Best Podcast Episodes About Department of Justice
Everything podcasters are saying about Department of Justice — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 27, 2026 – 75 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Department of Justice.
Top Podcast Clips About Department of Justice
“… for bad things. Well, I have a bummer of a story for you. Oh, no, Leah, no. Well, last week we learned in a court hearing in Rhode Island, a Department of Justice lawyer misled a judge about what the agency has been doing with voter roll data. So this DOJ lawyer, Eric Neff, who's the acting chief of the DOJ's voting section, said that nothing had been done with this information. But then our colleague David Gilbert reported that he later backtracked that statement and actually admitted that the preliminary internal data analysis of the non-public voter registration data has begun, which is a slightly …”
“Let's talk about another fun part of politics everything, which is voter data. Ryan, don't you love voter data? I love voter data. I love voter data when it is kept private and kept in my state and people can't use it to cross-reference for bad things. Well, I have a bummer of a story for you. Oh, no, Leah, no. Well, last week we learned in a court hearing in Rhode Island, a Department of Justice lawyer misled a judge about what the agency has been doing with voter roll data. So this DOJ lawyer, Eric Neff, who's the acting chief of the DOJ's voting section, said that nothing had been done with this information. But then our colleague David Gilbert reported that he later backtracked that statement and actually admitted that the preliminary internal data analysis of the non-public voter registration data has begun, which is a slightly complicated way to say, yeah, your voter data in certain states is being taken and being processed. And in the DOJ's case, they're looking for anomalies. They're trying to find people that they think should not be voting. This is part of a larger voter roll campaign that's been led by the DOJ. It started last year when the agency sent letters to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
A Department of Justice lawyer misled a judge about handling sensitive voter data, revealing that the agency is analyzing non-public voter registration information. This data includes personal details like social security numbers and is being shared with the Department of Homeland Security to check for anomalies, despite evidence showing non-citizen voting is extremely rare. This raises serious concerns about data privacy and the government's oversight in handling personal information.
Ridealong summary
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis demands the impeachment of Judge Tiffany Baker following her controversial decision to release a child rapist who later killed a five-year-old girl. This incident highlights the urgent need for judicial accountability, as the governor argues that without it, similar tragedies will continue to occur. The sheriff emphasizes the importance of holding judges responsible for their decisions to protect communities.
“… The rapid sequence of events on Monday in the courtroom of Judge Saeed Qawrashi. This was the latest indication of growing tensions between the Justice Department and the federal judiciary in New Jersey specifically, but also on the whole. It came during the scheduled sentencing of a man who last year agreed to plead guilty to possession of child pornography. So this is a sentencing hearing on a guilty plea. That's right. That's right. And the hearing did not go as prosecutors had planned. Judge Qureshi grew frustrated with the office's head of appeals, a gentleman named Mark Coyne, who had …”
“… judge threw a top prosecutor from the New Jersey U.S. Attorney's Office out of his courtroom during a sentencing hearing this week and demanded that the office's leadership testify about who had authority over their actions, according to court documents. The rapid sequence of events on Monday in the courtroom of Judge Saeed Qawrashi. This was the latest indication of growing tensions between the Justice Department and the federal judiciary in New Jersey specifically, but also on the whole. It came during the scheduled sentencing of a man who last year agreed to plead guilty to possession of child pornography. So this is a sentencing hearing on a guilty plea. That's right. That's right. And the hearing did not go as prosecutors had planned. Judge Qureshi grew frustrated with the office's head of appeals, a gentleman named Mark Coyne, who had not formally disclosed that he would appear. And the judge fiercely interrogated a more junior prosecutor about whether the former interim U.S. attorney, Alina Habba, still had some role in operating the office. And Judge Qureshi then eventually threw Mr. Coyne out of the courtroom. The judge then ordered the three leaders of the New Jersey office, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a dramatic courtroom showdown, Judge Saeed Qureshi expelled a top prosecutor from the New Jersey U.S. Attorney's Office during a sentencing hearing. This incident highlights escalating tensions between the Justice Department and federal judges, raising concerns about the legality of the office's leadership and the integrity of ongoing criminal cases.
“… the Midas Touch and legal AF channels. I don't know if that's true or not, but you all who also doesn't know if that's true or not? The FBI, the Department of Justice, because they refuse to conduct any investigations. How is it there are 1,200 victims, including one of my clients, Lisa Phillips? How is there 1,200 victims, acknowledged victims, of a child sex trafficking crime ring that has brought down 40 to 50 people worldwide, including a member of the royal family? And there's not one known investigation or prosecution of anybody in the United States by the Department of Justice. Not one. What does that …”
“… think that ties back to somebody who's at the time 13 years old that claimed that Donald Trump tried to force her to commit oral sex on him. She bit him and then he assaulted her. Now, I've always said the following, and I think this is consistent with the Midas Touch and legal AF channels. I don't know if that's true or not, but you all who also doesn't know if that's true or not? The FBI, the Department of Justice, because they refuse to conduct any investigations. How is it there are 1,200 victims, including one of my clients, Lisa Phillips? How is there 1,200 victims, acknowledged victims, of a child sex trafficking crime ring that has brought down 40 to 50 people worldwide, including a member of the royal family? And there's not one known investigation or prosecution of anybody in the United States by the Department of Justice. Not one. What does that tell you about the corruption of the Department of Justice? It's captured by Donald Trump. It's complete lack of independence. Why isn't there a special counsel that's been appointed? to go over the 3 million or 8 million or whatever pages there are of the Epstein files to bring the predators to justice. Why? Because we have a predator in chief …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Department of Justice's inaction on child sex trafficking raises serious questions about corruption linked to Donald Trump. With 1,200 acknowledged victims and no investigations, the claim is that Trump controls the DOJ, hindering justice for victims. This shocking situation highlights the potential cover-up involving high-profile figures, including a member of the royal family.
“… one of the most prolific sex traffickers in the world, you were Secretary of State. How did you miss it? Well, that would have been a matter of the Justice Department, not the State Department. But in your opening statement, in your statements earlier, in your opening statement you stated that Secretary Rubio should be called to testify. You said that he has, and the administration has, quote, abandoned survivors using the same logic. You were Secretary of State during a time period after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile and soliciting children for sex. Why then did you quote …”
“How did you miss it? If he's, I believe, one of the most prolific sex traffickers in the world, you were Secretary of State. How did you miss it? Well, that would have been a matter of the Justice Department, not the State Department. But in your opening statement, in your statements earlier, in your opening statement you stated that Secretary Rubio should be called to testify. You said that he has, and the administration has, quote, abandoned survivors using the same logic. You were Secretary of State during a time period after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile and soliciting children for sex. Why then did you quote using your own logic abandon survivors What is the question please I followed her comment First of all we focused on whether there were laws that made sex trafficking sexual slavery, domestic violence, other abuses of women on the books in countries. And then we tried to evaluate, were those laws being implemented? and were judges appropriately …”
View more
Ridealong summary
During a congressional hearing, Hillary Clinton deftly navigates questioning about the government's handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, highlighting the failure of the Justice Department while she was Secretary of State. She critiques the decimation of the office tasked with combating sex trafficking, arguing that the lack of resources hampers efforts to hold perpetrators accountable. This exchange reveals Clinton's sharp understanding of the complexities of governmental roles in addressing these serious issues.
“… your questions from a few weeks ago. But first, the Washington Post federal prosecutors on Thursday urged a judge to overturn a ruling barring the Justice Department from directly searching a Washington Post reporter's electronic devices, which were seized as part of an investigation into a government contractor who's been accused of leaking classified materials. Yes. Now, the hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga in the Eastern District of Virginia marked the government's latest attempt to convince the court that it should have the authority to conduct a tailored search of …”
“Okay, we have a couple more stories about the free press before we get to listener questions. And today we have a special guest, as A.G. just mentioned, coming on the show to answer one of your questions from a few weeks ago. But first, the Washington Post federal prosecutors on Thursday urged a judge to overturn a ruling barring the Justice Department from directly searching a Washington Post reporter's electronic devices, which were seized as part of an investigation into a government contractor who's been accused of leaking classified materials. Yes. Now, the hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga in the Eastern District of Virginia marked the government's latest attempt to convince the court that it should have the authority to conduct a tailored search of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson's phone and her computers and other devices to look for information relevant to its investigation of the contractor who they say leaked the classified information. Magistrate Judge William Porter ruled in February that the government could not search the devices, which all sides have agreed contain years of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The leadership changes in the Justice Department under Trump are creating chaos and undermining civil rights protections.
“… radar and nothing really happens. Rob, is this a clip as well you have from last night? So I have two. This is Todd Blanche talking about what the Department of Justice is currently focusing on. And then I have a separate clip where he's asked if Pam Bondi was fired because of the Epstein. Let's listen to both. Go for it. I will tell you this. You are right. This is an important and long overdue objective. Just today in Los Angeles, we had a takedown. Eight individuals were arrested for allegedly bilking over $50 million of intended loss from our taxpayer monies. And yes, this includes leadership in state …”
“So I don't know what's going to happen with Todd Blanch. I hope he doesn't become a vanilla AG where you come in You don't really do anything. You just kind of stay quiet and go under the radar and nothing really happens. Rob, is this a clip as well you have from last night? So I have two. This is Todd Blanche talking about what the Department of Justice is currently focusing on. And then I have a separate clip where he's asked if Pam Bondi was fired because of the Epstein. Let's listen to both. Go for it. I will tell you this. You are right. This is an important and long overdue objective. Just today in Los Angeles, we had a takedown. Eight individuals were arrested for allegedly bilking over $50 million of intended loss from our taxpayer monies. And yes, this includes leadership in state governments, our investigations do, because guess what? They are in many ways the actual conduit. They're letting it happen by not doing anything to stop these individuals stealing from the American people. And so you're going to see this Department of Justice pour all of our heart and soul into fraud. Let's go to the next one, Rob. Let's go to the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Todd Blanche, Trump's new acting Attorney General, vows to tackle fraud within the Department of Justice, but will he be effective? As he discusses past failures related to the Epstein files, concerns arise about his commitment to transparency and accountability. The stakes are high as Congress demands the release of crucial documents, and the public awaits real action against powerful abusers.
“… a court would accept what we said as presumptively true. We now know that any judicial notice has been taken of the lies that are repeatedly told by department lawyers. Things that have in Trump one resulted in disbarment, which has led to her trying to change the rules of ethics for lawyers at the department saying they cannot be held accountable at state bar associations, even though that's the law and the rule that they can only be held accountable will investigate them and therefore of course do nothing She eliminated the public integrity section the kleptocracy programs organized crime drug …”
“… general can go back to prosecuting those kinds of cases. But the thing that she has done is lost the presumption of credibility that all of us used to have when we were proud to go to court and say, on behalf of the United States, and to know that a court would accept what we said as presumptively true. We now know that any judicial notice has been taken of the lies that are repeatedly told by department lawyers. Things that have in Trump one resulted in disbarment, which has led to her trying to change the rules of ethics for lawyers at the department saying they cannot be held accountable at state bar associations, even though that's the law and the rule that they can only be held accountable will investigate them and therefore of course do nothing She eliminated the public integrity section the kleptocracy programs organized crime drug enforcement even though of course they going after drug cases allegedly in the high seas, international waters, foreign agent registration. Oh, who cares about that? Civil rights division, voting section, gutted. These are important and terrible things that have happened. And they've also eliminated a lot of investigations that were underway. And some …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Pam Bondi's tenure as Attorney General has severely damaged the credibility of the Justice Department, leading to a loss of trust in court proceedings. Her actions included gutting vital sections of the DOJ and politicizing the department, which will take years to repair. This legacy raises serious concerns about the future integrity of federal law enforcement.
“… And I would say that it's hard to imagine for anybody who truly believed that sort of analysis. So I put that part of analysis as another way from Justice Ho trying to audition for the Supreme Court. Like, hey, you think you found a conservative judge somewhere in D.C.? Look at me. I'm even more. And that's what it is.”
“… having the standing to challenge abortion pills. They wouldn't be able to see those cute little ultrasounds anymore. And it just that part of rationale is quite just insane. I think that part, I don't know if that is something that he truly believed. And I would say that it's hard to imagine for anybody who truly believed that sort of analysis. So I put that part of analysis as another way from Justice Ho trying to audition for the Supreme Court. Like, hey, you think you found a conservative judge somewhere in D.C.? Look at me. I'm even more. And that's what it is.”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Fifth Circuit Court's recent ruling imposed significant restrictions on the abortion pill Mifepristone, potentially limiting access for women. Judge Ho's concurrence raised eyebrows with its unusual arguments, suggesting that doctors experience 'aesthetic injury' from abortions, which some view as an extreme audition for the Supreme Court. This legal turmoil reflects the ongoing battle over reproductive rights in the U.S.
“… coming up with these, like the twisted draconian punishment, right? Like, you know, the right, like it wouldn't just be like the, we need the poetic justice. and so in this case yes yes you saw Jack Posobiec who by the way was very closely involved in spreading the Russian hacks about Emmanuel Macron I think raising connections about questions about you know what his foreign connections are you know this is about a decade ago at this point but he's very excited about it you know we saw that there's this one talk radio host who said well I'll just provide my financials preemptively you know I just …”
“they took the money from. Deportations, not just arrests. I should have noted that. Who else do we have yearning for some jail time? People love coming up with these, like the twisted draconian punishment, right? Like, you know, the right, like it wouldn't just be like the, we need the poetic justice. and so in this case yes yes you saw Jack Posobiec who by the way was very closely involved in spreading the Russian hacks about Emmanuel Macron I think raising connections about questions about you know what his foreign connections are you know this is about a decade ago at this point but he's very excited about it you know we saw that there's this one talk radio host who said well I'll just provide my financials preemptively you know I just want to show that I'm honest I'm not being paid by Qatar or Israel. So I mean, these guys are, they're so excited for what again, to be clear is the non-existent pundit purge. They're just lining up. I mean, you can't escape the sort of context here, which is that the reason that this sticks, this idea that the DOJ may be investigating foreign …”
View more
Ridealong summary
MAGA influencers are turning on each other amid rumors of a DOJ investigation into foreign money influencing their actions. Figures like Benny Johnson and Laura Loomer are not just worried about jail time; they’re eagerly discussing potential punishments for their peers, revealing a chaotic internal struggle fueled by a history of accepting foreign funding. This dramatic fallout highlights the deep-rooted issues within the MAGA movement regarding accountability and loyalty.
Ridealong summary
Joey Merlino claims the justice system unfairly targets him while letting others off easy, citing a mob associate's alleged sexual assault and a terrorist receiving a lighter sentence. He argues that his Italian heritage plays a role in the harsh treatment he faces, contrasting it with leniency shown to others. This raises questions about bias and fairness in the legal system.
“… a really extraordinary form of relief that is granted to very few people. And there is a rigorous investigation process that ordinarily applies. The Justice Department has a document called the Justice Manual, essentially, you know, like the Bible for Department of Justice employees that addresses pardons and has a rigorous set of standards that we as pardon attorney employees would apply in making recommendations to the president to ensure consistency. and to ensure that everybody could be considered fairly.”
“… applications for executive clemency and make recommendations to the president that are based on merit. To be considered for a pardon in ordinary times, you really have to demonstrate that you are deserving of a second chance through clemency. It's a really extraordinary form of relief that is granted to very few people. And there is a rigorous investigation process that ordinarily applies. The Justice Department has a document called the Justice Manual, essentially, you know, like the Bible for Department of Justice employees that addresses pardons and has a rigorous set of standards that we as pardon attorney employees would apply in making recommendations to the president to ensure consistency. and to ensure that everybody could be considered fairly.”
View more
Ridealong summary
The role of the DOJ pardon attorney drastically changed when Ed Martin took over, moving from a nonpartisan process to one influenced by political appointments. Former pardon attorney Liz Oyer explains how this shift undermines the fairness and rigor of the clemency process, which was designed to give deserving individuals a second chance. Understanding this change is crucial for grasping the current landscape of executive clemency in America.
“… has asked the USAID to open an investigation, to see if this grant actually occurred, and then if it did, to make a referral to the FBI and the Justice Department. This is real-time information recorded, names, details, name of grant. They've got everything in the classified setting. I got a declassified version of the intercept, but this is a big deal. Keep an eye on Tulsi Gabbard's social media. I think she's going to make a statement today or tomorrow, but this is going to start rumbling down the hill. This is, have we ever gotten an audit on the Ukraine funding? I mean, didn't we ask for …”
“… his own mental facilities in the open border are dragging him down. He's having a hard time raising money, even though he's the incumbent president. And this plot is intercepted by the NSA. The director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has asked the USAID to open an investigation, to see if this grant actually occurred, and then if it did, to make a referral to the FBI and the Justice Department. This is real-time information recorded, names, details, name of grant. They've got everything in the classified setting. I got a declassified version of the intercept, but this is a big deal. Keep an eye on Tulsi Gabbard's social media. I think she's going to make a statement today or tomorrow, but this is going to start rumbling down the hill. This is, have we ever gotten an audit on the Ukraine funding? I mean, didn't we ask for this forever? And this is one of the reasons. So for this audience, the hardcore of the hardcore, both on taking down the deep state and the weaponization of the government against MAGA, against President Trump, against Republicans and conservatives, are we now, because everybody's sitting there going, you know, what is happening? I can tell you in …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Evidence suggests the Democratic Party may have collaborated with foreign entities to influence U.S. elections. Recent revelations point to China providing access to voter databases and USAID potentially laundering taxpayer money into Biden's campaign. These developments raise serious questions about election integrity and government accountability.
“… i'll say it one more time no probable cause that means there was no good faith reason to raid his home and nonetheless the biden gang at the justice department with the acquiescence obviously of fbi leadership in the end because that's the way it technically or practically has to work raided his home in an unprecedented fashion and and the abuses have reverberated through our national consciousness since then that is some fitting of judicial watch with a big announcement, not a big surprise to anybody. There was no reason to raid Mar-a-Lago. It was the first time that the FBI had raided a …”
“so as the release uh says here we obtain the 207 pages of those fbi records that and the headline is they were concerned that there was no probable cause to raid the home of president trump at mar-a-lago i'll say it one more time no probable cause that means there was no good faith reason to raid his home and nonetheless the biden gang at the justice department with the acquiescence obviously of fbi leadership in the end because that's the way it technically or practically has to work raided his home in an unprecedented fashion and and the abuses have reverberated through our national consciousness since then that is some fitting of judicial watch with a big announcement, not a big surprise to anybody. There was no reason to raid Mar-a-Lago. It was the first time that the FBI had raided a president's residence after he left office. They planted folders that said top secret and all of this and laid out the stuff. They chased out all of the people in Mar-a-Lago. They asked that the cameras be turned off. It was clearly a use and abuse of the law enforcement on the federal level. Joining us to talk about this and so much more is Doug …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The FBI's unprecedented raid on President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate lacked probable cause, according to newly released records. Doug Burns, a former federal prosecutor, explains how the Justice Department could have opted for a subpoena instead, raising serious concerns about the legality of the raid. This incident has sparked a national debate about law enforcement overreach and the implications for justice in America.
“… was a towering figure. He had been a prosecutor for many years in U.S. attorney's offices around the country. He ran the criminal division at the Justice Department. And then he was sworn in to lead the FBI just a week before the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. And that really required him to turn the FBI into something of an intelligence gathering agency. His mandate from President George W. Bush was to make sure nothing like that ever happened again and to try to get the FBI to gather intelligence, connect the dots to prevent those kinds of terror plots from taking hold in the U.S. …”
“… Mueller. He died at the age of 81. And Kerry, I think it's easy to focus just on Mueller's time as special counsel. We'll get to that in just a bit. But I want to start with his much longer career in law enforcement. Tell us about that. Yeah, he really was a towering figure. He had been a prosecutor for many years in U.S. attorney's offices around the country. He ran the criminal division at the Justice Department. And then he was sworn in to lead the FBI just a week before the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. And that really required him to turn the FBI into something of an intelligence gathering agency. His mandate from President George W. Bush was to make sure nothing like that ever happened again and to try to get the FBI to gather intelligence, connect the dots to prevent those kinds of terror plots from taking hold in the U.S. And he actually was the longest serving FBI director since J. Edgar Hoover. He stayed through the rest of the W. Bush term. And then when President Obama arrived, he asked Mueller to stay on another two years. That required Congress to act. The Senate unanimously confirmed him 100 to nothing for two more years in that job. And then he thought he …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Robert Mueller's legacy extends beyond the Russia investigation, highlighting his transformative role in reshaping the FBI post-9/11.
“… Republicans? They are. And part of what is so striking is that you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News …”
“Now, are the officials in Mississippi defending this case not also Republicans? They are. And part of what is so striking is that you have the prospect that both the federal government and I think at least three justices, three Republican appointees, if not more, are more anti-voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That is the state of our union. So there was some dissensus between the conservative justices What was the kind of arguments you were hearing from say Alito and Thomas versus what you were hearing from say Kavanaugh and Barrett So Alito Thomas and Gorsuch seemed to be totally magapilled, like their brains had just been marinating in Fox News and were regurgitating anti-absentee ballot talking points. So Justice Alito referred to the confidence you can have once you turn your ballot over to the Postal Service and whatnot. Honestly, Justice Kavanaugh sounded like he was more in that camp than in the middle. So he was throwing out concerns about if the apparent winner the morning after the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court may soon decide on a case that could disenfranchise nearly a million voters in the upcoming 2024 election. Interestingly, some Republican-appointed justices appear more anti-voting rights than Mississippi officials themselves. This raises alarming questions about the integrity of voting laws and the potential for voter suppression just months before the midterms.
“… we got rid of the Jack Smith team gone. Those people are gone. We're still trying to find out. There are a lot of people in the FBI and also in the Department of Justice who despise Donald Trump, despise us, don't want to be there. We will find them because you have to believe in transparency. You have to believe in honesty. You have to do the right thing. And right now we're going to root them out. We will find them and they will no longer be employed. But again, we're starting at every level of the Justice Department, Sean, and getting rid of the worst of the worst. But there are a lot more people that …”
“… it now. That once the FBI was the world's premier law enforcement agency and that was weaponized and politicized, I believe the same with our intel community. How do we restore these institutions to their former greatness? Well, first and foremost, we got rid of the Jack Smith team gone. Those people are gone. We're still trying to find out. There are a lot of people in the FBI and also in the Department of Justice who despise Donald Trump, despise us, don't want to be there. We will find them because you have to believe in transparency. You have to believe in honesty. You have to do the right thing. And right now we're going to root them out. We will find them and they will no longer be employed. But again, we're starting at every level of the Justice Department, Sean, and getting rid of the worst of the worst. But there are a lot more people that shouldn't be there. But there are a lot of good people who are out there now risking their lives every day making these cases. OK, so with that and just to give our audience a further taste, you got Chuck Grassley doing the president's bidding, who says out loud about people such as your client that you cite in your complaint on paragraph 79. that the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
FBI agents involved in the Arctic Frost investigation are facing violent social media threats after being labeled as partisans by public officials like Pam Bondi and Chuck Grassley. These agents, who have a protected interest in their employment, were dismissed without due process, raising serious concerns about their safety and the integrity of the justice system. The rhetoric surrounding them is not just harmful but also undermines the professionalism of dedicated law enforcement officials.
“… captions it by saying trump used the presidential records act to defend himself against charges alleging that he stole classified documents now his justice department which is currently being run by his former criminal defense lawyer, says the PRA is unconstitutional. Yeah, from the Post, the Justice Department has concluded that a federal law requiring the preservation of presidential records is unconstitutional, which could effectively permit White House lawyers to try to set their own voluntary presidential record-keeping policy and potentially upend decades-old legal precedent established in …”
“We'll be right back. welcome back okay this next story is wild anna bauer of lawfare she captions it by saying trump used the presidential records act to defend himself against charges alleging that he stole classified documents now his justice department which is currently being run by his former criminal defense lawyer, says the PRA is unconstitutional. Yeah, from the Post, the Justice Department has concluded that a federal law requiring the preservation of presidential records is unconstitutional, which could effectively permit White House lawyers to try to set their own voluntary presidential record-keeping policy and potentially upend decades-old legal precedent established in response to Richard Nixon's effort to keep control of records upon his resignation from the Oval Office. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, which is tasked with serving as a legal advisor to the U.S. Attorney General and the executive branch, the same Office of Legal Counsel that penned the memo that says you can't indict a sitting …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's defense against charges of stealing classified documents hinges on a controversial claim: the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. This assertion, made by his Justice Department, could reshape how presidential records are maintained, echoing legal battles from Nixon's era. The implications could fundamentally alter the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
“… well, and certainly not to your client. All of these things have been on full display, the violations of all these things on full display with this Department of Justice under Pam Bondi. Another indicia of Pam Bondi knowing her, she's on thin ice, is trying before she gets thrown out to get this new rule passed because what they didn't like in the first term, is that the first starting team for Donald Trump of lawyers all got fined, sanctioned, censured, disbarred, indicted, and or convicted. And some, all three or four of those things. So you're talking about Ken Chesborough and Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis …”
“… a major one, candor to the tribunal. You've got to tell the truth. You've got to tell the truth to the best of your ability. to the judge or arbitrator or whoever that's asking you questions. You have to be candid and not lie to your opponent as well, and certainly not to your client. All of these things have been on full display, the violations of all these things on full display with this Department of Justice under Pam Bondi. Another indicia of Pam Bondi knowing her, she's on thin ice, is trying before she gets thrown out to get this new rule passed because what they didn't like in the first term, is that the first starting team for Donald Trump of lawyers all got fined, sanctioned, censured, disbarred, indicted, and or convicted. And some, all three or four of those things. So you're talking about Ken Chesborough and Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis and John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani, and the list goes on. Clark, Jeffrey Clark, this group all got subversion. Even Alina Haba got sanctioned by a federal judge for her shenanigans in private practice. So they don't want that to happen again. And Pondy is forcing, because Trump is too, forcing the Department of Justice assistant U.S. attorneys and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Department of Justice is facing a significant ethical crisis under Pam Bondi, with reports of attorneys being forced into unethical positions and violating court orders. This troubling trend follows a series of sanctions and disbarments of Trump’s legal team, prompting Bondi to propose new rules to prevent further accountability. The implications of these actions raise serious questions about the integrity of the legal system.
“… operation that Live Nation has run for the past year. And it culminated in the ousting of Gail Slater, who was the previous antitrust chief at the Department of Justice. And she was much more keen on either continuing this case or it seems at least pushing for a stronger settlement. And she was pushed aside. And I think the fact that this Justice Department has now settled this case really kind of vindicates many of the critics of this department administration that they are amenable to outside corporate influence. But the state AGs led by PACs in California, you got both blue states and red states. The judges …”
“… been adequate at all. Live Nation keeps, you know, completely violating these as the government has tried to update these consent decrees that go back to the Obama administration. And, you know, I think you have to look here at the political influence operation that Live Nation has run for the past year. And it culminated in the ousting of Gail Slater, who was the previous antitrust chief at the Department of Justice. And she was much more keen on either continuing this case or it seems at least pushing for a stronger settlement. And she was pushed aside. And I think the fact that this Justice Department has now settled this case really kind of vindicates many of the critics of this department administration that they are amenable to outside corporate influence. But the state AGs led by PACs in California, you got both blue states and red states. The judges said, OK, we're going to go forward with this trial. The trial is not off. The state AGs are basically going to be at the tip of this not not the Justice Department Yeah Yeah that absolutely right Now I mean I not gonna lie here You know there definitely downsides of this The state AGs have hired you know someone who described as one of the top …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The recent settlement between Live Nation and the DOJ has been criticized as inadequate, with state attorneys general continuing the case due to concerns over corporate influence. The judge's outrage over the settlement process revealed a chaotic courtroom scene, highlighting the potential for Live Nation to evade real accountability. This ongoing legal battle underscores the struggle to break up monopolistic practices in the ticketing industry.
Top Podcasts About Department of Justice
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
8 episodes
Bannon`s War Room
8 episodes
UnJustified
6 episodes
PBD Podcast
4 episodes
#SistersInLaw
4 episodes
The MeidasTouch Podcast
4 episodes
The Megyn Kelly Show
4 episodes
The Jesse Kelly Show
4 episodes
Stories Mentioning Department of Justice
Best Podcasts on Jerome Powell Investigation
The U.S. Justice Department has concluded its criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell without filing charges. This decision removes a potential legal cloud over Powell, allowing him to focus on monetary policy and economic challenges. The investigation's closure is significant for the stability of the Federal Reserve's leadership.
Jerome Powell
Federal Reserve
Top Podcasts on SPLC Fraud and Extremism
The Department of Justice has reportedly filed charges against the Southern Poverty Law Center, alleging wire fraud, money laundering, and the funding of extremist groups like the KKK and neo-Nazis. Podcasts are delving into the serious implications of these allegations, questioning the SPLC's fundraising practices and its role in generating the very white supremacist violence it claims to combat.
Southern Poverty Law Center