Best Podcast Episodes About Fetterman
Everything podcasters are saying about Fetterman — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Apr 01, 2026 – 29 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Fetterman.
Top Podcast Clips About Fetterman
“… I get that people feel left behind. Look at, you know, in 2022, so the district went for Trump three times, but also went for Josh Shapiro and John Fetterman in 2022. People see Josh Shapiro, they see somebody who's going to fight for them. In 2022, they saw every county every day with John Fetterman. That works for people. I don't think most people here actually care about party. There's a lot of independents out there too that are disenfranchised in primary. They just want to see you fight for them. After I get off here with you, I'm actually on my way to a public utility commission hearing to …”
“… been the case. Certainly in the case of Rob Bresnahan, we have a new member of Congress elected in 2024, who is the poster child for DC corruption. We're coming back to Rob in a second, don't you worry. Getting it on the grift. But I get it, right? I get that people feel left behind. Look at, you know, in 2022, so the district went for Trump three times, but also went for Josh Shapiro and John Fetterman in 2022. People see Josh Shapiro, they see somebody who's going to fight for them. In 2022, they saw every county every day with John Fetterman. That works for people. I don't think most people here actually care about party. There's a lot of independents out there too that are disenfranchised in primary. They just want to see you fight for them. After I get off here with you, I'm actually on my way to a public utility commission hearing to fight the gas company for yet another rate hike that they are going for, right? As mayor, we have been fighting, you know, fighting these guys that are trying to take advantage of us for a long time. I think people need to see you in action and see that you've done this and see that you're real. It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat or Republican or …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Voters want to see politicians actively fighting for their interests, regardless of party affiliation. In a shifting political landscape, candidates like Josh Shapiro and John Fetterman demonstrate that a commitment to action resonates with constituents. This approach is critical for Democrats to regain trust and support in traditionally blue regions that have turned red.
“Here's Fetterman today. Senator Fetterman accused U.S. media of engaging in selective coverage that has downplayed the successes of Operation Epic Fury and instead benefited Iran during the first 30 days of the war. He said, I read the entire political spectrum on Epic Fury. Iran now loves and learns from the American media. The media's selective coverage rewards and reinforces Iran's strategy. Media amplifies the 1% chaos Iran creates while ignoring the 99% of …”
“Here's Fetterman today. Senator Fetterman accused U.S. media of engaging in selective coverage that has downplayed the successes of Operation Epic Fury and instead benefited Iran during the first 30 days of the war. He said, I read the entire political spectrum on Epic Fury. Iran now loves and learns from the American media. The media's selective coverage rewards and reinforces Iran's strategy. Media amplifies the 1% chaos Iran creates while ignoring the 99% of Iran's beatdown. I'll tell you, this guy is good. I'm glad he's recovered from his illness, you know. Much of that coverage has been focused on the Strait of Hormuz, a critical checkpoint through which around one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil passes in which Tehran closed down after the U.S. and Israel started military strikes against the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Senator Fetterman claims U.S. media is selectively covering the Iran conflict, downplaying successes while amplifying chaos, ultimately benefiting Iran. He argues that this biased portrayal misrepresents the realities of military operations like Operation Epic Fury, which aims to stabilize the region, and overlooks the historical context of oil prices and geopolitical threats. Fetterman emphasizes that the media's narrative could embolden Iran, similar to how North Korea operates today.
“… this unless the House passes it. Because I do think it's really hard to figure out how you get this kind of a thing through. Maybe they pick up John Fetterman also on the side. What a vote for John Fetterman that would be. We're going to fully fund ICE. We're going to fully fund this war. We're going to cut your health. Now, I bet at the end the health care cuts, if you had to ask them whether they'd rather stomach health care cuts or a bill that raises the deficit in order to fund the war, I think they would go for – I think most Republicans in this caucus would go for the deficit. Doesn …”
“… By the way, if Cornyn gets through this primary, we don't know when this vote will be. But before the vote, Cornyn's politics are fucked anyway. You slice it. But I would assume if you're in the Senate, what you're saying is we're not going to touch this unless the House passes it. Because I do think it's really hard to figure out how you get this kind of a thing through. Maybe they pick up John Fetterman also on the side. What a vote for John Fetterman that would be. We're going to fully fund ICE. We're going to fully fund this war. We're going to cut your health. Now, I bet at the end the health care cuts, if you had to ask them whether they'd rather stomach health care cuts or a bill that raises the deficit in order to fund the war, I think they would go for – I think most Republicans in this caucus would go for the deficit. Doesn reconciliation like there are rules in reconciliation that they going to have to find some fake way to pay for it Yes fake accounting bullshit Yeah but look then we talking about parliamentarians again And you have Republicans in the Senate who are committed to that I don't know how this gets done. The politics of this are dog shit. And Fetterman aside, I've …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Republicans are considering drastic healthcare cuts to raise $200 billion for Trump's war in Iran, but the political fallout could be disastrous. With tight margins in both the House and Senate, key figures like Collins and Murkowski are likely to oppose the bill, leaving the GOP scrambling to find a way to pass it. The stakes are high, as many Republicans may prefer to raise the deficit rather than cut healthcare for their constituents.
“Well, out of Pennsylvania, my home state, Democratic Senator John Fetterman criticized other Democrats on Wednesday for not viewing President Donald Trump's strikes against Iran as a success. Fetterman said that Democrats should view the strikes as successful since they eliminated Iran's chances of developing a nuclear weapon and killed the Islamic regime's leadership. Yeah, I've heard a lot of them. There's a, I guess for me, intellectual dishonesty pisses me off the most. And, you know, they had the briefing with …”
“Well, out of Pennsylvania, my home state, Democratic Senator John Fetterman criticized other Democrats on Wednesday for not viewing President Donald Trump's strikes against Iran as a success. Fetterman said that Democrats should view the strikes as successful since they eliminated Iran's chances of developing a nuclear weapon and killed the Islamic regime's leadership. Yeah, I've heard a lot of them. There's a, I guess for me, intellectual dishonesty pisses me off the most. And, you know, they had the briefing with Pete Hegseth and, and, um, oh God, uh, uh, what's his name? Marco Rubio and stuff. And they kind of laid out what their, what the next several weeks would look like. And then every Democrat just came out and went I have no idea what the plan is I don know what they were saying They talking about boots on the ground like they just acted like basically …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, the host hilariously critiques the absurdity of people wearing pajamas and slippers at the airport, likening it to a chaotic hotel lobby after a fire alarm. The funniest moment comes when he describes how the pandemic has led to a slippery slope of casual attire, turning airports into a fashion disaster zone.
Ridealong summary
Senator John Fetterman argues that the U.S. must hold Iran accountable for its actions, claiming that the military's current state has rendered it ineffective and chaotic. He contrasts this situation with historical lessons from World War II, emphasizing that disarming dangerous regimes is crucial for global security. As NATO allies hesitate to support U.S. efforts, he questions whether this marks the end of a unified Western alliance.
“… Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania. Look, I've been very clear. We do not want these ice detention centers in Pennsylvania. Here's moderate John Fetterman, every conservative's favorite Democrat he's so smart and sensible I could really get along with that oh there's there's a couple truths embedded in in this conversation too I don't support as it in its current its current state to vote Save America and the president is con mr. moderate John Fetterman even he's come out publicly and said I'm not voting for the same Democrats are communists and communists are trying to burn down the country and …”
“… why I brought in abolishing. They'll tell you to your face. You will go to Pancot Palace. Now there is a new Maharaja. And again, the palace has the power of the dark light. Even the moderate Democrats, they'll tell you to your face. Here's moderate Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania. Look, I've been very clear. We do not want these ice detention centers in Pennsylvania. Here's moderate John Fetterman, every conservative's favorite Democrat he's so smart and sensible I could really get along with that oh there's there's a couple truths embedded in in this conversation too I don't support as it in its current its current state to vote Save America and the president is con mr. moderate John Fetterman even he's come out publicly and said I'm not voting for the same Democrats are communists and communists are trying to burn down the country and communists know patriotic American citizens don want their country burnt down so communists have reached out to others and brought them here so they can put your country to the torch and loot it when they do And every day now you have to wake up and turn on the television set and hear things like this. Cheryl Mentor and her two sons are mourning …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The political elite in Washington, D.C. view immigration as the key to maintaining their power, even if it means ignoring public safety. A tragic case highlights this issue: a woman was murdered by a repeat offender who should have been detained, but the system failed her due to political agendas. This situation underscores the dire implications of current immigration policies and their impact on communities.
“… I like, well, some of our listeners, I like this. I don't like that. This should be done. It's not getting done. I don't like this. Okay. Like John Fetterman. Okay. I fucking hated John Fetterman. I thought he was the biggest moron in the history of politics. Turns out, seems like I was wrong. He's a critical thinker. And he doesn't fucking align himself with the party a thousand percent of the time. And I think that's a good thing. Yeah. Okay. So, you know, we got to be able to fucking critique people. We got to be able to criticize people. And if you actually want the country to be better, you …”
“… You can't just support one person and think they're infallible in every decision that they make. Nobody's perfect. Okay. But it goes the other way too, right? Like I have the capacity and our listeners have the capacity to objectively say, okay, I like, well, some of our listeners, I like this. I don't like that. This should be done. It's not getting done. I don't like this. Okay. Like John Fetterman. Okay. I fucking hated John Fetterman. I thought he was the biggest moron in the history of politics. Turns out, seems like I was wrong. He's a critical thinker. And he doesn't fucking align himself with the party a thousand percent of the time. And I think that's a good thing. Yeah. Okay. So, you know, we got to be able to fucking critique people. We got to be able to criticize people. And if you actually want the country to be better, you should criticize Donald Trump when he doesn't do the shit he says he's going to do. Not just go along and be like, oh, fucking you're the greatest. That doesn't solve anything. No. No. Now, I'm not saying you can't say things that he does are good, too. But you could say when they're not good. No. You know? Well that the other piece dude because if …”
View more
Ridealong summary
If you can't criticize your own political team, you can't be trusted. In this segment, we explore the necessity of critical thinking in politics, emphasizing that blind loyalty leads to ignorance. The discussion highlights how even those we dislike can show unexpected wisdom, urging listeners to evaluate leaders objectively rather than following them blindly.
“… so that they can retain power. And they'll do whatever they can to pursue that. And I'm not trying to be negative on everybody. I will highlight Fetterman, Senator Fetterman. He stepped up. He wore a suit, which was incredible. And he shook Donald Trump's hand. But he was willing to stand up and clap for those who he saw as important in America. He showed that he values them over an agenda. And so I thought that was the best foot forward that a Democrat put on that evening was Fetterman. Was Fetterman. So you see the Democrats as sort of uniquely trying to do whatever they can to hold on to …”
“… and applauded. Those who didn't, didn't really respond. You don't think Democrats want to see America win? I don't think so. What do you think Democrats want? I think they want to see the country divided. And they want to keep their focus groups intact so that they can retain power. And they'll do whatever they can to pursue that. And I'm not trying to be negative on everybody. I will highlight Fetterman, Senator Fetterman. He stepped up. He wore a suit, which was incredible. And he shook Donald Trump's hand. But he was willing to stand up and clap for those who he saw as important in America. He showed that he values them over an agenda. And so I thought that was the best foot forward that a Democrat put on that evening was Fetterman. Was Fetterman. So you see the Democrats as sort of uniquely trying to do whatever they can to hold on to power. Right. The Republicans in the House have a one vote edge right now. It's real tight. And there is a Republican member of Congress in Texas, Tony Gonzalez, who recent text messages show that he was asking for nude pictures from a staffer who was married. He kept pressing her for them. And she eventually killed herself by lighting herself on fire …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Amidst Trump’s speech celebrating American victories, a stark contrast emerged: applause from Republicans and silence from Democrats. The discussion highlights how some believe Democrats prioritize power over national unity, exemplified by Senator Fetterman's rare bipartisan gesture. This raises questions about the motivations behind political actions in a divided America.
“… would be paid during all this. The Democrats stopped that. So the Democrats know exactly what they are doing. Now, the one sane Democrat, John Fetterman, here he is fully admitting that the Democrats have known the entire time that this would accomplish absolutely nothing. Why are we doing this? We just don't get it. I mean, these are not rich people. They make around $50,000 a year. That used to be or should be our wheelhouse. These are the kind of people that we should be fighting for And now we talking about affordability and now now we denying them to their paychecks and out here And we …”
“… They're the ones paying the price right now. But meanwhile, members of Congress and the Senate, they're being paid, although Ted Cruz has put his paycheck on hold and John Kennedy from Louisiana tried to get something passed so that none of the senators would be paid during all this. The Democrats stopped that. So the Democrats know exactly what they are doing. Now, the one sane Democrat, John Fetterman, here he is fully admitting that the Democrats have known the entire time that this would accomplish absolutely nothing. Why are we doing this? We just don't get it. I mean, these are not rich people. They make around $50,000 a year. That used to be or should be our wheelhouse. These are the kind of people that we should be fighting for And now we talking about affordability and now now we denying them to their paychecks and out here And we knew going into it that shutdown of DHS would have zero impact on forcing any kinds of changes at ICE. And that's that's here we are right now. So what is it that we really get out of it? You know, all we've done is we've punished TSA and other employees under DHS and made us less safe and now creating mass chaos in our air traffic system across …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Democrats are intentionally causing pain to travelers and TSA employees to shift blame onto Trump, despite knowing the shutdown won't achieve their goals.
The Democrats are deliberately causing airport chaos to make the public blame Trump, while TSA workers suffer without pay.
“… I think to some extent they're in a box. Their base hates ICE. If you're a Democrat senator, look, here I'm going to tell you what John Fetterman tweeted this weekend. Elon Musk stepped in and said, I would like to offer to pay the salaries of TSA personnel during this funding impasse that is so negatively affecting the lives of so many Americans. It was incredibly generous. Elon is a patriot. Here's what John Fetterman said. This is incredibly generous. TSA agents across the country are relying on food pantries and community donations just to get by. I remain the lone Democrat to vote …”
“… And that's how you know it's premeditated, the point that you made earlier. Like this is clearly they decided this is the issue we're going to go on, and we are premeditating this, and we want it to hurt. Yeah, it's actually even different from premeditated. I think to some extent they're in a box. Their base hates ICE. If you're a Democrat senator, look, here I'm going to tell you what John Fetterman tweeted this weekend. Elon Musk stepped in and said, I would like to offer to pay the salaries of TSA personnel during this funding impasse that is so negatively affecting the lives of so many Americans. It was incredibly generous. Elon is a patriot. Here's what John Fetterman said. This is incredibly generous. TSA agents across the country are relying on food pantries and community donations just to get by. I remain the lone Democrat to vote with my Republican colleagues to fully fund DHS and get people paid. It should never come to this point. So Fetterman's speaking the truth. Here's the problem. Most of the rest of the Democrat senators, they're in a situation where they feel if they vote to fund ICE, their angry open border activists will never forgive them. And I think a lot of …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Democrat senators are facing backlash from their base for considering funding ICE, leading to a government impasse that leaves TSA agents unpaid. As travel chaos ensues, Senator John Fetterman highlights the dire situation, revealing that TSA workers are relying on food pantries. This political standoff showcases how party loyalty is jeopardizing the livelihoods of essential workers.
“… There's obviously military conflict in the Middle East. The terror threat is heightened. And yet every Democrat but one, every Democrat but John Fetterman, has voted now eight times to defund the entire Department of Homeland Security, the purpose of the Department of Homeland Security. DHS was created in the wake of 9-11 to prepare for and prevent terror attacks. And I think the Democrats would have left it shut the entire year. They don't care. It was the most reckless, irresponsible action we've ever seen. You look at what was happening at the airports. The chaos at the airports was out of …”
“… back to those core points that you were about to mention. Well, number one, we have had four major terrorist attacks in the last three weeks, all four by radical Islamic terrorists. The Department of Homeland Security exists to prevent terror attacks. There's obviously military conflict in the Middle East. The terror threat is heightened. And yet every Democrat but one, every Democrat but John Fetterman, has voted now eight times to defund the entire Department of Homeland Security, the purpose of the Department of Homeland Security. DHS was created in the wake of 9-11 to prepare for and prevent terror attacks. And I think the Democrats would have left it shut the entire year. They don't care. It was the most reckless, irresponsible action we've ever seen. You look at what was happening at the airports. The chaos at the airports was out of control. And here's what I told my colleagues. I said, in my view, the Democrats in the Senate will never, ever vote to fund ICE again. They've just lost their minds. They are an open border party. So they are willing to defund the Border Patrol and defund ICE. And that's who they are. and I said there's not going to be any wearing them down on this …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In a bold move, a senator proposes funding ICE for a decade despite ongoing Democratic opposition, arguing that their obstructionism has only backfired. With four terrorist attacks in recent weeks, the urgency to support the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is critical, yet Democrats have repeatedly voted to defund it. The senator believes this funding strategy will not only secure the budget but also expose the consequences of the Democrats' actions.
“… man who once had brain damage and his brain is healing in front of our very eyes, although he's still a Democrat, so it's not totally healed. John Fetterman, here he is, praising Marco Rubio and saying that the Dems just don't get it. Another thing that I clapped for was the president gave a shout out to Marco Rubio. And I did. Absolutely. I was the only damn. He's done a great job. He really has done it. He's risen dramatically. He's done a great job. And it's like, yes, he's a different party. And yes, our views might be different in some things. But I think there's more things that overlap. He …”
“There is one sane Democrat. You already know who I'm talking about. And here he is. That's right. The man who once had brain damage and his brain is healing in front of our very eyes, although he's still a Democrat, so it's not totally healed. John Fetterman, here he is, praising Marco Rubio and saying that the Dems just don't get it. Another thing that I clapped for was the president gave a shout out to Marco Rubio. And I did. Absolutely. I was the only damn. He's done a great job. He really has done it. He's risen dramatically. He's done a great job. And it's like, yes, he's a different party. And yes, our views might be different in some things. But I think there's more things that overlap. He was our colleague just not that long ago. and now I've had, I mean, you're entitled to your views, but now they're announcing I'm disappointed or I regret my vote. No, like that, I thought that's, you know, he's done, I mean, think of all the things that's been thrown at him and I think he's done a great job managing it. I have to say, in some …”
View more
Ridealong summary
John Fetterman, a Democratic senator, shocked viewers by praising Republican Marco Rubio during a recent appearance, highlighting that bipartisan support is essential for effective governance. He argued that the current Democratic party has lost sight of common ground, emphasizing the need for accountability and collaboration across party lines. Fetterman's candid remarks reflect a growing frustration within some Democrats about the party's direction and a desire to return to more constructive politics.
“… in which case he would get through the committee. And there is a Democrat on the committee who has hinted he would vote for him, and that's John Fetterman. The second way is that you can just take it out of the committee and bring it to the floor. But at that point, it requires 60 votes for passage. So that would probably doom the nomination. All things being equal, it looks like Fetterman will probably vote for Mo. He's being a little bit cagey about it now. And so we'll see. In terms of saying the right things, the other thing you said, saying the right things for the right audiences. There was …”
“… won't apologize for me getting absolutely pummeled by my neighbor. At that point, you would think there's a tie vote and it won't get through committee. However, there's two ways forward. One is a Democrat on the committee can vote for the nomination, in which case he would get through the committee. And there is a Democrat on the committee who has hinted he would vote for him, and that's John Fetterman. The second way is that you can just take it out of the committee and bring it to the floor. But at that point, it requires 60 votes for passage. So that would probably doom the nomination. All things being equal, it looks like Fetterman will probably vote for Mo. He's being a little bit cagey about it now. And so we'll see. In terms of saying the right things, the other thing you said, saying the right things for the right audiences. There was another moment where he said the right thing for the key audience, which is Donald Trump. He was asked about the 2020 elections, asked about because, one, he was part of the effort to question the validity of the 2020 elections. But two, is because DHS, at least according to this administration, may have a role in monitoring election sites in …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Sen. John Fetterman may hold the key to Markwayne Mullin's nomination as DHS Secretary, with a potential tie vote looming in the committee. If Fetterman votes 'yes,' Mullin could advance, but if he abstains, the nomination could falter. This political maneuvering highlights the delicate balance of power in the Senate and the implications for immigration policy.
“… is no stranger to exaggerating things that happen for his own effect. And now we're in a position where I don't think it's fair what Senator Fetterman just said, that Democrats choose to believe the regime instead of the president. I don't think that's true from the interviews that I'm doing. But we know the regime is a bunch of liars, Bill. Here's my question to you. Can you really say to the American people, you can believe President Trump? You've got to be skeptical of every administration. They're going to put forth what they want the American people to digest. This has been going on …”
“… They suggest what you did, which is they don't really know what the state of play is on that side. But I'll tell you, you know, you say this is the misinformation, the spin. And, well, you know, what goes around comes around in politics. And the president is no stranger to exaggerating things that happen for his own effect. And now we're in a position where I don't think it's fair what Senator Fetterman just said, that Democrats choose to believe the regime instead of the president. I don't think that's true from the interviews that I'm doing. But we know the regime is a bunch of liars, Bill. Here's my question to you. Can you really say to the American people, you can believe President Trump? You've got to be skeptical of every administration. They're going to put forth what they want the American people to digest. This has been going on since Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are slugging it out. I don't understand the people being so naive about this. You're wrong about Schumer. Schumer had an opportunity to say, look, we backed the U.S. military, wouldn't do it. And I'd love to see Schumer on the Cuomo show. Yeah, me too. You know him. He won't come on. Why won't he come on? Why? …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Senator Chuck Schumer is labeled a coward for avoiding tough interviews, which critics argue undermines accountability in politics. This commentary highlights the mistrust in political leadership, questioning whether the public can truly believe any administration, including President Trump’s. The discussion emphasizes a long-standing issue in American politics: the challenge of discerning truth amid political spin.
“… justify any military action against them. Now, the Democratic Party opposes everything that Donald Trump does, with a few exceptions like Senator Fetterman of Pennsylvania. But it's a block vote. We hate Trump. Whatever he does, we're not going to support it. If Biden, and he never would have, had confronted Iran with military action, the Democratic Party would have supported it. But not Trump. Okay. So we know that. But one of the people who spoke out, and you haven't heard anything from John Kerry, by the way. I think he's on Nantucket hiding. I don't know. But he's been silent. Kamala Harris …”
“… all kinds of weapons to kill Americans and Jews and Israelis. And you'll remember on October 7, 2003, Hamas, armed by Iran, went in and killed 1,200 Jews, took hostages. Was it 26 Americans killed in that? Okay, so these are bad people, and you could justify any military action against them. Now, the Democratic Party opposes everything that Donald Trump does, with a few exceptions like Senator Fetterman of Pennsylvania. But it's a block vote. We hate Trump. Whatever he does, we're not going to support it. If Biden, and he never would have, had confronted Iran with military action, the Democratic Party would have supported it. But not Trump. Okay. So we know that. But one of the people who spoke out, and you haven't heard anything from John Kerry, by the way. I think he's on Nantucket hiding. I don't know. But he's been silent. Kamala Harris steps up and says this. Go. Donald Trump has dragged us into a war the American people do not want. He has put American troops in harm's way. I unequivocally oppose this war of choice and everyone should. Okay So for four years she sat there as the Biden administration negotiated deal after deal that the Iranians broke all of them and Trump had to …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The $16 billion unfrozen by Obama and Biden empowered Iran to resume its nuclear program and fund terrorism, culminating in the October 7, 2003, attack by Hamas that killed 1,200 Jews. Despite the Democratic Party's opposition to Trump, military action against Iran would have garnered support if initiated by Biden. Kamala Harris criticized Trump for escalating tensions, yet her party's previous negotiations with Iran ultimately failed to prevent violence.
“… Not that anybody in America cares at all. He's from Philadelphia, by the way, and his own senator won't even stand up for him, Senator John Fetterman, a Democrat, just to show you some of the bipartisanship of this nature. That's why it's sickening to watch. I mean, we've described this before as not a healthy relationship. we're so far beyond that. We need to wake up and we need to reclaim our sovereignty right now. And this has nothing to do with anti-Semitism. I just laid out the very strategic case for why individually this is going to hurt you in the short term, in your pocketbook, in …”
“… That's what they like to call it. You're going to see very similar actions right now in Gaza and in the West Bank. Don't forget, I know you haven't seen this, or I know you've seen this. An American citizen was killed in the West Bank very, very recently. Not that anybody in America cares at all. He's from Philadelphia, by the way, and his own senator won't even stand up for him, Senator John Fetterman, a Democrat, just to show you some of the bipartisanship of this nature. That's why it's sickening to watch. I mean, we've described this before as not a healthy relationship. we're so far beyond that. We need to wake up and we need to reclaim our sovereignty right now. And this has nothing to do with anti-Semitism. I just laid out the very strategic case for why individually this is going to hurt you in the short term, in your pocketbook, in the long term, from our geopolitical allies or strategic situation in the region and then across the globe. If you care about China, chips, anything really, you're watching the degradation of our ability to project force. And that is not only shocking, but it is an urgent crisis, which unfortunately, again, you are not going to hear much of this …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Israel is seizing the opportunity to expand its influence in southern Lebanon and the West Bank while the world is distracted by chaos. This aggressive posture is supported by the U.S., which has long backed Israel's military ambitions, raising questions about the implications for American foreign policy and regional stability. As tensions escalate, the narrative surrounding these actions is critically overlooked by mainstream media.
“We talked about John Fetterman voting yes. And as of Sunday, Martin Heinrich of New Mexico said he's voting yes. He said Mullen is a friend and will stand up to bullying by Stephen Miller. Heinrich also noted that in Mullen's confirmation hearing, he, quote, recognized the necessity of judicial warrants, which also supports reporting from The New York Times over the weekend that before his nomination, Mullen had been working behind the scenes with Democratic Congressman Josh …”
“We talked about John Fetterman voting yes. And as of Sunday, Martin Heinrich of New Mexico said he's voting yes. He said Mullen is a friend and will stand up to bullying by Stephen Miller. Heinrich also noted that in Mullen's confirmation hearing, he, quote, recognized the necessity of judicial warrants, which also supports reporting from The New York Times over the weekend that before his nomination, Mullen had been working behind the scenes with Democratic Congressman Josh Gottheimer to hash out a compromise on reopening DHS that included requiring judicial warrants in most cases. I'm wondering what you guys make of Mullen's relatively easy path to confirmation. Not just the yes votes from Fetterman and Heinrich but just not a lot of intense opposition from the Democrats Seems to be based partly on a belief that DHS …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Mark Wayne Mullen's confirmation is surprisingly smooth, thanks to bipartisan support, including votes from Democrats like John Fetterman and Martin Heinrich. Heinrich's endorsement highlights Mullen's potential for a more humane Department of Homeland Security, contrasting with the chaotic leadership under his predecessors. This unexpected camaraderie raises questions about the influence of personal relationships in political decisions.
“Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us as always here. Yes. Oh, no, you don't have to cut me off here. Go ahead, Senator. We're not cutting you off. well you you said something that it's like it's it's it's appropriate to cover it it is appropriate to cover it you know it's a tragedy absolutely you know and now if we're on that it's entirely appropriate for it to apologize and if you're implying that i don't think it's wrong …”
“Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us as always here. Yes. Oh, no, you don't have to cut me off here. Go ahead, Senator. We're not cutting you off. well you you said something that it's like it's it's it's appropriate to cover it it is appropriate to cover it you know it's a tragedy absolutely you know and now if we're on that it's entirely appropriate for it to apologize and if you're implying that i don't think it's wrong to cover it that's just not true you know it's so interesting because you know i keep making the jokes he had brain damage he's becoming more conservative as his brain heals and everything And it's like the guy still has a certain way to go, right? Like there's some stuff that his speech is a little whatever. And yet he's making more sense. His …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Iran is using cluster bombs designed to inflict maximum civilian damage in Israel, contrasting sharply with the precision of U.S. military operations. Senator John Fetterman argues that while the West conducts careful follow-ups after military actions, Iran's tactics are aimed at random destruction. This raises critical questions about military ethics and the implications of warfare on civilian populations.
“… saying, I love Trump, or in particular, when he's like, I love Hitler, that was kind of fueled a lot of the clone stuff. Or in the case of John Fetterman, this Pennsylvania senator who has faced a lot of clone allegations. I mean, he had the stroke. You know, he suddenly starts maybe dressing differently. He starts, you know, being this very conservative guy. He had to come out and say, I'm not a clone. And so I think we see I just love saying the word clone Isn that fun I feel like it just is like Klondike bar It just hits so good I think also one of the most prominent body double conspiracy …”
“… I mean, you know, you hit on something here with politics, which is I think often this clone stuff can emerge when a public figure sort of takes a very oppositional stance to how they were once viewed. And so Kanye West, for example, when he started saying, I love Trump, or in particular, when he's like, I love Hitler, that was kind of fueled a lot of the clone stuff. Or in the case of John Fetterman, this Pennsylvania senator who has faced a lot of clone allegations. I mean, he had the stroke. You know, he suddenly starts maybe dressing differently. He starts, you know, being this very conservative guy. He had to come out and say, I'm not a clone. And so I think we see I just love saying the word clone Isn that fun I feel like it just is like Klondike bar It just hits so good I think also one of the most prominent body double conspiracy theories catching hold today is also the Melania Trump body double conspiracy Yeah, I mean, this is kind of like maybe one of the biggest ones out there. This idea that this dates back to, you know, the first Trump administration, that Melania,”
View more
Ridealong summary
The Melania Trump body double conspiracy theory suggests that the First Lady has been replaced by a lookalike during her husband's presidency. This theory gained traction during the Trump administration, fueled by public appearances that seemed inconsistent with her previous behavior. Such conspiracies reflect a larger trend where public figures who change their stance or appearance face wild speculation about their authenticity.
“… okay. All right. Everybody is an expert, you know? Everybody's an expert in the comments section. um let's see what do we think what a douche canoe fetterman turned out to be yeah yeah i agree with that that dude uh that dude is tough here's my thing about fetterman this was tough for me i had him on um i don want the pod god was it about a year ago now i don know time is a flat circle and um i mean i couldn i went i was too nice to him because i couldn't handle the questions um like he couldn't handle them and i and anytime i asked him a follow-up question that was not like on something that he had …”
“… Okay, guys, see, we knew we were going to have some hiccups time one here. Okay, everybody? So just you hang out. We're going to pull it back up. Who's this guy? We got it? I think we got it. Tiny Tim in the corner. I said close all times. Guys, okay. All right. Everybody is an expert, you know? Everybody's an expert in the comments section. um let's see what do we think what a douche canoe fetterman turned out to be yeah yeah i agree with that that dude uh that dude is tough here's my thing about fetterman this was tough for me i had him on um i don want the pod god was it about a year ago now i don know time is a flat circle and um i mean i couldn i went i was too nice to him because i couldn't handle the questions um like he couldn't handle them and i and anytime i asked him a follow-up question that was not like on something that he had a talking point for already he would start to stutter and he'd get lost and i like didn't know whether it was the stroke or like whether what what was happening and so i felt like i was like a debate i kind of i felt like going hard at him like i go after somebody on the piers morgan show felt like it would be you know almost like beating up a kid …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The discussion revolves around the controversial idea of eliminating leaders like John Fetterman, who has faced significant mental health challenges since his stroke. The speaker reflects on a past interview with Fetterman, revealing how the senator struggled with questions and whether the criticism he receives is justified. This raises questions about the competency of leaders and the implications of their mental health on governance.
Top Podcasts About Fetterman
Mark Levin Podcast
3 episodes
The Rubin Report
3 episodes
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
3 episodes
The Bulwark Podcast
2 episodes
Pod Save America
2 episodes
The Jesse Kelly Show
2 episodes
Verdict with Ted Cruz
2 episodes
Bulwark Takes
2 episodes
Stories Mentioning Fetterman
Best Podcasts on DHS Airport Disruptions
A prolonged stalemate in Congress over Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding has led to significant disruptions, including unpaid TSA agents and widespread airport delays across the country. President Trump issued an emergency order to pay TSA workers, but the political battle between Democrats and Republicans over immigration policy and border security continues to impact national security and travel.
TSA
Best Podcasts on TSA Shutdown Impact
Airports nationwide are experiencing severe delays and chaos due to a partial DHS government shutdown, leaving TSA agents unpaid and leading to staffing shortages. President Trump has responded by deploying ICE agents to assist with security, a move criticized by some as using American travelers as leverage in a political dispute over immigration. The situation has resulted in hours-long security lines and disrupted travel for many.
TSA
Government shutdown
Top Podcasts on Trump Replacing DHS Secretary
President Donald Trump has replaced Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with Senator Markwayne Mullin, effective March 5, 2026. This leadership change comes as the DHS remains partially shut down due to an unresolved budget impasse between the White House and Democrats over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reforms, a contentious issue that led to calls for Noem's removal.
Top Podcasts on Trump Firing Kristi Noem
President Trump has dismissed Kristi Noem from her role as Secretary of Homeland Security, marking a significant cabinet shakeup in his second term. The firing comes amidst allegations of her misleading Congress regarding a $220 million ad campaign and growing criticism over her effectiveness, raising questions about accountability and the future direction of the department.