Best Podcast Episodes About J6 Committee
Everything podcasters are saying about J6 Committee — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 30 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about J6 Committee.
Top Podcast Clips About J6 Committee
“… so they're just not willing to challenge anybody. I'll tell you another thing. I used to be the chief investigator in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I did that from 09 to 11. And a couple of days after I started the job, these two guys came in, clearly, obviously from APAC, and they said, hey, welcome to Capitol. Hill. I said, thanks. I've worked on Capitol Hill before. We want to invite you for an all expenses paid trip to the Holy Land. They didn't say Israel. Totally. And I said, thanks, guys. I can pay for my own vacations. I'm not interested. It's all expenses paid, and we're going to …”
“… some of them are afraid of being primaried and and god knows that that apac if you are not 100 pro-israel in your voting record They will primary you and they will spend millions of dollars to defeat you. That scares most members of Congress. And so they're just not willing to challenge anybody. I'll tell you another thing. I used to be the chief investigator in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I did that from 09 to 11. And a couple of days after I started the job, these two guys came in, clearly, obviously from APAC, and they said, hey, welcome to Capitol. Hill. I said, thanks. I've worked on Capitol Hill before. We want to invite you for an all expenses paid trip to the Holy Land. They didn't say Israel. Totally. And I said, thanks, guys. I can pay for my own vacations. I'm not interested. It's all expenses paid, and we're going to take you to all the Christian holy sites. I go, guys, I'm not taking APAC's money. I'm not interested. But I don't think a single day went by where I didn't see those two. They practically had offices up there. And then individual House members say that there are APAC reps that will go to their office every day and just sit on the couch. And if …”
View more
Ridealong summary
During his first briefing as a CIA analyst, John Kiriakou encountered a shocking attempt by Israeli intelligence to recruit him, highlighting the tense dynamics between the CIA and Israeli operatives. Despite the close political ties, Kiriakou reveals that Israeli agents have been caught trying to bug CIA meetings and that many are operating undercover in the U.S. This experience left him furious and questioning the integrity of the U.S.-Israel relationship.
“… other day, 90 of our money that was going to be given to the Clean Energy Project would then be laundered into Joe Biden and the Democratic National Committee campaign coffers ahead of the 2024 election And remember when we are in the fall of 2022 people are catching on that maybe Joe Biden isn mentally all there He screwed up Afghanistan and we left there in shame. The open border has now become a crisis for American people. Young people are being killed by illegal aliens just marauding around in towns. So Joe Biden has trouble raising money because of the fact that his policies and his own …”
“… of dollars to Ukraine for a clean energy project, then move that down to non-profits. Non-profits would move it to contractors. Contractors would move it to subcontractors. And 90%, that's the exact term in the intercepts that I made public the other day, 90 of our money that was going to be given to the Clean Energy Project would then be laundered into Joe Biden and the Democratic National Committee campaign coffers ahead of the 2024 election And remember when we are in the fall of 2022 people are catching on that maybe Joe Biden isn mentally all there He screwed up Afghanistan and we left there in shame. The open border has now become a crisis for American people. Young people are being killed by illegal aliens just marauding around in towns. So Joe Biden has trouble raising money because of the fact that his policies and his own capabilities are being questioned. And it's at that moment our NSA intercepts a conversation about a plot to route hundreds of millions of our hard-earned tax dollars through a series of transactions, eventually laundering it into the Democratic Party's coffer to help them win the 2024 election. That is the story where we have it right now.”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a shocking revelation, intercepted communications reveal a plot to funnel $200-$300 million of U.S. taxpayer money to Ukraine, with 90% potentially laundered into the Democratic Party's campaign coffers ahead of the 2024 election. This scheme emerged during a time when Ukraine was under siege from Russia, raising serious questions about priorities and corruption. The story exposes a troubling intersection of foreign aid and domestic political financing.
“… point his office says contact was immediately cut off. The FBI at the time not accusing the congressman of any wrongdoing. A subsequent House Ethics Committee investigation into the matter, concluding in 2023 with no action taken against Swalwell. The Washington Post reporting over the weekend that Director Patel quote dispatched agents to review and redact the files in a potential move to ready them for public release In a copy of the letter reviewed by the Post attorneys Sean Hecker and Norman Eisen argue releasing the files would violate federal privacy law, raise First Amendment concerns, and run …”
“… at least two Midwestern mayors. Despite persistent rumors, no romantic relationship was publicly confirmed between Fang Fang and Swalwell. Authorities approaching Mr. Swalwell's office in 2015, warning of Fang's suspected ties to China, at which point his office says contact was immediately cut off. The FBI at the time not accusing the congressman of any wrongdoing. A subsequent House Ethics Committee investigation into the matter, concluding in 2023 with no action taken against Swalwell. The Washington Post reporting over the weekend that Director Patel quote dispatched agents to review and redact the files in a potential move to ready them for public release In a copy of the letter reviewed by the Post attorneys Sean Hecker and Norman Eisen argue releasing the files would violate federal privacy law, raise First Amendment concerns, and run counter to Justice Department rules meant to avoid influencing elections. From the letter, quote, the congressman has never been accused of wrongdoing in that matter, and your attempt to release the file is a transparent attempt to smear him and undermine his campaign for governor of California. Your actions threaten to expose you, others at the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Congressman Eric Swalwell is battling the FBI to prevent the release of files related to his past contact with a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. He claims this move is a political smear tactic aimed at undermining his campaign for California Governor, despite no accusations of wrongdoing against him. The situation raises significant concerns about federal influence in elections and the integrity of political campaigns.
“… everyone in certain income brackets, yes. Before we go, Evan, I did want to mention that we had legislation, my bill just passed, the Public Safety Committee that would require the Sheriff's Department to disclose when it purchases surveillance technology. You might ask why the legislature doesn't vote on those purchases. It's a long story, but we don't vote on a lot of those purchases, which are now in the form of contracts with companies such as Axon Technologies. So law enforcement purchases what they want. You don't vote on it. Not necessarily. Not unless it's part of our capital budget. The …”
“Well, that is very transparent, and it's the same for everyone in certain income brackets, yes. Before we go, Evan, I did want to mention that we had legislation, my bill just passed, the Public Safety Committee that would require the Sheriff's Department to disclose when it purchases surveillance technology. You might ask why the legislature doesn't vote on those purchases. It's a long story, but we don't vote on a lot of those purchases, which are now in the form of contracts with companies such as Axon Technologies. So law enforcement purchases what they want. You don't vote on it. Not necessarily. Not unless it's part of our capital budget. The thing is, these are now considered soft because we're not talking about physical hardware. We are in some cases, but a lot of it is software. And those are long-term contracts. The state controller doesn't consider these software contracts to be professional service contracts. I totally disagree. and I've asked the state controller to reverse that, to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
New legislation just passed requiring the Sheriff's Department to disclose purchases of surveillance technology, a move that could reshape how law enforcement uses data. This is crucial because many purchases are made without legislative oversight, often involving long-term software contracts. As concerns grow over surveillance pricing in retail, advocates urge citizens to push for stricter regulations on these practices.
“… Route it through a series of transactions, move it into the United States and launder it into Joe Biden's 2024 campaign. Wow. Democratic National Committee. Well, you know, he also got like $35 million from the Chinese Communist Party through 27 LLCs to nine of his family members. We have the intercepts for the first time. Tulsi Gabbard's team was willing to declassify them. There is now an investigation underway beginning with USAID to look at who was involved, whether any crimes were committed, and if that is the case, to refer that to the FBI in the next few days. Those declassified documents …”
“… Agency, He intercepted conversations of President Zelensky's government in Ukraine in 2022, late 2022, conspiring with federal workers at the USAID to come up with a plan to take $200 million of USAID money. That is your money, folks. Taxpayer money. Route it through a series of transactions, move it into the United States and launder it into Joe Biden's 2024 campaign. Wow. Democratic National Committee. Well, you know, he also got like $35 million from the Chinese Communist Party through 27 LLCs to nine of his family members. We have the intercepts for the first time. Tulsi Gabbard's team was willing to declassify them. There is now an investigation underway beginning with USAID to look at who was involved, whether any crimes were committed, and if that is the case, to refer that to the FBI in the next few days. Those declassified documents up at justinnews.com. You can go check about it today. Members of Congress have been clamoring all day to get their hands on the documents. It has been verified through classified documents. $200 million of U.S. aid money came back from Ukraine into the campaign coffers of Joe stinking Biden. When are people going to start being tried and thrown in …”
View more
Ridealong summary
A shocking revelation claims that $200 million of U.S. taxpayer aid to Ukraine was allegedly funneled back into Joe Biden's 2024 campaign through a series of transactions. This information comes from intercepted conversations involving Ukraine's government and USAID officials, now leading to an investigation into potential crimes. As Congress clamors for the documents, questions arise about accountability and corruption in political funding.
“Wait, what? Son of a bitch. All right. So then he goes So the election deniers you know the house flips and Jim Jordan gets his gavel and starts this committee called the I forget the proper name We just shorthand is the Weaponization Committee but it the subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee to investigate the weaponization of the federal government He decides there has been a Biden censorship regime. And even though the agencies that we engaged with during the 2020 election were run by Trump appointees, again, run by Trump appointees, that despite the fact that we were talking to state and …”
“Wait, what? Son of a bitch. All right. So then he goes So the election deniers you know the house flips and Jim Jordan gets his gavel and starts this committee called the I forget the proper name We just shorthand is the Weaponization Committee but it the subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee to investigate the weaponization of the federal government He decides there has been a Biden censorship regime. And even though the agencies that we engaged with during the 2020 election were run by Trump appointees, again, run by Trump appointees, that despite the fact that we were talking to state and local election officials and occasionally when we did speak to federal government agencies, like when the Iranians ran an influence operation pretending to be the Proud Boys, we did talk to the FBI about that because our team saw that early on. We did speak to the FBI. Trump appointees. But these are real. These are real. These are real things that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a wild twist, the segment reveals how election deniers, led by Jim Jordan, accused researchers of censorship while ironically using government power to create a spectacle. The absurdity peaks when they claim that 22 million tweets were censored, despite the researchers being transparent about their findings. It's a hilarious dive into the chaos of political narratives and the irony of weaponization from within.
“… subpoena, but also you have Indyke and Kahn, the lawyer and the accountant for Epstein testifying over the past two weeks before the House Oversight Committee, and the House Oversight Committee, at least led by the Democrats, Garcia, pushing for these hard drives that Epstein private investigators took and apparently the DOJ never looked for these hard drives What kind of chain of custody is that So we got a lot to discuss Pope on today episode Yeah I grew up in New York New Jersey as people know as you did And there used to be a phrase that referred to the subway system, which is stay away from the …”
“… the judge issued a powerful ruling. Again, another ruling of a judge calling out the Trump for behaving like a dictator, apt for no kings. We see developments in the Epstein files, which we'll talk about as well, both Pam Bondi trying to dodge that subpoena, but also you have Indyke and Kahn, the lawyer and the accountant for Epstein testifying over the past two weeks before the House Oversight Committee, and the House Oversight Committee, at least led by the Democrats, Garcia, pushing for these hard drives that Epstein private investigators took and apparently the DOJ never looked for these hard drives What kind of chain of custody is that So we got a lot to discuss Pope on today episode Yeah I grew up in New York New Jersey as people know as you did And there used to be a phrase that referred to the subway system, which is stay away from the third rail. The third rail was the electrified rail, or still is, that subways run on. And usually an administration has one third rail. I've never seen an administration that has two third rails and hold onto them as if it's going to help their sinking poll numbers or administration. One third rail is the continued cover-up and the cover-up of the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The protests against the Trump administration are a powerful rejection of authoritarianism, emphasizing a collective demand for democracy and the rule of law.
“… political foes Prosecutors are weighing whether the cost overruns amount to fraud and whether Powell gave false testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. No and no. And as, you know, top deputies in Jeanine Pirro's office admitted in court, they also don't have any evidence of any of that. But G.A. Masuko Lateef, who was recently named chief of the criminal division of the U.S. Attorney's Office in D.C. under Jeanine Pirro there, said at the March 3rd hearing that the Justice Department lawyers, quote, do not know at this time what evidence there is of fraud or criminal misconduct, arguing only …”
“… testimony on the renovation costs during a congressional hearing last year The criminal investigation followed years of criticism from Trump over the Fed handling of monetary policy and his public demands that the Justice Department target his perceived political foes Prosecutors are weighing whether the cost overruns amount to fraud and whether Powell gave false testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. No and no. And as, you know, top deputies in Jeanine Pirro's office admitted in court, they also don't have any evidence of any of that. But G.A. Masuko Lateef, who was recently named chief of the criminal division of the U.S. Attorney's Office in D.C. under Jeanine Pirro there, said at the March 3rd hearing that the Justice Department lawyers, quote, do not know at this time what evidence there is of fraud or criminal misconduct, arguing only that the project is a $1.2 billion over budget. and it just doesn't seem right. That's their argument. There are 1.2 billion reasons for us to look into it. That's what Masuko Lateef told Chief U.S. District Judge James Bosberg. Don't say that kind of dumb stuff to James Bosberg. Yeah, or how about we quote, do not know at this time. That's just, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Justice Department's investigation into the Federal Reserve's $2.5 billion renovation has been undermined by a surprising admission: they lack evidence of any wrongdoing. This revelation challenges claims made by former President Trump and raises questions about the legitimacy of the subpoenas issued during the inquiry, which were ultimately quashed by a federal judge. The DOJ's own deputy acknowledged they have no proof of fraud or false testimony, suggesting the subpoenas were more about political pressure than justice.
“… or listened to in court. The most detailed account of the call segments played in court come from notes taken by the Prairieland Defense Support Committee. The actual evidence exhibit is not yet available to be purchased on PACER. Not sure if it will be or if that'll just be after sentencing, but I tried to actually get the transcript of the call and it was not available. Des told his wife that he already talked with her mom, who she had previously called the day before. Rueda talked about feds confiscating property. FBI Special Agent Whitworth said in his opinion Rueda was concerned about the …”
“… in Denton, Texas. The government claims that Ryuda called Des from jail on July 6th, instructing him to conceal evidence. Now, we don't have access to a full transcript of this call. The full call was given to the jury, but sections of it were read or listened to in court. The most detailed account of the call segments played in court come from notes taken by the Prairieland Defense Support Committee. The actual evidence exhibit is not yet available to be purchased on PACER. Not sure if it will be or if that'll just be after sentencing, but I tried to actually get the transcript of the call and it was not available. Des told his wife that he already talked with her mom, who she had previously called the day before. Rueda talked about feds confiscating property. FBI Special Agent Whitworth said in his opinion Rueda was concerned about the evidence Rueda then voiced concern for her car parked at the 2400 block of 56th Street which had her phone stored inside This was the staging site before she went to the action. She then instructed Dez to quote-unquote, Toe it. My phone is in the back. Do what you gotta do. Just tow it. Unquote. The support committee wrote that, quote, prosecution …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a recent court case, Des Estrada and Mari Ryuda were found guilty of evidence tampering related to political zines. The government argued that their phone conversations indicated a conspiracy to conceal evidence from federal authorities, while the defense claimed they were merely discussing personal items. This segment dives into the complexities of the charges and the implications of the trial's outcome.
“… he's somebody who is clearly in this rapid decline? what's the sense of it? I mean, I saw MAGA Mike Johnson at the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee event had to like make up an award for him and literally looked, I don't know how to describe it, but like I felt I was truly watching some, I don't know, something like in a hospice care situation where the nurse was trying to help the patient remember the days where they may have gotten awards. Hey, I got an award for you. It's called the You're the Best Award, everybody and I'm like what are we doing here so what's the vibe I think …”
“… that it's hurting our country every single day. What's the vibe on Capitol Hill about that? I mean, do Republicans kind of privately talk about how bad mentally and physically it's getting? I mean, is it just kind of a known thing at this point that he's somebody who is clearly in this rapid decline? what's the sense of it? I mean, I saw MAGA Mike Johnson at the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee event had to like make up an award for him and literally looked, I don't know how to describe it, but like I felt I was truly watching some, I don't know, something like in a hospice care situation where the nurse was trying to help the patient remember the days where they may have gotten awards. Hey, I got an award for you. It's called the You're the Best Award, everybody and I'm like what are we doing here so what's the vibe I think Republicans on the Hill just try to separate Trump the person from Trump the policies but you really can because his policy positions change all the time right remember he was against any war against Iran accused Kamala Harris of being the candidate who would take us to war with Iran And now he all about war with Iran and has started one And so they try to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump's erratic behavior is causing chaos both domestically and internationally, leaving advisors and foreign leaders in disbelief. As his health declines, Republican leaders struggle to separate his erratic personality from his ever-changing policies, which ultimately impacts the entire party and the nation. This instability is why many believe Democrats must regain control to restore order.
“… you be troubled if tomorrow the Trump Department of Justice issued a subpoena for the phone records of every Democrat that sits on the Judiciary Committee? Not if it was based on factual evidence, specific and articulable facts. Well, let me be clear. I'd be damned troubled. And that would be an abuse of power. And I'm going to predict not a single Democrat is going to say even a word about the abuse of power on their side. And that double standard is troubling. Senator Lee. Senator, you're absolutely right there in the point that you were making. Yeah, it really is amazing that nobody – and by …”
“… than a fishing expedition targeting 20 percent of the Republicans in the Senate? Would you agree that's qualitatively different? I'm not familiar with the details of either investigation, so I wouldn't want to speculate. Well, let me ask you this. Would you be troubled if tomorrow the Trump Department of Justice issued a subpoena for the phone records of every Democrat that sits on the Judiciary Committee? Not if it was based on factual evidence, specific and articulable facts. Well, let me be clear. I'd be damned troubled. And that would be an abuse of power. And I'm going to predict not a single Democrat is going to say even a word about the abuse of power on their side. And that double standard is troubling. Senator Lee. Senator, you're absolutely right there in the point that you were making. Yeah, it really is amazing that nobody – and by the way, the entire hearing, the Democrats were completely silent. Like when it came their turn to question, they just said, orange man bad. They just said, we hate Donald Trump. They didn't acknowledge it. Look, one of the things that happened in Arctic Frost is not only did you have Jack Smith getting subpoenas for the phone records of 20 percent …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Arctic Frost investigation reveals shocking abuse of power, likening it to Watergate. Evidence shows that subpoenas targeted 20% of Republican senators and even included illegal wiretaps of campaign staff. This political maneuvering raises serious concerns about integrity and legal boundaries in government investigations.
“… Tulsi. Tell us about that rat cliff. Here, play this clip. I'm asking the question is, there seems to be a discrepancy between what the Intelligence Committee has, a community has reported over the years and what the president has said in terms of his, of this action. For example, Senator Wyden read the report from a year ago that strikes against neighboring states and action to close the Strait of Hormuz was predicted by the intelligence community. And yet the president says nobody knew. And my question is, did you tell him? Anybody want to answer that question?”
“… was never even conceived of that iran might strike their arab neighbors with american bases in it if america invaded iran or that iran would shut down the Hormuz? Did you not know that? Because kind of everybody knew that. So tell us about that, Tulsi. Tell us about that rat cliff. Here, play this clip. I'm asking the question is, there seems to be a discrepancy between what the Intelligence Committee has, a community has reported over the years and what the president has said in terms of his, of this action. For example, Senator Wyden read the report from a year ago that strikes against neighboring states and action to close the Strait of Hormuz was predicted by the intelligence community. And yet the president says nobody knew. And my question is, did you tell him? Anybody want to answer that question?”
View more
Ridealong summary
During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, top Trump officials like Tulsi Gabbard faced intense questioning about their intelligence briefings on Iran's military actions. They struggled to provide coherent answers, revealing discrepancies between their statements and the intelligence community's assessments, particularly regarding the threat of Iranian aggression. This cross-examination highlights the confusion and chaos surrounding U.S. military decisions in the region.
“… with Lisa, take advantage of Lisa being with us. So two major cases and a third coming up. Mail-in ballots, Watson versus the Republican National Committee. I never thought in my lifetime I'd be talking about a Mississippi case where Mississippi was defending voting rights. But we are, along with 29 other states, giving a grace period. As long as you cast mark your ballot, you elect who you want to elect, and it's postmarked by Election Day, five business day grace period or some grace period, it'll still be counted. We're not talking about fraud. We're just talking about when the mails can …”
“… breaking the law. So we do have to move past somehow the president is, you know, the deference to it. I think we certainly are. I think us as a country have a lot more willingness to prosecute. So let's stay on the Supreme Court while we're there. And with Lisa, take advantage of Lisa being with us. So two major cases and a third coming up. Mail-in ballots, Watson versus the Republican National Committee. I never thought in my lifetime I'd be talking about a Mississippi case where Mississippi was defending voting rights. But we are, along with 29 other states, giving a grace period. As long as you cast mark your ballot, you elect who you want to elect, and it's postmarked by Election Day, five business day grace period or some grace period, it'll still be counted. We're not talking about fraud. We're just talking about when the mails can deliver. I mailed a letter from Miami to New York. It took eight days to show up. Seriously. OK, so we have a mail in ballot and oral argument the next day.”
View more
Ridealong summary
To uphold our constitutional republic, we must confront the actions of a lawless president, even if it means impeaching or prosecuting him despite potential mass pardons. Historical context shows that failing to hold leaders accountable, as with Nixon, may have emboldened future presidents like Trump. As we navigate voting rights cases in the Supreme Court, it's crucial to recognize the implications of these legal battles on our democracy.
“… as traders apparently recognize that the cost of oil is not coming down anytime soon. Yesterday, after a classified briefing, House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers, a Republican of Alabama, who backed the Iran strikes, told reporters that Congress members want to know more about what's going on, what the options are, and why they're being considered, adding, and we're just not getting enough answers on those questions. Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, a Republican of Mississippi, commented, I can see why he might have said that. In an in-depth interview with …”
“… pushed Trump approval rating down to just 36 while a new Reuters poll shows that only 25 of Americans approve of how Trump is handling the cost of living Today, the stock market, which has generally trended downward since the invasion, dropped sharply as traders apparently recognize that the cost of oil is not coming down anytime soon. Yesterday, after a classified briefing, House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers, a Republican of Alabama, who backed the Iran strikes, told reporters that Congress members want to know more about what's going on, what the options are, and why they're being considered, adding, and we're just not getting enough answers on those questions. Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, a Republican of Mississippi, commented, I can see why he might have said that. In an in-depth interview with Hunter Walker and Josh Kovansky of Talking Points Memo yesterday, Representative Joe Morelli, a Democrat of New York, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee, explained how Trump's Iran incursion has become a mess for the president. The administration has suggested it is going to ask for $200 billion for the war. And Morelli noted that we are …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's fluctuating war strategy has driven his approval rating down to just 36%, as Americans grapple with skyrocketing costs and uncertainty. With Congress questioning the lack of clarity on military objectives and a staggering $30 billion already spent, critics argue this ill-conceived military action lacks support and threatens the stability of the post-World War II international order. As the situation escalates, even Republican leaders are expressing concerns about the administration's direction.
“… that much money directly we didn't get deep into that there's obviously more uh in 2021 APAC so APAC is the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee right so they just want to work on public opinion, which makes sense. Again, we have to go back and look at the history a little bit. In 1943, there was a group called the American Zionist Emergency Commission. The American Zionist Emergency Commission. I think it was commission. I don't remember what the C stood for, but I think it was commission. 1943. Bad things are happening to Jews. We need an emergency committee. I think it was committee. …”
“… our Congress that constantly supports Israel. And we talked about how I said they were occupied by AIPAC. AIPAC is the tip of the iceberg, really. um we talked about how APAC was a coordinator of funding right and it is but APAC itself doesn't contribute that much money directly we didn't get deep into that there's obviously more uh in 2021 APAC so APAC is the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee right so they just want to work on public opinion, which makes sense. Again, we have to go back and look at the history a little bit. In 1943, there was a group called the American Zionist Emergency Commission. The American Zionist Emergency Commission. I think it was commission. I don't remember what the C stood for, but I think it was commission. 1943. Bad things are happening to Jews. We need an emergency committee. I think it was committee. American Zionist Emergency Committee. We need to form a group in the U.S. that is advocating to help Jews, especially in Germany, World War II, everything going on. Great. 1943 they were made. 1949 the war is over They said it no longer an emergency We will rename to the American Zionists Committee And again I think it committee Anyway so that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Michael Lester discusses the complex origins and influence of AIPAC, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, on U.S. foreign policy regarding Israel. He reveals that AIPAC's roots trace back to a 1943 emergency committee formed during World War II, and highlights how its evolution has led to significant political funding mechanisms that shape congressional support for Israel. This raises critical questions about the implications of such influence on U.S. democracy and foreign policy.
“… a child sex trafficking ring with the Epstein files. You had the accountant Khan and the lawyer Indyke testify last week before the House Oversight Committee Last week you also saw Pam Bondi in an impromptu basis on 24 hours notice call a saying that she wanted to show up and voluntarily offer information to the House Oversight Committee as a status update which Democrats very quickly smoked out was an effort for her to avoid showing up at her subpoenaed appearance before the House Oversight Committee and she was going to use this carefully choreographed appearance with MAGA Republicans and the …”
“… on both the emergency vehicles and the landing? And we've seen a number of close calls very recently as well. And so our heart goes out to the victims and their families there. And also, let's not forget that the Trump regime continues to cover up a child sex trafficking ring with the Epstein files. You had the accountant Khan and the lawyer Indyke testify last week before the House Oversight Committee Last week you also saw Pam Bondi in an impromptu basis on 24 hours notice call a saying that she wanted to show up and voluntarily offer information to the House Oversight Committee as a status update which Democrats very quickly smoked out was an effort for her to avoid showing up at her subpoenaed appearance before the House Oversight Committee and she was going to use this carefully choreographed appearance with MAGA Republicans and the Trump regime to say, I showed up already. Why would I need to show up and be subpoenaed? I've already given you the information. And Democrats walked out the moment they saw what she was trying to do. And it was a very smart move by Democratic Congress member Garcia to say, we can't be complicit in the cover-up. The setup by Comer and Bondi and Blanche …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Trump regime's latest tactics reveal a disturbing pattern of manipulation and cover-ups, particularly illustrated by a recent House Oversight Committee meeting. When Pam Bondi attempted to dodge a subpoena with a staged appearance, Democrats quickly recognized the trap and walked out, refusing to be complicit in the charade. This incident underscores the lengths to which Trump's team will go to control the narrative and evade accountability.
“… is exactly correct. What happened when RFK came to HHS is that he examined the system and how it came to be. And everybody pointed to this Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which has been around for decades. It's mostly just rubber stamped, whatever pharma puts in front of them. Actually, whatever pharma puts in front of the CDC, the CDC puts it in front of this committee. And the committee sleeps through the meetings. They wake up at the very end, shaking off hangovers and take votes. And it's always been unanimous. Every new shot gets approved. Well, RFK looked at who was on the …”
“… go to these rogue judges, and they have the power of the best law firms in the country, the best research in the country. And, of course, the media, as you see in the New York Times, they cheering them on. Correct, sir? That is – everything you said is exactly correct. What happened when RFK came to HHS is that he examined the system and how it came to be. And everybody pointed to this Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which has been around for decades. It's mostly just rubber stamped, whatever pharma puts in front of them. Actually, whatever pharma puts in front of the CDC, the CDC puts it in front of this committee. And the committee sleeps through the meetings. They wake up at the very end, shaking off hangovers and take votes. And it's always been unanimous. Every new shot gets approved. Well, RFK looked at who was on the committee and found obvious stated and many unstated conflicts of interest, direct payments to these guys from pharmaceutical companies, ownership of patents and the drugs on which they're voting. I mean, this is a brazen plot. I mean, it was so outrageous that it struck RFK that, well, I'm here to root out corruption. How can this committee possibly …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Bobby Kennedy took decisive action against the pharmaceutical industry's influence on vaccine approvals by firing a corrupt advisory committee. He replaced them with independent experts, aiming to reform the childhood vaccination schedule that had ballooned since 1986. This radical overhaul could change how vaccines are evaluated and approved in America.
“… rights case that is pitting Republican against Republican. In an unusual case of inter-party warfare, the case Watson versus Republican National Committee challenges a Mississippi law that allows for a grace period for election officials to count ballots postmarked by Election Day, but arriving up to five business days later. Mississippi Republican Secretary of State Michael Watson and Attorney General Lynn Fitch, whose case pushed the Dobbs case that overturned Roe, are defending Mississippi's law, which passed Mississippi's Republican supermajority legislature by a vote of 118 yays to one lone …”
“court let's play the clip mike i want you to opine on what's happening today about uh how we stop elections from being stolen in the future tomorrow the supreme court is set to hear oral arguments in a voting rights case that is pitting Republican against Republican. In an unusual case of inter-party warfare, the case Watson versus Republican National Committee challenges a Mississippi law that allows for a grace period for election officials to count ballots postmarked by Election Day, but arriving up to five business days later. Mississippi Republican Secretary of State Michael Watson and Attorney General Lynn Fitch, whose case pushed the Dobbs case that overturned Roe, are defending Mississippi's law, which passed Mississippi's Republican supermajority legislature by a vote of 118 yays to one lone dissent. But will the people be damned, at least when it comes to this RNC, backed by the White House and Justice Department, who argue that ballots must be received before the end of Election Day to be counted? Mike Davis, your thoughts on this? I'm a big, hey, it's got to be boom, in, or it doesn't count, but your thoughts on this? So under the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court is set to hear a pivotal case tomorrow that could redefine how elections are conducted in Mississippi. The case, Watson vs. Republican National Committee, challenges a law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted for five additional days, stirring controversy among Republicans themselves. As state officials defend this law, the RNC argues for stricter rules, igniting a fierce debate over election integrity and the future of voting rights.
“… your subpoenaed? We don't want this. We want you to show up under oath, not a sham hearing. Then MAGA Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer, was like, stop bitching. He said, you need to. Why are you bitching? He said, that's the words of Comer at this sham hearing. And she put him on blast. Watch what went down to our lawful subpoena in a deposition. So instead, I asked Chairman Comer if he would compel her to come to our deposition. If she did not come, would he force her to or if he would move for contempt hearings as he did for other people who did not respond to …”
“… that Bondi wanted to contrive with Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans, One of the things that went down is when you had a Democratic congresswoman, Summer Lee, asking questions and saying, you know, are you going to show up, Bondi, to your deposition, your subpoenaed? We don't want this. We want you to show up under oath, not a sham hearing. Then MAGA Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer, was like, stop bitching. He said, you need to. Why are you bitching? He said, that's the words of Comer at this sham hearing. And she put him on blast. Watch what went down to our lawful subpoena in a deposition. So instead, I asked Chairman Comer if he would compel her to come to our deposition. If she did not come, would he force her to or if he would move for contempt hearings as he did for other people who did not respond to our subpoena? Instead of answering, as an adult, he said that I was bitching, which is, again, something that would not be allowed if we were operating under the rules of this committee, because engaging in personalities is actually something that we are not able to do. If C-SPAN and the public were there, I'd imagine that he would not act that way. …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Democrats uncovered a sham hearing orchestrated by Pam Bondi and Donald Trump to evade accountability regarding Epstein. During the chaotic session, Congresswoman Summer Lee pressed Bondi on her compliance with a subpoena, while Republican Chairman James Comer dismissed her concerns. This confrontation highlights ongoing tensions and the Democratic push for justice and transparency in the Epstein investigation.
“… as long as they are postmarked by Election Day and then received within five business days thereafter. Four years later, the Republican National Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, a voter, and a county election official challenging that law, arguing it conflicts with a federal statute that sets a single National Election Day, the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. A separate lawsuit by the Libertarian Party of Mississippi eventually combined with the Republicans' case. The Constitution grants states authority over the, quote, times, places, and manner of elections, but also …”
“… reshape how states handle mail-in ballots, specifically whether ballots postmarked by election day, but arriving later, can still be counted. At issue, a Mississippi law adopted in 2020 during the COVID pandemic, allowing mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they are postmarked by Election Day and then received within five business days thereafter. Four years later, the Republican National Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, a voter, and a county election official challenging that law, arguing it conflicts with a federal statute that sets a single National Election Day, the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. A separate lawsuit by the Libertarian Party of Mississippi eventually combined with the Republicans' case. The Constitution grants states authority over the, quote, times, places, and manner of elections, but also gives Congress the power to override those rules. Mississippi arguing that an election occurs when voters cast their ballots, not when officials receive or count them, and that timely postmarking therefore satisfies federal law. The challengers arguing election day means when officials receive the ballots, making Mississippi's mail-in policy in …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's recent hearing could redefine mail-in ballot rules, questioning whether ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later should count. This stems from a Mississippi law allowing such ballots, challenged by the Republican National Committee and others who argue it conflicts with federal election statutes. The justices expressed skepticism about Mississippi's stance, raising critical questions about the definition of 'Election Day' and the validity of mail-in voting practices.
Top Podcasts About J6 Committee
The MeidasTouch Podcast
4 episodes
Bannon`s War Room
4 episodes
The Megyn Kelly Show
3 episodes
The Rob Carson Show
2 episodes
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
2 episodes
Verdict with Ted Cruz
2 episodes
Letters from an American
2 episodes
Mark Levin Podcast
2 episodes
Stories Mentioning J6 Committee
Best Podcasts on Trump Protests
Large-scale "No Kings" protests have erupted across the United States, with demonstrators voicing opposition to the Trump administration's policies and perceived overreach. Podcasts are discussing the size and funding of these rallies, with some linking them to broader "color revolution" narratives and questioning the motivations and understanding of the protesters. The movement highlights growing public discontent and political polarization.
'No Kings' protests