Best Podcast Episodes About Adam Schiff
Everything podcasters are saying about Adam Schiff — curated from top podcasts
Updated: Mar 30, 2026 – 11 episodes
Listen to the Playlist
Ridealong has curated the best and most interesting podcasts and clips about Adam Schiff.
Top Podcast Clips About Adam Schiff
“… people who are doing it, I mean, you think this fraud is accidental? You think all, you know, like the worst human being in America is a man named Adam Schiff. Yes. He is. I do hate that guy. He is a horrible, censured liar, human being. He promoted that Russia hoax. What people never realize is while he was doing it and all of the media were on lockstep with all the mantras that whoever would write up for them every day, their talking points. And then all the useful idiots would follow it in the Democratic Party. And they still say it. I mean, Stephen Colbert, I can't believe I'm saying his name, …”
“… fred because i'm banging bill over at the office so maybe i'll get the kid brother to do it and so on because she is a sociopathic killer And you don't know. So when these people are all provoking people to murder ICE agents and do all this stuff, the people who are doing it, I mean, you think this fraud is accidental? You think all, you know, like the worst human being in America is a man named Adam Schiff. Yes. He is. I do hate that guy. He is a horrible, censured liar, human being. He promoted that Russia hoax. What people never realize is while he was doing it and all of the media were on lockstep with all the mantras that whoever would write up for them every day, their talking points. And then all the useful idiots would follow it in the Democratic Party. And they still say it. I mean, Stephen Colbert, I can't believe I'm saying his name, literally used these words. Trump is Putin's cock holster. Said this about the president of the United States. Right. OK. You know, I have to say it's like on a network television. It's it's just a. appalling and it was a complete and utter psyop it was it was a psychological operation done you know but well the part that was interesting and it's the …”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this segment, the host dives into a wild analogy about a woman named Tina who might just be plotting her husband's demise with her volatile brother. The hilarious twist comes when the host compares political narratives to Tina's manipulative game, leaving listeners questioning who the real 'useful idiots' are in society.
“… Yeah. Want to have a catch? Thank you. Thank you. That's powerful. It's good stuff. This has been a wonderful reenactment. I just want to say, Adam Carolla, was I nervous to work with Adam Carolla, the great Adam Carolla, to take the stage with him? Sure, I was. But he is so generous as a performer. Yeah. He creates a playground, and that's why I got into acting. The craft is so exhilarating when someone else is taking chances. I'm courageous. He's just brave.”
“… to know who God's choice is for me, can she have bigger tits? Yeah, okay, listen, I'm hanging up. There's tsunamis. We've got tornadoes. I'm cooking up over here. We got all sorts of stuff. All right, I'll let you go. Hey, Jesus, one more question. Yeah. Want to have a catch? Thank you. Thank you. That's powerful. It's good stuff. This has been a wonderful reenactment. I just want to say, Adam Carolla, was I nervous to work with Adam Carolla, the great Adam Carolla, to take the stage with him? Sure, I was. But he is so generous as a performer. Yeah. He creates a playground, and that's why I got into acting. The craft is so exhilarating when someone else is taking chances. I'm courageous. He's just brave.”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, a caller hilariously navigates the absurdities of Christian dating sites, humorously questioning if God's choice for him could have 'bigger tits.' The interplay between traditional family ideals and outrageous scenarios like 'tsunamis and tornadoes' adds to the comedic chaos, making it a must-listen moment.
“not all boomers. I'm not saying all older people. We have a diverse audience here at the Adam Mockler feed. I'm saying the people around Donald Trump, not just the boomers, people like Pete Hegseth, people like Marco Rubio and J.D. Vance that are playing defense for this regime on a daily basis while they are ruining our future. We got into $8 trillion in extra debt from the first two Middle Eastern wars in the 2000s. Now we pay $1 trillion per year just on the interest of the United States national debts. And what is Donald Trump …”
“not all boomers. I'm not saying all older people. We have a diverse audience here at the Adam Mockler feed. I'm saying the people around Donald Trump, not just the boomers, people like Pete Hegseth, people like Marco Rubio and J.D. Vance that are playing defense for this regime on a daily basis while they are ruining our future. We got into $8 trillion in extra debt from the first two Middle Eastern wars in the 2000s. Now we pay $1 trillion per year just on the interest of the United States national debts. And what is Donald Trump doing? He's not paying off the debt. He's asking for $200 billion to go to war. And then he's asking for hundreds of billions of dollars more from random companies to build his ballroom. Mind you, his ballroom can only be built because he sued a bunch of media and news corporations. He sued a bunch of universities and said, if you want me to drop this …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Donald Trump is mortgaging the future of younger generations by asking for $200 billion for war while piling on national debt. His controversial tactics, including suing media companies for funding his personal projects, raise serious concerns about leadership and accountability. This behavior highlights a troubling pattern among political leaders who prioritize their interests over the well-being of the country.
“… So I love that Don Lemon was sitting there, too. Yeah. And probably like, thank God he didn't do that to me. Yeah. All right. So partisan hack, Adam Schiff, not surprised there. So speaking of more partisanship on one side, of course, not the other, Jesse Jackson's funeral was over the weekend. And it's interesting because his family had asked people to, hey,”
“… right right right and yes no one ever really grills him on But anyway, he's a dope. He says that it's really vague, the statement from the Obama. Totally vague. Okay. Right. Totally vague. Totally vague. All right. He's just a partisan hack. That's fine. So I love that Don Lemon was sitting there, too. Yeah. And probably like, thank God he didn't do that to me. Yeah. All right. So partisan hack, Adam Schiff, not surprised there. So speaking of more partisanship on one side, of course, not the other, Jesse Jackson's funeral was over the weekend. And it's interesting because his family had asked people to, hey,”
View more
Ridealong summary
In this hilarious segment, a diner battles with a waitress over the absence of regular iced tea, leading to a glorious moment when an angelic customer intervenes to cancel her passion fruit order. The absurdity of the situation, combined with the host's passionate rants about hyperbole and partisanship, creates a laugh-out-loud experience that resonates with anyone who's faced ridiculous menu options.
“… like this. Why you give asylum? This is not a political refugee, right? This is a real situation that's going on that the president's doing. Adam, you look like you want to say something. No, just let me know when we figure out the Epstein situation. I'm weighted with bated breath. Are we getting closer? Do we figure it out yet? I'm not even being sarcastic. Are we getting closer? No, this is like JFK. Guys, guys, we're going to be talking about this 20 years from now. This is like JFK. The longer it goes, the more things are going to pop out. Something will be unredacted and come out. …”
“… react to this. What is Australia going to do about this Most likely they going to listen to them and have to keep him But if they don come to U These are the moments when you hear the phrase asylum like why give asylum It's not Tony Montana. It's situations like this. Why you give asylum? This is not a political refugee, right? This is a real situation that's going on that the president's doing. Adam, you look like you want to say something. No, just let me know when we figure out the Epstein situation. I'm weighted with bated breath. Are we getting closer? Do we figure it out yet? I'm not even being sarcastic. Are we getting closer? No, this is like JFK. Guys, guys, we're going to be talking about this 20 years from now. This is like JFK. The longer it goes, the more things are going to pop out. Something will be unredacted and come out. And, you know, there you have it. And you know what? It's never going to be done because they control everything. But, you know, I do love people like Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton having to be subpoenaed. And the fact that they hate it, that they still have to do it, that's what I want. Can I show you guys what Bill Maher did to Adam Schiff that …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump just tweeted that Australia is making a grave humanitarian mistake by forcing the Iran National Women's Soccer Team back to Iran, where they could face severe consequences. This situation highlights the complexities of asylum in political contexts, especially when athletes' lives are at stake. As tensions rise, the world watches closely to see how Australia will respond to this urgent plea for asylum.
“Great hit. Bill Maher had Adam Schiff on his show. Adam Schiff, the insufferable senator from California. led the impeachment against Trump, invading against Trump's supposedly illegal war in Iran. Bill Maher asked him to get a little bit more specific about his objections. This statement from the administration, the president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national …”
“Great hit. Bill Maher had Adam Schiff on his show. Adam Schiff, the insufferable senator from California. led the impeachment against Trump, invading against Trump's supposedly illegal war in Iran. Bill Maher asked him to get a little bit more specific about his objections. This statement from the administration, the president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest. That's too vague for you? Totally vague. Okay, because that's from Obama. about Libya? Well, Obama made the argument initially that he could go into Syria without an authorization. I and many others pushed back on that argument. Ultimately, he did not go forward with going after Assad, even though Assad was gassing his own people, because he …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Adam Schiff faced tough questions from Bill Maher about his inconsistent stance on military interventions, particularly contrasting Trump's actions in Iran with Obama's in Libya. While Schiff criticized Trump's authority, Maher pointed out Schiff's silence on Obama's prolonged military action, revealing a double standard in political accountability. This exchange highlights the complexities of war powers and the selective outrage in U.S. politics.
“… be somewhat on the right, and you're going to have to call out the nonsensical drivel of the lefty host. But watch what Bill Maher did right here to Adam Schiff.”
“… because this was rather brilliant. This was rather brilliant. You know, I'm a big fan of receipts, right? You're on a show, you take out some notes, and you call out the BS of usually the host, because if you're a sane person, you're going to be somewhat on the right, and you're going to have to call out the nonsensical drivel of the lefty host. But watch what Bill Maher did right here to Adam Schiff.”
View more
Ridealong summary
Iran's military leadership faced a catastrophic failure when they gathered for a crucial meeting, only to be targeted and decimated by surrounding forces. This blunder highlights their incompetence, as they ignored the looming threat and even joked about their 'Assembly of Experts' being filled with 'extraordinary idiots.' Bill Maher critiques this absurdity, showcasing the irony of their situation and the hypocrisy in political discourse.
“… protect key names in the Trump administration. Wyden's post echoes the September 13, 2019 letter from then-chair of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, a Democrat of California, to acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph McGuire, in which Schiff called out McGuire for illegally withholding a whistleblower complaint. In that 2019 letter, Schiff warned, the committee can only conclude that the serious misconduct at issue involves the President of the United States and or other senior White House or administration officials. This raises grave concerns that your office, together with the …”
“Given Blanche's close personal ties to Donald Trump, this reeks of a continued cover-up to protect key names in the Trump administration. Wyden's post echoes the September 13, 2019 letter from then-chair of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, a Democrat of California, to acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph McGuire, in which Schiff called out McGuire for illegally withholding a whistleblower complaint. In that 2019 letter, Schiff warned, the committee can only conclude that the serious misconduct at issue involves the President of the United States and or other senior White House or administration officials. This raises grave concerns that your office, together with the Department of Justice and possibly the White House, are engaged in an unlawful effort to protect the president and conceal from the committee information related to his possible serious or flagrant misconduct abuse of power or violation of law Schiff was right The whistleblower had flagged Trump's July 2019 phone call with newly elected Ukraine …”
View more
Ridealong summary
The investigation into Jeffrey Epstein reveals a troubling cover-up linked to the Trump administration. Senator Ron Wyden's concerns echo past warnings from Adam Schiff about serious misconduct involving the President, culminating in Trump's first impeachment for abuse of power. Despite the evidence, Senate Republicans acquitted Trump, highlighting a deep political divide and ongoing accountability issues.
“… suspects. Okay. Now this week, members of the Senate, Democratic members of the Senate, Cory Booker, Chris Murphy, Tim Kaine, Demi Duckworth, Adam Schiff, Tommy Baldwin, all Trump haters. All right. And so we're going to shut the Senate down unless Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. We're going to shut it down. That means we're not going to even consider any legislation so nothing will get done. It's kind of blackmail, right? No matter what the issue, they're not going …”
“… War, and Nixon just trounced the Democratic opposition across the board. You might remember that 53 Democrats in the House of Representatives voted against recertifying that Iran is a terrorist state. That just happened last week. 53 and the usual radical suspects. Okay. Now this week, members of the Senate, Democratic members of the Senate, Cory Booker, Chris Murphy, Tim Kaine, Demi Duckworth, Adam Schiff, Tommy Baldwin, all Trump haters. All right. And so we're going to shut the Senate down unless Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. We're going to shut it down. That means we're not going to even consider any legislation so nothing will get done. It's kind of blackmail, right? No matter what the issue, they're not going to cooperate. In addition to that, a number of these same senators objected to the June bombing, June 13th, 2025, of the Iranian nuclear headquarters. Remember that? Which was successful. And set back the Iranian nuke weapons program. However, there were other smaller facilities that still continue to operate. And that's what the current …”
View more
Ridealong summary
President Trump's actions against Iran could secure Republican victories in the midterms, but if it backfires, Democrats may surge. The Democratic Party faces a significant risk as they position themselves as the anti-war party, reminiscent of the Vietnam War era, which could lead to a repeat of past political failures. With key senators opposing military actions, the stakes are high for both parties in this unfolding drama.
“… there f***ing everything up. What he said, what he said. And it's not like Democrats in elected office have good answers. So, Maher had on Senator Adam Schiff, who, again, it's insane that Adam Schiff is a senator, given the extraordinary lies he told during the first Trump administration about Russiagate and the fact that he basically set a pup tent up in the CNN offices so he could be on TV every five seconds. In any case, Maher had on Adam Schiff, and he basically shellacked him over this. This statement from the administration, the president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of …”
“… regime change, and we got to get rid of the nukes, and they were supporters of terrorism. It's all of it. How about this? This was a fascist theocracy, and nothing in the Middle East was ever going to get better while they were supporting it. Still there f***ing everything up. What he said, what he said. And it's not like Democrats in elected office have good answers. So, Maher had on Senator Adam Schiff, who, again, it's insane that Adam Schiff is a senator, given the extraordinary lies he told during the first Trump administration about Russiagate and the fact that he basically set a pup tent up in the CNN offices so he could be on TV every five seconds. In any case, Maher had on Adam Schiff, and he basically shellacked him over this. This statement from the administration, the president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest. That's too vague for you? Totally vague. Okay, because that's from Obama about Libya. Well, Obama made the argument initially that he could go into Syria without an authorization. I and many others pushed back on that argument. he did not go …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Many Democrats are puzzled by their own party's opposition to President Trump's intervention in Iran, despite the clear human rights violations by the regime. This reflects a deeper issue within the 'grievance party,' where both the left and the right share a flawed perspective on America's role in global conflicts. The key takeaway? True American principles hinge on recognizing the necessity of intervention against oppressive regimes.
“There was an interesting exchange on Bill Maher over the weekend. He had Shifty Shift, Adam Schiff, senator now, on his show. And Maher, I guess Adam Schiff didn't really listen to Maher's monologue because Maher is in favor of the war. He's not in favor of ground troops there, which Trump continues to leave open as a possibility. Please don't do that, President Trump. Please don't put American boots on the ground in Iran. But in any event, OK, he's not in favor of that. But he is in favor of the conflict, of the war. And he set up a trap, …”
“There was an interesting exchange on Bill Maher over the weekend. He had Shifty Shift, Adam Schiff, senator now, on his show. And Maher, I guess Adam Schiff didn't really listen to Maher's monologue because Maher is in favor of the war. He's not in favor of ground troops there, which Trump continues to leave open as a possibility. Please don't do that, President Trump. Please don't put American boots on the ground in Iran. But in any event, OK, he's not in favor of that. But he is in favor of the conflict, of the war. And he set up a trap, Maher did, for Senator Schiff, which is very interesting. Watch this. This statement from the administration. The president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest. That's too vague for you? Totally vague. OK, because that's from …”
View more
Ridealong summary
Bill Maher confronts Senator Adam Schiff about his inconsistent stance on military actions, highlighting how Democrats previously defended President Obama's use of force. Maher argues that the political criticisms of Trump are hypocritical, given their silence during Obama's drone strikes, revealing a lack of principled consistency in political discourse. This exchange showcases the shifting narratives in politics, leaving many confused about party ideologies.
Top Podcasts About Adam Schiff
Adam Carolla Show
3 episodes
The Adam Mockler Show
1 episode
PBD Podcast
1 episode
The Michael Knowles Show
1 episode
The Rubin Report
1 episode
Letters from an American
1 episode
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
1 episode
The Ben Shapiro Show
1 episode