is Bezmanov level thinking here. Massive demoralization exercise. Folks, people are policy. There are no easy fixes to this. No easy fixes. We have to just keep winning. That's the only solution. I'd love to tell you there's some big complicated tactical plan to changing government and keeping those changes, letting the concrete dry. But we have to continue to win elections or you're going to see more of this. This is Ted Cruz at the hearing the other day, the same hearing, laying out some of the stuff we had to let people go for. And there are investigations on right now that are public. It's not like nothing is happening. You can look it up yourself. It's open source. Here's Ted Cruz laying out what happened that Chris O'Leary, who I've never met before and don't care to, seems to have completely forgotten about. You want to fix the place then you got to acknowledge exactly like we did that this stuff got screwed up You don't run from it pretend it didn't happen. Here's the list in case you missed it check this out Arctic frost is the culmination of a gross pattern of abuse by Democrats for partisan ends to elect and reelect a Democrat president In 2016 …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The FBI's actions during the 2016 and 2020 elections reveal a disturbing pattern of political manipulation. Ted Cruz highlights how the agency misused its power to influence election outcomes, labeling the Hunter Biden laptop story as disinformation, which has since been proven false. This alarming trend shows the need for continued electoral victories to combat such abuses of power.
“… However, Del, I just disagree that you can't be exciting and run as a kind of sensible moderate. I think you definitely can. And if you look at the elections of 2025 in New Jersey and Virginia, you had women running for governor there who did not make viral moments on social media. They did not, you know, cause a huge kerfuffle on late night comedy the way that Jordan Mamdani did in his run for mayor. And to be clear, he ran a brilliant campaign and is a skilled social media artist. They didn't have any viral moments, but they did pretty well. They won by overwhelming margins in tough states. …”
“… attacked and erased, then it is not a stance I can get behind. Hold your nose and vote blue is never going to win hearts and minds. That's from Dell. Go ahead, Matt. That's true. No one should be told to hold their nose and vote for anybody. However, Del, I just disagree that you can't be exciting and run as a kind of sensible moderate. I think you definitely can. And if you look at the elections of 2025 in New Jersey and Virginia, you had women running for governor there who did not make viral moments on social media. They did not, you know, cause a huge kerfuffle on late night comedy the way that Jordan Mamdani did in his run for mayor. And to be clear, he ran a brilliant campaign and is a skilled social media artist. They didn't have any viral moments, but they did pretty well. They won by overwhelming margins in tough states. Abigail Spanberger flipped a state from red to blue. Mike Sherrill held on to a governor seat where no party had held on for three terms in a row for 35 years. That was hard to do. And by the way, the turnout in Virginia and New Jersey relative to 2024, which is how you measure that against the last presidential, was higher than it was in New York City. …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Moderate candidates can indeed energize voters, contrary to popular belief. Despite calls for new voices, recent elections show that sensible moderates like Abigail Spanberger and Mike Sherrill have successfully mobilized support and achieved significant victories. This challenges the notion that only viral, progressive candidates can inspire enthusiasm among the electorate.
“… we agree to disagree. It doesn't mean that his, it doesn't mean either of us are bad people. We can just have civil disagreement. And then we have elections to solve those differences. And so they were always, they were always, you know, reasonable, uh, conversations. And it led us to a point where, where we said, well, uh, we agree to disagree and we'll see what the voters think. Was he angry or disappointed? I, well, again, I don't want to get into, to, um, to personal conversations, but I'll tell you this. He's, he's always been professional. Uh, he's, you know, a lifetime of services community …”
“… relationship. And, you know, we just have some differences of policy. And, you know, there are times when you could talk through those differences of policy and come up with a compromise. And then there are other times when you say, you know, we agree to disagree. It doesn't mean that his, it doesn't mean either of us are bad people. We can just have civil disagreement. And then we have elections to solve those differences. And so they were always, they were always, you know, reasonable, uh, conversations. And it led us to a point where, where we said, well, uh, we agree to disagree and we'll see what the voters think. Was he angry or disappointed? I, well, again, I don't want to get into, to, um, to personal conversations, but I'll tell you this. He's, he's always been professional. Uh, he's, you know, a lifetime of services community that I'm, I'm so grateful for. And, uh, but I don't want to get into emotional states of, you know, I think that's fair. Um, But since he decided not to run again, you haven't spoken to him? Well, I'll tell you this, Evan. I was also in Puerto Rico right after designation. I decided to visit my in-laws, have family there. So we went away for …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In Brighton, a young candidate prioritizes constituent feedback over party leaders' advice, reflecting a growing trend among younger Democrats challenging established politicians nationwide. This shift is fueled by a desire for fresh ideas and representation, as many residents are eager to hear alternative opinions. Such dynamics mirror the national landscape where younger candidates are taking on long-serving members of Congress, highlighting a significant generational shift in politics.
“… things. I mean, how does that work? How does that work politically, John? I don't understand how that works, especially if those numbers hold to the midterm elections. you leaving your safe seat in the united states senate for two and a half years of that i'm not cheering for it you know i'm dreading it but if these numbers don't change if these numbers with independence don't change by november whatever your solutions or my solutions we're not talking about our feelings if these numbers do not change by November we are going to be slaughtered at the polls slaughtered Democrats are going to”
“… Look at this. Say the Trump admin is focused on the wrong things. 60 percent overall say that the Trump administration is focused on the wrong things. Look at that. 78 percent of independents say that the Trump administration is focused on the wrong things. I mean, how does that work? How does that work politically, John? I don't understand how that works, especially if those numbers hold to the midterm elections. you leaving your safe seat in the united states senate for two and a half years of that i'm not cheering for it you know i'm dreading it but if these numbers don't change if these numbers with independence don't change by november whatever your solutions or my solutions we're not talking about our feelings if these numbers do not change by November we are going to be slaughtered at the polls slaughtered Democrats are going to”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Trump administration's staff changes, including the hypothetical firing of Pam Bondi, reflect a loss of initial enthusiasm and a focus on the wrong priorities.
“… trickle-down effect, not to mention grocery prices, et cetera, et cetera. I mean, are you hesitant to talk about sort of the impact of this for the midterms? I'm not. I'm more optimistic than JVL, I think. So do you want optimism first or pessimism? Let's have the bad news first. Okay, JV, I'll let you go, and then I'll follow. I don't know that I'm – maybe you're more optimistic than I am. So I have been – I do not have a Bloomberg terminal account myself because they're really expensive, but I have some buddies in finance. Hey, Jeremy, who have been sharing their stuff with me. And so I've been …”
“… right? Gasoline prices have increased. I don't know if that's going to be a short-term pain thing or if it's going to be temporary. But they do say that it could take weeks, even months, to open up the Strait of Hormuz. So this could have a serious trickle-down effect, not to mention grocery prices, et cetera, et cetera. I mean, are you hesitant to talk about sort of the impact of this for the midterms? I'm not. I'm more optimistic than JVL, I think. So do you want optimism first or pessimism? Let's have the bad news first. Okay, JV, I'll let you go, and then I'll follow. I don't know that I'm – maybe you're more optimistic than I am. So I have been – I do not have a Bloomberg terminal account myself because they're really expensive, but I have some buddies in finance. Hey, Jeremy, who have been sharing their stuff with me. And so I've been obsessing with all the oil futures curves. and I mean we are projected to be well over 80 a barrel out into July June like automatically we're only 30 weeks away I mean think about it there are about 30 weekends left between by the way that Barron's piece JBL said it could go up to 150 a barrel yeah I mean and you know at that point like I don't …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The ongoing war could drastically affect midterm elections by driving oil prices up to $150 a barrel, creating a logistical nightmare for the economy. Even if the conflict ended today, the repercussions would linger for months, impacting everything from gas prices to grocery bills. This uncertainty poses a significant challenge for candidates as they head into the election with only weeks to go.
Top Podcasts About Midterm Elections
Bannon`s War Room
10 episodes
The Jesse Kelly Show
7 episodes
The Dan Bongino Show
5 episodes
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
5 episodes
The MeidasTouch Podcast
5 episodes
Connections Podcast
4 episodes
Bulwark Takes
4 episodes
The NPR Politics Podcast
3 episodes
Stories Mentioning Midterm Elections
Top Podcasts on Pam Bondi's Dismissal
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been fired as part of a series of staff changes within the Trump administration. This turnover highlights ongoing shifts in the administration's personnel, which could impact its policy direction and stability.
Pam Bondi
Best Podcasts on SAVE America Act Delays
The SAVE America Act has encountered delays in the U.S. Senate as Republican lawmakers face internal disagreements. The legislation, which aims to address key economic and social issues, is stalled due to a lack of consensus among party members. This impasse highlights ongoing challenges in passing significant legislative measures in a divided political landscape.
SAVE America Act
Top Podcasts on Ken Paxton's Texas Senate Race
Ken Paxton's bold strategies in the Texas Senate runoff are reshaping the political landscape, positioning the race as a referendum on election integrity and the 'Save America Act.' With incumbent John Cornyn facing unprecedented challenges from Paxton and a potential endorsement from Trump, the stakes are high for both candidates as they navigate deep divisions within the Republican Party.
