Best Podcast Episodes About American Giant
Everything podcasters are saying about American Giant — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 60 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about American Giant.
Top Podcast Clips About American Giant
“… know, it almost is lost in all of the mania that there was no vote, there was no debate. There's been very little direct information given to the American public. And to the extent there is, they just consistently lie about what every day the goals change. Marco Rubio now is added back, making sure that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. That's in the latest iteration of what the goals are. It's just, to your point, fundamentally undemocratic in a way that is deeply troubling because it seems to signal they don't think that they need democratic consent. They didn't bother manufacturing …”
“… Princess Wanda while my daughter is there. Just me, okay? How about while he's sending our sons and daughters off to the Middle East to die? How about that? Do we want to, you know, I mean, it's just disgusting. Too much. You're so right that, too, you know, it almost is lost in all of the mania that there was no vote, there was no debate. There's been very little direct information given to the American public. And to the extent there is, they just consistently lie about what every day the goals change. Marco Rubio now is added back, making sure that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. That's in the latest iteration of what the goals are. It's just, to your point, fundamentally undemocratic in a way that is deeply troubling because it seems to signal they don't think that they need democratic consent. They didn't bother manufacturing consent. They barely bothered to speak to us And I think the only reason that Trump gave this speech yesterday which was you know packed full of lies and deception as usual but I think it was not really about the American people. It was trying to calm the markets and give them, you know, make sure that oil prices stay low per barrel, make sure the markets …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's recent speech comparing his military actions to World War I and Vietnam is alarming and misleading. He downplays the severity of current conflicts while ignoring the historical consequences of previous wars, which were sold to the public as quick and easy. This critique highlights the troubling lack of democratic consent in his administration's approach to military operations.
“All this outrage. How can this be? How can this guy be the one running for Senate? How can there be a town, an American town, where the sympathies are that way? And downstream of that, you see so many people talk about how we have to ban Sharia law and things like that. And all that stuff's fine. Ban Sharia law. That sounds great. But that doesn't fix the problem. You can pass all the laws you want. You can ban anything you want. If you don't stop massively importing Islam into the United States of America, you'll have Sharia law. I don't care how many bans you …”
“All this outrage. How can this be? How can this guy be the one running for Senate? How can there be a town, an American town, where the sympathies are that way? And downstream of that, you see so many people talk about how we have to ban Sharia law and things like that. And all that stuff's fine. Ban Sharia law. That sounds great. But that doesn't fix the problem. You can pass all the laws you want. You can ban anything you want. If you don't stop massively importing Islam into the United States of America, you'll have Sharia law. I don't care how many bans you put on it. And Republicans are too soft and pathetic to talk about that. To this day, they'll stare in the camera and they'll tell you, Well, I'm against illegal immigration, but legal immigration is great. Hey, we need wide gates, right? Why Gates? Well, then you're going to get Sharia law. Then you going to get Americans butchered on the streets …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's upcoming decision on birthright citizenship could redefine American immigration policy. With the 14th Amendment at the center of the debate, the discussion highlights the tension between legal immigration and the fears surrounding cultural integration. This pivotal moment raises questions about the future of citizenship in America.
“It's very obvious that the only thing they care about is not the safety and security of the American citizen, not the safety and security of the vote, but that they know they can rely on Democrats to vote no matter what they do in Washington, D.C. So 70% want voter ID, 100% of Democrats on Capitol Hill don't want it. They know the Democrats will vote for it even though they have no representation, but they need illegals to put them over the top to win. Would you agree? I agree completely. And, you know, this is not only an 80-20 issue. This is …”
“It's very obvious that the only thing they care about is not the safety and security of the American citizen, not the safety and security of the vote, but that they know they can rely on Democrats to vote no matter what they do in Washington, D.C. So 70% want voter ID, 100% of Democrats on Capitol Hill don't want it. They know the Democrats will vote for it even though they have no representation, but they need illegals to put them over the top to win. Would you agree? I agree completely. And, you know, this is not only an 80-20 issue. This is a 90-10 issue. Americans of all stripes, political stripes, conservative and liberal, are in favor of this. You remember back in Georgia a few years ago when Joe Biden said that when Georgia passed a voter ID bill that was Jim Crow, and what happened? We had African Americans voting in record numbers. African Americans support this. And, you know, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
A significant shift is occurring as many African Americans are reconsidering their loyalty to the Democratic Party. Despite claims that voter ID laws are discriminatory, a survey revealed that 100% of African American voters had no issues voting on Election Day, challenging the narrative that they need special treatment. This growing sentiment indicates that black voters are realizing their votes are taken for granted, prompting a reevaluation of party affiliation.
“… mean it's not racist. So it's race. It's I guess it's by definition, it's racist because when you're talking about people born here who aren't American citizens, they're not American. So maybe it's more xenophobic is that he should have gone with xenophobic. But your thoughts on whether this argument that Trump's raising is racist and the Save America Act to Mike Davis racist. Yeah, because I don't want Chinese birth tourists, 1.5 million of Chinese nationals in Beijing voting in American elections. And I don't want them taking welfare. If that makes me racist, then screw it. I'm racist. I …”
“… racism. And really, implicitly, people who are challenging that clause are really espousing a racist viewpoint. It's very hard to get around that no matter what sort of legal arguments you want to couch, Just because you have a legal argument doesn't mean it's not racist. So it's race. It's I guess it's by definition, it's racist because when you're talking about people born here who aren't American citizens, they're not American. So maybe it's more xenophobic is that he should have gone with xenophobic. But your thoughts on whether this argument that Trump's raising is racist and the Save America Act to Mike Davis racist. Yeah, because I don't want Chinese birth tourists, 1.5 million of Chinese nationals in Beijing voting in American elections. And I don't want them taking welfare. If that makes me racist, then screw it. I'm racist. I don't care.”
View more
Ridealong summary
The debate surrounding the SAVE Act raises questions about voter ID requirements and their implications for citizenship. Proponents argue that proof of citizenship is essential for voting, while critics claim it disproportionately affects marginalized groups. This contentious issue highlights the intersection of race, immigration, and voting rights in America today.
“… from now. What have we done to them? What can they do? Are they done? Where are we at with this whole thing before we do that? Pure Talk hires Americans. I just want to stress that over and over and over and I want to stress to you that while Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile ship as many jobs overseas as they possibly can, here's pure talk hiring Americans. An American company, American jobs for American citizens. And it's not just a wonderful thing to do, it makes the customer service experience freaking wonderful. When you switch from Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile, You can keep your phone. You can …”
“… long time. It is up to you to decide whether that word will be effective on you. All right. We'll do a couple emails before we move on. Some good things happening in the business world. We have BK going to talk about Iran military matters about 15 minutes from now. What have we done to them? What can they do? Are they done? Where are we at with this whole thing before we do that? Pure Talk hires Americans. I just want to stress that over and over and over and I want to stress to you that while Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile ship as many jobs overseas as they possibly can, here's pure talk hiring Americans. An American company, American jobs for American citizens. And it's not just a wonderful thing to do, it makes the customer service experience freaking wonderful. When you switch from Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile, You can keep your phone. You can keep your phone number. You're going to save a fortune. They're on the same towers, so you don't have to stress dropping calls. And you get to spend 10 minutes on the phone with an American. Is that the kind of company you want to do business with? Dial pound 250 and say, Jesse Kelly. Pound 250, say, Jesse Kelly. We'll be back. The Jesse Kelly Show …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Political leaders are often paralyzed by the fear of being labeled with the R word, even in the wake of tragic events like George Floyd's death. This fear, exploited by those on the left, shapes political discourse and actions, as seen with figures like Tim Scott and Donald Trump advocating for police reform. The effectiveness of this tactic raises questions about how we engage in political discussions today.
“the American South and so on in that period and the artwork in that period. So those kinds of nurturing of the human spirit really matter. And that's one of the things I don't think we necessarily pay enough attention to. But one of the ways that political change happens is, you know, and I thought a lot about this, is, you know, if everything's going fine, basically no one's paying much attention to politics. And then there are a few people who are …”
“the American South and so on in that period and the artwork in that period. So those kinds of nurturing of the human spirit really matter. And that's one of the things I don't think we necessarily pay enough attention to. But one of the ways that political change happens is, you know, and I thought a lot about this, is, you know, if everything's going fine, basically no one's paying much attention to politics. And then there are a few people who are complaining, but their kind of voice is crying in the wilderness. And you're like, yeah, whatever, you know, have a Cheeto, you know. But then as people get more and more upset, more and more people are like, hey, hey, did you hear what that person has to say? And they start to make a community of people who are upset about one thing or another. And once …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Heather Cox Richardson humorously highlights how political change often starts with frustrated citizens munching on Cheetos, while leaders are oblivious. She connects the dots between historical storytellers and today's media, showing how a crisis can spark a collective narrative that demands a government that serves the people. It's a wild ride through history that leaves you questioning your snack choices!
“iran's use of lego set rap music tells us it's been studying us these are videos meant for the american people crafted in a language iran knows will understand can you tell me about that so it's rap music's very popular. It's the backdrop for a lot of American life, I would say. And it's cartoons. You know, I've got this quote that they end the piece on. Like, Iran knows that Americans love pop culture heroes. We like our cartoons. We like our superheroes. And they've been watching how we interact with all of that pop culture for so long. And …”
“iran's use of lego set rap music tells us it's been studying us these are videos meant for the american people crafted in a language iran knows will understand can you tell me about that so it's rap music's very popular. It's the backdrop for a lot of American life, I would say. And it's cartoons. You know, I've got this quote that they end the piece on. Like, Iran knows that Americans love pop culture heroes. We like our cartoons. We like our superheroes. And they've been watching how we interact with all of that pop culture for so long. And like if you make money on social media just by like generating posts, like you're one of these AI slop farms, the gold is in American views. Like that's where the advertising dollars are. And so it pays for everyone that is a student of like AI generated content to learn American culture and learn like what hits here. Right. And like that's why you …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Iran's propaganda is cleverly using American pop culture, like rap music and cartoons, to resonate with U.S. audiences. By tapping into familiar themes, such as shrimp and Jesus, they're crafting videos that speak directly to American values and interests, making their message more impactful. This strategy reveals how deeply Iran understands American culture and its potential for influence.
“… they're saying, well, you know, everybody's subject to the jurisdiction of the United States if you're born here because you are required to obey American law. And when we think about jurisdiction in terms of modern legal conceptions, like that's what jurisdiction means. like the courts have the right to bring you into court and hold you accountable if you commit crimes. Therefore, in some sense, you're subject to the jurisdiction thereof. But the idea is if that's the way to understand the language of the 14th Amendment, that would mean that American Indians should have been granted citizenship …”
“… the day. So a big part of Democrats or essentially the respondents idea here, the people who are saying birthright citizenship should apply to anybody born here is a very broad view of what it means to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Basically, they're saying, well, you know, everybody's subject to the jurisdiction of the United States if you're born here because you are required to obey American law. And when we think about jurisdiction in terms of modern legal conceptions, like that's what jurisdiction means. like the courts have the right to bring you into court and hold you accountable if you commit crimes. Therefore, in some sense, you're subject to the jurisdiction thereof. But the idea is if that's the way to understand the language of the 14th Amendment, that would mean that American Indians should have been granted citizenship by the 14th Amendment And that wasn the case right There was you know everybody understood when they were enacting the 14th Amendment that it didn cover the children of American Indians even if those children were born outside of Indian reservations It just it didn cover them So that means that parent, it's not just about where you're physically …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Supreme Court's interpretation of birthright citizenship should consider both the constitutional language of the 14th Amendment and the statutory language, which are often identical, to avoid a bizarre legal outcome.
“… is just destroyed for quite a while for anyone, whether it's him or Rubio or even Tucker Carlson or whoever. Just remember, things change rapidly in American politics. A decade from now – I mean a decade ago, are you really going to say Trump is going to stick around and still be the president of the United States? No, nobody would say that, right? Remember, 40 more years. So never make grand pronouncements about – it's over forever. It could be over in the interim, six to eight years, something like that. And I think American history, modern American history shows us genuine dominance would be the …”
“But I just think, I mean, it's very possible a Republican project is just destroyed for quite a while for anyone, whether it's him or Rubio or even Tucker Carlson or whoever. Just remember, things change rapidly in American politics. A decade from now – I mean a decade ago, are you really going to say Trump is going to stick around and still be the president of the United States? No, nobody would say that, right? Remember, 40 more years. So never make grand pronouncements about – it's over forever. It could be over in the interim, six to eight years, something like that. And I think American history, modern American history shows us genuine dominance would be the FDR to Truman pipeline of about – what was that? 20-something years, 24 years, right, of democratic rule. That's about as good as you can get, I think, in America. Yeah. And so – Yeah, large majority. Things change very rapidly. But for Vance, I mean, I actually was thinking about this earlier. I'm not sorry to go on a bit of a tangent, but he was …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's decisions have led to severe polling declines and potential long-term damage to the Republican Party. From unpopular tariffs to controversial military actions, every misstep is self-inflicted, raising questions about the party's future. The landscape could change dramatically in the next decade, but for now, Trump's choices are haunting the GOP.
“… more like China all the time. You know, what is happening again this week, we've got the Defense Department threatening retaliation against an American company because that American company wants to hold firm on what I would consider to be a core American value of not using their technology for mass surveillance. What is it that people typically worry about when they talk about Chinese AI or Chinese values or living in Xi's world? I think one of the big things is mass surveillance, right? It's the idea that I can't speak my mind anymore, even in private contexts, because the government's going …”
“… better than than their recursively self AIs All of which by the way is happening against the backdrop And I don like to say this kind of thing because it not a very popular opinion And it's not, it's not something I take any pleasure in. We are looking more like China all the time. You know, what is happening again this week, we've got the Defense Department threatening retaliation against an American company because that American company wants to hold firm on what I would consider to be a core American value of not using their technology for mass surveillance. What is it that people typically worry about when they talk about Chinese AI or Chinese values or living in Xi's world? I think one of the big things is mass surveillance, right? It's the idea that I can't speak my mind anymore, even in private contexts, because the government's going to hoover up all that information and potentially use it against me. As far as I can tell, that's exactly what the U.S. Defense Department is trying to coerce Anthropic into doing right now. And what? Like we're losing our we're kind of losing the thread here in our, you know, I don't know, in our delusions of grandeur, you know, our idea that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The U.S. is increasingly mirroring China's mass surveillance tactics, as evidenced by the Defense Department's coercion of an American company to compromise its values. This alarming trend raises questions about our own ethical standards while we pursue strategic dominance over AI. As we risk losing our identity in this race, we must consider the importance of trust and collaboration with China rather than escalating tensions.
“Are you going to be American tourists right now? You psychopath. We're destabilizing the globe. What kind of psychopath are you going to be right now? You're going to go to Italy and tell them why they're fucked because we're attacking Iran. And we've driven the price of oil up and everything's gone insane. Have the decency to not inflict yourself on the rest of the world at this point. Do you think anyone wants you? Does anyone want the American tourist right now telling …”
“Are you going to be American tourists right now? You psychopath. We're destabilizing the globe. What kind of psychopath are you going to be right now? You're going to go to Italy and tell them why they're fucked because we're attacking Iran. And we've driven the price of oil up and everything's gone insane. Have the decency to not inflict yourself on the rest of the world at this point. Do you think anyone wants you? Does anyone want the American tourist right now telling people how it is? Oh, it's the ugly American here who's blowing up the world with Israel, everyone's other favorite country. Oh, good. It's America and Israel. Everyone's favorites. Everyone's favorites. Tell them where the best cheese shop is. It's America and Israel. You know, us in Israel right now are like just two junky meth heads the town has …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious rant, the host hilariously questions the sanity of American tourists traveling abroad amidst global chaos, painting a vivid picture of them as unwelcome guests. The outrageous imagery of Americans sipping wine in Spain while the world teeters on the brink of disaster perfectly captures the absurdity of the situation.
“… the lead coordinator for the protests. You've got Radical Network of Socialists and Communist Organizations, funded by Neville Roy Singham, an American tech tycoon and avowed communists living in China. Here's an example in New York City. This is not protected speech. This is seditious speech. Everyone who attended this rally and said this needs to be investigated. And if you're not here as a legal citizen, or even if you are a naturalized citizen, you should be removed. Working class revolution. Working class revolution. Working class revolution. Solution. There is only one solution. …”
“… trying to take down our government. They should be extradited and tried for sedition. 1,000%. 500 groups, $3 billion in revenue. Some of them are Minnesota Indivisible, National Well-Heeled Democrat Political Advocacy Organization, funded by George Soros, the lead coordinator for the protests. You've got Radical Network of Socialists and Communist Organizations, funded by Neville Roy Singham, an American tech tycoon and avowed communists living in China. Here's an example in New York City. This is not protected speech. This is seditious speech. Everyone who attended this rally and said this needs to be investigated. And if you're not here as a legal citizen, or even if you are a naturalized citizen, you should be removed. Working class revolution. Working class revolution. Working class revolution. Solution. There is only one solution. Communist revolution. Yeah, only one solution. Communist revolution. I don't know if you know this, but you're too stupid and you went to, wasted probably each one of you a couple hundred thousand dollars in debt for a worthless degree. You can't get a job except for, you know, carrying a sign and a communist flag. You know, you might have want to learn …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Protests may be driven by a network of 500 groups with a staggering $3 billion budget, allegedly funded by influential figures like George Soros. This funding not only supports protests but also aligns with revolutionary socialist politics aimed at destabilizing the American government. The implications of this financial backing raise serious questions about the motives behind these movements and their political influence.
“X, formerly known as Twitter, you're probably missing, there's a massive love affair going on between Americans and Japanese people. So basically the product manager at X decided to reveal the information that the largest country participating on X is actually Japan, it's not America. America's number two. And so they decided to flip on the auto-translate feature and then from that point on Americans and Japanese people started interacting and turns out we love each other and that's honestly really nice to see like the timeline is just filled with …”
“X, formerly known as Twitter, you're probably missing, there's a massive love affair going on between Americans and Japanese people. So basically the product manager at X decided to reveal the information that the largest country participating on X is actually Japan, it's not America. America's number two. And so they decided to flip on the auto-translate feature and then from that point on Americans and Japanese people started interacting and turns out we love each other and that's honestly really nice to see like the timeline is just filled with japanese people talking about american culture predominantly like red america culture we're talking like monster trucks barbecues pickup trucks texas in general and obviously japan you know americans have always had a thing for japan so that's you know the weeb thing's always been there but the tweets are so it's i have to say it's so nice to see an …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Japan has emerged as the largest user on X, surpassing America, leading to a cultural exchange filled with mutual admiration. From barbecues to baseball, Japanese people are embracing American traditions, showcasing a unique blend of cultures that challenges the concept of cultural appropriation. This interaction highlights Japan's appreciation for classic American culture, revealing a refreshing allyship amidst global tensions.
“… are autistic and maybe they don't even have three kids and they certainly don't have three kids who are autistic. So it takes money away from the American citizens who need these services. It defrauds the taxpayer. And you're absolutely right that the thing that we need to do is get real justice. So, you know, something I learned just the past couple of months, I had no idea that we do not prosecute fraud in this country if it's under $1.5 million per year. Okay. So think about that. Think of all the people who are $1.5 million a year. This is not chump change. That is meaningful money. I mean, …”
“… that's going to be reversed. Take a look. So you take a program that exists within Medicaid to help autistic children get the resources that they need. So you have a Somalian fraudster in suburban Minneapolis who says that they have three kids who are autistic and maybe they don't even have three kids and they certainly don't have three kids who are autistic. So it takes money away from the American citizens who need these services. It defrauds the taxpayer. And you're absolutely right that the thing that we need to do is get real justice. So, you know, something I learned just the past couple of months, I had no idea that we do not prosecute fraud in this country if it's under $1.5 million per year. Okay. So think about that. Think of all the people who are $1.5 million a year. This is not chump change. That is meaningful money. I mean, even that right there, it's like the government, What have you people been doing all these years? So if someone commits $1.4 million of fraud, the government will just let you get away with it. But if you throw in that extra 100 grand, you're in trouble. It's sort of like the law in LA. You're allowed to steal $799 worth of stuff from a retail …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Ilhan Omar has been accused of committing immigration fraud, sparking a larger investigation into fraudulent activities within the Somali community. This includes a scheme where Somali fraudsters exploited Medicaid resources meant for autistic children, stealing millions and depriving families of necessary support. The government’s previous inaction on fraud under $1.5 million has now come under scrutiny as calls for accountability grow.
“… It wasn't, but we got rid of that. But it's just forever. It's amazing how omnipresent they are. Yeah, I've actually been working with this company, American Giant, that they make – they've tried to use just American cotton and make their products just in America. I mean just a top-to-bottom America-only company that makes textiles or clothing because they don't really even have those anymore.”
“… myself of toxins, and I'm using it on my body. With the polyester, right? I'm wiping my body with toxins. So that was an idiotic mistake. But an example, we're just finding this forever. So we got rid of all the – I thought that was a cotton towel. It wasn't, but we got rid of that. But it's just forever. It's amazing how omnipresent they are. Yeah, I've actually been working with this company, American Giant, that they make – they've tried to use just American cotton and make their products just in America. I mean just a top-to-bottom America-only company that makes textiles or clothing because they don't really even have those anymore.”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a hilarious twist, the host discovers that while trying to detox from microplastics, he accidentally used a towel with polyester, effectively wiping toxins back onto his body. This segment humorously highlights the omnipresence of microplastics in everyday life, making it both entertaining and eye-opening as they navigate the absurdity of modern living.
“There's very few stock markets out there, if any, I think that has at all kept up with the American economy. So that's why everyone reinvests back into America. I think, Jeff, I don't know if you're explicitly doing this, but it seems to be you are pointing directionally towards a top of American equities dominance as it relates to the rest of the world. Maybe those are my words, but I might guess that you might agree with that. And so there's like other economies out there. And I've noticed just a lot of ramblings about like LATAM ETFs, …”
“There's very few stock markets out there, if any, I think that has at all kept up with the American economy. So that's why everyone reinvests back into America. I think, Jeff, I don't know if you're explicitly doing this, but it seems to be you are pointing directionally towards a top of American equities dominance as it relates to the rest of the world. Maybe those are my words, but I might guess that you might agree with that. And so there's like other economies out there. And I've noticed just a lot of ramblings about like LATAM ETFs, Brazil, Argentina. What about specifically maybe in South America? What do you think about LATAM ETFs when it comes to like fitting into what you think the future holds for us? So I going to take a slightly ignorant and blunt approach here which is that when I think about emerging markets there two dimensions One is the actual engine of growth …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Investors are shifting focus to emerging markets as traditional havens lose their appeal. With the U.S. dollar remaining strong, countries like Uruguay are emerging as potential conduits for wealth. This shift highlights the evolving landscape of global investment strategies amidst changing economic dynamics.
“… It's easy to see it as warmongering or fear mongering. But we need to think about it as the core thesis of the book is that national security is American prosperity. These are just two sides of the same coin. And if you get too fixated on just national security, national security is not an end unto itself. It's a means to underwrite the prosperity of the American people. And we're a little bit out of balance there. Fortunately, a lot has happened in the last 12 months to really address these things. There's been a huge amount of change in the Pentagon, acquisition reform, which sounds like a …”
“That is deterrence. And so I think a lot of people, especially folks, it's easy to get cynical about the defense industrial base. It's easy to see it as warmongering or fear mongering. But we need to think about it as the core thesis of the book is that national security is American prosperity. These are just two sides of the same coin. And if you get too fixated on just national security, national security is not an end unto itself. It's a means to underwrite the prosperity of the American people. And we're a little bit out of balance there. Fortunately, a lot has happened in the last 12 months to really address these things. There's been a huge amount of change in the Pentagon, acquisition reform, which sounds like a very boring term. But hey, we got to like, throw away the process, not be a victim to the process and said, do things that work. How about that? How about we just do things that work and get out of our own way. And a big part of the book, I spend time talking about the historic figures who threw away the process, who rebelled against the system and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
National security is essential for American prosperity, as discussed in Shyam Sankar's insights on the defense industrial base. He emphasizes that true innovation often comes from those who challenge the status quo, highlighting recent advancements in military technology from American startups. This shift in thinking is crucial for fostering a culture of invention that aligns with national interests.
“… the process. So I'd be doing this every week. When it came to diet, for sure I would have done that. I would have had all the Dietetic Society, American Heart Association. And what I would do in that office is I would get the medical orthodoxy on my side. I wouldn't write policy with just a handful of assistants because there's a million doctors out there. There's a half a million nurse practitioners and PAs. There's 5,600 hospitals, hospitals, 2200 acute care hospitals. I mean, come on. The medical industry is too big and too strong. You can't do anything in Washington without the medical …”
“… haven't had any. But we go to Washington. You have all kinds of experts from academia, from the FDA, CDC, NIH, industry. You have public citizens. There's an agenda. You raise some issues. You basically vet them, gain a consensus. drive policy. That's the process. So I'd be doing this every week. When it came to diet, for sure I would have done that. I would have had all the Dietetic Society, American Heart Association. And what I would do in that office is I would get the medical orthodoxy on my side. I wouldn't write policy with just a handful of assistants because there's a million doctors out there. There's a half a million nurse practitioners and PAs. There's 5,600 hospitals, hospitals, 2200 acute care hospitals. I mean, come on. The medical industry is too big and too strong. You can't do anything in Washington without the medical community. That's what I would do. And you can make it mandatory. So listen, if you want to get your CMS funding, your NIH funding, you show up here and I would do it for topic after topic, food dyes, fluoride. I'd go through childhood vaccines. I'd go through the whole thing and just use Washington as a convening and talk about make America healthy …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Dr. Peter McCullough humorously critiques the medical establishment's handling of the COVID vaccine, likening it to a circus of bureaucratic meetings. His vivid imagery of Washington meetings and the 'freight train' of medical societies creates a compelling narrative that’s both entertaining and thought-provoking.
“… all over the world with AI mining companies to find lithium, uranium, and cobalt. They need to rearm all of Europe. They need to recolonize Latin American Africa. They need to suppress leftism and communism globally. And, you know, ultimately, this all unfolds within a war with China, because that's what's waiting for them at the end of this thing. And once you have all these things in place, you're looking at the rise of the techno-fascist civilization, which is the network state, which we are going to talk about in our next episode, it sounds like. Yep. So you can look forward to the global …”
“… then these mega projects, the data centers, the new cities, in order to feed all of their data centers and all of their new factories and their new manufacturing, we're headed for a new age of resource extraction where they're literally already going all over the world with AI mining companies to find lithium, uranium, and cobalt. They need to rearm all of Europe. They need to recolonize Latin American Africa. They need to suppress leftism and communism globally. And, you know, ultimately, this all unfolds within a war with China, because that's what's waiting for them at the end of this thing. And once you have all these things in place, you're looking at the rise of the techno-fascist civilization, which is the network state, which we are going to talk about in our next episode, it sounds like. Yep. So you can look forward to the global systemic tech fascist state. tomorrow oh god”
View more
Ridealong summary
Venture capital firms are increasingly positioning themselves to replace government functions with their startups, aiming for global deregulation and tax suspension. This strategy involves extensive resource extraction and political manipulation to ensure the rise of a techno-fascist civilization. The implications of this shift are critical as it could redefine global governance and economic systems.
“… project, pairing college students with historians to study both New York State history and, in some ways, their local history and the meaning of American independence. Can it work? More ominously, what are the costs of a poorly educated society that doesn't have this kind of knowledge? Here's how Dr. Oberg describes some of what has already happened with this kind of work. Quote, we placed students in local historians' offices to work on projects connected to the 250th anniversary of American independence. It is truly a unique program. We provided well-paying fellowships to students from …”
“So what should we know about our own history? With a country turning 250 years old, Geneseo history professor Michael Oberg has launched a new project, or really has extended a previous project, pairing college students with historians to study both New York State history and, in some ways, their local history and the meaning of American independence. Can it work? More ominously, what are the costs of a poorly educated society that doesn't have this kind of knowledge? Here's how Dr. Oberg describes some of what has already happened with this kind of work. Quote, we placed students in local historians' offices to work on projects connected to the 250th anniversary of American independence. It is truly a unique program. We provided well-paying fellowships to students from Geneseo, but also Canisius, Albany, Brooklyn College, Potsdam, New Paltz, Cornell, and Stony Brook. We paid 71 students to return to their hometowns and perform work that was important to their communities and that was, for some of them, a life-changing experience. Two of the students wrote books, end quote. So let's talk about that, what has already …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Dr. Michael Oberg's fellowship program is transforming how students engage with American history as the country turns 250 years old. By placing students in local historians' offices, they not only contribute to their communities but also gain life-changing experiences, with some even writing books. This initiative highlights the critical need for historical knowledge in a society that often overlooks its past.
Top Podcasts About American Giant
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
4 episodes
The Jesse Kelly Show
4 episodes
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 episodes
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
3 episodes
The Rob Carson Show
2 episodes
The Megyn Kelly Show
2 episodes
This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von
2 episodes
The Shawn Ryan Show
2 episodes
Stories Mentioning American Giant
Top Podcasts on Loyola Student Murder Debate
The murder of Loyola University student Sheridan Gorman in Chicago has ignited a debate over immigration policies. The suspect in the case is reportedly an undocumented immigrant, leading to discussions on how immigration enforcement intersects with public safety. This incident has brought attention to the broader implications of immigration laws on community security.
Top Podcasts on Joe Kent's Controversies
Former Trump ally Joe Kent is facing scrutiny and accusations of betraying President Trump, including claims of leaking information to harm figures like Erika Kirk. His changing political path and alleged involvement in controversies, such as testifying for Tyler Robinson's defense and being criticized by "Israel-firsters," are sparking heated debates within conservative media and political circles.
Top Podcasts on Joe Kent's FBI Investigation
Joe Kent, former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, is reportedly under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information related to the Iran War to media figures like Tucker Carlson. Podcasts are discussing the implications of these alleged leaks, the administration's narrative surrounding the war, and the broader political fallout.
Top Podcasts on Iran Conflict & Joe Kent
The ongoing conflict involving Iran has escalated, leading to significant economic repercussions. In a related development, Joe Kent has resigned, adding to the political turmoil. This situation is critical for the tech industry due to potential disruptions in global markets and supply chains.