Best Podcast Episodes About Lockheed Martin
Everything podcasters are saying about Lockheed Martin — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 02, 2026 – 29 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Lockheed Martin.
Top Podcast Clips About Lockheed Martin
“… extra sensors and speed control, it's a lot more complicated than it used to be. And they have for example the control stick of an F you know so Lockheed Stealth Fighter So they had all of these other elements to integrate And that was part of the problem And, you know, Graham did reference this. It turned out to be a bit more complicated than they'd really banked on. So that was the integration challenge was a bit more severe than they'd reckoned on. So as far as the shaping itself, part of this, the whole point of this, again, as Graham mentioned, really is to reduce the intensity of the shock …”
“… aspects of other aircraft together, like undercarriage and the landing gear, for example. He mentioned we'd have used an F-5, something with high speed capability. They decided to bring in an F-16 landing gear, basically, but because it's got all these extra sensors and speed control, it's a lot more complicated than it used to be. And they have for example the control stick of an F you know so Lockheed Stealth Fighter So they had all of these other elements to integrate And that was part of the problem And, you know, Graham did reference this. It turned out to be a bit more complicated than they'd really banked on. So that was the integration challenge was a bit more severe than they'd reckoned on. So as far as the shaping itself, part of this, the whole point of this, again, as Graham mentioned, really is to reduce the intensity of the shock waves coming off. So, really, the idea is to create a noise level that's more similar to hearing a car door slam at around 20 feet away, rather than being inside the car when the door slams, which is sort of the equivalent of what Concorde's 105 PLDB sound level was. and if you remember the db decibel scale is not logarithmic is logarithmic it's …”
View more
Ridealong summary
NASA's X-59 aims to revolutionize supersonic travel by drastically reducing noise levels to that of a car door slamming. This is achieved through innovative design elements, such as a long nose and a unique wing shape, which help control shockwaves. The integration of advanced technology has proven more complex than expected, but it’s crucial for making supersonic flight acceptable over populated areas.
“… do you do that Well, by quoting something called the Book of Esther, which is in the Christian Old Testament, a controversial book for a long time. Martin Luther thought it shouldn't have been there, but it is there. And it's the story, among other things, of a genocide of Persians. Oh, yeah. 75,000 Persians. Not just people who committed crimes, but people who are Persian. And that's why they were killed. And it's in the book of Esther, which you should read because it's interesting. It also happens to be, maybe not coincidentally, the only book in the Christian Bible, Old and New Testaments, …”
“… more important it's a moral crime you can't kill people who have committed no crime who did nothing wrong you can't murder the innocent you can't kill kids and women and yet Franklin Graham is up there standing at the podium praying for that now how do you do that Well, by quoting something called the Book of Esther, which is in the Christian Old Testament, a controversial book for a long time. Martin Luther thought it shouldn't have been there, but it is there. And it's the story, among other things, of a genocide of Persians. Oh, yeah. 75,000 Persians. Not just people who committed crimes, but people who are Persian. And that's why they were killed. And it's in the book of Esther, which you should read because it's interesting. It also happens to be, maybe not coincidentally, the only book in the Christian Bible, Old and New Testaments, that doesn't mention God. There's no mention of God in the book of Esther. Now, there are all kinds of theologians, and this has been a debate for 2,000 years, and there are people who argue that the book of Esther implies the presence of God. God's plan unfolds in the book of Esther. Fine. hardly a theologian not going to debate it but if you're a …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The recent prayer by Franklin Graham for the president reveals a troubling disconnect in Christian leadership, as it endorses violence against innocents, contrary to the teachings of Jesus. The Book of Esther, referenced in this context, highlights a historical genocide without mentioning God, raising questions about the moral implications of such endorsements. This moment signifies the potential end of a certain interpretation of Christianity that supports violence, suggesting a shift in religious influence on politics.
“… They mutually agree on how much something is going to cost them to make. And then they add a fixed rate on top of it. So they get a premium. So Lockheed Martin says, this piece is going to cost a million dollars. Well, cost plus means, well, NASA will pay you a 20% premium on that. But there's no incentive for them to bring it down because the premium gets higher as the cost goes higher. So there's all the incentive in the world to make these things incredibly expensive, where SpaceX, a private company that does not use our taxpayer dollars to fund its launches, has every incentive in the world to …”
“… government funded industries and private industry and part of the reason is that the contracts are such a nightmare when nasa builds these things they use it they They build them based on cost plus contracts, meaning that the company decides a cost. They mutually agree on how much something is going to cost them to make. And then they add a fixed rate on top of it. So they get a premium. So Lockheed Martin says, this piece is going to cost a million dollars. Well, cost plus means, well, NASA will pay you a 20% premium on that. But there's no incentive for them to bring it down because the premium gets higher as the cost goes higher. So there's all the incentive in the world to make these things incredibly expensive, where SpaceX, a private company that does not use our taxpayer dollars to fund its launches, has every incentive in the world to remove the costs. And that's why you get this thing called the Idiot Index, which is the delta between the cost of materials versus the actual cost it takes to get these things into orbit. And the Idiot Index on NASA's SLS is pretty freaking high. I'm starting to think that this entire mission should just have been handled and managed by”
View more
Ridealong summary
NASA's Artemis II mission costs a staggering $4.1 billion, highlighting inefficiencies compared to SpaceX's innovative approach. With SpaceX capable of launching for as little as $100 million, the contrast raises questions about government funding versus private industry efficiency. This gap in costs reveals the challenges NASA faces in modern space exploration.
“… that military-industrial complex that feels much more overtly ideological. Oh, yeah, 100%. Like, gone are the days with, as you allude to, you know, Lockheed Martin just doing their thing or whatever. Come to a party. We have shrimp. We just sell the weapons, whatever. Now, you have these very charismatic founders and owners. You know, there's Palmer Luckey of Angeril, which provides AI-enabled towers for the U.S., Mexico, and the Canadian border. He's very obviously coming out. We need to defend the homeland. Of course, you have Karp from Palantir as well saying we need to defend the West, and Karp …”
“… to Capitol Hill, but they don't really give a shit who you are. They just know, I want more unaccountable money. I don't want to pass an audit. I just want you to keep feeding the military-industrial complex. This is a new kind of appendage of that military-industrial complex that feels much more overtly ideological. Oh, yeah, 100%. Like, gone are the days with, as you allude to, you know, Lockheed Martin just doing their thing or whatever. Come to a party. We have shrimp. We just sell the weapons, whatever. Now, you have these very charismatic founders and owners. You know, there's Palmer Luckey of Angeril, which provides AI-enabled towers for the U.S., Mexico, and the Canadian border. He's very obviously coming out. We need to defend the homeland. Of course, you have Karp from Palantir as well saying we need to defend the West, and Karp actually, you know, constantly beefs with Silicon Valley, saying you guys have just made, like, food delivery apps for years. We're actually trying to make a difference. It's completely explicit now. Like, it's not even a subtext. They have, I mean, there were adverts on bus stops, I think, throughout the United States for Palantir trying to get more …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Tech companies are now openly aligning with state power, transforming into ideological arms of the military-industrial complex. With charismatic leaders like Palmer Luckey and Alex Karp promoting a defense-first agenda, the tech landscape is shifting towards a more aggressive partnership with government. This partnership raises questions about accountability and the implications for society as ordinary people begin to resist through grassroots movements.
“… G.I. Joe Friend. I mean, they probably just did one black action figure and went, fuck it. Like, with white people, we need to do three. Skinny Martin Luther King. Yeah, right. Okay, quick footnote. They used to do this a lot more in the 80s, where See the Topper in Spanish says he was Apollo Creed and Rocky, and now... He's action. They used to reference other movies a lot more in poster. They used to, like, Sylvester Stallone, like, now he's fighting for his life in some other movie after Rocky. Right. They used to do that a lot more. I think my brother's always been fighting for his life …”
“… T. Nelson. The white action figures don't have to look like the real people they represent. Imagine how far off the black ones can be. Do you know what I mean? I mean, that was probably O.J. and Jim Brown. And Black Kendal. And Black Kendal and Black G.I. Joe Friend. I mean, they probably just did one black action figure and went, fuck it. Like, with white people, we need to do three. Skinny Martin Luther King. Yeah, right. Okay, quick footnote. They used to do this a lot more in the 80s, where See the Topper in Spanish says he was Apollo Creed and Rocky, and now... He's action. They used to reference other movies a lot more in poster. They used to, like, Sylvester Stallone, like, now he's fighting for his life in some other movie after Rocky. Right. They used to do that a lot more. I think my brother's always been fighting for his life in a movie. I kind of miss when they would reference another movie that the guy was from. But to give you a heads up. Yep. Yeah. Oh, that guy. My favorite thing that they always used to do is they would find when Logan's Run starred Michael York and some chick, some British chick you've never heard of. But for like two years, Farrah Fawcett was …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, the hosts hilariously debate the legacy of Action Jackson, questioning everything from its star, Carl Weathers, to whether it was a movie or a doll. The absurdity peaks as they riff on the ridiculousness of 80s action figures and the outrageous marketing of movies featuring stars like Farrah Fawcett, making it a delightful listen for anyone who loves nostalgia and comedy.
“… They would actually err towards the safe bet, right? No one ever got fired for hiring IBM is like the tech phrase. No one ever got fired for hiring Lockheed Martin. At this stage in the game, it's become like, hey, why are you guys – the question is like, okay, why is it that you're just working with a legacy prime? Is there a reason why you're not working with a company that can do it in a different way, that can solve the problem maybe in a different way? And it's not to say that like, look, I have all the respect in the world for our legacy aerospace and defense prime contractors. They make incredible …”
“… to try to make the military a client for many years. Have you noticed a change in that culture in the past year? And if so, how is it different? You know, in the past, you would see portfolio acquisition executives or program executive officers. They would actually err towards the safe bet, right? No one ever got fired for hiring IBM is like the tech phrase. No one ever got fired for hiring Lockheed Martin. At this stage in the game, it's become like, hey, why are you guys – the question is like, okay, why is it that you're just working with a legacy prime? Is there a reason why you're not working with a company that can do it in a different way, that can solve the problem maybe in a different way? And it's not to say that like, look, I have all the respect in the world for our legacy aerospace and defense prime contractors. They make incredible products. They make incredible weapon systems. but again their specialty has not been ai and autonomy it has not been software honestly it hasn't been small systems um and so you see this need from the customer from the warfighter for a different way of doing business and that is what uh you know absolutely are feeling that change uh in the u.s …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The U.S. military is shifting from traditional defense contractors to innovative startups, reflecting a significant cultural change in military acquisition. With a recent defense spending increase, leaders are questioning why they should stick to legacy companies when new tech can solve problems more effectively. This transformation signals a new era for military technology, emphasizing AI and autonomy over established practices.
“… the Pentagon that has to top using them now. Exactly. It effectively forces any company that wants to work with the military companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin or Palantir to strip Anthropic out of their own internal workflows. So if I'm an engineer at Lockheed Martin and I use Claude to write code or summarize technical documents of my daily work. You are now a liability. Lockheed Martin cannot risk its massive government contracts by harboring a designated supply chain risk in its software stack. They have to rip it completely out. There's a massive contradiction in the order itself, though. It …”
“… the company is an active threat to the integrity of the nation's defense. Yes. And applying it to an American firm for a contract dispute is entirely unprecedented. It acts as a corporate death penalty in the federal sector. Because it's not just the Pentagon that has to top using them now. Exactly. It effectively forces any company that wants to work with the military companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin or Palantir to strip Anthropic out of their own internal workflows. So if I'm an engineer at Lockheed Martin and I use Claude to write code or summarize technical documents of my daily work. You are now a liability. Lockheed Martin cannot risk its massive government contracts by harboring a designated supply chain risk in its software stack. They have to rip it completely out. There's a massive contradiction in the order itself, though. It claims Anthropic is a security risk, but simultaneously mandates they continue providing services for a six-month transition period. Which really highlights that this isn't about espionage. Think about it. If Huawei was actively spying on the Pentagon, you wouldn't say, OK, keep the routers plugged in for six more months while we find a replacement. …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a strategic move to exert control over AI companies rather than a genuine security concern.
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a power play that threatens the company's future and signals to Silicon Valley the severe consequences of noncompliance.
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a power play that threatens the company's entire enterprise ecosystem and signals to Silicon Valley that noncompliance has severe consequences.
The federal ban on Anthropic is a power play by the Trump administration, threatening the company's enterprise ecosystem and signaling to Silicon Valley that noncompliance with military demands has severe consequences.
The federal ban on Anthropic AI is a power play that threatens the company's future and signals to Silicon Valley that noncompliance with government demands carries severe consequences.
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a power play to force compliance, not a genuine security concern.
The U.S. government's blacklisting of Anthropic is a power play that threatens the company's future and signals to Silicon Valley that noncompliance with government demands carries severe consequences.
The Pentagon's actions against Anthropic are a strategic power play rather than a genuine security concern, revealing a dependency on the company's AI technology despite labeling it a risk.
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a power play that threatens the company's future and signals to Silicon Valley that noncompliance with government demands has severe consequences.
“… who worked in government saying that some of the materials were delivered to corporations. And I had a visitor to my home. So this is meaning like Lockheed, Raytheon. Yes. Those contractors getting alien technology. Potentially. Potentially. So we don't know. And I had a former executive of Lockheed Martin visiting my home. And I asked him, is this nonsense? And he said, no, it's not necessarily wrong. And I then asked another former employee of Lockheed Martin. He said, I've never heard about this. So it's probably compartmentalized. And the question is, who knows what? And I don't know if the …”
“That's one possibility. However, there are people who worked in government saying that some of the materials were delivered to corporations. And I had a visitor to my home. So this is meaning like Lockheed, Raytheon. Yes. Those contractors getting alien technology. Potentially. Potentially. So we don't know. And I had a former executive of Lockheed Martin visiting my home. And I asked him, is this nonsense? And he said, no, it's not necessarily wrong. And I then asked another former employee of Lockheed Martin. He said, I've never heard about this. So it's probably compartmentalized. And the question is, who knows what? And I don't know if the president of the United States knows everything, but the fundamental question is is there something there that is not human made And if there is I think it completely inappropriate to withhold the information from the public for the same reason that if you go and visit your backyard the backyard of your home and you see a tennis ball, and you …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Avi Loeb discusses the possibility that alien technology has been delivered to major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. He argues that withholding such information from the public is inappropriate, drawing a parallel to the Vatican's historical treatment of Galileo, who was silenced despite being right about heliocentrism. This conversation raises critical questions about transparency in government and the importance of scientific inquiry.
“… there were some issues with how they scaled it up, and they put that on the back burner. But the two major technical approaches that worked was the Lockheed approach with spectral beam combination. and the in-light approach with coherent beam combination. And those are the two that have now been selected to scale up even further. So Lockheed is going to do a 500-kilowatt laser, but in-light with their CBC approach, which is also the same approach for Iron Beam, is going to one megawatt. And I can also, just to give you an idea of how those work, if you're not a physicist, and if you are a …”
“… picked four different technical approaches to scaling up lasers to 300 kilowatts. That was the goal they set in 2018 was to get to 300 kilowatts. They had four different technical approaches. Two made it. Actually, a third sort of made it, but there were some issues with how they scaled it up, and they put that on the back burner. But the two major technical approaches that worked was the Lockheed approach with spectral beam combination. and the in-light approach with coherent beam combination. And those are the two that have now been selected to scale up even further. So Lockheed is going to do a 500-kilowatt laser, but in-light with their CBC approach, which is also the same approach for Iron Beam, is going to one megawatt. And I can also, just to give you an idea of how those work, if you're not a physicist, and if you are a physicist, Please close your ear or turn on something else because you're not going to like me explaining this in a non-physics way. I'm not a physicist. But the way I think about spectral beam combining, it's a bit like a prism. The way a prism bends light into different wavelengths, but it's in the opposite of way, right? Because a prism works. You have a …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The future of laser technology is racing towards one megawatt, with Lockheed and In-Light leading the charge. In 2018, they set a goal to scale lasers to 300 kilowatts, and now two innovative approaches—spectral beam combining and coherent beam combining—are paving the way for this breakthrough. These methods not only enhance laser efficiency but also promise transformative applications in airborne systems.
“… lose a lot of that competitive nature. This is something that I think is going to define the next 25 years of innovation in Silicon Valley. In 1956, Lockheed Martin had six times as many employees in Silicon Valley as HP Defense Investment built the region. Then the pendulum swung to software. And by 2017, Google employees were walking out rather than work with the Department of Defense. Three weeks after A60Z announced its American dynamism practice in January, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. That changed everything. SpaceX and Palantir alumni started founding companies focused on the national interest. …”
“… Horowitz, there was not a peep out of people thinking that this was terrible. Technology is the backbone of what makes America strong, what is the envy of the world. And if we don't apply that to our national security and our national interest, we lose a lot of that competitive nature. This is something that I think is going to define the next 25 years of innovation in Silicon Valley. In 1956, Lockheed Martin had six times as many employees in Silicon Valley as HP Defense Investment built the region. Then the pendulum swung to software. And by 2017, Google employees were walking out rather than work with the Department of Defense. Three weeks after A60Z announced its American dynamism practice in January, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. That changed everything. SpaceX and Palantir alumni started founding companies focused on the national interest. Autonomous surface vessels, hypersonic weapons, attritable systems built cheaply and mass produced quickly. Now every venture firm in Silicon Valley is investing in defense. The question is whether this represents a lasting category of innovation or a one-time thesis. In this episode, we share a recording from WSJ Invest Live where Barron's editor at …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In 2022, Andreessen Horowitz shocked Silicon Valley by launching a practice focused on companies that support the national interest, just weeks before Russia invaded Ukraine. This bold move marked a significant shift from a global technology perspective to one that prioritizes defense and national security. Today, every venture firm in Silicon Valley is now investing in this new category, hinting at a transformative era for innovation.
“… help from its industry partners in the space sector. Could anyone come up with a way to save MSR? Various players with spaceflight experience, like Lockheed Martin, sent in proposals for consideration. Then just a few months later, in July 2024, Perseverance came in clutch, finding those special leopard-spotted and speckled rocks in an old river valley,”
“… be the point of gathering all those samples if they were going to be left to stay on Mars? The community, Byrne explains, just needed to answer one question. How do you do this in a way that's faster and cheaper? In April 2024, NASA publicly sought help from its industry partners in the space sector. Could anyone come up with a way to save MSR? Various players with spaceflight experience, like Lockheed Martin, sent in proposals for consideration. Then just a few months later, in July 2024, Perseverance came in clutch, finding those special leopard-spotted and speckled rocks in an old river valley,”
View more
Ridealong summary
NASA's Perseverance rover is uncovering vital evidence of ancient life on Mars, but the Mars Sample Return (MSR) project faces severe delays and budget overruns. A recent report revealed that MSR's disorganization could push rock returns to the 2040s, sparking debate over its future. Meanwhile, Perseverance continues its crucial work, leaving scientists to ponder how to save the mission efficiently.
“… before you know it, the Department of War is declaring anthropic supply chain risk, which means that no government vendors across the like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, et cetera, can use anthropics technology in any way or they could potentially lose their government contract. This sort of response is something that we normally use for companies like Huawei or companies that are like a legitimate national security threat, not just like an AI company that was a little too presumptuous in negotiations with the government. Yeah, I mean, there are many Chinese AI companies that are not designated supply chain …”
“… like, well, wait a minute, like we just kind of want to make sure that you're abiding to the terms of our agreement. And we do have these sort of bright lines. And here's the reasons why. And pretty quickly, it seems like things just break down. And before you know it, the Department of War is declaring anthropic supply chain risk, which means that no government vendors across the like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, et cetera, can use anthropics technology in any way or they could potentially lose their government contract. This sort of response is something that we normally use for companies like Huawei or companies that are like a legitimate national security threat, not just like an AI company that was a little too presumptuous in negotiations with the government. Yeah, I mean, there are many Chinese AI companies that are not designated supply chain risks. And it's not just that it's extreme from a security perspective, right? It's extreme in its potential effects on Anthropic because, as you know, Google and Amazon and almost anyone who might give them compute that they need to kind of run their business at a really fundamental level, likely do some business with the government or with the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk is an extreme response typically reserved for national security threats, not AI companies negotiating terms.
“… use his quick start initiative to really start moving ahead on the tanker. And if you recall, right around that time, we heard a lot from industry. Lockheed Martin, for example, put out that crazy rendering of a gigantic F-22 looking type thing. And then later on that year, put out another rendering of an uncrewed, crazy looking tanker with two booms on it, refueling F-35s. Boeing talked about a big wing MQ-25 to us. And at the time, Embraer had a teaming agreement with L3Harris for putting a boom on their KC-390. Those of you who are watching, I'm holding a little toy of a KC-390 that I got in Singapore …”
“… put forward its future tanker program, the next generation aerial refueling system, their NGAS, that really came to a head in 2023, 2024, so during an AOA, and there was a lot of momentum. You had Secretary Kendall coming out and saying he wants to use his quick start initiative to really start moving ahead on the tanker. And if you recall, right around that time, we heard a lot from industry. Lockheed Martin, for example, put out that crazy rendering of a gigantic F-22 looking type thing. And then later on that year, put out another rendering of an uncrewed, crazy looking tanker with two booms on it, refueling F-35s. Boeing talked about a big wing MQ-25 to us. And at the time, Embraer had a teaming agreement with L3Harris for putting a boom on their KC-390. Those of you who are watching, I'm holding a little toy of a KC-390 that I got in Singapore a few weeks ago. But then a big thing happened, and that was the Air Force awarding Boeing the F-47. And that really kind of ate everyone's lunch in the budget world. There was not really an understanding that if we go ahead with NGAD, can we really fund NGAS? So that seemed to be kind of the thinking for a while. But then later on last year, a few …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Air Force is caught in a budget battle over the future of the E-7 aircraft, crucial for their operations but facing pressure from the Pentagon to cut costs. Despite the need for the E-7, industry and congressional forces are pushing to keep the program alive amidst competing priorities, including a shift towards space-based capabilities. This delicate dance will determine the fate of the E-7 and the future of Air Force refueling strategies.
“… NASA uses Trusted Tech. Netflix uses, I mean, you don't get bigger than that, uses Trusted Tech. Neuralink, Apple uses Trusted Tech. Intel, Google, Lockheed Martin, the best in the world, the highest tech companies in the world use Trusted Tech and save 32 to 52% compared to the average Microsoft unified support agreement and you're getting the best. Trusted Tech's Microsoft certified engineers first respond within 10 minutes, achieving an 85.7% in-house ticket resolution rate and 99.3% customer satisfaction rate. That's pretty universal, that's perfect. Trusted Tech's flexible ticket-based monthly or …”
“… Tech elevates the Microsoft support experience with its certified support services. Another way you know they're great, their client list, go to the website, you'll see it. Enterprises, well, let me tell you some of the people who use Trusted Tech. NASA uses Trusted Tech. Netflix uses, I mean, you don't get bigger than that, uses Trusted Tech. Neuralink, Apple uses Trusted Tech. Intel, Google, Lockheed Martin, the best in the world, the highest tech companies in the world use Trusted Tech and save 32 to 52% compared to the average Microsoft unified support agreement and you're getting the best. Trusted Tech's Microsoft certified engineers first respond within 10 minutes, achieving an 85.7% in-house ticket resolution rate and 99.3% customer satisfaction rate. That's pretty universal, that's perfect. Trusted Tech's flexible ticket-based monthly or annual pricing model also offers direct escalation to Microsoft from a managed partner when needed. So, you know, you kind of got belt and suspenders, the principal architect for TaylorMade. This is what he says, quote, "'We don't break glass often, but when we do, "'being able to quickly leverage "'Trusted Tech's professional services "'through the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Many Windows 10 users are frustrated by annoying notifications after updates, but there's a simple fix. By navigating to the control panel, you can turn off the 'Welcome Experience' and other intrusive suggestions, enhancing your user experience. This tip not only benefits those sticking with Windows 10 but also applies to Windows 11 users looking for a more streamlined interface.
“… someone to watch your kid what if that person could tell your kid how to hang themselves so here's a nice one that is for an app but could be for Lockheed Martin make your inside outside oh a company called wow now I love that I love the and they're usually foreign companies yeah who did not think about some of the implications of their of their branding or their American name. There was one booth I saw, and I don't know what the company did, but I took a picture of it because it just said, making it easier to edge with AI. And there was another, and I talked to them, they had a legitimately good …”
“… dreams in one dream. All dreams in one dream? It gets to the point. You want to have a wedding ring but what if your wedding ring could tell you how to make thermite hmm here's a good one also the ring tells you if you're stressed or calm yeah you want someone to watch your kid what if that person could tell your kid how to hang themselves so here's a nice one that is for an app but could be for Lockheed Martin make your inside outside oh a company called wow now I love that I love the and they're usually foreign companies yeah who did not think about some of the implications of their of their branding or their American name. There was one booth I saw, and I don't know what the company did, but I took a picture of it because it just said, making it easier to edge with AI. And there was another, and I talked to them, they had a legitimately good product, it's like a, AI-enabled goon cave. That exists here, by the way. No, I wrote down the phrase sexless goon cave while here, and that, now we're gonna have AI and they're gonna be fucking and sucking. But I feel like CES is the sexless goon cave, it's just a bunch of activity. Oh, people are fucking at this CES. The robot with the, with the, with …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Amazon's advertising model ensures that the worst products often top search results, leading to a market where bad drives out good. This phenomenon, akin to Gresham's law, highlights a troubling shift in consumer choices where quality is sacrificed for ad spend. As AI continues to influence marketing, the implications for product quality and consumer trust are significant.
“… a severe blow to the startup's fast-growing sales to business customers, end quote. Indeed, Reuters was reporting that big defense contractor Lockheed Martin plans to follow”
“… would, quote, continue to work to figure out a solution with the DOW. The investors taking a stance on Pentagon Talks are focused on helping Anthropic avoid being designated a supply chain risk by the U.S. government, which, if implemented, could deliver a severe blow to the startup's fast-growing sales to business customers, end quote. Indeed, Reuters was reporting that big defense contractor Lockheed Martin plans to follow”
View more
Ridealong summary
Anthropic's stance against using its AI for mass surveillance and autonomous weapons has boosted its public image, despite potential fallout with the Pentagon.
Anthropic's ethical stance against the Pentagon's AI warfare policy has paradoxically boosted its popularity and revenue, despite investor concerns about potential business fallout.
Anthropic's refusal to align with Pentagon demands has paradoxically boosted its public image and app popularity, highlighting a complex interplay between ethical stances and business success.
“… on flying saints at MIT, and a guy who I've met, actually, who runs revolutionary technologies at Skunk Works. Advanced R&D division obviously of Lockheed Martin, and he's running their most advanced R&D division of skunk works He attended the lecture and was very interested in flying Saints. That's so great. It's interesting. So great Yeah, well, I don't think there's any question that Once you start believing in certain mystical experiences either because you've experienced them yourselves or you've heard such compelling Tales like I read Virgin Mary Which I didn't know as I stress a lot Really the …”
“… religions, so maybe this is a real phenomenon where you do shed the baggage of individual ego, and you become one with God, and you fly. In fact, Jeffrey Kripal, who's a religious studies professor at Rice University in Houston, he was giving a lecture on flying saints at MIT, and a guy who I've met, actually, who runs revolutionary technologies at Skunk Works. Advanced R&D division obviously of Lockheed Martin, and he's running their most advanced R&D division of skunk works He attended the lecture and was very interested in flying Saints. That's so great. It's interesting. So great Yeah, well, I don't think there's any question that Once you start believing in certain mystical experiences either because you've experienced them yourselves or you've heard such compelling Tales like I read Virgin Mary Which I didn't know as I stress a lot Really the history of those appearances and to now, of course, I sort of study them To look at the similarities to hear the different descriptions see how close they were to mine And then it was very reassuring as I see a sort of so many similarities and commonalities, but the point is to your Explaining. Yeah, you got to be willing to believe all kinds of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Flying saints, like St. Joseph of Cupertino, have eyewitness accounts that challenge our understanding of spirituality. A researcher found compelling evidence that these mystical experiences could transcend individual ego, leading to extraordinary phenomena like levitation. This revelation, shared by religious scholars, suggests that such experiences are not just historical myths but could represent a deeper truth about our connection to the divine.
“… role in this? Because that seems to be also something that has changed. You had all of these very legacy prime defense companies, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, etc., and they have their own histories. But now it seems as though the investors, VCs in Silicon Valley who invest in like consumer tech apps, who invest in things like DoorDash and Uber, they're also investing in the weaponry of tomorrow. Is this not becoming a larger story in Silicon Valley? And is that a new paradigm? It is definitely new. I mean, I remember going out Silicon Valley, I'm going to guess it was about eight years ago now, …”
“… that be arming people in Ukraine, whether that be what's happening right now in Iran, whether that be what happened a month or two ago in Venezuela. Yeah, we are in more theaters than the U.S. has been in for a long time. What about Silicon Valley's role in this? Because that seems to be also something that has changed. You had all of these very legacy prime defense companies, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, etc., and they have their own histories. But now it seems as though the investors, VCs in Silicon Valley who invest in like consumer tech apps, who invest in things like DoorDash and Uber, they're also investing in the weaponry of tomorrow. Is this not becoming a larger story in Silicon Valley? And is that a new paradigm? It is definitely new. I mean, I remember going out Silicon Valley, I'm going to guess it was about eight years ago now, over to Founder Fund's offices. And Founders Fund was one of the earliest investors in Endural. And they actually led this most recent or not the new round, but the prior one at $30.5 billion. And it was a conversation in front of a bunch of Valley people, kind of quote on stage, private conversation about venture capitalists investing in defense tech …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Defense tech startups like Anduril are raising billions, reshaping an industry traditionally dominated by old giants. With a $4 billion fundraise potentially doubling Anduril's valuation to $60 billion, this surge reflects increased defense spending and a shift in Silicon Valley's investment focus toward military technology. As venture capitalists embrace this new paradigm, the implications for the future of warfare are profound.
“… you why. It's if their model has this policy bias, let's call it, based on their constitution, their culture, their people, and so on. I don't want Lockheed Martin using their model to design weapons for me. I don't want the people who are designing the things that go into the componentry to come to me. Because if you believe the risk of poisoning, it can enter into any part of the defense enterprise. But it's just the defense enterprise. So Boeing wants to use Anthropic to build commercial jets. Have at it. Boeing wants to use it to build fighter jets. I can't have that because I don't trust what the …”
“… that I think triggered a lot of the news this week is why then designate them a supply chain risk Why not just abandon them move on use the other vendors Like, why take this kind of punitive action? Yeah, so I don't view it as punitive, and I'll tell you why. It's if their model has this policy bias, let's call it, based on their constitution, their culture, their people, and so on. I don't want Lockheed Martin using their model to design weapons for me. I don't want the people who are designing the things that go into the componentry to come to me. Because if you believe the risk of poisoning, it can enter into any part of the defense enterprise. But it's just the defense enterprise. So Boeing wants to use Anthropic to build commercial jets. Have at it. Boeing wants to use it to build fighter jets. I can't have that because I don't trust what the outputs may be because they're so wedded to their own policy preferences. I guess a dovetail to that is why couldn't this have been handled quietly? Is this Anthropic who made this a public spat or was it the administration that made it a public spat or two to ten? I mean, they have a very good, sophisticated press operation and like really good and …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Relying on AI tools for military applications poses significant risks, as seen with Lockheed Martin's concerns over a specific AI model's bias. The fear isn't just about inefficiency; it's about the potential for critical systems to fail at crucial moments, reminiscent of past national security failures. Companies like Anthropic may not be the right partners if they don't align with defense needs.
“… prime territory. It was a big moment for Palantir when they passed the sort of the legacy primes on market cap. Well, still got a ways to go with Lockheed Martin sitting at 150. 150, but within the sites, I don't know. Josh, Andrew is seeking to raise about $4 billion. The fundraising is expected to value the startup at $60 billion. The company is raising capital as it pursues projects, including a facility in Ohio to mass-produce aerial and maritime drones and other products. There was a piece in the New York Times about Palmer Luckey that was going back and forth, kind of digging into, honestly, just …”
“… that could nearly double the defense startup's valuation. There have been rumors about this round. It's 50 or 60, correct? So the fundraising is finally going to be worth more than figure. That's right. And they're getting up into the defense tech prime territory. It was a big moment for Palantir when they passed the sort of the legacy primes on market cap. Well, still got a ways to go with Lockheed Martin sitting at 150. 150, but within the sites, I don't know. Josh, Andrew is seeking to raise about $4 billion. The fundraising is expected to value the startup at $60 billion. The company is raising capital as it pursues projects, including a facility in Ohio to mass-produce aerial and maritime drones and other products. There was a piece in the New York Times about Palmer Luckey that was going back and forth, kind of digging into, honestly, just a lot of history on the company, but also sort of trying to understand how deployed the different products are, where things are going well. I don't think it was the most friendly piece, but certainly painted an interesting picture of Palmer and a nice graphic in the header. Well, without further ado, let's bring in our next guest. We have James …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Cyber attackers are advancing daily, while organizations struggle to keep up at human speed. To combat this, we need a cohesive command and control system for cyber defense, similar to military initiatives, to fuse data and enhance responsiveness. This shift is crucial for identifying and mitigating risks before they escalate into major breaches.
Top Podcasts About Lockheed Martin
Aviation Week's Check 6 Podcast
3 episodes
TBPN
2 episodes
The Tucker Carlson Show
1 episode
Limitless Podcast
1 episode
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart
1 episode
Adam Carolla Show
1 episode
Bold Names
1 episode
Elon Musk Podcast
1 episode
Stories Mentioning Lockheed Martin
Best Podcasts on OpenAI vs Anthropic AI Rivalry
OpenAI and Anthropic are intensifying their competition in the development of AI agents and advancements towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). This rivalry highlights the growing focus on creating more autonomous and capable AI systems, which could significantly impact various industries and the future of AI technology.
Anthropic
OpenAI
AGI
Top Podcasts on OpenAI & Anthropic AI Rivalry
The AI landscape is buzzing with rapid developments, including Anthropic's accidental leak of its powerful "Claude Mythos" model and its focus on "Computer Use" agents. OpenAI is reportedly shifting strategy, canceling projects like Sora to focus on AGI, while Google rolls out new real-time voice models and Search Live globally. These moves signal a new era of AI capabilities and strategic pivots by major tech players.
Claude
OpenAI
AGI
Anthropic
Top Podcasts on Pentagon vs Anthropic AI Clash
The ethical implications and military applications of artificial intelligence are a major discussion point, highlighted by the lawsuit filed by AI firm Anthropic against the Pentagon. Anthropic alleges it was blacklisted for refusing to waive ethical restrictions on using its Claude model for autonomous weaponry and mass surveillance. This conflict underscores a broader debate about AI's impact on jobs, its role in warfare, and the responsibility of tech companies in developing powerful AI systems.
Best Podcasts on Anthropic's Pentagon Clash
AI company Anthropic is suing the Trump administration after the Pentagon officially designated it a 'supply-chain risk,' effectively blacklisting it from federal defense contracts. This escalation follows Anthropic's refusal to waive ethical restrictions on using its Claude AI model for autonomous weaponry and mass domestic surveillance, sparking a debate about AI ethics, government contracts, and the future of AI in military applications.
Dario Amodei
OpenAI
Sam Altman
Claude Code