Best Podcast Episodes About Sean Hannity
Everything podcasters are saying about Sean Hannity — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 26 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Sean Hannity.
Top Podcast Clips About Sean Hannity
“… to defend his actions in Iran There a lot going on here Joining me now to react to all of this is Saurabh Amari He's U.S. editor of UnHerd and Sean Davis, who is CEO of The Federalist.”
“… he resigned. They spoke to the vice president and then he went and directly spoke to the president about leaving. The Guardian also reporting that Trump is not happy that Tulsi a longtime opponent of foreign interventions has appeared somewhat reluctant to defend his actions in Iran There a lot going on here Joining me now to react to all of this is Saurabh Amari He's U.S. editor of UnHerd and Sean Davis, who is CEO of The Federalist.”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump is reportedly planning to fire Attorney General Pam Bondi due to her handling of the Epstein files and perceived inaction against his political rivals. This shake-up reflects Trump's frustration with his administration's performance, as he also considers replacing the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, for her reluctance to support his foreign policy decisions. The potential changes signal a significant shift in Trump's approach to governance as he seeks more aggressive allies.
“… In fact, it's going to challenge us all to double down on our efforts to ensure that we are protecting every single individual across neighborhoods. Sean, do you guys understand what he's saying? What he's saying is, hey, listen, I know an illegal just murdered an 18-year-old American citizen. But guess what, Chicago? I'm going to still represent the illegals to come into this freaking state and into this country and continue to kill 18-year-old girls. Do you understand how insane that is? And for anybody out there that keeps voting for Democrats, I'm sorry, guys. You've lost the freaking plot. …”
“… is a terrible tragedy. and what I've said from the very beginning, I'm going to continue to use every single tool that's available to me to protect the residents of the city of Chicago. Jeez. And this tragedy is not going to deter us from our work. In fact, it's going to challenge us all to double down on our efforts to ensure that we are protecting every single individual across neighborhoods. Sean, do you guys understand what he's saying? What he's saying is, hey, listen, I know an illegal just murdered an 18-year-old American citizen. But guess what, Chicago? I'm going to still represent the illegals to come into this freaking state and into this country and continue to kill 18-year-old girls. Do you understand how insane that is? And for anybody out there that keeps voting for Democrats, I'm sorry, guys. You've lost the freaking plot. It's over. Robert, can you pull up Maria Hayden, the older woman? So I had on my radio show the mother, Cheryl Minter is her name, 41-year-old daughter, Stephanie Minter, murdered by another Biden-Harris-Mayorkas illegal. And here's where it gets worse. You know, you have kids. Your kids do something wrong. Not a big deal. Okay, it's when they lie …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Recent tragic murders linked to illegal immigration have ignited a fierce debate over national security and border policies. Critics argue that sanctuary cities and current leadership are responsible for rising violence, citing alarming statistics of crimes committed by undocumented individuals. This segment highlights the urgent need for change in immigration policies to protect American citizens.
“Sean Pace, the guy I was just talking about, eventually finds me. I don't remember what comes first. He signs me to – I'm just going to say his name. He signs me to – or he introduces me to ****. So I'm sleeping in my car and all kinds of stuff just to work with this guy. Where? Where? In Atlanta. So you're down there. Yeah. I'm sleeping in my Honda. I'm driving all the way down there. I'm living in an apartment up here. So I was making iTunes …”
“Sean Pace, the guy I was just talking about, eventually finds me. I don't remember what comes first. He signs me to – I'm just going to say his name. He signs me to – or he introduces me to ****. So I'm sleeping in my car and all kinds of stuff just to work with this guy. Where? Where? In Atlanta. So you're down there. Yeah. I'm sleeping in my Honda. I'm driving all the way down there. I'm living in an apartment up here. So I was making iTunes money, but I couldn't afford to just get a hotel and all that stuff. So going back and forth, he introduced me to Jay Frank. I signed a management deal with Jay, but I'm still going down to see just to work on music and stuff because he wants to. He's hungry. Anyway, he signs me to a deal, and it's 50-50. But I was just so excited to get signed that I …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Kane Brown hilariously recounts how he signed a disastrous 50-50 deal that cost him tens of millions. The absurdity peaks when he explains how he went viral—only for the label to suddenly want him after saying no. His candidness about the music industry’s pitfalls makes this segment both entertaining and relatable.
“… learned about later. Confirmation bias is another problem. If you're sitting at a deathbed hoping for a sign, your brain might create one. Physicist Sean Carroll argues that life after death is incompatible with everything we know about modern physics. We're made of atoms, so when we die, it's like a candle being blown out. There's no way for consciousness to survive because there's nothing for it to survive in. Yeah, it seems to me you live your life like a candle in the wind. No more atoms to cling to when it rains set in. That was pretty good. Yeah, I just miss Norma Jean. The real Kennedy …”
“… is an even stronger argument. Every time you remember something, your brain edits the memory. Under extreme emotional stress, those edits get more dramatic. SDE experiencers may be unconsciously reshaping their memories to match patterns they learned about later. Confirmation bias is another problem. If you're sitting at a deathbed hoping for a sign, your brain might create one. Physicist Sean Carroll argues that life after death is incompatible with everything we know about modern physics. We're made of atoms, so when we die, it's like a candle being blown out. There's no way for consciousness to survive because there's nothing for it to survive in. Yeah, it seems to me you live your life like a candle in the wind. No more atoms to cling to when it rains set in. That was pretty good. Yeah, I just miss Norma Jean. The real Kennedy conspiracy is her death. Hashtag chapit did it. Skeptical investigator Joe Nichols says SDEs are psychological coping mechanisms. When people remember the moment of loss, they introduce false memories to make it more bearable. A 2024 study in Neuroscience of Consciousness found strong overlap between near experiences and psychedelic experiences The …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Shared death experiences (SDEs) are reported across cultures, with many believing they connect the living to the dying. However, skeptical explanations suggest these phenomena may be psychological coping mechanisms rather than evidence of an afterlife. This segment delves into the science behind SDEs, including concepts like shared psychosis and memory reconstruction, while also acknowledging the compelling cases that challenge purely skeptical views.
“… yeah, well, Paul was right, is included prominently. Yes. And even when they show the clip of Paul being interviewed after John murder they have Sean Lennon narrating his interpretation of it and trying to make it smoother and better Paul famously gave this, infamously gave this sort of like blank, disaffected interview, maybe a day or less than a day after Lennon was murdered. And it's a little bit of a black mark on his legacy because he just seems so unfeeling. it ends with yeah it's a drag and then thank you walks off it's real i mean it's really really yeah but i i did also feel that it …”
“… with remind me the Wiley manager's name. The Allens. Yeah. Klein. Klein. When they are finally freed or, you know, the arrangement. The whole arrangement and then breaking that up. Exactly. You know, that the archival clip of John Lennon being like, yeah, well, Paul was right, is included prominently. Yes. And even when they show the clip of Paul being interviewed after John murder they have Sean Lennon narrating his interpretation of it and trying to make it smoother and better Paul famously gave this, infamously gave this sort of like blank, disaffected interview, maybe a day or less than a day after Lennon was murdered. And it's a little bit of a black mark on his legacy because he just seems so unfeeling. it ends with yeah it's a drag and then thank you walks off it's real i mean it's really really yeah but i i did also feel that it was fair to him the way that sean kind of characterized that that it was sort of like this is a traumatic event and that this is a person who spent his life trying to protect himself right and in these events you can't give people too much not be in front of the cameras totally but there for every one of those you know the whole linda can't sing …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The latest documentary on Paul McCartney sheds light on his complex legacy, particularly in the shadow of John Lennon. It features archival clips and personal insights, showcasing how McCartney's work ethic impacted The Beatles and his individual artistry. While the film is engaging and well-edited, it could benefit from a deeper psychological focus on McCartney's journey.
“… tired. From your lips to Cosio's, man. Yeah, I hear ya, it's a fucking, it's a tough time. What else we got, what else we got? John, do you think Sean Hannity and Jesse Waters defend Trump out of genuine belief, or is it more about personal financial gain? I think sometimes one blends into the other. I think when you wear a mask long enough, you start to believe you're that character, and you do start seeing everything through that filter. It's one of the interesting things about like actors that are method, like you play a role long enough, and it's kinda hard, like, am I Frazier, or am I Kelsey …”
“… that, anything that he does can be redone and done better. So the lesson here is patience, this too shall pass. No, not patience, but like, it's gonna take, yeah, and the harder we work now, the faster this will be over. That's all. Now, I just got tired. From your lips to Cosio's, man. Yeah, I hear ya, it's a fucking, it's a tough time. What else we got, what else we got? John, do you think Sean Hannity and Jesse Waters defend Trump out of genuine belief, or is it more about personal financial gain? I think sometimes one blends into the other. I think when you wear a mask long enough, you start to believe you're that character, and you do start seeing everything through that filter. It's one of the interesting things about like actors that are method, like you play a role long enough, and it's kinda hard, like, am I Frazier, or am I Kelsey Graham, like, you know. Like how Austin Butler just kept that accent for like two years after Elvis. Jillian, that's perfect. That's the perfect analogy, you know. So Hannity's like kind of a normal radio host. He's like, I'm on the right, Combs is on the left, and now he's just like, look at me, I'm 60, and I take martial arts and defend whatever …”
View more
Ridealong summary
An aspiring comedian believes their anxiety and overthinking are barriers to confidence, but the truth is, these traits can be their greatest assets. Embracing these qualities can lead to unique comedic insights and relatable material. The key is to channel that energy into writing and performing, transforming anxiety into a superpower.
“… you what he thinks at the highest possible level. And think if you were to sit down, think about the, forget the content for just a second. If Sean Hannity was to sit down with Gavin Newsom, the slick, overly performative, ridiculous way of mannerisms and speaking and everything else, or any Democrat, if it was, if it was Anyone, well, Bernie, I would say, Bernie is Bernie. I'll give him that. He is Bernie. He's wrong about everything, but he's Bernie. But if you were the rest of them, the performative ridiculousness of Ilhan, of AOC, of all of them, of Chuck Schumer, who will say one thing from …”
“… is a guy who's kind of sitting back in that chair. And you can tell he's just telling you what he thinks. And what have I been telling you about Trump over the last however long at this point? What is so good about Trump right now is he's just telling you what he thinks at the highest possible level. And think if you were to sit down, think about the, forget the content for just a second. If Sean Hannity was to sit down with Gavin Newsom, the slick, overly performative, ridiculous way of mannerisms and speaking and everything else, or any Democrat, if it was, if it was Anyone, well, Bernie, I would say, Bernie is Bernie. I'll give him that. He is Bernie. He's wrong about everything, but he's Bernie. But if you were the rest of them, the performative ridiculousness of Ilhan, of AOC, of all of them, of Chuck Schumer, who will say one thing from five years ago in the complete reverse now. So there's Fetterman basically being like, look, I'm just gonna tell you what I think. It is what it is. And I hate to tell him, but as the years go by, he will continue to have those comfortable, enjoyable, pleasant conversations with hardcore right-wingers like Sean Hannity, and he will have less and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Hospice care fraud in Los Angeles is set to dwarf previous schemes, as uncovered by Nick Shirley, who filmed shocking evidence of empty facilities claiming to care for patients. With $6,000 per beneficiary at stake and many places boarded up, the investigation reveals a troubling pattern of deceit that could impact countless families. This alarming situation raises critical questions about oversight in end-of-life care.
“… are well over 50% saying that he's too quick to use force. Now I have an idea of who the 25% are. Who do you think they are? Andy? The boomers, the Sean Hannity boomers, the people who are, who are the people who have not waken up. they haven't woken up to the fact that our country's been subverted and they don't understand that every decision that's being made is not being made on behalf on behalf of american citizens they still believe that our government actually works on behalf of the citizens they believe in this patriotic indoctrination that's been pushed to them for their whole entire 80 years …”
“… 24 hours after next of kin notification. Now, here's the contention piece, folks. Okay, here's the contention piece. All right. 25% of Americans support any of this happening right now. Yeah. one in four back Trump's around strikes with most people are well over 50% saying that he's too quick to use force. Now I have an idea of who the 25% are. Who do you think they are? Andy? The boomers, the Sean Hannity boomers, the people who are, who are the people who have not waken up. they haven't woken up to the fact that our country's been subverted and they don't understand that every decision that's being made is not being made on behalf on behalf of american citizens they still believe that our government actually works on behalf of the citizens they believe in this patriotic indoctrination that's been pushed to them for their whole entire 80 years on this planet and um they're not going to look into it because everything else is bullshit everything else is conspiracy Things are what they seem to be on the surface and these people are very comfortable living that life yeah and uh they have not had to deal with any of the hardships or the uh the the unaffordability or the things that are …”
View more
Ridealong summary
As of March 2nd, the US death toll in military operations has risen to six, with major combat ongoing. Surprisingly, only 25% of Americans support these actions, reflecting a deep divide in public opinion, particularly among older generations who may not grasp the current geopolitical realities. This segment explores the disconnect between these views and the implications for future military engagement.
“These sound bites that we're going to play for you are all from one interview, one interview that Graham did last night with Sean Hannity. And I just have to say up front, Hannity offered zero pushback to any of this, zero to anything you were about to hear. like why not do your viewers the service of just saying at least hey you know here's the here's what your critics are saying here's what the president's critics are saying fox prize itself on having allegedly more independence watching its programming than any other cable news channel well that's not saying much but why not …”
“These sound bites that we're going to play for you are all from one interview, one interview that Graham did last night with Sean Hannity. And I just have to say up front, Hannity offered zero pushback to any of this, zero to anything you were about to hear. like why not do your viewers the service of just saying at least hey you know here's the here's what your critics are saying here's what the president's critics are saying fox prize itself on having allegedly more independence watching its programming than any other cable news channel well that's not saying much but why not service them and offer both sides like at least you're not going to have somebody who actually disagrees with lindsey graham but you as the anchor i used to do this. I know a thing or two about how to anchor a show that would wind up becoming the number one show on cable for a Fox News audience in a way that's meaningful. Offer pushback if you don't …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Senator Lindsey Graham declared that the U.S. is ready to go to war for Saudi Arabia, igniting outrage over his unchecked authority in foreign policy discussions. During an interview with Sean Hannity, Graham suggested a mutual defense agreement that would obligate the U.S. to protect Saudi Arabia against Iran. Critics argue that this undermines American interests and raises questions about who truly holds power in foreign decision-making.
Ridealong summary
Political speeches at the Oscars have evolved significantly, with presenters now feeling freer to make jokes about political issues without directly naming figures like Trump. This shift reflects a broader hesitation in Hollywood to engage in overt political statements, especially after fiery speeches in the early 2000s faced backlash. The conversation highlights the tension between using the platform for political commentary and the fear of backlash from audiences and media.
“Sean Baker did that last year. You know, that's that was unusual when he did it when he won four last year. But for the most part, that's very rarefied air. And it's not typically our guys, so to speak, who ascend to those spaces. Has not been until now. Until now. And so I find this to be a fascinating win. I find it to be the fact that it is a movie, as PTA said when he accepted his screenplay Oscar, that is very much about kind of exiting your …”
“Sean Baker did that last year. You know, that's that was unusual when he did it when he won four last year. But for the most part, that's very rarefied air. And it's not typically our guys, so to speak, who ascend to those spaces. Has not been until now. Until now. And so I find this to be a fascinating win. I find it to be the fact that it is a movie, as PTA said when he accepted his screenplay Oscar, that is very much about kind of exiting your youth, exiting that period of hope and expectation and handing it off to the people behind you. That that is the time when he is recognized while in the same category as a Ryan Coogler or a Josh Safdie and director is fascinating because that is usually what the Oscars makes you do. they say wait until you're 55 and you spent the last 20 30 years of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Paul Thomas Anderson's recent Oscar win for 'One Battle After Another' marks a significant moment in cinema, as it reflects a generational shift in recognition for filmmakers. Unlike many directors who wait decades for such accolades, Anderson's win celebrates his unique vision and creative integrity, while also addressing themes of aging and legacy. This recognition not only honors his work but also resonates deeply with the current cultural landscape, making it a defining moment for Gen X filmmakers.
“… undisputed, undefeated, Weed Whacker Guy. Champion of hurling grass and pollen everywhere. And in the blue corner, the challenger, extra strength, Hannity. Eye drops and work all day to prevent the release of histamines that cause itchy, allergy eyes. And the winner by knockout is Hannity. Hannity, bring it on. Mark Levin doesn't just read the news, he makes the news. Call the Mark Levin Show now at 877-381-3811. You know, when I was starting out in this business, actually with Mr. Producer, we had a hard and fast rule. We don't do what? Platform Nazis. Right, Mr. Producer? Is that a tough one? …”
“It's so disgraceful. Paradev presents, in the red corner, the undisputed, undefeated, Weed Whacker Guy. Champion of hurling grass and pollen everywhere. And in the blue corner, the challenger, extra strength, Hannity. Eye drops and work all day to prevent the release of histamines that cause itchy, allergy eyes. And the winner by knockout is Hannity. Hannity, bring it on. Mark Levin doesn't just read the news, he makes the news. Call the Mark Levin Show now at 877-381-3811. You know, when I was starting out in this business, actually with Mr. Producer, we had a hard and fast rule. We don't do what? Platform Nazis. Right, Mr. Producer? Is that a tough one? We don't platform Klansmen. We don't platform racists. so you know when Tucker Carlson hey can we have a debate at TPUSA can we do that please please a debate with a guy that fits all those categories what am I going to do debate my faith with a piece of you know what and I told him flat out you attack my faith you attack my stepson there's not …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Mark Levin draws a hard line against platforming hate, stating he won't engage with figures who attack his faith or family. He challenges the idea of civil debate with those he deems neo-fascist, emphasizing the dangers of normalizing such rhetoric. This highlights a broader conversation about the responsibilities of media in addressing controversial figures.
“… money they had because it was more than they knew what to do with, including buying grand pianos and Herman Miller chairs for people You also have Sean Duffy out there We going to talk about what happening at security at the airports He had a collision at LaGuardia of FAA problems all across the country Got Sean Duffy walking around begging for another billion to pick the FAA to modernize air traffic control recruiting of air traffic controllers. We can't get that money through Congress, but Trump's going to get $200 billion to pay for his war, basically to legalize it and authorize it after …”
“… do probably definitely vote, likely voters, 55-45. That's 10 points. That would be larger than the vote in 2018. The Pentagon budget's already over a trillion dollars. Stories recently about at the the last fiscal year, they were racing to spend what money they had because it was more than they knew what to do with, including buying grand pianos and Herman Miller chairs for people You also have Sean Duffy out there We going to talk about what happening at security at the airports He had a collision at LaGuardia of FAA problems all across the country Got Sean Duffy walking around begging for another billion to pick the FAA to modernize air traffic control recruiting of air traffic controllers. We can't get that money through Congress, but Trump's going to get $200 billion to pay for his war, basically to legalize it and authorize it after the fact. What are we doing here? Yeah, there are already, I was thinking they would do this last week, and I think best in”
View more
Ridealong summary
Voters overwhelmingly oppose a $200 billion funding request for the Iran war, creating a political opportunity for Democrats. Recent polls show that 56% of Americans are against more war funding, with significant disapproval of the war itself, prompting calls for a louder opposition. As the Pentagon faces budget excesses, the contrast between domestic needs and war spending raises critical questions about priorities.
“… them. He pays for the shoes, the White House said. President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have some. So do Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump's Communications Director. Wow, it's really everyone. Sean Hannity, Senator Lindsey Graham have a pair. One recipient said Trump had a stack of them in an office. A box for Scott for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett. Bessett does not want these. Maybe there's an opportunity to start the left-wing response to Florsheim since often these things get politicized. But …”
“… known for expensive Brioni suits, long red ties, and a pension for aesthetics late last year began searching for something that would feel better after a day on the job and settled on Florsheim. Trump liked them so much he started dispensing them. He pays for the shoes, the White House said. President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have some. So do Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump's Communications Director. Wow, it's really everyone. Sean Hannity, Senator Lindsey Graham have a pair. One recipient said Trump had a stack of them in an office. A box for Scott for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett. Bessett does not want these. Maybe there's an opportunity to start the left-wing response to Florsheim since often these things get politicized. But the real money is going deeper in the supply chain, selling weapons to both sides. This is the alpha. You know that both Alex Jones and Gwyneth Paltrow at one point were sourcing supplements from the same co-packer? Yes. Yes. The exact same ingredients, the exact same chemicals sold to two wildly opposing audiences. Like this is something that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump has been gifting Florsheim shoes to various political figures, raising eyebrows about the brand's unexpected political implications. This trend highlights how consumer choices can intertwine with political identities, potentially opening avenues for a left-wing alternative. Meanwhile, BYD's potential entry into motorsport represents a bold move for a Chinese manufacturer in a traditionally Western-dominated field.
“… media is attitudinally inclined to much of the media is attitudinally inclined to parrot the New York Times. But they all left and right This is the Sean Hannity phenomenon by which you like they not even covering it It like you quoting the New York Times They must be covering it because you talking about their reporting So it's the necessity component that comes in. And that is all true. But I will say also that when, you know, 30, 20, 30 years ago, there was the Washington Post. There was a Wall Street Journal was pretty much in the same place that it is now as a sort of like a breakthrough news …”
“… to dig deep. And when they hit the Epstein birthday letter, whatever, right, when they get there, they really get there, and it works for them. But nobody matches the New York Times for the breadth of the reporting and the amount of stuff. So the media is attitudinally inclined to much of the media is attitudinally inclined to parrot the New York Times. But they all left and right This is the Sean Hannity phenomenon by which you like they not even covering it It like you quoting the New York Times They must be covering it because you talking about their reporting So it's the necessity component that comes in. And that is all true. But I will say also that when, you know, 30, 20, 30 years ago, there was the Washington Post. There was a Wall Street Journal was pretty much in the same place that it is now as a sort of like a breakthrough news source. that popped big stories. And arguably, the Associated Press was more important than the New York Times. It was the first source in every newsroom in the world. And it had competition itself. And you had ABC, and you had NBC, all of whom together had 40 million people a day. And now there's the New York Times with 13 million people a day and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The New York Times has become an essential source of news, shaping media coverage across the country. Once merely aspirational, its reporting now drives the narratives of news outlets from all sides. While competitors like the Wall Street Journal excel in investigative journalism, none match the breadth and influence of the Times, which has transformed how news is consumed and reported.
“… and we'll play it for our audience just to get a little taste of it, you reference an interview that Pam Bondi, the attorney general, made to Sean Hannity in March of 2025 about getting rid of the Jack Smith team and trying to root out all of the partisan FBI agents and the like. In fact, we're going to play it now. That once the FBI was the world's premier law enforcement agency and that was weaponized and politicized, I believe the same with our intel community. How do we restore these institutions to their former greatness? Well, first and foremost, we got rid of the Jack Smith team gone. …”
“… agents they deserve their safety and they also deserve to be able to go back to their jobs and perform their jobs in the manner that FBI agents do which is keeping a low profile and not being subject to this kind of harassment In fact, in your complaint, and we'll play it for our audience just to get a little taste of it, you reference an interview that Pam Bondi, the attorney general, made to Sean Hannity in March of 2025 about getting rid of the Jack Smith team and trying to root out all of the partisan FBI agents and the like. In fact, we're going to play it now. That once the FBI was the world's premier law enforcement agency and that was weaponized and politicized, I believe the same with our intel community. How do we restore these institutions to their former greatness? Well, first and foremost, we got rid of the Jack Smith team gone. Those people are gone. We're still trying to find out. There are a lot of people in the FBI and also in the Department of Justice who despise Donald Trump, despise us, don't want to be there. We will find them because you have to believe in transparency. You have to believe in honesty. You have to do the right thing. And right now we're going to root …”
View more
Ridealong summary
FBI agents involved in the Arctic Frost investigation are facing violent threats after incendiary comments from officials, including President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi. Despite their professionalism, these agents were wrongfully targeted and denied due process, raising serious safety concerns and implications for their careers.
“… ones who actually go to the polls, all think it's going swimmingly. That's what they believe because that's what they're being told every night by Sean Hannity. I mean, his show is full propaganda with Lindsey Graham every night, Tom Cotton, you know, all these big cheerleaders for the war. And then you've got like, let me know when we have it. Like the one time one guy tried to ask a dissenting question, he got his hand slapped by General Jack Keene, who I also really, I love General Keene, but he's, you know, show the hammer, the nail. What is it? To a hammer, everything's a nail. Of course, he's in …”
“… I love Will Cain and he's an honest broker. But he's the only one who's like tried to like ask a couple skeptical questions like this isn't great. Everybody else is cheerleading the war. So Republican voters who are older voters, but they are the ones who actually go to the polls, all think it's going swimmingly. That's what they believe because that's what they're being told every night by Sean Hannity. I mean, his show is full propaganda with Lindsey Graham every night, Tom Cotton, you know, all these big cheerleaders for the war. And then you've got like, let me know when we have it. Like the one time one guy tried to ask a dissenting question, he got his hand slapped by General Jack Keene, who I also really, I love General Keene, but he's, you know, show the hammer, the nail. What is it? To a hammer, everything's a nail. Of course, he's in favor of this action. And to me, it's just evidence of the media problem we're having. When you look at the Republican numbers, we have the side. Here it is. Watch what happened. You know, I think the objectives are pretty clear. Hanks just secretary just laid it out. The president has laid it out and the secretary of state has laid it out. The …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump's fascination with quick military victories may lead to disastrous consequences in Iran, as he offloads responsibility to J.D. Vance. With American casualties potentially rising, public sentiment among voters, especially women, could shift dramatically against him. This highlights a troubling media landscape where dissenting voices are stifled, leaving many Republicans unaware of the true stakes involved.
“… any kind of poll. And it's he's watching Fox News, which is telling him the same thing. And he's getting fake polling. I guess they're only polling Sean Hannity's viewers or something. And so I'm not sure that there's a sense as if this was yesterday because I was getting so agitated and worried. I don't think that there's a sense that this is unpopular. Great. I mean, so what do you make of that? First of all, the polling thing is – I haven't seen polling like that.”
“… because I think it's so important. And the person says, don't bother. Because he's being shown polling that this war is like a 90-10 win for him. and I said, I don't know where that polling is coming from. It's like, you know, I guess you can make any kind of poll. And it's he's watching Fox News, which is telling him the same thing. And he's getting fake polling. I guess they're only polling Sean Hannity's viewers or something. And so I'm not sure that there's a sense as if this was yesterday because I was getting so agitated and worried. I don't think that there's a sense that this is unpopular. Great. I mean, so what do you make of that? First of all, the polling thing is – I haven't seen polling like that.”
View more
Ridealong summary
Trump is reportedly being misled by fake polling that suggests a 90% approval for a war, highlighting a concerning disconnect between reality and his sources. This moment mirrors George W. Bush's infamous golfing incident where he prioritized hitting a golf ball over serious questions about war. The influence of Tucker Carlson in shaping Trump's understanding of public opinion raises alarms about decision-making in the White House.
“… Hence the nickname, The Great One. Let's pause for a second on The Great One. It's so ridiculous. Did he give himself that name? Or is that a Sean Hannity introduction? I think either Rush Limbaugh. Trump here says Sean Hannity came up with it. it was either rush or sean who did um yeah we should start handing out nicknames yeah mark would often do sean's show speaking as a lawyer and sean realized then as did others that he was special i can't believe they talked to each other like this mark levator is not looking to do television radio or anything else but he was drafted by very smart people …”
“… words It so small the font and the print But it just says Mark Levin a truly great American patriot somewhat under siege by other people with far less intellect I can't even read it. Capability and love for our country. Mark is tough, strong and brilliant. Hence the nickname, The Great One. Let's pause for a second on The Great One. It's so ridiculous. Did he give himself that name? Or is that a Sean Hannity introduction? I think either Rush Limbaugh. Trump here says Sean Hannity came up with it. it was either rush or sean who did um yeah we should start handing out nicknames yeah mark would often do sean's show speaking as a lawyer and sean realized then as did others that he was special i can't believe they talked to each other like this mark levator is not looking to do television radio or anything else but he was drafted by very smart people who understood that there are a few like him he is a true conservative and it's like blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah okay this just goes on and on and on. We don't need to keep reading this. Well, wait, there's a key part where he says, you know, when other, when you hear others attack Mark, remember they are a jealous and angry human …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump publicly defends Mark Levin, calling him a 'great American patriot' while indirectly addressing criticisms from Megyn Kelly. This response highlights the tension within conservative circles, as Trump positions Levin as a key figure in the MAGA movement. The drama unfolds as Levin's abrasive personality clashes with the expectations of broader support from right-wing audiences.
“… yeah, yeah. And so there like I mean we have a lot of I the boss but of this department like we got Vincent we have Mitch I would argue with love to Sean Beam who one of my favorites that he is quite miscast us as Mitch. And I think it's just very odd, though, obviously wonderful to get the Lord of the Rings jokes. I don't like that joke. Too much, too winky. I just think it like takes you out. It does. It's just sort of like, we all know that Sean Beam was in Lord of the Rings, you know? I had the Hermes crew. Oh, you Google. No, no, no. Who is Elrond? Who is Elrond? to me yeah yeah yeah and …”
“… very, very, very funny. But I think also that casting... is indicative of why I bump on the humor in this movie a little bit. I'm like, if you don't get the tone quite right, or you're playing it slightly differently, it doesn't communicate. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And so there like I mean we have a lot of I the boss but of this department like we got Vincent we have Mitch I would argue with love to Sean Beam who one of my favorites that he is quite miscast us as Mitch. And I think it's just very odd, though, obviously wonderful to get the Lord of the Rings jokes. I don't like that joke. Too much, too winky. I just think it like takes you out. It does. It's just sort of like, we all know that Sean Beam was in Lord of the Rings, you know? I had the Hermes crew. Oh, you Google. No, no, no. Who is Elrond? Who is Elrond? to me yeah yeah yeah and once they started doing like the i mean they acknowledge it in the movie but who is sean being in lord of the warmeir who's that he's what's the guy he dies the first time man of gondor man of gondor i just learned one of the members of the original fellowship yeah the tree people yeah the ends okay just learned about the end well i just mean lord of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Despite being a gripping survival story, 'The Martian' features an ensemble cast that some argue detracts from the film's impact. The discussion highlights how the humor and character choices, particularly Kristen Wiig's role, may have misaligned with the film's tone, affecting the overall emotional experience. The segment also explores the tension and anxiety that make the film rewatchable, even when the outcome is known.
Top Podcasts About Sean Hannity
Bulwark Takes
4 episodes
The Megyn Kelly Show
3 episodes
The Big Picture
2 episodes
PBD Podcast
1 episode
The Bobby Bones Show
1 episode
The Why Files: Operation Podcast
1 episode
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart
1 episode
The Rubin Report
1 episode