Best Podcast Episodes About President Trump
Everything podcasters are saying about President Trump — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 33 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about President Trump.
Top Podcast Clips About President Trump
“… country and creating an anchor baby so that you can pull your illegal family into the country. So this is that xenophobia. This is that racism that Trump likes pulling on. OK, so this is something to Trump's voters. This feels wrong to them. And Trump is a brilliant culture warrior. Again, people can like me for saying it or dislike me, but he understands how to identify emotional pressure points on people. Right. The policy argument is a little bit interesting about the magnet effect, right? So what Trump's people like at the Heritage Foundation that are a little deeper intellectually than …”
“And so birthright citizenship is the most powerful symbol of that. You're coming into the country and creating an anchor baby so that you can pull your illegal family into the country. So this is that xenophobia. This is that racism that Trump likes pulling on. OK, so this is something to Trump's voters. This feels wrong to them. And Trump is a brilliant culture warrior. Again, people can like me for saying it or dislike me, but he understands how to identify emotional pressure points on people. Right. The policy argument is a little bit interesting about the magnet effect, right? So what Trump's people like at the Heritage Foundation that are a little deeper intellectually than Trump, what they would say about this is that the data is mixed, meaning that some people come for jobs and safety, but some people also come to live off of the welfare system, right? So that's the thing the heritage guys are like, hey, man, you're coming over here. You have your kid. Your kid's a citizen. He's already entitled to this. And so this is …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's review of Trump's birthright citizenship order could redefine the 14th Amendment's scope, impacting immigration policy and potentially curbing birth tourism.
The Trump administration's challenge to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment is seen as a controversial move that could redefine citizenship for children of non-citizens in the U.S.
The Supreme Court's review of birthright citizenship is a pivotal moment that could redefine immigration policy, with Trump challenging the 14th Amendment's longstanding interpretation.
“… where does she go where does she go in the private sector right he's got plenty of private sector ventures a lot of crypto money he's got that new presidential library he can make it very lucrative if you want he could but he is humiliating her and i actually i think this is this is what i'm this is my point about what's important I think for cash, I think for Tulsi, I think for a lot of these people who have been like, no, no, no, Trump's going to stand by me. This is a very rattling move for them because this is Trump now being like, no, I'm back to firing people by tweet. I'm ruining your …”
“… I don't know about this, JV. Actually we should unpack this just slightly because I was wondering about this too which is Do you fire somebody if she knows if she like a huge liability like don you keep actually that person in the tent because i think where does she go where does she go in the private sector right he's got plenty of private sector ventures a lot of crypto money he's got that new presidential library he can make it very lucrative if you want he could but he is humiliating her and i actually i think this is this is what i'm this is my point about what's important I think for cash, I think for Tulsi, I think for a lot of these people who have been like, no, no, no, Trump's going to stand by me. This is a very rattling move for them because this is Trump now being like, no, I'm back to firing people by tweet. I'm ruining your careers. I'm ruining your reputations. I'm making you hold on to all of my baggage and then I'm sending you away with it so I don't have to shoulder it myself. So I want to tell you, I am happy. This is one of the reasons I'm happy. I think it is important, genuinely important for democracy, for people in Trump's cabinet to see that Trump is still the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's recent firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi sends a chilling message to his cabinet: loyalty means nothing if you're seen as a liability. This move not only humiliates Bondi but also serves as a stark reminder to others that they could be next, reinforcing Trump's pattern of discarding those who carry his baggage. The discussion raises questions about who will be foolish enough to step into the line of fire next.
“And for good reason, because today on the show, President Trump has signed a new executive order related to voting that is already facing multiple legal challenges, which isn't entirely surprising. For months, Trump has teased on social media that he would be signing an order related to mail-in ballots. Hansi, though, can you catch us up on what Trump ultimately ended up signing on Tuesday? What was in that order? This order is basically about citizenship lists and the U.S. Postal Service. It specifically …”
“And for good reason, because today on the show, President Trump has signed a new executive order related to voting that is already facing multiple legal challenges, which isn't entirely surprising. For months, Trump has teased on social media that he would be signing an order related to mail-in ballots. Hansi, though, can you catch us up on what Trump ultimately ended up signing on Tuesday? What was in that order? This order is basically about citizenship lists and the U.S. Postal Service. It specifically calls for the Trump administration to create lists of adult U.S. citizens in each state. And states can review and suggest changes to those lists. and the Postal Service would be banned from delivering mail-in balance to anyone not on those lists. Yeah, and I mean, this is a pretty hard executive order. Would you agree with that, Hansi, to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump's new executive order on voting is already encountering multiple legal challenges, with experts deeming it unconstitutional. The order aims to create federal lists of eligible voters, but critics argue it oversteps presidential authority and violates the Constitution, sparking lawsuits from various groups. This situation underscores the ongoing battle over voting rights and election laws in the U.S.
“… about the actual timeline? Is it two to three weeks or is that just another gambit and the next phase of this war? No one will deviate from what the president says in the military. They said when you ask about a timeline, they say we're not going to talk about it. Well, the president said two to three weeks. Well, then that must be it. So we have no idea if that's actually legit. One thing that we do know is if you just kind of look at sort of the metrics here, which are relatively vague, the U.S. has hit more than 13,000 targets. The Israelis have hit thousands more. There are only so many military …”
“What are you hearing about the actual timeline? Is it two to three weeks or is that just another gambit and the next phase of this war? No one will deviate from what the president says in the military. They said when you ask about a timeline, they say we're not going to talk about it. Well, the president said two to three weeks. Well, then that must be it. So we have no idea if that's actually legit. One thing that we do know is if you just kind of look at sort of the metrics here, which are relatively vague, the U.S. has hit more than 13,000 targets. The Israelis have hit thousands more. There are only so many military targets that they went into this war planning to hit. Now, there are additional things that the president's been threatening that may not have been on the original list, things like that bridge that you just saw the video of, the electrical grid. So that could add to it. But there is a point where they will basically exhaust all of their military …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Pam Bondi's dismissal reflects President Trump's growing frustration with her handling of high-profile cases and his impatience with the Justice Department's progress.
Pam Bondi's departure from the Trump administration is seen as a predictable move within the dynamics of 'Trump world,' with her future in the private sector still aligned with supporting the president.
“… what do you make of, let's start with the Bondi report first. Yeah, so I think to understand the whole Bondi thing, you have to go back to the first Trump administration. His initial AG was Jeff Sessions, one of the first people in Congress who ever got on his side back in 2015. Trump thought he would be great. He was an immigration hawk, and he ended up being a disaster. He turned over the department to the deep state. He recused himself during the Russia hoax. And then we had Rod Rosenstein for several years. And in comes Bill Barr. So at that point, Bill Barr was maybe not the most loyal guy, …”
“… not be wavering on Tulsi because the Joe Kent thing clearly was a bee in his bonnet. But I am kind of surprised about the Pam Bondi thing because my impression of the Pam Bondi thing was she handled most of that exactly the way he wanted her to. So what do you make of, let's start with the Bondi report first. Yeah, so I think to understand the whole Bondi thing, you have to go back to the first Trump administration. His initial AG was Jeff Sessions, one of the first people in Congress who ever got on his side back in 2015. Trump thought he would be great. He was an immigration hawk, and he ended up being a disaster. He turned over the department to the deep state. He recused himself during the Russia hoax. And then we had Rod Rosenstein for several years. And in comes Bill Barr. So at that point, Bill Barr was maybe not the most loyal guy, but was seen as very, very competent He dispatched the Mueller probe and is a special counsel but then kind of fell apart at the end He didn really follow through with what he needed to do on Russiagate accountability and then ended up kind of going crazy towards the end He and Trump have a breakup So I think Trump with Bondi decided that what he …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Pam Bondi was dismissed not just for loyalty issues but due to incompetence in handling key matters like Epstein and White House meetings, which damaged Trump's administration.
Pam Bondi's dismissal reflects her failure to effectively manage the antitrust agenda and the Epstein files disclosure, leading to her being blamed for Trump's declining support.
“… It not good at all So then he gives the speech and I not going to do the whole speech again I just going to pick out small portions like when Donald Trump was like we got the cards Iran we got the cards. What cards do you have? They control the Strait of Hormuz. Here, play this clip. We have all the cards. They have none. It's very important that we keep this conflict in perspective. And then the way he described the war was blowing up Iran, the country, to the stone ages, their electrical grids, their infrastructure. It's not saying the regime. He's saying we're going to blow up the country to …”
“I mean it very strange behavior And the people there laughing and encouraging that behavior It not good at all So then he gives the speech and I not going to do the whole speech again I just going to pick out small portions like when Donald Trump was like we got the cards Iran we got the cards. What cards do you have? They control the Strait of Hormuz. Here, play this clip. We have all the cards. They have none. It's very important that we keep this conflict in perspective. And then the way he described the war was blowing up Iran, the country, to the stone ages, their electrical grids, their infrastructure. It's not saying the regime. He's saying we're going to blow up the country to the stone ages. As I've said, he sounds like like like the cartoon car, the corny bad guy cartoon characters I grew up with your play. This book, we're going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks. We're going to bring them back to the stone ages where they belong. So I'm not going to show you much more of the speech, but …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's erratic behavior and incoherent speech patterns raise serious concerns about his cognitive health and decision-making capabilities.
“… Strait of Hormuz Greg what else were you listening for and hearing or not hearing in the remarks Yeah I mean it was a couple of these verbal U that Trump made within the course of his speech last night to pick up on what Tom said about the contradictions. Of the many reasons he's giving for going to war in Iran, certainly the nuclear program was one of the top ones, if not the top one. And he devoted the first part of his speech to saying how bad, how serious and imminent the threat was. And then later on in the speech, he said, well, the most critical component, this highly enriched uranium is …”
“But they still in power and they have a stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz Greg what else were you listening for and hearing or not hearing in the remarks Yeah I mean it was a couple of these verbal U that Trump made within the course of his speech last night to pick up on what Tom said about the contradictions. Of the many reasons he's giving for going to war in Iran, certainly the nuclear program was one of the top ones, if not the top one. And he devoted the first part of his speech to saying how bad, how serious and imminent the threat was. And then later on in the speech, he said, well, the most critical component, this highly enriched uranium is buried under rubble in a mountain and it's not really that important. We can monitor this from a satellite. So is this the reason you went to war or is this something you can monitor from a satellite? He also talked again this sort of back and forth on regime change, that the Iranian leaders are the world's leading sponsors of state terrorism, that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump's recent speech about the war in Iran revealed major contradictions in his justifications for military action. He oscillated between declaring an imminent nuclear threat and downplaying it as something easily monitored from satellites. This inconsistency raises questions about the true objectives of the war and the potential consequences for gas prices and regional stability.
“… Mike, podcast listener Mike First of all, thank you for listening on the podcast Second of all, I couldn't disagree with you more I don't think that Trump is giving the Democrats scalps I think that, if anything, Clay, in this case it's Trump voters, it's MAGA who feel very annoyed about what happened with Pam Bondi I don't think there's there's not some Democrat clamoring that Trump is bending the knee to here. It's a lot of people who listen to this show who were very bothered by the way the whole Epstein files thing was handled. And also, I'll just put it to everyone this way. What's the big …”
“2.0 is imploding, guys Okay, Mike, podcast listener Mike First of all, thank you for listening on the podcast Second of all, I couldn't disagree with you more I don't think that Trump is giving the Democrats scalps I think that, if anything, Clay, in this case it's Trump voters, it's MAGA who feel very annoyed about what happened with Pam Bondi I don't think there's there's not some Democrat clamoring that Trump is bending the knee to here. It's a lot of people who listen to this show who were very bothered by the way the whole Epstein files thing was handled. And also, I'll just put it to everyone this way. What's the big win from the what's the big win from the DOJ in the last year? What's the big thing? We got big win at the border with Border Patrol. But what's the big win that they they've racked up? I mean, you could say, oh, well, law enforcement, that's really more FBI. The law enforcement agents helping out in places like Memphis and D yeah there DOJ of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's dismissal of Pam Bondi is not a concession to Democrats but a strategic move to streamline his administration.
“for the New Yorker this morning titled Trump's case for war fails to mention how to win it, among other things. it failed to mention like you know what exactly it is we doing there what the plans are for after And it was there so many WTF moments of this second presidency you know it kind of hard to rank them but but this last night was towards the top for me Yeah. And for me too, exactly. I mean, there are so many almost existential questions that Trump at this point raises, uh, for …”
“for the New Yorker this morning titled Trump's case for war fails to mention how to win it, among other things. it failed to mention like you know what exactly it is we doing there what the plans are for after And it was there so many WTF moments of this second presidency you know it kind of hard to rank them but but this last night was towards the top for me Yeah. And for me too, exactly. I mean, there are so many almost existential questions that Trump at this point raises, uh, for example, uh, you know, can everything be going according to the plan if there is no plan. Although I will, I will say, I will say that Donald Trump, he lied about literally almost everything in that speech. But a few hours before the speech, he did tell the truth when he said, I'm going to give a little speech at nine o'clock tonight. And I'm basically …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Pam Bondi's dismissal reflects Trump's preference for loyalists who aggressively pursue his political agenda, highlighting a troubling pattern in his administration's treatment of women.
“So given the fact that President Trump, two things I think ruled the markets is number one, he did leave it kind of open of whose actual responsibility is to open the Strait of Hormuz. Part of the implication, it would be the Chinese and Chinese Communist Party because he was very specific on those of you who take the oil, not those of you who produce the oil. So he got the he got, I think, the Arabs or try to get the Arabs off the hook of any obligation they have, which I think is …”
“So given the fact that President Trump, two things I think ruled the markets is number one, he did leave it kind of open of whose actual responsibility is to open the Strait of Hormuz. Part of the implication, it would be the Chinese and Chinese Communist Party because he was very specific on those of you who take the oil, not those of you who produce the oil. So he got the he got, I think, the Arabs or try to get the Arabs off the hook of any obligation they have, which I think is a huge obligation. It should be theirs. But he said those who take the oil, which is clearly Japan, the Chinese Communist Party in the NATO nations, it's your responsibility. In addition, he was very specific and used the bomb him to a stone age phrase of, I think, Curtis LeMay from the Vietnam War in talking about if he didn't get a deal. Now, I …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Following President Trump's recent speech, oil prices skyrocketed from $98 to $112 a barrel, driven by market reactions to his comments on the Strait of Hormuz. He shifted responsibility for oil security to China and NATO, leaving the Arab nations off the hook, which unsettled refiners and traders alike. This indicates a volatile market responding to geopolitical tensions rather than just speculation.
“… out of it and maybe a Nobel Prize. I don't know. Let's listen to one other clip, and this does not come from last night. This comes from last week. President Trump was asked about the idea that from the outset he had asked the Iranian people to rise up, to overthrow their leaders, to institute a democratic form of government. And he was asked a question about whether regime change. is part of the series of goals for the United States. And I want to listen to how he describes how he considers a successful move towards regime change. But let's see how they turn out. We have really regime change. You know, …”
“… BB bulldozer on Iran And that guy has devastated universities hospitals schools the food processing center in Sfahan And he's going after more and more and more. And both of them are causing all this devastation. And this man likes to get a victory out of it and maybe a Nobel Prize. I don't know. Let's listen to one other clip, and this does not come from last night. This comes from last week. President Trump was asked about the idea that from the outset he had asked the Iranian people to rise up, to overthrow their leaders, to institute a democratic form of government. And he was asked a question about whether regime change. is part of the series of goals for the United States. And I want to listen to how he describes how he considers a successful move towards regime change. But let's see how they turn out. We have really regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. And so this was, I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right? So he wants credit for regime change now because Ayatollah Khamenei is dead. I mean, there's a new Ayatollah Khamenei, I …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump boldly claimed that the U.S. has already achieved regime change in Iran, citing the deaths of key leaders. However, critics argue that this perspective is misguided and that true regime change requires more than just a shift in leadership. This discussion delves into the implications of Trump's statements and the reality of the situation in Iran.
“… think you could send them over? Oh, I'll have to ask my team. I said, you're the prime minister. You don't have. No, no, no. I have to ask my team, president. My team has to meet. We're meeting next week. Next week. But the war already started. Next week. It's not good. The war is going to be over in three days. My prediction, it turns out. By the way, do we have the greatest military ever? going to be over in three days. Well, guess what? That didn't happen. And now he's saying it's going to be over in two weeks. I don't think that's going to happen either, Sagar. Yeah. And actually, probably the …”
“… and there really is no strategy and the goals here change day to day, let's take a listen to a little bit of this leaked video where he admits he thought it would be over in three days. I said, you have two old broken down aircraft carriers. You think you could send them over? Oh, I'll have to ask my team. I said, you're the prime minister. You don't have. No, no, no. I have to ask my team, president. My team has to meet. We're meeting next week. Next week. But the war already started. Next week. It's not good. The war is going to be over in three days. My prediction, it turns out. By the way, do we have the greatest military ever? going to be over in three days. Well, guess what? That didn't happen. And now he's saying it's going to be over in two weeks. I don't think that's going to happen either, Sagar. Yeah. And actually, probably the most significant piece of video. And just to explain, basically, this was a White House Easter lunch. It was not open to the press. Obviously, though, the White House filmed the whole thing. They accidentally uploaded the whole video to YouTube for maybe only five minutes. But in that time, enough people were able to download the Phil video and so …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump predicted a swift end to military conflict, claiming it would wrap up in just three days—an assertion that proved wildly inaccurate. This unexpected prolongation of war raises serious implications for U.S. domestic policies, particularly as rising oil prices strain everyday Americans. As Trump prioritizes military spending over social programs, voters are left grappling with the consequences of this strategy.
“never to be used again, much more to follow. The Iranian social media accounts say the following, Trump directly admits to targeting civilian positions, international organizations, governments. Hasn't the time come to act against this brutality? You know, one of the things I note as well is that the Trump regime has been using this guy a lot, Barack Ravid, this Axios reporter, to try to funnel lots of the propaganda goes through Axios. And this guy, Barack Ravid, who's almost always wrong about everything. He's the guy who will be like, Donald …”
“never to be used again, much more to follow. The Iranian social media accounts say the following, Trump directly admits to targeting civilian positions, international organizations, governments. Hasn't the time come to act against this brutality? You know, one of the things I note as well is that the Trump regime has been using this guy a lot, Barack Ravid, this Axios reporter, to try to funnel lots of the propaganda goes through Axios. And this guy, Barack Ravid, who's almost always wrong about everything. He's the guy who will be like, Donald Trump says ceasefire is happening. Donald Trump says this is happening. Donald Trump says this is happening. He kind of reminds me when I used to be a litigator and I would handle sports cases, there were always those sports reporters who would like for each league, they'd be like the insider, right? There was like an NBA insider and the NFL …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump openly admits to targeting civilian positions, prompting international outcry for action against his regime's brutality. This segment reveals how Trump’s administration uses Axios reporter Barack Ravid to spread propaganda, sanitizing his war crimes while misleading the public. The discussion highlights the dangers of media complicity in matters of war and peace.
“not on day 31 or whatever day we're on now. And in a funny way, the thought bubble I was thinking the entire speech was kind of Donald Trump saying, look, I'm not exactly, I'm kind of in a box here. I'm not sure exactly how I'm going to get out of it. I'm trying out a variety of different rationales or formulas or declarations of success. I'm road testing them all today, see which one sticks. And it really was, to me, the story of the commander in chief who... weeks into this war is deeply uncertain about how it ends, in part because I think at this point, he doesn't have a clear …”
“not on day 31 or whatever day we're on now. And in a funny way, the thought bubble I was thinking the entire speech was kind of Donald Trump saying, look, I'm not exactly, I'm kind of in a box here. I'm not sure exactly how I'm going to get out of it. I'm trying out a variety of different rationales or formulas or declarations of success. I'm road testing them all today, see which one sticks. And it really was, to me, the story of the commander in chief who... weeks into this war is deeply uncertain about how it ends, in part because I think at this point, he doesn't have a clear sense of why it started, even though he's trying now to paint a coherent picture of why it started, which is reverse engineered from the kinds of things he was saying at the outset. And then, you know, the one thing I do believe really did emerge from this speech was he put his thumb on the scale on this highly enriched uranium question as you …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump's recent speech reveals his deep uncertainty about how to handle Iran's nuclear capabilities, especially regarding highly enriched uranium. With reports of U.S. bombing Iran's Esfahan facility, the administration seems to prefer monitoring from afar rather than risky ground operations. This approach raises questions about the effectiveness of current strategies to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
“And I think that, you know, a lot of it has to do with the fact that he thinks he can do anything he wants. So if you were covering President Trump, you would be skeptical of him? Well, I would be – I'm trying to be skeptical of everybody. Would you be fair to him? You know, fairness is a strange word. I think my big problem with Trump, it feels to me – and this is 60 Minutes and CBS. I kind of feel like we're in federal receivership. Well, he's a populist. He's a strong man. Yeah, exactly. And the trustees of this receivership are Trump, Ellison, and Barry Weiss. And they have said quite …”
“And I think that, you know, a lot of it has to do with the fact that he thinks he can do anything he wants. So if you were covering President Trump, you would be skeptical of him? Well, I would be – I'm trying to be skeptical of everybody. Would you be fair to him? You know, fairness is a strange word. I think my big problem with Trump, it feels to me – and this is 60 Minutes and CBS. I kind of feel like we're in federal receivership. Well, he's a populist. He's a strong man. Yeah, exactly. And the trustees of this receivership are Trump, Ellison, and Barry Weiss. And they have said quite openly that they think that they need to adjust. Yeah, they need to be fairer to him, more fair. Yeah. And I agree with that because as we talked about with Pelley and I know what I'm doing, so do you. I can see when Leslie Stahl is interviewing Trump and she says to him, well, there's no evidence of Russian collusion, you know, blah, blah, blah. …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Steve Kroft reveals the challenges of balancing skepticism and fairness when covering President Trump, contrasting it with his experience interviewing Barack Obama 17 times. He argues that the media feels pressured to adjust their approach to Trump, highlighting how interview techniques can impact public perception. This discussion sheds light on the evolving landscape of political journalism.
“All right. Today is a beautiful, beautiful day due to the breaking news that we just got. The reporting is Donald Trump has officially informed Attorney General Pam Bondi that her time is coming to an end. She is getting the Kristi Noem treatment. On top of that, we have reports that Donald Trump has been polling the advisors around him about whether or not Tulsi Gabbard, the current director of national intelligence, should be replaced. So you can paint a pretty clear picture of an administration that is in turmoil, an administration that is rapidly spiraling …”
“All right. Today is a beautiful, beautiful day due to the breaking news that we just got. The reporting is Donald Trump has officially informed Attorney General Pam Bondi that her time is coming to an end. She is getting the Kristi Noem treatment. On top of that, we have reports that Donald Trump has been polling the advisors around him about whether or not Tulsi Gabbard, the current director of national intelligence, should be replaced. So you can paint a pretty clear picture of an administration that is in turmoil, an administration that is rapidly spiraling in the polls, and Trump is starting to open the floodgates of replacement and of you're fired. It seemed like he was trying not to have a high turnover rate for the first year or so of his presidency because a huge talking point that we used after his first one is, dude, he had like a 90% turnover rate. Every single month in Donald Trump's first …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Trump administration is in turmoil, with high turnover rates and instability as evidenced by the firing of Pam Bondi and potential further dismissals.
Pam Bondi's dismissal is a consequence of her unwavering support for Trump, which ultimately undermined the credibility of the administration.
“… this down the road. So it's nothing new, guys. It's nothing new. There will be more people coming down the pipe for sure. Now, I want to go into the Trump highlights from last night. Everybody, if you didn't catch the speech, this will give it a good wrap up. Take a look. In these past four weeks, our armed forces have delivered swift, decisive, overwhelming victories on the battlefield. Obama gave them $1.7 billion in cash, green, green cash. So to those countries that can't get fuel, many of which refuse to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, we had to do it ourselves, build up some …”
“And that is the fact. And we kind of anticipated this down the road. So it's nothing new, guys. It's nothing new. There will be more people coming down the pipe for sure. Now, I want to go into the Trump highlights from last night. Everybody, if you didn't catch the speech, this will give it a good wrap up. Take a look. In these past four weeks, our armed forces have delivered swift, decisive, overwhelming victories on the battlefield. Obama gave them $1.7 billion in cash, green, green cash. So to those countries that can't get fuel, many of which refuse to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, we had to do it ourselves, build up some delayed courage, should have done it before, should have done it with us, as we asked. Go to the strait and just take it. In any event, when this conflict is over, the strait will open up naturally. It'll just open up naturally. And the gas prices will rapidly come back down. Stock prices will rapidly go back up. They haven't come down very much, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Despite President Trump's assurances, oil prices have surged past $112 a barrel, raising concerns about the U.S. economy. His speech failed to calm the market, with analysts warning that escalating prices could lead to a no-win situation for the United States. This reaction highlights the ongoing tensions and uncertainties in the global oil market.
“… man. I smacked him around pretty good when we were on Real Time with Bill Maher. Here he is with some thoughtful political analysis. Listen to me, Trump. I'm going to tell you a fat ass something. You're getting ready to get the living crap kicked out of you. You don't know because they haven't really told you. And let me tell you something. They're going to start breaking the news to you kind of gently. And you're going to sit there and wonder what it feels like to be punched in the mouth by Mike Tyson. Now, let me tell you about, let's talk about your future, your post-November future. First, …”
“And speaking of insane, James Carville, James Carville, who was once one of the most influential Democratic strategists in America. He was Bill Clinton's right hand man. I smacked him around pretty good when we were on Real Time with Bill Maher. Here he is with some thoughtful political analysis. Listen to me, Trump. I'm going to tell you a fat ass something. You're getting ready to get the living crap kicked out of you. You don't know because they haven't really told you. And let me tell you something. They're going to start breaking the news to you kind of gently. And you're going to sit there and wonder what it feels like to be punched in the mouth by Mike Tyson. Now, let me tell you about, let's talk about your future, your post-November future. First, people are not going to return your phone calls. Democrats are going to investigate you to no end Then they going to start going after you Then they going to start figuring out where all the money stolen is Then they going to go after you stupid jackass kids and their spouses and all the other bullshit that you see. And they're going to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The current system of birthright citizenship is being abused and does not make sense in its present form.
The current system of birthright citizenship is being abused and does not make sense in cases of birth tourism.
The current system of birthright citizenship is being horrifically abused and needs to be reformed to prevent exploitation by those engaging in birth tourism.
“… meantime, discussions are ongoing. All right, so he gives a timeline two to three weeks. We've heard that before. Sometimes it goes back and forth. President Trump is definitely reserving the right here to define what he sees as victory. The question, though, has remained what to do with the Strait of Hormuz. And I think that's where we're starting to get the most clarity here, SOT7. To those countries that can't get fuel, many of which refuse to get involved in the decapitation of Iran. We had to do it ourselves. I have a suggestion. Number one, buy oil from the United States of America. We have plenty. …”
“… tonight that we are on track to complete all of America's military objectives shortly, very shortly. We're going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks. We're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages where they belong. In the meantime, discussions are ongoing. All right, so he gives a timeline two to three weeks. We've heard that before. Sometimes it goes back and forth. President Trump is definitely reserving the right here to define what he sees as victory. The question, though, has remained what to do with the Strait of Hormuz. And I think that's where we're starting to get the most clarity here, SOT7. To those countries that can't get fuel, many of which refuse to get involved in the decapitation of Iran. We had to do it ourselves. I have a suggestion. Number one, buy oil from the United States of America. We have plenty. We have so much. And number two, build up some delayed courage. Should have done it before. Should have done it with us, as we asked. go to the strait and just take it, protect it, use it for yourselves. Iran has been essentially decimated. The hard part is done. So President Trump is sending a very clear signal to, I would say, France, England, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump’s latest speech on the Iran war signals a decisive shift, emphasizing a timeline for military objectives while avoiding mention of ground troops. He clearly communicates that NATO countries must take responsibility for securing the Strait of Hormuz, while asserting that the U.S. is on track to victory. This speech is a critical moment in defining how Trump views military success and international responsibility.
“Let's get somebody in there to put some people in jail, damn it. Here is the President of the United States at the prayer breakfast for Easter. I want you to listen. On Good Friday, the Son of God was nailed to the cross, crucified, and he died. For all of us, it was a day of darkness, but it wasn't the end. By any means, it was not the end. On Easter Sunday, the stone was rolled away and the grave was empty. Christians everywhere rejoiced, and we continue to rejoice. Easter is one of the incredible days. It is. It is an …”
“Let's get somebody in there to put some people in jail, damn it. Here is the President of the United States at the prayer breakfast for Easter. I want you to listen. On Good Friday, the Son of God was nailed to the cross, crucified, and he died. For all of us, it was a day of darkness, but it wasn't the end. By any means, it was not the end. On Easter Sunday, the stone was rolled away and the grave was empty. Christians everywhere rejoiced, and we continue to rejoice. Easter is one of the incredible days. It is. It is an incredible day. Erica Kirk was there. Here he is. This is the president. This is where it gets really funny. Listen to the president. As we prepare to celebrate a thing called Happy Easter. Do we have that? Everyone happy? Anybody that doesn't want to unload, dog? Wow, that's a good table. I like that table. You're doing well, right? Talking about Erica …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump humorously embraces his 'king' persona during an Easter prayer breakfast, contrasting his self-proclaimed royalty with the struggles of political life. He reflects on the significance of Easter while joking about his lack of a ballroom, showcasing his unique blend of humor and gravitas. This moment highlights the lasting impact of his presidency and his ability to entertain, even among critics.
Top Podcasts About President Trump
Bulwark Takes
3 episodes
The MeidasTouch Podcast
3 episodes
Bannon`s War Room
3 episodes
The NPR Politics Podcast
2 episodes
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
2 episodes
The Rest Is Politics: US
1 episode
Meet the Press
1 episode
The Megyn Kelly Show
1 episode
Stories Mentioning President Trump
Top Podcasts on Kristi Noem's Cross-Dressing Scandal
Bryon Noem, husband of South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, is at the center of a scandal involving cross-dressing. This situation has drawn significant media attention due to Kristi Noem's political prominence and could impact her public image and political career.
Kristi Noem
Top Podcasts on Trump's White House Ballroom
A federal judge has issued a halt on the construction of a controversial ballroom project at the White House initiated by former President Donald Trump. The decision comes amid legal challenges questioning the project's compliance with federal regulations. This ruling highlights ongoing scrutiny over Trump's post-presidency initiatives.
Top Podcasts on Pam Bondi's Dismissal
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been fired as part of a series of staff changes within the Trump administration. This turnover highlights ongoing shifts in the administration's personnel, which could impact its policy direction and stability.
Pam Bondi
Top Podcasts on Pentagon's Iran Deployment
The Pentagon is preparing for prolonged ground operations as US troops are deployed to Iran. This move signifies a significant military engagement and could have wide-ranging implications for regional stability and international relations.
Top Podcasts on US Government Shutdown
The United States is experiencing its longest government shutdown in history as a deal to fund the Department of Homeland Security collapses. The impasse affects various government operations and has significant implications for federal employees and services. The ongoing shutdown highlights political divisions and impacts the tech industry, particularly in areas reliant on government contracts.
Top Podcasts on Iran-Linked FBI Email Breach
Hackers associated with Iran have reportedly accessed the emails of FBI Director Kash Patel. This breach raises concerns about cybersecurity vulnerabilities within high-level government communications and the potential implications for national security.
Kash Patel
Top Podcasts on Trump's Health Concerns
Recent public appearances by Donald Trump have sparked concerns about his health and mental fitness. Observers noted erratic behavior, prompting discussions about his capability to continue his political activities. This situation is significant as it may impact his influence and future in politics.
Best Podcasts on Trump Protests
Large-scale "No Kings" protests have erupted across the United States, with demonstrators voicing opposition to the Trump administration's policies and perceived overreach. Podcasts are discussing the size and funding of these rallies, with some linking them to broader "color revolution" narratives and questioning the motivations and understanding of the protesters. The movement highlights growing public discontent and political polarization.
'No Kings' protests
Best Podcasts on Iran Conflict & Energy Crisis
The ongoing war with Iran is intensifying, leading to significant global repercussions including a sharp rise in oil and gas prices, with some regions seeing prices surpass $4 a gallon. Podcasts are discussing the military escalation, potential ground operations, Trump's shifting rhetoric on negotiations and threats of war crimes, and the broader economic and geopolitical fallout, including Russia's alleged involvement and allied nations' reactions.
Best Podcasts on Trump's Legal and Public Battles
Former President Donald Trump is facing criticism due to a series of political missteps and ongoing legal challenges. Additionally, protests under the banner 'No Kings' have emerged, further complicating his public image. This situation highlights the ongoing controversies surrounding Trump's influence in the political landscape.
'No Kings' protests