Best Podcast Episodes About Putin
Everything podcasters are saying about Putin — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 27, 2026 – 83 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Putin.
Top Podcast Clips About Putin
“That guy has a fucking fourth grade vocabulary. I mean, shit, I even saw this thing Putin did for International Women's Day. I was like, the women, they work, but they are also so nice and feminine. How did they do this at the same time? Like, even Putin can hold it together and act like a human every now and then. What is his accidental thing? Is he just like, what are we talking about, women? This is in... Women's Day. This is like the unedited thing. He's like, give me something to drink before I kill you. Oh, they accidentally …”
“That guy has a fucking fourth grade vocabulary. I mean, shit, I even saw this thing Putin did for International Women's Day. I was like, the women, they work, but they are also so nice and feminine. How did they do this at the same time? Like, even Putin can hold it together and act like a human every now and then. What is his accidental thing? Is he just like, what are we talking about, women? This is in... Women's Day. This is like the unedited thing. He's like, give me something to drink before I kill you. Oh, they accidentally released this. I'm sure he was thrilled about that. I'm sure nobody got fucking beheaded for doing that. It's terrible. Ladies and gentlemen, I am very happy to congratulate you on International Women's Day. See? Ladies and gentlemen, I am sincerely pleased to congratulate you on the International Women's Day. This is not the clip. We always …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, the hosts mock Putin's fourth-grade vocabulary and his bizarre attempt to celebrate International Women's Day. The punchline hits when they question whether anyone got beheaded for the awkward celebration, showcasing the absurdity of cultural differences in honoring women.
“… than what he's done in the last month is a catastrophe. No question. economically, geostrategically, politically, the law. Well, I think Vladimir Putin would disagree. We can come on. I think he's quite excited about what Donald Trump has done. We could come on to him. I should have inserted the words democratically elected. There we go. I get that. Right. But they're all having to deal with the fallout. Yes. From what is essentially a catastrophic misjudication. by a terrible president. Now, I'm not suggesting that Keir Starmer stands up and says this is a catastrophic misjudgment by a …”
“… it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. What I think has to happen, Mark Carney's Davos speech, the principles in that speech are what should be applied now. Because there's barely a leader in the world, apart from Donald Trump, who thinks anything other than what he's done in the last month is a catastrophe. No question. economically, geostrategically, politically, the law. Well, I think Vladimir Putin would disagree. We can come on. I think he's quite excited about what Donald Trump has done. We could come on to him. I should have inserted the words democratically elected. There we go. I get that. Right. But they're all having to deal with the fallout. Yes. From what is essentially a catastrophic misjudication. by a terrible president. Now, I'm not suggesting that Keir Starmer stands up and says this is a catastrophic misjudgment by a terrible president. But I think all of them should get together and say we are being put in this position because the American administration has decided to completely upend the world order. We therefore have to start to design and devise the world order that follows this. And if the Americans are on. I mean, there have been rumblings of that. I mean, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, the hosts humorously dissect the absurdity of Donald Trump's diplomatic style, comparing him to an 'impulsive man baby' wielding military power. The discussion takes a sharp turn when they ponder how Keir Starmer could have called Trump out during a press event, leading to a hilariously imagined confrontation that showcases the ridiculousness of political decorum.
“I believe that Trump has known all along, like the rest of the world has known, that Putin's plans were to continue with aggression in Ukraine, and that Trump knowingly helped Putin with this endeavor through Trump's stalling techniques and maneuvers regarding Ukraine that have continued to occur. I believe that Putin likely has blackmail-type material on Trump, and they likely have a mutual agreement regarding the stalling of any peace process in Ukraine, as well as an agreement regarding a possible crisis creation in the future …”
“I believe that Trump has known all along, like the rest of the world has known, that Putin's plans were to continue with aggression in Ukraine, and that Trump knowingly helped Putin with this endeavor through Trump's stalling techniques and maneuvers regarding Ukraine that have continued to occur. I believe that Putin likely has blackmail-type material on Trump, and they likely have a mutual agreement regarding the stalling of any peace process in Ukraine, as well as an agreement regarding a possible crisis creation in the future that would help Trump's position. What do you think about that? That's Linda. That's a lot of speculation. Well, we know that Donald has kowtowed to Putin. Remember in Helsinki in 2018, he said, I don't trust any of the American intelligence agencies, but I take Vladimir Putin at his word. He's had at least two meetings with him where there was no one …”
View more
Ridealong summary
David Cay Johnston claims that Donald Trump has knowingly aided Vladimir Putin's aggression in Ukraine, possibly due to compromising material Putin holds over him. He argues that Trump's actions, including lifting sanctions, have directly benefited Russia while undermining democracy. Johnston also criticizes Biden's diplomatic approach, suggesting it has prolonged the conflict and given Russia an advantage.
“… wealthy rushed to repatriate their fortunes. But, and this is the fourth reason the Russian economy is still ticking, Russian President Vladimir Putin was ready. There was a lot of durability and buffers built in right at the outset. You saw very cautious economic policy from Russia, tight fiscal policy, tight monetary policy, deleveraging, reducing vulnerabilities and building up buffers. Tim says Putin was likely planning for sanctions as far back as the invasion of Crimea in 2014. He put skilled technocrats in charge of the economy who've managed things well. They stopped money flowing …”
“… There's no penalty, really, for helping Russia get around sanctions. And actually, sanctions pay. Tim says the sanctions did give Russia a jolt when they were first put in place in 2022. He says about $100 billion flowed out of the country as Russia's wealthy rushed to repatriate their fortunes. But, and this is the fourth reason the Russian economy is still ticking, Russian President Vladimir Putin was ready. There was a lot of durability and buffers built in right at the outset. You saw very cautious economic policy from Russia, tight fiscal policy, tight monetary policy, deleveraging, reducing vulnerabilities and building up buffers. Tim says Putin was likely planning for sanctions as far back as the invasion of Crimea in 2014. He put skilled technocrats in charge of the economy who've managed things well. They stopped money flowing out. They stockpiled dollars. Alina says they forced foreign companies to sell their operations, often at fire sale prices. The Kyiv School of Economics estimated in March 25 last year that foreign businesses suffered over billion in direct losses She says the sales of these foreign companies gave Putin a golden opportunity to shift key assets into …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Despite severe sanctions and war, Russia's economy remains surprisingly stable due to strategic planning by President Putin. By building economic buffers and creating a loyal base of oligarchs, he ensured that the wealthy would support the regime, even amidst shocks. This unique approach, termed 'death economics,' showcases how sanctions have paradoxically strengthened Russia's financial resilience.
“… Next, I want to show you the cross-examination by Democratic Congress member Keating. And he grills De Nanno about the Trump regime's support of Putin, whether or not they view Putin as a war criminal. Hint, hint, De Nanno basically refuses to answer the question, and he's like all over the place with his answer. And this Congress member's like, why would you be cutting support for like Ukraine right now and bolstering support for Russia. Like, what are you doing right now? I want you to watch as DiNano, who exposes himself yet again, and this whole Trump regime as Putin puppets right here, …”
“… the potential for nuclear fallout, and you won't answer this basic question. Well, again, it would be outside of my purview as the arms control and arm proliferation under Secretary to discuss that specific question. Sir, that is a dereliction of duty. Next, I want to show you the cross-examination by Democratic Congress member Keating. And he grills De Nanno about the Trump regime's support of Putin, whether or not they view Putin as a war criminal. Hint, hint, De Nanno basically refuses to answer the question, and he's like all over the place with his answer. And this Congress member's like, why would you be cutting support for like Ukraine right now and bolstering support for Russia. Like, what are you doing right now? I want you to watch as DiNano, who exposes himself yet again, and this whole Trump regime as Putin puppets right here, watch him get crushed under cross-examination. Let's play this clip. You're also cutting the support we have for the general prosecutor in Ukraine that's prosecuting war crimes. Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal, sir? Sir, again, that's well outside of my purview as the T undersecretary. No, no. How about as an American? No, as an American person and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a heated cross-examination, Congressman Keating confronts a top Trump official about the administration's support for Vladimir Putin and the implications for war crimes in Ukraine. Despite the gravity of the situation, the official dodges direct questions, failing to acknowledge Putin as a war criminal while discussing cuts to critical support for Ukraine's prosecution of war crimes. This exchange highlights the troubling priorities of the Trump regime amidst ongoing atrocities in Ukraine.
“This one infuriates me. Brian Kilmeade asks Trump, do you think Putin is helping Iran? And I'll just let it play out from there. Do you think Putin is helping him? I think he might be helping him a little bit. Yeah, I guess. And he probably thinks we're helping Ukraine, right? And you are, right? Yeah, we're helping him also. And so he says that. And China would say the same thing. You know, it's like, hey, they do it and we do it in all fairness. OK, I'm just going to be candid here. Trump is Putin's little …”
“This one infuriates me. Brian Kilmeade asks Trump, do you think Putin is helping Iran? And I'll just let it play out from there. Do you think Putin is helping him? I think he might be helping him a little bit. Yeah, I guess. And he probably thinks we're helping Ukraine, right? And you are, right? Yeah, we're helping him also. And so he says that. And China would say the same thing. You know, it's like, hey, they do it and we do it in all fairness. OK, I'm just going to be candid here. Trump is Putin's little bitch. He's being incredibly cavalier, apathetic and like nonchalant about Vladimir Putin helping our enemy target U.S. service members. I just reported not even three minutes ago that six U service members were killed in an air plug at a crash and the Islamic resistance of Iraq tried to claim that it did it So we have enemies in the Middle East, like …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump downplays Vladimir Putin's support for Iran, suggesting it's akin to U.S. aid for Ukraine. This false equivalency not only misrepresents international relations but also shows a disturbing lack of awareness about the realities of U.S. military losses. The comparison trivializes the serious implications of Russian aggression and undermines the sacrifices made by American service members.
“… drones to Iran along with satellite imagery, targeting data, and intelligence support that has been crippling to the United States. and Vladimir Putin and Lavrov and Yushikov and Dmitriyov, the crew that keeps on meeting with Witkoff and Kushner, who keep getting more concessions out of the United States, they're out there bragging and boasting that the United States military bases throughout the Middle East have been obliterated. You want to use the word obliterated, Donald? New York Times is reporting how Iran just wrecked all of America's Gulf bases. Kuwait gutted with collapsed roofs and …”
“All hell is breaking loose as Russia has entered Donald Trump's war against Iran in a big way. Russia ain't hiding the fact that it has been sending drones to Iran along with satellite imagery, targeting data, and intelligence support that has been crippling to the United States. and Vladimir Putin and Lavrov and Yushikov and Dmitriyov, the crew that keeps on meeting with Witkoff and Kushner, who keep getting more concessions out of the United States, they're out there bragging and boasting that the United States military bases throughout the Middle East have been obliterated. You want to use the word obliterated, Donald? New York Times is reporting how Iran just wrecked all of America's Gulf bases. Kuwait gutted with collapsed roofs and smashed radar. 17 U.S. sites have been hit in the Middle East region. $800 million or more in damage in weeks. Our troops have basically abandoned all of the American military bases in the Middle East. May I repeat that? Our troops have abandoned basically all of the military bases in the Middle East, and now they are working remotely from hotels …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Russia has dramatically escalated its involvement in Iran's military actions against U.S. bases, sending drones and critical intelligence that has led to significant damage and troop relocations. With 17 U.S. military sites hit and American personnel now working from hotels, the situation has become dire, exposing vulnerabilities in U.S. defense strategies. This shift highlights a new era of warfare where traditional military bases are increasingly becoming targets, thanks to foreign alliances and advanced technology.
“Donald Trump is panicking as Vladimir Putin just put him on blast and made a public ultimatum trying to call Donald Trump and Trump's regime out. Putin said that, yes, he is giving intelligence to Iran, but he said that he would stop giving intelligence to Iran to help Iran target American soldiers, kill Americans and harm American interests. So long as the United States cuts off support to Ukraine, Politico reports. Now, it's being reported that the U.S. at a military level is rejecting …”
“Donald Trump is panicking as Vladimir Putin just put him on blast and made a public ultimatum trying to call Donald Trump and Trump's regime out. Putin said that, yes, he is giving intelligence to Iran, but he said that he would stop giving intelligence to Iran to help Iran target American soldiers, kill Americans and harm American interests. So long as the United States cuts off support to Ukraine, Politico reports. Now, it's being reported that the U.S. at a military level is rejecting this proposal, although Donald Trump has not commented. But this has left many across the world incredibly nervous that this is a deal that Donald Trump is contemplating. Moscow proposed a quid pro quo. And you know Donald Trump loves quid pro quos to the U.S., although Donald Trump never makes good on his side of the quid pro quo, unless it's …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump's actions and rhetoric are exacerbating tensions with Iran and destabilizing international relations, potentially leading to economic turmoil.
Trump's actions are destabilizing global markets and could lead to disastrous economic consequences, including soaring oil prices and inflation.
The U.S. military's rejection of Putin's proposal and Trump's antagonistic stance towards NATO are exacerbating global tensions and economic instability.
Trump's actions are causing chaos in global markets, with potential oil prices skyrocketing to $200 per barrel due to his reckless foreign policy decisions.
“… Seven, or G7, nations with advanced economies, has maintained sanctions against Russia since it invaded Ukraine in 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been eager to get those sanctions dropped because oil sales will help the flailing Russian economy. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant says the move is necessary to help ease oil prices, which are skyrocketing because Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the attack by the U.S. and Israel. But German Chancellor Friedrich Maers says the heads of the G7 had urged Trump not to ease the sanctions, saying, There is currently a …”
“… forces in the Middle East, late last night, the Trump administration lifted sanctions on shipments of Russian oil until April 11, permitting it to be sold to buyers around the world for the next month. The U.S., along with the rest of the Group of Seven, or G7, nations with advanced economies, has maintained sanctions against Russia since it invaded Ukraine in 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been eager to get those sanctions dropped because oil sales will help the flailing Russian economy. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant says the move is necessary to help ease oil prices, which are skyrocketing because Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the attack by the U.S. and Israel. But German Chancellor Friedrich Maers says the heads of the G7 had urged Trump not to ease the sanctions, saying, There is currently a price problem, but not a supply problem. He added that he would like to know what additional motives led the U.S. government to make this decision. After Trump lifted sanctions on Russian oil that was already in ships, Democrats cried foul. At a Senate Armed Services Committee meeting yesterday, Senator Angus King, an independent of Maine, said, There …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a surprising move, the Trump administration lifted sanctions on Russian oil, allowing shipments to resume despite Russia's intelligence support for Iran against U.S. forces. This decision comes as oil prices soar due to Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, benefiting Russia by an estimated $6 billion in just two weeks. Meanwhile, Ukraine steps up to assist the U.S. with drone defense, contradicting Trump's claims of self-sufficiency in military technology.
“… attacked this nation, that nation. You know, Donald Trump said all these nations that wanted to help will go after you. It's like declaring war. Putin goes to do a Vladimir Putin. I'm heading over to Cuba. And Donald Trump's like, welcome, welcome to Cuba right off the shore of Florida. Why don't you come in? Now, if you also don't believe that Vladimir Putin is also helping give Cuba weapons right now, in my opinion, you are very naive. You don't think that they're bringing Shahid drones and other weapons. How do we know? How do we not know? At the end of the day, what Trump did there was, …”
“… and says, all right, we're going to go and deliver this oil. And then the U.S. is like, OK, well, we're not going to do anything. You can come on in and you can then defeat the entire purpose of everything we've been saying to every other nation. We've attacked this nation, that nation. You know, Donald Trump said all these nations that wanted to help will go after you. It's like declaring war. Putin goes to do a Vladimir Putin. I'm heading over to Cuba. And Donald Trump's like, welcome, welcome to Cuba right off the shore of Florida. Why don't you come in? Now, if you also don't believe that Vladimir Putin is also helping give Cuba weapons right now, in my opinion, you are very naive. You don't think that they're bringing Shahid drones and other weapons. How do we know? How do we not know? At the end of the day, what Trump did there was, again, extra, extra weak. I mean, as Jose Diaz-Baseno explains, two months after signing an executive order threatening Mexico and all these countries with tariffs, if they sent oil to Cuba, Trump says he's got no problem now at all with Russia doing so. Come on in, Russia. Happy to do it. So Donald Trump was aboard Air Force One and he was asked, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump's blockade against Cuba has crumbled, allowing Putin to send a Russian oil tanker to the island. This move not only strengthens ties between Trump and Putin but also poses significant risks to U.S. security. The implications of this alliance could have lasting effects on international relations and American interests.
“… on my own podcast with this really amazing historian and technologist Claire Evans. And she has this book all about the history of women in computing. And I guess the thesis would be, you know, that we are often told that technology is a boys club and that women and other marginalized people are trying to like break their way in. But actually, women have been at the start of computing since the beginning. And so it's like rightfully our domain. We are not trying to break in anywhere. Like it is our landscape. And that some of the reasons why women and kind of get pushed out of tech, both in …”
“… route and this sort of feminized skill set and this kind of traditionally masculinized or seen as a very masculine field. And I just love it. I love it so much. Yeah, it makes me it's a good reminder for all of us. You know, I did an interview on my own podcast with this really amazing historian and technologist Claire Evans. And she has this book all about the history of women in computing. And I guess the thesis would be, you know, that we are often told that technology is a boys club and that women and other marginalized people are trying to like break their way in. But actually, women have been at the start of computing since the beginning. And so it's like rightfully our domain. We are not trying to break in anywhere. Like it is our landscape. And that some of the reasons why women and kind of get pushed out of tech, both in terms of like careers, but also just in terms of like who gets remembered who doesn who goes overlooked First of all just to be clear a lot of it is just good old fashioned sexism like nothing special about that But then another aspect of it is exactly what you were saying, is that a lot of times the contributions that women have made to computers …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Women have been at the forefront of computing since its inception, yet their contributions often go unrecognized due to sexism and the intangible nature of their work. Susan Kare's design work for Apple and the coding efforts behind fan fiction platform AO3 exemplify this trend, highlighting the need for intentional preservation of women's achievements in technology. It's crucial to acknowledge that technology is not just a boys' club; it's a landscape that women have shaped from the beginning.
“… paper that came out in December of 25, for example, they acknowledge this in the paper. They say, essentially, we are constrained by a lack of computing power. And the DeepSeek CEO, when I was in office in 2024, said, my issue is not talent and it's not money, it's computing power. And he's right. He's absolutely right. So I think several things are true here where DeepSeek people can be very talented, which they are, and also it can be the case that computing power remains incredibly important. In fact, probably the most important US advantage. So none of this changes in my mind on the policy …”
“And they're constrained in their performance. They, in many respects, lag US companies because of their inability to get US chips. And if you look at the DeepSeek v3.2 paper that came out in December of 25, for example, they acknowledge this in the paper. They say, essentially, we are constrained by a lack of computing power. And the DeepSeek CEO, when I was in office in 2024, said, my issue is not talent and it's not money, it's computing power. And he's right. He's absolutely right. So I think several things are true here where DeepSeek people can be very talented, which they are, and also it can be the case that computing power remains incredibly important. In fact, probably the most important US advantage. So none of this changes in my mind on the policy side of it and what we did or didn't do.”
View more
Ridealong summary
The DeepSeek CEO revealed that their biggest hurdle isn't talent or funding, but a critical shortage of computing power due to restrictions on US chips. This limitation significantly hampers their performance compared to US companies. Understanding this dynamic highlights how crucial computing power is for maintaining a competitive edge in AI and cybersecurity.
“… so they ship the i assume that Annapurna, which is the internal place that Amazon makes its chips, ships them, it looks like, to Foxconn, Quanta Computing, and Jabil. And then they put them in the servers. So really, it's them cutting the checks to them. I'm going to be watching the monthly earnings of those companies in Taiwan quite viciously, because here's the thing. If it's all $200 billion of capex, if they really think they're going to get paid that much, but what happens? Has Amazon ever faced the situation where they did an overbuild? Has that ever happened to them? What did they do? …”
“because he builds the chips no these are the server manufacturing ships themselves because they have anapurna they bought and do the design but they don't do the fab so they ship the i assume that Annapurna, which is the internal place that Amazon makes its chips, ships them, it looks like, to Foxconn, Quanta Computing, and Jabil. And then they put them in the servers. So really, it's them cutting the checks to them. I'm going to be watching the monthly earnings of those companies in Taiwan quite viciously, because here's the thing. If it's all $200 billion of capex, if they really think they're going to get paid that much, but what happens? Has Amazon ever faced the situation where they did an overbuild? Has that ever happened to them? What did they do? Yes. They made a bunch of noises about it. During the pandemic, they overbuilt their distribution centers. Ah, but that's people buy stuff. Exactly. That was my position on it. And it feels like, okay, like they slowed it down and they didn't shut them down, but they waited for people to grow into it. The thing is, a warehouse that you use to ship out …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Amazon's massive $200 billion investment in AI and Tranium chips may lead to a significant problem: potential obsolescence. As they rush to release newer generations of chips, the question arises whether their current offerings can keep pace with the rapidly evolving tech landscape. This situation mirrors the fate of Osborne Computer, which failed due to similar over-promising and under-delivering on technology.
“… you realize it could go that way. If these things are done and goes that way, if another thing has done. Hmm. You've been in the room with Vladimir Putin. What's your impression of him? Well, it wasn't as extensive as so many of the people, you know, obviously in the U S government who have had a lot of interaction with them. So I don't want to put it on. So I just happen to have a fairly unique one-time thing where we met in his first foreign trip. I was in Norway, uh, I'm Norwegian America, as I said, so it was a great honor for me to go back to Norway. And I happened to be there again. One of …”
“… spiritual stuff later, missus mystical experiences is history is not inevitable. History isn't history comes together because of the decisions people make. And when you're experiencing it live, like in a war or in a coup or in a change of government, you realize it could go that way. If these things are done and goes that way, if another thing has done. Hmm. You've been in the room with Vladimir Putin. What's your impression of him? Well, it wasn't as extensive as so many of the people, you know, obviously in the U S government who have had a lot of interaction with them. So I don't want to put it on. So I just happen to have a fairly unique one-time thing where we met in his first foreign trip. I was in Norway, uh, I'm Norwegian America, as I said, so it was a great honor for me to go back to Norway. And I happened to be there again. One of these things, I thank God a little bit for the privilege of to be there during the last meeting of what was called the Oslo peace accord process was started in Oslo, Norway, and now it was culminating. So this was, uh, in the November, 1993, 93, no, no, 1998, 1998, the last meeting. Oh, okay. And, uh, the last meeting was one amazing. No, I had no …”
View more
Ridealong summary
During a pivotal dinner in 1998, Vladimir Putin's presence hinted at his future significance in global politics. Observing interactions between key leaders, the speaker felt a sense of foreboding about the peace process, which ultimately unraveled due to extremist factions. This moment underscores the unpredictable nature of history and the impact of individual decisions on global events.
“… issue, yet it highlights the need for decision-making alignment in your cybersecurity architecture. Organizational stress becomes clear when edge computing meets integration challenges. This week, a partnership in the mining sector faced hurdles while trying to implement edge technologies. Without strong integration, they experienced delays, affecting crucial real-time decisions. If companies ignore these technological shifts, they'll face serious operational slowdowns. Fragmentation appears in both physical and digital realms due to inefficient data processing. This issue goes beyond simple tech …”
“… the situation, setting compliance boundaries around cybersecurity practices is essential. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities are also vital for maintaining a proactive defense against intrusions. You might see this as a purely technology issue, yet it highlights the need for decision-making alignment in your cybersecurity architecture. Organizational stress becomes clear when edge computing meets integration challenges. This week, a partnership in the mining sector faced hurdles while trying to implement edge technologies. Without strong integration, they experienced delays, affecting crucial real-time decisions. If companies ignore these technological shifts, they'll face serious operational slowdowns. Fragmentation appears in both physical and digital realms due to inefficient data processing. This issue goes beyond simple tech problems. It highlights who holds the power to make key decisions. Many teams focus on keeping their IT systems running, but the real challenge is evolving those workflows to meet industry needs. If strategic projects aren't prioritized in tech planning, the entire operational structure suffers, reducing responsiveness. To improve this situation, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Ignoring integration challenges in technology can lead to operational slowdowns, as seen in a recent mining sector partnership that struggled with edge computing. Their delays in real-time decision-making highlight the critical importance of clear roles and decision-making alignment in cybersecurity and technology adoption. Companies must prioritize strategic tech planning to avoid fragmentation and inefficiencies.
“Let's dive into edge computing. It sounds like a technical term my kids use when they're talking about remote gaming. But what's it really about? Great question. Edge computing processes data closer to where it's generated. Think of it like getting a snack from the pantry instead of cooking a full meal. Okay, but why does it matter? Are we talking about faster streaming or something more groundbreaking? It's much bigger than that. Edge computing reduces latency, enhances …”
“Let's dive into edge computing. It sounds like a technical term my kids use when they're talking about remote gaming. But what's it really about? Great question. Edge computing processes data closer to where it's generated. Think of it like getting a snack from the pantry instead of cooking a full meal. Okay, but why does it matter? Are we talking about faster streaming or something more groundbreaking? It's much bigger than that. Edge computing reduces latency, enhances response times, and boosts efficiency in industries like trucking and aerospace. For instance, companies like Satellite are leveraging it to transform their operations. So ignoring edge computing could be like ignoring an airport security line. Things will get chaotic. Exactly. If businesses overlook it, they risk falling behind. Just look at the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Ignoring edge computing could lead to chaos in industries, much like neglecting airport security. By processing data closer to its source, companies are achieving groundbreaking efficiencies, such as real-time decision-making in mining and enhanced operations in aerospace. Embracing edge computing is essential for staying competitive and unlocking new capabilities.
“… open source through the final miles of adoption in companies and enterprises, as well as what is actually happening on the research world. Sky Computing Lab, over the last few years, has produced amazing infrastructure and new research ideas, and Jan continued to explore a new frontier on that front, and then we're quite excited to hear that, and also innovate on the open source together. Yeah, and he also helps recruiting a lot, and he's involved in all of our hiring process. He basically teaches us how to tell talents, where to find talents. These are all amazingly helpful. So, on that …”
“… this project since its inception. Jan knows open source project, academic project, industry research trend, in and out. So, from what we're working together on, Jan really helps us with both clearly understanding all the lessons learned about bringing open source through the final miles of adoption in companies and enterprises, as well as what is actually happening on the research world. Sky Computing Lab, over the last few years, has produced amazing infrastructure and new research ideas, and Jan continued to explore a new frontier on that front, and then we're quite excited to hear that, and also innovate on the open source together. Yeah, and he also helps recruiting a lot, and he's involved in all of our hiring process. He basically teaches us how to tell talents, where to find talents. These are all amazingly helpful. So, on that topic, what are some of the big problems you need to solve now, and what type of people are you hiring to help you solve? Definitely, the inference at scale is kind of one of the biggest challenges, I think, in the field, not only for us, but in the field overall. So, we are trying to hire more, like very experienced ML infra engineers overall to make, …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Jan Stoica, co-founder of Databricks, plays a pivotal role in mentoring students and guiding startups in the open-source AI space. His insights bridge academic research and industry needs, especially in hiring talent and tackling challenges like scaling machine learning infrastructure. This mentorship is crucial for new companies navigating the complexities of open-source adoption and innovation.
“… threading their GPUs through Taiwan. There are companies like Honhai Precision Corporation Limited, which is better known as Foxconn, Quanta Computing, Wistron, WeWin, there are others too, nevertheless. These are big Taiwanese server companies that buy the GPUs from NVIDIA and then they ship them to Microsoft or Meta or Google or Oracle. Nevertheless, why am I the person who went and find that out? Why am I the guy? I'm just a fella. I'm just one dipshit with Google. Why the fuck am I the guy? Well, the answer might be because, well, I have a theory, and it's that analysts and investors are …”
“… I previously wrote in this script that we have no idea, but we actually found out to an extent. So this will be a future episode because it's a whole separate thing, but the way that these big companies, the hyperscalers are doing it, is they're actually threading their GPUs through Taiwan. There are companies like Honhai Precision Corporation Limited, which is better known as Foxconn, Quanta Computing, Wistron, WeWin, there are others too, nevertheless. These are big Taiwanese server companies that buy the GPUs from NVIDIA and then they ship them to Microsoft or Meta or Google or Oracle. Nevertheless, why am I the person who went and find that out? Why am I the guy? I'm just a fella. I'm just one dipshit with Google. Why the fuck am I the guy? Well, the answer might be because, well, I have a theory, and it's that analysts and investors are in an abusive relationship with tech stocks. It is fundamentally insane that Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Google have spent $776 billion in capital expenditures in the space of three years, and even more so that analysts and investors, when faced with such egregious numbers, sit back and say, oh yeah, baby. Oh yeah, they're building the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The podcast segment critically examines the massive capital expenditures of hyperscalers, questioning the transparency and accountability of their spending, particularly in relation to AI investments and data centers.
“… and in the mortally. Children in an Iranian school, U.S. service members, et cetera, lots and lots of losers here. but the one unequivocal winner is Putin because Putin benefits from much higher oil prices in and of itself right that is very good for his war chest and the fact that Putin now has more customers he can sell that oil to because we are relaxing our sanctions there have been a few different ways in which we have relaxed our sanctions in fact on Russia and it's just so short-sighted because you help Russia, you enrich Putin, you enrich Russia's military operations. And that, again,”
“… it's ridiculous we are funding the people who are helping our opponents figure out how to better kill our soldiers our service members That is really what this is about. And there have been many losers from this war economically, diplomatically and in the mortally. Children in an Iranian school, U.S. service members, et cetera, lots and lots of losers here. but the one unequivocal winner is Putin because Putin benefits from much higher oil prices in and of itself right that is very good for his war chest and the fact that Putin now has more customers he can sell that oil to because we are relaxing our sanctions there have been a few different ways in which we have relaxed our sanctions in fact on Russia and it's just so short-sighted because you help Russia, you enrich Putin, you enrich Russia's military operations. And that, again,”
View more
Ridealong summary
Despite sanctions on Russian oil due to the war in Ukraine, the U.S. administration is easing restrictions to secure oil supplies, inadvertently enriching Putin. This decision not only benefits Russia financially but also strengthens its military operations, as they provide support to adversaries like Iran. Ultimately, the relaxation of sanctions reveals a troubling paradox: while many suffer from the conflict, Putin emerges as a clear winner.
“… that in Russian interest to help Iranians. And I don't believe, I know that they share information. and he went on to say that he believes Vladimir Putin is hoping for a long dragged out war in the Middle East he says the high oil prices are helping the Kremlin it means more tax revenue for the Russian war machine and also as Courtney was saying the interceptor missiles made by the United States which Ukraine says it needs to defend its own cities from Russian ballistic missiles and drones are now in enormous demand here in the Middle East. And it would very much be in Putin's interest for that …”
“… it been that one two days they will attack Do they help Iranians Of course How many percent 100 percent But just so I clear what you were saying you believe Russia is actively helping Iran target American forces in the Middle East right now I think that in Russian interest to help Iranians. And I don't believe, I know that they share information. and he went on to say that he believes Vladimir Putin is hoping for a long dragged out war in the Middle East he says the high oil prices are helping the Kremlin it means more tax revenue for the Russian war machine and also as Courtney was saying the interceptor missiles made by the United States which Ukraine says it needs to defend its own cities from Russian ballistic missiles and drones are now in enormous demand here in the Middle East. And it would very much be in Putin's interest for that supply of missiles to be split between the two. Right. It's easy to forget how all of this is interconnected. Let's talk more now about President Trump in Iran in President Trump saying that that Iran's going to allow 20 oil tankers to transit through the Strait of Hormuz. He described that as a gift to him today. Caroline Leavitt rejected that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Ukraine's President Zelensky revealed that Russia is actively sharing intelligence with Iran to target U.S. forces in the Middle East. Before a recent attack on a U.S. base in Saudi Arabia, Russia took satellite images three times, indicating a clear intent to assist Iran. This collaboration not only heightens tensions but also benefits Russia by increasing oil prices and demand for military supplies.
Top Podcasts About Putin
The MeidasTouch Podcast
21 episodes
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
5 episodes
The Rest Is Politics: US
4 episodes
The Adam Mockler Show
3 episodes
Pod Save the World
3 episodes
The Briefing with Jen Psaki
3 episodes
Letters from an American
2 episodes
Better Offline
2 episodes
Stories Mentioning Putin
Best Podcasts on Hyperscaler AI Spending
New analyst reports indicate that the five largest US tech infrastructure providers (Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Oracle) have committed to spending between $660 and $690 billion on CapEx in 2026. This near-doubling of 2025 spending levels is driven primarily by the construction of data centers and the acquisition of AI chips to support training clusters, raising questions among investors about the timeline for return on investment.